On Dec 24th 2015 the Interstate Aviation Committee (MAK) released their concluding the probable causes of the crash were: - The captain not having had primary flight training - Flight crew members being allowed to upgrade to Boeing 737 without satisfying the required qualifications including the English language - Methodical shortcomings in retraining as well as verification of results and quality of training - Insufficient level of organisation of flight operations at the airline, which resulted in failure to detect and correct shortcomings in working with the navigation equipment, pilot technique and crew interaction, including missed approaches - Systematic violation of crew work and rest hours, a large debt of holidays, which could have resulted in accumulation of fatigue adversely affecting crew performance - Simulator training that lacked a missed approach with intermediate height and all engines operating - Increased emotional stress to the flight crew before deciding to go around because they could not establish the position of their aircraft with the necessary precision to accomplish a successful landing - Violation of the principle "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate" by both flight crew and air traffic control, which resulted in the flight crew not following standard operating procedures at the time of initiating the go around because the pilot monitoring was diverted from his duties for a prolonged period and did not monitor the flight parameters - The fact that the crew did not recognize the autopilot had disconnected and delayed intervention by the crew, that resulted in the aircraft entering a complex spatial position (nose up upset) - Imperfection of simulator training programs for Upset Recovery Procedures as well as lack of criteria for assessing the quality of training, which resulted in the crew being unable to recover the aircraft from the upset - The possible impact of somatogravic illusions - Lack of proper supervision of issuance of pilot certificates in accordance with achieving specified requirements and qualifications - Failure of safety management system (SMS) in the airline, lack of guidelines for SMS development and approval, lack of a formal approach to approve/agree on SMS and pilot training by the related authorities - Deficiencies in aviation training centers' performance and absence of verification of training quality - Lack of requirements for flight crew to be proficient in English Language for retraining on foreign aircraft types and lack of formal approach to verify language proficiency - lack of formal approach to conduct periodic verifications of flight crew qualification - systematic violation of crew work and rest times - lack of training of flight crew on go arounds from intermediate heights in manual control potentially leading to complex spatial psoition (e.g. nose high upset) - The map shifts in aircraft without GPS without training of crew to operate in such conditions - Lack of active assistance by air traffic control when the approach procedure was deviated from over a prolonged period of time - Breach of principle "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate" The MAK reported the crew had flown the leg to Moscow Domodedovo resulting in a safe landing despite turbulence on final approach and windshear at 60 meters/200 feet AGL and gusting winds on touch down. The captain (47, ATPL, ILS Cat I, 2,784 hours total, 2509 hours on type) was pilot flying, the first officer (47, CPL, ILS Cat II, 2,093 hours total, 1,943 hours on type) was pilot monitoring. The return flight was properly prepared, the aircraft was loaded within limitations and CG at 21% MAC well within limits. Departure and cruise flight were without incidents. Descending into Kazan the aircraft was handed off to Kazan Approach and was cleared to descend to FL070 (2130 meters). Approach control subsequently advised that the aircraft was flying 4km to the left of the assigned track, which the crew replied to "Thank you". The aircraft was subsequently vectored for an ILS approach to runway 29 and was cleared to descend to 500 meters. The crew subsequently received clearance for the ILS approach, the MAK annotated the point of ILS approach initiation was significantly different to the procedure (closer to the runway than Final Approach Fix), the localizer was not captured by the autopilot as result and the autopilot remained in altitude hold. The aircraft established on final approach, about 4km to the right of the extended runway center line, and was handed off to tower. The crew saw the CDI fly full left, and selected the heading bug 40 degrees to the left of the runway heading, insufficient however with the current winds to re-acquire the extended runway center line. The crew reported to tower 14km before touchdown, landing gear was down, ready for landing, was informed of winds from 220 degrees at 9m/s gusting to 12m/s (17 knots gusting 23 knots) and received clearance to land on runway 29 and read back the clearance. The flaps were set to 30 degrees, the airspeed was reduced to between 130 and 135 KIAS, the CDI remained in the full fly left position. About 2km before touchdown the CDI began to move and the localizer was captured, the aircraft began to descend, the crew selected a vertical speed of 1200 fpm in order to descend. The aircraft settled on the localizer. The GPWS announced "one thousand", the captain announced "one thousand, stabilized, no flags", the approach was clearly unstabilized however and the crew had to take the decision to go around, however, continued to visually look out for the runway. The first officer finally caught sight of the PAPIs, announced "Oh, everything here, the bar is below us, 4 whites, we are high." About one minute after receiving landing clearance and about 13 seconds after that remark by the first officer the crew reported they were going around due to "non-landing" position, the captain engaged the TOGA button which disconnected the autopilot and required the crew to continue manually on flight director. The aircraft was about 1km before touchdown descending through 270 meters/700 feet AGL (editorial note: that height would be appropriate for 5km before touch down on a 3 degrees glideslope), the autopilot had established the aircraft on the localizer/extended center line of the runway, never captured the glide path, autothrust maintained an airspeed between 130 and 135 KIAS. The first officer engaged in a communication with tower to establish what altitude the aircraft should climb to, a misunderstanding (600 meters instead of 500 meters) resulting in an erroneous readback prompted tower to reiterate the clearance to 500 meters, all in all that communication lasted for 20 seconds. After initiating the missed approach the crew selected the flaps to 15 degrees, the flaps remained in that position until impact, the aircraft climbed to 700 meter/2300 feet then entered a steep dive and impacted ground at about 450 km/h airspeed (242 KIAS) and a nose down attitude of 75 degrees between the runway, main taxiway and taxiway B 43 seconds after initiating the go-around. All occupants perished, the aircraft was completely destroyed and was partially burned in the resulting ground fire. The investigation concluded after examining the wreckage, that all damage to the airframe was the result of impact and post impact fire, prior to impact all aircraft systems were working normally. However, the investigation found particles inside the power control unit (PCU) driving the left hand elevator that could have partially jammed the actuator and may have resulted in excessive control forces necessary to move the elevator or could have resulted even in seizure. The MAK reported the aircraft was equipped with a Flight Management System (FMS) that determines the current position of the aircraft using the Inertial Reference System and ground based navigation aids. The IRS must be properly aligned prior to departure, nonetheless, a drift by about 2nm per hour due to natural drift is to be expected. The error and error rate may increase if the initial position is incorrectly entered/aligned. The IRS data are persistently adjusted using ground based naivation equipment, e.g. multiple DME transmitters or VOR/DME. The aircraft was not equipped with a GPS. The aircraft's AOM stated, that the FMS was not approved as independent source of position information. The necessary accuracy of navigation can only be achieved by using ground based navigation aids. The investigation was able to download the flight data recorder and restore the cockpit sound recorder, which had suffered substantial damage to both casing and memory module, 30 minutes of 4 channel audio could be downloaded after repairs and were found to be consistent with the last 30 minutes of the accident flight. The MAK reported that the French BEA performed a sensorical simulation with the aim to model how the crew could lose spatial orientation. The model suggested that after initiating the go around the feel of the pitch angle of the crew and the actual pitch angle were in agreement until about +14 degrees, when the nose rose further to 25 degrees the crew still felt the pitch increase to 17 degrees. Subsequently, when the actual pitch began to decrease the felt pitch continued to increase until reaching +25 degrees, in this phase first nose down inputs are recorded on the flight controls. The felt pitch and actual pitch subsequently completely separated, as the aircraft settled in the dive further increasing nose down inputs were recorded. The MAK reported that the British AAIB performed simulations with the aim to determine whether somatogravic illusions were present. The AAIB concluded that in the absence of proper control of the instrument readings the crew could have perceived during the transition from climb to dive after the missed approach, that the aircraft was flying inverted. The MAK performed simulator tests with a number of pilots having them go through a scenario similiar to the accident flight, in particular forcing a go around at intermediate height with the autopilot disconnecting at the initiation of the go-around by pressing the TOGA button. The MAK reported that the vast majority of crews coped well with the scenario but found it difficult to master reporting highly increased stress levels, especially when the pilot monitoring did not provide full assistance. A number of pilots, although the autopilot disconnect aural and visual alerts are very distinct and have high attraction potential, did not catch the fact, that the autopilot had disconnected, several silencing the alerts by pressing the AP disconnect button, a number (about 42% of the pilots tested) not recognizing the alert at all and therefore responding with a substantial delay or not reacting at all. None of the pilots participating in the test was able to answer all questions to the procedures correctly, the MAK reported that 28% even believed the go around was automatic on autopilot despite the AP disconnect alert indicating lack of knowledge and a substantial gap between theoretic knowledge and practical skills. Of all pilots participating in the test only one third mastered the go around successfully. Only 28% attempted to achieve a suitable pitch angle after initiating the go around aiming for +15 degrees of nose up, others began to react only between +20 and +37 degrees of nose up attitude and airspeeds as low as 90 KIAS with stick shaker activation. None of the pilots was able to level off at the assigned altitude. In a second part of the experiment a test pilot produced a pitch up upset similiar to the accident flight and then let the participating pilot recover the aircraft. None of the pilots took the right decisions and none was able to recover the aircraft. The most common mistake was to believe, the control wheel would return to the neutral position on its own, this mistake however resulted in a substantial acceleration of the nose down movement resulting in rapid increase of the dive and vertical accelerations between +0.5G and -1.2G. The MAK annotated that in real flight such an acceleration likely causes the temporary and permanent incapacitation of passengers, cabin crew and even flight crew and may cause injuries to occupants. The common mistakes during the upset recovery noted by the MAK were non-optimal application of flight controls especially if the aircraft is in a bank, no reselection of flaps in order to adjust to the current airspeed resulting in flap limit exceedance and loss of additional height, the non-use of speed brakes. The MAK reported, that after demonstration of the correct upset recovery technics almost all pilots were able to apply the technics and recover the aircraft, suggesting that the result of the experiment was mainly the result of lack of pilot training with respect to upset recovery. The MAK analysed that at the time, approach control reported the aircraft 4km to the left of the approach track, the deviation was caused by the IRS, which had drifted 4km off the correct position. The crew changed the heading bug as result but the change was insufficient to acquire the correct track. The MAK analysed that the crew was using single autopilot Approach mode, which does not permit automatic go arounds (unlike the dual autopilot approach mode) and would not perform automatic flare, touchdown and roll out. TOGA therefore automatically disconnected the autopilot and required the crew to continue manually on flight director. The MAK analysed that according to flight data recorder and actual taxi path at Moscow the IRS was not correctly aligned at departure showing a "map shift" of 2km to the south while taxiing out for departure, it is probable that the crew entered incorrect coordinates, possibly the coordinates stored by the FMS from the previous flight to Moscow. The MAK analysed that the investigation discovered two scenario in which excessive control forces on the elevator control could be needed due to jamming of the PCU (which likely resulted in the MAK cancelling the airworthiness certificate of the Boeing 737, see ). The MAK continued analysis however, that there were no such signs on the accident flight evidenced by flight data recorder as well as lack of related comments by flight crew. The MAK analysed that the investigation could not identify, if, when and where the captain had undergone initial flight training. Of course the captain had acquired certain piloting skills evidenced by passing the type rating upgrade course on a certified aviation training center and more than 2500 hours logged on the 737. At the same time the captain showed serious lack of skills in emergency situations. The investigation established that Russia's Civil Aviation Authority Northwest Regional Center issued the ATPL to the captain only 8 months after he allegedly acquired the license. The MAK stated that this was not a case of a forged pilot's license, however, a case of lack of supervision and monitoring of pilot certificates by Rosaviatsia. The MAK analysed further that the airline had all documents and possibilities at hand to identify that the ATPL had been granted to the captain unjustifiedly. For example, the MAK reasoned, the captain was conducting manufacturing flights to the airline when he, according to documents, was receiving training and passed examinations. Even a cursory check of the documents would have unveiled these discrepancies. The MAK analysed that the Civil Aviation Authority of Tatarstan issued the ATPL formally, a reason for the (undue) issuance of the license was not provided. The MAK analysed that the first officer failed two exams for acquiring the theoretical commercial pilot's license, on the third attempt he passed with 100% putting the result into serious doubt. The type rating took substantial more time (about 6 months) than normal, with a large pause between theoretical and simulator training. That simulator training was considered inadequate. For example the MAK annotated the training was conducted by freelance instructors invited by the airline, there were two such instructors used on flight training devices and 5 on the full flight simulator. The MAK therefore concludes that the pilot training in general was not carried out according to the principles set forth in FAR-23. The MAK analysed that both pilots were suffering from accumulation of fatigue. Although officially there had been sufficient rest time, evidence showed that there was substantial revision of the work times leaving insufficient rest times to compensate for accumulated fatigue. The MAK analysed that air traffic control observed the significant deviations from the approach procedure but did not offer assistance, i.e. vectors, to correct and compensate. The controller stated in post accident interviews he had no idea he could have offered vectors. He believed, in contradiction to existing air traffic control regulations stating "the need for vectoring is determined by air traffic controller assessing the current air traffic situation. Vectors are offered to provide navigational assistance to flight crews.", he needed an active request by the crew to provide vectors. The MAK continued that even after turning final the aircraft was substantially to the right of the extended runway center line, clearly observed on radar, the controller therefore should at least have advised the crew of the significant deviation from the final approach course and should have recommended a go around. The MAK analysed that the investigation's "fitness experiment" showed that the vast majority of airline transport pilots failed the unexpected go around, only about 30% more or less succeeded to perform the go around. The MAK analysed that the accident captain - just like the survey in the experiment showed - anticipated an automatic go around controlled by the autopilot and did not expect the autopilot to drop offline. In addition he did not register the autopilot disconnect indications, just like almost half of the pilots participating in the experiment. The MAK analysed that a survey amongst Tatarstan pilots revealed, that in full flight simulator lessons they always used dual autopilot when the approach mode was being used, which would result in an automatic go around on autopilot upon pressing the TOGA button. However, when in real flight and the crew did not intend to perform an automatic landing, they always used single pilot approach mode, which disallows an automatic go around. The MAK analysed that the priority in handling aircraft is "Aviate, Navigate, Communicate". When the go-around was initiated priority was on "aviate", however, at that time the first officer engaged in an ATC communication that lasted for 20 seconds and turned his attentation away from monitoring flight instruments and the actions by the pilot flying. Therefore he did not perform according to standard operating procedures, for example missed to call out "positive rate of climb", failed to point out the exceeding pitch angle, failed to point out speed deviations, ... Only 20 seconds after the go around was initiated the first officer "returned to the cockpit" and pointed out that the landing gear was still extended. The MAK analysed that one of the factors leading to loss of situation awareness could have been zero or negative gravity, which would not only cause the state of weightlessness, but would also cause all loose items in the cockpit to "float" including dirt and dust always present in a cockpit. As this is usually very sudden, it has a "chilling" effect on flight crew, apart from dirt and dust entering eyes and noses of flight crew limiting sight and breathing. Aerial overview of crash site (Photo: MAK): |
Add your comment: (max 1024 characters) | |
Your IP address 185.148.24.167 is being tracked. We reserve the right to remove any comment for any reason. Profanities, personal attacks (against any physical or legal person), discussions about site policies, false statements or similiar as well as copyrighted materials from third parties will not be tolerated, those messages will summarily be deleted. Links and mail addresses are not permitted and will not appear in the display, posts trying to circumvent the restriction of links/mail addresses will be removed. We ask for your valid e-mail address in the email field. This address is only used by us to establish contact with you in case of further questions, it will not be displayed anywhere or be used otherwise. | |
Your Name: | |
Your Email: | |
Subject: | |
Your comment: | |
Get the news right onto your desktop when they happen |
Guest Violinist
Jobson was born in Billingham, Stockton-on-Tees, England.
He began playing the piano at age 7 and violin at age 8. Later he attended Bede Hall Grammar School, leaving at age 16. At that point he joined the band Fat Grapple, playing locally in venues such as Redcar Jazz Club. It was at this venue that they played in support of Curved Air, which Jobson joined the following year.
At this time Jobson fronted Fat Grapple on electric violin, opening with a rendition of the current hit piece “Jig-a-Jig”. The band played original compositions and were well regarded, but failed to break out beyond the Newcastle area. Nonetheless, Jobson’s playing won him a place in Curved Air, though the group disbanded after just one album, 1973’s Air Cut, which brought Jobson little commercial success beyond what he’d had with Fat Grapple.
In 1973 he replaced Brian Eno in Roxy Music, getting the job partially through a connection between his sister and the sister of singer Bryan Ferry, who knew each other in college. Jobson found himself playing three roles: Eno’s, Ferry’s (who had stepped up as a frontman after first playing piano), and his own. Jobson stayed with the band for three studio albums and many tours.
In 1976, with Roxy on a hiatus, Jobson recorded an obscure solo single, “Yesterday Boulevard” b/w On a Still Night”, playing all instruments himself with the exception of drums (by Simon Phillips). To date (2013) neither side of the single have ever been reissued on vinyl or CD. During his time with Roxy, Jobson also provided studio overdubs on King Crimson’s live “USA” album and on several solo albums by members of Roxy, The Who, and Deep Purple. After turning down an offer to join Procol Harum, Jobson became a member of Frank Zappa’s band in mid-1976. He appeared on the cover of the Zoot Allures album though he didn’t play a note on it. He did however perform on the Zappa in New York live double album.
In 1977, Eddie helped form the prog rock supergroup UK. Other members included former King Crimson members Bill Bruford (drums) and John Wetton (bass and lead vocals) and Allan Holdsworth (guitar). Bruford was replaced by Terry Bozzio of Frank Zappa’s band after their debut album and Holdsworth also left the band due to pressures from the record company. They released three albums: UK, Danger Money and the live set Night After Night.
After UK broke up in early 1980, Jobson started work on a solo project, but was then asked to participate in Jethro Tull frontman Ian Anderson’s solo album, which became the Tull album A, on which Jobson was credited as a ‘special guest’. He stayed on for the subsequent world tour, playing his final live show in France in February 1981.
Jobson was briefly a member of Yes in 1983 after the departure of Tony Kaye. Jobson never recorded nor performed live with Yes. His only official appearance with Yes was on the video for “Owner of a Lonely Heart”. But the video was released after Kaye had rejoined and Jobson left. This resulted in Jobson appearing (though edited out as much as possible) in the original version of the song’s video. Jobson has reported on his own website that he was first asked to replace Kaye and then (as relations were mended between Yes and Kaye) to share the keyboard duties. Jobson declined, and left the band.
In the 1980s, Jobson released two albums. Zinc – The Green Album (1983) was performed in a rock-band format with session musicians, and Theme of Secrets (1985) was an electronic album and one of the first releases from New Age record label Private Music. That same year Jobson wrote and performed three pieces on Piano One, also from Private Music. Throughout the 1980s and 1990s he also built a successful career as a composer of TV and film soundtracks. He scored nearly 100 episodes of the TV series Nash Bridges. He also produced the Bulgarian Women Choir’s 2000 album Voices of Life, contributing three new compositions (from an abortive UK reunion project called Legacy) and playing violin on two of the new pieces. Since 2000, he has run his own label, “Globe Music Media Arts,” adding a second label, Glo Digital, in 2009. The official Eddie Jobson Forum went online on January 1, 2006.
The Creation of Peace Festival in Kazan, Tatarstan on August 30, 2008 saw Jobson’s return to the stage after more than 27 years. He played violin on one song with the Patti Smith Group, one song with Fairport Convention, and two songs (“Red” and second part of “Larks’ Tongues in Aspic”) with the King Crimson Project. This band featured Adrian Belew, Tony Levin, Pat Mastelotto, Eric Slick and Julie Slick; it was created specifically for this festival, and one additional performance, a few days later on September 3, 2008 at the B1 club in Moscow. In addition to joining this collection of musicians, Jobson also performed piano and violin solos at the B1.
In October 2007, Jobson announced the formation of a new band, UKZ, with Trey Gunn, Marco Minnemann, Alex Machacek, and Aaron Lippert. Their EP, “Radiation,” became available from the Globe Music online store in January 2009 and had its official release on Glo Digital in March 2009; a 7:48 video of the title track was released earlier, appearing on YouTube in January 2009. The band’s first live performance was held at Town Hall in New York City on January 24, 2009. UKZ also performed four dates in Japan in June 2009 in the cities of Tokyo, Nagoya, and Osaka. In the summer of 2009, Jobson created an adjunct performing group, the ‘U-Z Project,’ which has featured a revolving line-up of guest musicians on a number of mini-tours through August 2009 in the eastern U.S., as well as Poland and Russia in November 2009.Three performances in Poland (in the cities of Krakow, Warsaw, and Bydgoszcz) saw Jobson reunited with former Roxy Music and UK bandmate, John Wetton, for what was termed “The 30th Anniversary of UK.” Additionally, on 9 August 2009, Eddie Jobson did a one-off reunion gig with Curved Air in Chislehurst, Kent.
In January 2010 Jobson was named to the technical advisory board of Austin, Texas based keyboard manufacturer, Infinite Response. He was involved in the development of the company’s VAX77 folding MIDI keyboard controller, which Jobson showcased at the January 2010 NAMM Show in Anaheim, California. Jobson’s U-Z Project headlined NEARfest in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania on June 20, 2010. A CD compiled from various U-Z performances in 2009 was released in Japan in November 2010.
In January 2011, Jobson gave a series of “master classes” in Japan, featuring performances of compositions throughout his career and lecture-style discussions of his music. In April of that year, a Jobson-Wetton “UK” reunion tour provided performances in Japan and the US, with Alex Machacek (guitar) and Marco Minnemann (drums) completing the 4-piece lineup. Jobson headlined the 2011 Zappanale festival on August 21 in Bad Doberan, Germany, and played an earlier gig in Zoetermeer, Netherlands on August 19, with a U-Z project lineup of Marc Bonilla (vocals/bass), Alex Machacek (guitar) and Marco Minnemann (drums).
In early 2012, Jobson confirmed that he re-formed the U.K. trio lineup—Jobson, John Wetton, and Terry Bozzio — for a one-off world tour, which took place from May–June 2012, with the trio playing dates in North America and Japan and Alex Machacek (guitar) and Gary Husband (drums) substituting for Bozzio in the band lineup during the European dates and a final added show in which the band played at NEARFest Apocalypse in Bethlehem, Pennsylvania as the Sunday headliner.
IMAGES
VIDEO
COMMENTS
Here's my band 9 essay on the topic of whether professionals should be allowed to work abroad. There's also a quick homework task. IELTS Writing Task 2: Discussion essay (independence) Here's another band 9 'discussion' essay, with a quick study task below it. Here's a model essay for a 'discuss both views' task.
Essay from Examiners. IELTS Ideas. Search-Home IELTS Books Simon IELTS Writing Task 1/ Task 2 Band 9 [Ebook] Simon IELTS Writing Task 1/ Task 2 Band 9. 5347. By IELTS Practice Online. Facebook. Twitter. Pinterest. WhatsApp. Linkedin. Print. Telegram. VK. LINE.
Here's my band 9 sample answer for the question below. Some people say that music is a good way of bringing people of different cultures and ages together. ... Hi Simon, thank you very much for your invaluable lessons, I just wanted to know if we can write planet's language instead of planet's global language in this essay. Posted by: Prasad ...
To answer Joe above - as far back as 2103 - Australian teachers see paragraphs that start with FIRSTLY, SECONDLY, IN CONCLUSION and similar as very good ways to learn the basics of essay of paragraph writing. But a writer in the band 7, 8 9 level probably needs to move past these.
Displaying Writing Task 1 - Band 9 collection Simon.PDF.
Small words like articles and prepositions cause the most problems. If an essay has no grammar mistakes and a mix of long and short sentences, it's almost certain that it will get band 9 for grammar. If ideas are explained and developed in a clear, logical way, you will get a high score for coherence and cohesion.
Here's my full model answer, at band 9 level, for the 'summer holiday' task. Listen to a short talk about a university degree course in Marine Biology, and answer the multiple choice questions. Try today's practice exercise. Read the passage and choose the best title. Compare two sentences written by students with my improved versions.
35 Sample Band 9 IELTS Essays. Take a look at these 35 sample Band 9 IELTS essays for writing task 2 of the IELTS exam. Task 2 can cover a wide range of essay topics for the IELTS writing task section of the test, so preparation is key. Use the following samples when preparing your IELTS essays to see how close you are to a band 9!
With my expertise in this area and my impressive IELTS scores (an overall band score of 8.5, with subscores of 9 in Reading and Listening, 8.5 in Speaking, and 8 in Writing), I can provide detailed feedback and guidance to help you improve your writing skills and achieve the score you desire on the IELTS exam.
In conclusion, various measures can be taken to tackle the problems that are certain to arise as the populations of countries grow older. (265 words, band 9) Kiểm tra trình độ IELTS Online 70 fKiểm tra trình độ IELTS Online Some people regard video games as harmless fun, or even as a useful educational tool.
30 sample essays band 9 IELTS of Simon - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document summarizes information from four charts about various topics: 1) The charts show data on salmon lifecycles, tourist attractions in Britain in 1999, and waste production from three companies from 2000-2015. 2) Additional charts display spending on children's sports ...
Simon's Band 9 Essays - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. IELTS
22 Band 9 Essays From Corcoran Simon - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) or read online for free. The document discusses a partnership between two individuals, Kholov Feruz and another unnamed person, to establish an agricultural cooperative to grow cotton and wheat. They plan to obtain land and equipment and hire local farmers to work on the cooperative farm.
There are a lot of misconceptions about the test out there, and you need someone who will not waste your time looking at things that are not required. 3. They should be someone you like. If you enjoy spending time with them then you will get more out of your sessions. 4. They should be 'on your back' at all times.
IELTS Band 9 sample essay. Band 9 Sample answers are useful as study guides for IELTS preparation for the IELTS Writing Task 2 essay - especially for a band 9 IELTS essay. Having access to previously completed work that you can have confidence in will show you what you are missing! Take a look at these sample task 2 essay questions to help ...
It is admitted that technology has made man more social. I firmly agree with this statement. 9. band. Some people believe that modern technology is increasing the gap between rich and poor, while others disagree and say that it is helping reduce the gap. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Below are IELTS Band 9 Essay samples, written by a native English speaker and former IELTS examiner. Robert Nicholson is the co-author of 'High Scorer's Choice' IELTS Practice Tests book series, created in collaboration with Simone Braverman, the founder of this website.
Posted by: rasim | December 07, 2011 at 19:13. In my opinion, the main goal of IELTS Writing is to CLEARLY let the examiner understand your points. Vocabulary is important, but it is even more important for students to be able to use such words/expressions in a natural way. Simon's sample essays are great examples.
117,000.00USD. For sale. House. 150 m². 4 Zelenaya str, Kazan 3 bd, 2 ba, 1615 sqft. FOR SALE HOME DETAILS Three bedroom single house. First floor: kitchen, dining/family room, guest be... Add to favourites Details.
A Tatarstan Airlines Boeing 737-500 on behalf of Ak Bars Aero, registration VQ-BBN performing flight U9-363/2B-363 from Moscow Domodedovo to Kazan (Russia) with 44 passengers and 6 crew, initiated a go-around while on short final to Kazan's runway 29 but lost height, crashed onto or near runway 29 and burst into flames at 19:25L (15:25Z).
Jobson was born in Billingham, Stockton-on-Tees, England. He began playing the piano at age 7 and violin at age 8. Later he attended Bede Hall Grammar School, leaving at age 16. At that point he joined the band Fat Grapple, playing locally in venues such as Redcar Jazz Club. It was at this venue that they played in support of Curved Air, which ...
The band originally played songs like classic heavy metal with melodious vocals, but over the time Bagira's music has progressed and has become more extreme with clean and extreme vocal elements. At the last of july Bagira released their 4th russian-language album called 'Y gryanet grom', means 'And the Thunder will break out'.