impact of social media on politics essay

• Follow us on Facebook
• Follow us on Twitter
• Criminal Justice
• Environment
• Politics & Government
• Race & Gender

Expert Commentary

How does social media use influence political participation and civic engagement? A meta-analysis

2015 paper in Information, Communication & Society reviewing existing research on how social media use influences measures such as voting, protesting and civic engagement.

Republish this article

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License .

by John Wihbey, The Journalist's Resource October 18, 2015

This <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org/politics-and-government/social-media-influence-politics-participation-engagement-meta-analysis/">article</a> first appeared on <a target="_blank" href="https://journalistsresource.org">The Journalist's Resource</a> and is republished here under a Creative Commons license.<img src="https://journalistsresource.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/cropped-jr-favicon-150x150.png" style="width:1em;height:1em;margin-left:10px;">

Academic research has consistently found that people who consume more news media have a greater probability of being civically and politically engaged across a variety of measures. In an era when the public’s time and attention is increasingly directed toward platforms such as Facebook and Twitter, scholars are seeking to evaluate the still-emerging relationship between social media use and public engagement. The Obama presidential campaigns in 2008 and 2012 and the Arab Spring in 2011 catalyzed interest in networked digital connectivity and political action, but the data remain far from conclusive.

The largest and perhaps best-known inquiry into this issue so far is a 2012 study published in the journal Nature , “A 61-Million-Person Experiment in Social Influence and Political Mobilization,” which suggested that messages on users’ Facebook feeds could significantly influence voting patterns. The study data — analyzed in collaboration with Facebook data scientists — suggested that certain messages promoted by friends “increased turnout directly by about 60,000 voters and indirectly through social contagion by another 280,000 voters, for a total of 340,000 additional votes.” Close friends with real-world ties were found to be much more influential than casual online acquaintances. (Following the study, concerns were raised about the potential manipulation of users and “digital gerrymandering.” )

There are now thousands of studies on the effects of social networking sites (SNS) on offline behavior, but isolating common themes is not easy. Researchers often use unique datasets, ask different questions and measure a range of outcomes. However, a 2015 metastudy in the journal Information, Communication & Society , “Social Media Use and Participation: A Meta-analysis of Current Research,” analyzes 36 studies on the relationship between SNS use and everything from civic engagement broadly speaking to tangible actions such as voting and protesting. Some focus on youth populations, others on SNS use in countries outside the United States. Within these 36 studies, there were 170 separate “coefficients” — different factors potentially correlated with SNS use. The author, Shelley Boulianne of Grant MacEwan University (Canada), notes that the studies are all based on self-reported surveys, with the number of respondents ranging from 250 to more than 1,500. Twenty studies were conducted between 2008 and 2011, while eight were from 2012-2013.

The study’s key findings include:

• Among all of the factors examined, 82% showed a positive relationship between SNS use and some form of civic or political engagement or participation. Still, only half of the relationships found were statistically significant. The strongest effects could be seen in studies that randomly sampled youth populations.
• The correlation between social-media use and election-campaign participation “seems weak based on the set of studies analyzed,” while the relationship with civic engagement is generally stronger.
• Further, “Measuring participation as protest activities is more likely to produce a positive effect, but the coefficients are not more likely to be statistically significant compared to other measures of participation.” Also, within the area of protest activities, many different kinds of activities — marches, demonstrations, petitions and boycotts — are combined in research, making conclusions less valid. When studies do isolate and separate out these activities, these studies generally show that “social media plays a positive role in citizens’ participation.”
• Overall, the data cast doubt on whether SNS use “causes” strong effects and is truly “transformative.” Because few studies employ an experimental design, where researchers could compare a treatment group with a control group, it is difficult to claim causality.

“Popular discourse has focused on the use of social media by the Obama campaigns,” Boulianne concludes. “While these campaigns may have revolutionized aspects of election campaigning online, such as gathering donations, the metadata provide little evidence that the social media aspects of the campaigns were successful in changing people’s levels of participation. In other words, the greater use of social media did not affect people’s likelihood of voting or participating in the campaign.”

It is worth noting that many studies in this area take social media use as the starting point or “independent variable,” and therefore cannot rule out that some “deeper” cause — political interest, for example — is the reason people might engage in SNS use in the first place. Further, some researchers see SNS use as a form of participation and engagement in and of itself, helping to shape public narratives and understanding of public affairs.

Related research: Journalist’s Resource has been curating a wide variety of studies in this field. See research reviews on: Effects of the Internet on politics ; global protest and social media ; digital activism and organizing ; and the Internet and the Arab Spring . For cutting-edge insights on how online organizing and mobilization is evolving, see the 2015 study “Populism and Downing Street E-petitions: Connective Action, Hybridity, and the Changing Nature of Organizing,” published in Political Communication .

Keywords: social media, Facebook, Twitter

About The Author

John Wihbey

Social media and the 2020 election

Adobe Stock

The 2016 U.S. presidential election raised significant concerns among academics, political observers, policymakers, and others about the role social media played in the spread of misinformation during the campaign and the concurrent rise in polarization.  So when Andrew Guess of Princeton’s School of Public and International Affairs was given the chance to use de-identified primary data from two of the world’s most influential platforms to study their effects on the 2020 election, he leapt at it.

“I've long believed that conducting on-platform experiments to study the impact of feature changes and other interventions on real-user behavior is the holy grail for research on social media and politics,” said Guess, an assistant professor of politics and public affairs at SPIA whose research bridges political communication, public opinion and political behavior. “To that end, for several years I've been involved with efforts to facilitate data-sharing between researchers and platforms, so when this unique opportunity arose, I was fortunate to be asked to join the project team as it was coming together.”

Andrew Guess

Guess and his 16 academic collaborators joined with researchers from Meta, the parent company of Facebook and Instagram, to explore how changes in those platforms’ delivery of content affected users. The first of the team’s work was published this week — three papers in Science and one in Nature.

Guess is the lead author on two of the Science papers. One looks at the effects of changing the feed-ranking algorithms on Facebook and Instagram, and the other explores what happens when reshared content is removed from users’ Facebook feeds.

“I was part of the academic research team that helped to develop the overarching study design, such as which data we'd collect, what questions we specifically wanted to ask and the design of the platform experiments that we'd conduct,” he said. “After the initial development period, we split into teams focusing on specific experiments. It was a very hands-on and collaborative experience.”

The U.S. 2020 Facebook and Instagram Election Study was launched when internal researchers at Meta partnered with researchers at the University of Texas at Austin and New York University. Meta’s involvement gave Guess and his collaborators unprecedented access to user data with no substantive restrictions.

The academic team proposed and selected specific research questions and study designs with Meta’s explicit agreement that the company could reject them only for legal, privacy or infeasibility reasons. Meta could not restrict or censor findings, and the academic lead authors had final say over writing and research decisions. "Due   in large part to the fact that the relevant data about users' experiences and behaviors are locked up inside the platforms themselves, comprehensive evidence of these impacts has been scarce,” Guess said. 

In “How Do Social Media Feed Algorithms Affect Attitudes and Behavior in an Election Campaign?,” Guess and his coauthors investigated the effects of Facebook and Instagram feed algorithms for 23,000 consenting Facebook users and 21,000 consenting Instagram users from October through December 2020. The team assigned a sample of users to reverse chronologically ordered feeds — in which the newest content appears at the top of the feed — while the control group’s feeds were governed by the platforms’ default algorithms.

They found that moving users out of the algorithmic feeds “substantially decreased the time they spent on the platforms and their activities.” The move also affected the kind of content users saw, with “political and untrustworthy content” increasing on both platforms, “uncivil and hateful content” decreasing on Facebook, and “content from moderate friends and ideologically mixed audiences” rising on Facebook.

Despite these changes, the users who were fed chronologically based content did not report significant changes in their levels of issue polarization, affective polarization, political knowledge or other key attitudes over the course of the study.

“Algorithmic ranking systems and platform features that enable virality substantially shape people's experience on these platforms, such as the kinds of content they encounter and how they engage with it,” Guess said. “But we find limited evidence that these effects impacted people's political attitudes and behavior off-platform.”

Guess’ other Science paper, “Reshares on Social Media Amplify Political News But Do Not Detectably Affect Beliefs or Opinions,” studied the effects of exposure to reshared content during the 2020 election. A random subset of 23,000 Facebook users were assigned feeds that contained no reshared content over the study’s three months.

Removing reshares, the researchers report, greatly reduced “the amount of political news, including content from untrustworthy sources to which users [were] exposed; decrease[d] overall clicks and reactions; and reduce[d] partisan news clicks.” As in the first Science study, the team found no changes in political polarization or individual-level political attitudes in the subset who saw no reshared content. Those users did, however, display marked reductions in accurate news knowledge.

“This implies that reshares make people more knowledgeable,” said Guess, “which may seem counterintuitive since potentially viral reshared content is thought to promote misinformation — and, in fact, we present evidence that it does to some extent. But more reshared content is actually from trustworthy than untrustworthy sources, so on net people are more informed.”

The three papers published today in Science and the one in Nature are the first of at least 10 more that are in the pipeline. In addition, the team is giving access to de-identified data from the studies to other academic researchers who want to explore their own research questions.

Related Stories

Consuming online partisan news leads to distrust in the media .

Princeton researchers find consumption of partisan media leads readers to become more distrustful of news sources.

Political polarization and its echo chambers: Surprising new, cross-disciplinary perspectives from Princeton .

Like a natural system, democracy faces collapse as polarization leads to loss of diversity. Studies published this week in a special issue of the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences explore why and how.

Experts call for national and corporate action to combat disinformation on social media .

A daylong conference at Princeton, “Defending Democracy: Civilian and Military Responses to Weaponized Information,” brought together leaders from military, government and academic backgrounds to discuss information warfare and how to protect against its corrosive effects on democracy.

Book reveals media choice hurts political participation .

As the presidential election season approaches, many people are steeling themselves for the onslaught of political coverage on television, on the Internet and in the print media. But for some Americans, the next 12 months will be like any other period, because they largely ignore political news. In his new book, "Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections," Markus Prior, an assistant professor of politics and public affairs, takes on this phenomenon. 

Q&A: Casting light on the Internet's shadows (and shadowing) .

The specter of a faceless system collecting data from Web users and compiling personal profiles has raised alarms among privacy advocates worldwide. Arvind Narayanan, an assistant professor of computer science at Princeton University, founded the Web Transparency and Accountability Project (WebTAP) at the Center for Information Technology Policy (CITP) to address difficult questions related to Internet privacy.

Student projects use computing to ensure technology serves society .

Students engaged in research at Princeton's Center for Information Technology Policy apply a range of approaches from diverse disciplines to study complicated questions of how technology and computing affect society, both positively and negatively.  

Innovative ideas with potential for impact selected for Dean for Research funding .

A wide-ranging collection of new research projects from disciplines across campus have been selected to receive Princeton funding through the Dean for Research Innovation Funds. The funding program encourages ideas and collaborations that push the boundaries of conventional areas and may be at too early a stage to find backing from external grants. This year's awards will support a wide range of initiatives in the natural sciences, humanities and social sciences, as well as spurring research collaborations with industry and promoting sustainability research using the campus as a lab.

A business journal from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania

Knowledge at Wharton Podcast

How social media is shaping political campaigns, august 17, 2020 • 11 min listen.

Political newcomers can leverage social media to raise money and gain recognition, which could help them compete against incumbents, according to new research co-authored by Wharton’s Pinar Yildirim.

Wharton’s Pinar Yildirim speaks with Wharton Business Daily on Sirius XM about how social media is changing political competition.

In his short-lived campaign for president, entrepreneur and former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg spent more than $1 billion of his own money before dropping out of the race in March 2020. More than 70% of that budget went toward advertising.

The extraordinary spend highlights just how much cash it takes to run for public office in America and why it’s so difficult for political newcomers to gain momentum at the polls without connections to influential donors (or in Bloomberg’s case, his own deep pockets). The problem perpetuates through election cycles, which is why up to 90% of incumbents are reelected in what research calls “the incumbency advantage.”

How Has the Internet Revolutionized Political Campaigns?

But social media has changed the game, allowing incumbents and newcomers alike to speak directly to constituents on everything from policy to what they had for dinner. Barack Obama was the first presidential candidate to use the medium, which was still nascent during his 2008 bid, and Donald Trump took to Twitter almost daily to express himself without the filter of traditional media.

“If you look at the way that politicians communicate today, it’s very different than the way that they used to communicate five, 10 years ago,” Wharton marketing professor Pinar Yildirim said. “They would speak through the official speakers or they would be on TV. They would be in print or official online newspapers. Today, they are communicating through places like Twitter. And I think that begs a question, why are they doing that? Is there any benefit to communicating on channels like Twitter?”

“This is not about the age of your constituency.” — Pinar Yildirim

A study co-authored by Yildirim offers some answers. “ Social Media and Political Contributions: The Impact of New Technology on Political Competition ,” written with Maria Petrova and Ananya Sen, finds that political newcomers can get a substantial boost in support by using social media channels, which cost next to nothing and are easily tapped by anyone with an internet connection. The finding is important because it indicates how social media can help level the playing field in politics, where money and access to formal communication channels pose huge barriers to new entrants.

“Never have politicians been so accessible to the public,” the authors wrote in an opinion piece for The Globe Post . Yildirim recently spoke about the researchers’ findings during a segment of the Wharton Business Daily radio show on Sirius XM . (Listen to the podcast at the top of this page.)

Using Social Media for Political Campaign Fundraising

The study, which will be published in Management Science , measured support for a candidate based on donations from individual citizens and whether that support increased after the candidate opened a Twitter or Facebook account. Yildirim said she and her colleagues were surprised to find such a significant effect: Within the first month of using Twitter, politicians were able to raise between 1% and 3% of what they would have raised in a two-year traditional campaign. But that gain flowed almost exclusively to newcomers, not incumbents. And it was amplified when candidates included hyperlinks to more information.

Yildirim made it clear that the advantage has nothing to do with assumptions about age; there is simply more to learn about new candidates.

“This is not about the age of your constituency. This is not because the political newcomers are somewhat more technologically savvy, or their base is younger and that’s where they can communicate and find those individuals on social media,” she said. “We tested all of these, and these are not the drivers.”

Beyond communicating their policy views, new candidates can humanize themselves through their social media accounts, and that helps voters feel more connected to them. For example, former Democratic presidential contender Pete Buttigieg introduced his shelter dogs to his 2 million Twitter followers , while U.S. Sen. Elizabeth Warren used her Instagram account to chat live with supporters who made small contributions to her presidential campaign.

Those small contributions — often between $5 to $100 — seem unlikely to move the needle in a multimillion-dollar political campaign. But the researchers said they are an important part of the voting process because they represent hope.

“There’s this idea that if there are many of us just donating in small amounts, eventually that will turn into a sea of donations, and that could help this person to get elected down the road,” Yildirim said. “So, donations are very meaningful in a number of ways.”

“You don’t have to have the big money, big bucks, big fundraisers, big supporters to be able to communicate on Twitter with your constituency.” — Pinar Yildirim

In Politics, All Communication Counts

If video killed the radio star, as the 1980 pop song declared, will Facebook kill nationally televised debates or news interviews that are the hallmark of old-school political campaigns? Probably not. As Yildirim pointed out, organic coverage from newspapers or television stations is free and reaches a wide audience. And while costly, paid advertising allows candidates to target a specific message to a specific audience. However, so does social media. It cannot be discounted as a low-cost, powerful tool in political competition.

“You don’t have to have the big money, big bucks, big fundraisers, big supporters to be able to communicate on Twitter with your constituency and tell them about what your ideas are for the future,” Yildirim noted. “You can tell them about who you are, what your values are, and this is typically what we see politicians do. They talk about themselves. They talk about their dog, they talk about their favorite sports team, they talk about their favorite place to go in the neighborhood. Of course, you can always talk about your policies and what you hope to achieve if you were elected into an office. And you can do this way before you officially declare running for an office.”

The scholars believe the intersection of social media and politics is ripe for more research, and their paper makes a notable contribution in the field. The finding suggests that, with enough strategy, social media could erase the incumbency advantage and bring American politics back to its grass roots.

“As political campaigns are becoming increasingly more expensive and the need to reach out to constituencies is becoming more vital, social media will undoubtedly play a more important role in determining electoral outcomes as it gives young politicians a platform,” they said in the op-ed.

More From Knowledge at Wharton

Who Benefits in the Deal Between Reddit and OpenAI?

This Media Bias Detector Analyzes News Reports in Real Time

Co-Intelligence: How to Live and Work with AI

Looking for more insights.

Sign up to stay informed about our latest article releases.

Likes, Shares, and Beyond: Exploring the Impact of Social Media in Essays

Table of contents

• 1 Definition and Explanation of a Social Media Essay
• 2.1 Topics for an Essay on Social Media and Mental Health
• 2.2 Social Dynamics
• 2.3 Social Media Essay Topics about Business
• 2.4 Politics
• 3 Research and Analysis
• 4 Structure Social Media Essay
• 5 Tips for Writing Essays on Social Media
• 6 Examples of Social Media Essays
• 7 Navigating the Social Media Labyrinth: Key Insights

In the world of digital discourse, our article stands as a beacon for those embarking on the intellectual journey of writing about social media. It is a comprehensive guide for anyone venturing into the dynamic world of social media essays. Offering various topics about social media and practical advice on selecting engaging subjects, the piece delves into research methodologies, emphasizing the importance of credible sources and trend analysis. Furthermore, it provides invaluable tips on structuring essays, including crafting compelling thesis statements and hooks balancing factual information with personal insights. Concluding with examples of exemplary essays, this article is an essential tool for students and researchers alike, aiding in navigating the intricate landscape of its impact on society.

Definition and Explanation of a Social Media Essay

Essentially, when one asks “What is a social media essay?” they are referring to an essay that analyzes, critiques, or discusses its various dimensions and effects. These essays can range from the psychological implications of its use to its influence on politics, business strategies, and social dynamics.

A social media essay is an academic or informational piece that explores various aspects of social networking platforms and their impact on individuals and society.

In crafting such an essay, writers blend personal experiences, analytical perspectives, and empirical data to paint a full picture of social media’s role. For instance, a social media essay example could examine how these platforms mold public opinion, revolutionize digital marketing strategies, or raise questions about data privacy ethics. Through a mix of thorough research, critical analysis, and personal reflections, these essays provide a layered understanding of one of today’s most pivotal digital phenomena.

Great Social Media Essay Topics

When it comes to selecting a topic for your essay, consider its current relevance, societal impact, and personal interest. Whether exploring the effects on business, politics, mental health, or social dynamics, these social media essay titles offer a range of fascinating social media topic ideas. Each title encourages an exploration of the intricate relationship between social media and our daily lives. A well-chosen topic should enable you to investigate the impact of social media, debate ethical dilemmas, and offer unique insights. Striking the right balance in scope, these topics should align with the objectives of your essays, ensuring an informative and captivating read.

Topics for an Essay on Social Media and Mental Health

• The Impact of Social Media on Self-Esteem.
• Unpacking Social Media Addiction: Causes, Effects, and Solutions.
• Analyzing Social Media’s Role as a Catalyst for Teen Depression and Anxiety.
• Social Media and Mental Health Awareness: A Force for Good?
• The Psychological Impacts of Cyberbullying in the Social Media Age.
• The Effects of Social Media on Sleep and Mental Health.
• Strategies for Positive Mental Health in the Era of Social Media.
• Real-Life vs. Social Media Interactions: An Essay on Mental Health Aspects.
• The Mental Well-Being Benefits of a Social Media Detox.
• Social Comparison Psychology in the Realm of Social Media.

Social Dynamics

• Social Media and its Impact on Interpersonal Communication Skills: A Cause and Effect Essay on Social Media.
• Cultural Integration through Social Media: A New Frontier.
• Interpersonal Communication in the Social Media Era: Evolving Skills and Challenges.
• Community Building and Social Activism: The Role of Social Media.
• Youth Culture and Behavior: The Influence of Social Media.
• Privacy and Personal Boundaries: Navigating Social Media Challenges.
• Language Evolution in Social Media: A Dynamic Shift.
• Leveraging Social Media for Social Change and Awareness.
• Family Dynamics in the Social Media Landscape.
• Friendship in the Age of Social Media: An Evolving Concept.

Social Media Essay Topics about Business

• Influencer Marketing on Social Media: Impact and Ethics.
• Brand Building and Customer Engagement: The Power of Social Media.
• The Ethics and Impact of Influencer Marketing in Social Media.
• Measuring Business Success Through Social Media Analytics.
• The Changing Face of Advertising in the Social Media World.
• Revolutionizing Customer Service in the Social Media Era.
• Market Research and Consumer Insights: The Social Media Advantage.
• Small Businesses and Startups: The Impact of Social Media.
• Ethical Dimensions of Social Media Advertising.
• Consumer Behavior and Social Media: An Intricate Relationship.
• The Role of Social Media in Government Transparency and Accountability
• Social Media’s Impact on Political Discourse and Public Opinion.
• Combating Fake News on Social Media: Implications for Democracy.
• Political Mobilization and Activism: The Power of Social Media.
• Social Media: A New Arena for Political Debates and Discussions.
• Government Transparency and Accountability in the Social Media Age.
• Voter Behavior and Election Outcomes: The Social Media Effect.
• Political Polarization: A Social Media Perspective.
• Tackling Political Misinformation on Social Media Platforms.
• The Ethics of Political Advertising in the Social Media Landscape.
• Memes as a Marketing Tool: Successes, Failures, and Pros of Social Media.
• Shaping Public Opinion with Memes: A Social Media Phenomenon.
• Political Satire and Social Commentary through Memes.
• The Psychology Behind Memes: Understanding Their Viral Nature.
• The Influence of Memes on Language and Communication.
• Tracing the History and Evolution of Internet Memes.
• Memes in Online Communities: Culture and Subculture Formation.
• Navigating Copyright and Legal Issues in the World of Memes.
• Memes as a Marketing Strategy: Analyzing Successes and Failures.
• Memes and Global Cultural Exchange: A Social Media Perspective.

Research and Analysis

In today’s fast-paced information era, the ability to sift through vast amounts of data and pinpoint reliable information is more crucial than ever. Research and analysis in the digital age hinge on identifying credible sources and understanding the dynamic landscape. Initiating your research with reputable websites is key. Academic journals, government publications, and established news outlets are gold standards for reliable information. Online databases and libraries provide a wealth of peer-reviewed articles and books. For websites, prioritize those with domains like .edu, .gov, or .org, but always critically assess the content for bias and accuracy. Turning to social media, it’s a trove of real-time data and trends but requires a discerning approach. Focus on verified accounts and official pages of recognized entities.

Analyzing current trends and user behavior is crucial for staying relevant. Platforms like Google Trends, Twitter Analytics, and Facebook Insights offer insights into what’s resonating with audiences. These tools help identify trending topics, hashtags, and the type of content that engages users. Remember, it reflects and influences public opinion and behavior. Observing user interactions, comments, and shares can provide a deeper understanding of consumer attitudes and preferences. This analysis is invaluable for tailoring content, developing marketing strategies, and staying ahead in a rapidly evolving digital landscape.

Structure Social Media Essay

In constructing a well-rounded structure for a social media essay, it’s crucial to begin with a strong thesis statement. This sets the foundation for essays about social media and guides the narrative.

Thesis Statements

A thesis statement is the backbone of your essay, outlining the main argument or position you will explore throughout the text. It guides the narrative, providing a clear direction for your essay and helping readers understand the focus of your analysis or argumentation. Here are some thesis statements:

• “Social media has reshaped communication, fostering a connected world through instant information sharing, yet it has come at the cost of privacy and genuine social interaction.”
• “While social media platforms act as potent instruments for societal and political transformation, they present significant challenges to mental health and the authenticity of information.”
• “The role of social media in contemporary business transcends mere marketing; it impacts customer relationships, shapes brand perception, and influences operational strategies.”

Social Media Essay Hooks

Social media essay hooks are pivotal in grabbing the reader’s attention right from the beginning and compelling them to continue reading. A well-crafted hook acts as the engaging entry point to your essay, setting the tone and framing the context for the discussion that will follow.

Here are some effective social media essay hooks:

• “In a world where a day without social media is unimaginable, its pervasive presence is both a testament to its utility and a source of various societal issues.”
• “Each scroll, like, and share on social media platforms carries the weight of influencing public opinion and shaping global conversations.”
• “Social media has become so ingrained in our daily lives that its absence would render the modern world unrecognizable.”

Introduction:

Navigating the digital landscape, an introduction for a social media essay serves as a map, charting the terrain of these platforms’ broad influence across various life aspects. This section should briefly summarize the scope of the essay, outlining both the benefits and the drawbacks, and segue into the thesis statement.

When we move to the body part of the essay, it offers an opportunity for an in-depth exploration and discussion. It can be structured first to examine the positive aspects of social media, including improved communication channels, innovative marketing strategies, and the facilitation of social movements. Following this, the essay should address the negative implications, such as issues surrounding privacy, the impact on mental health, and the proliferation of misinformation. Incorporating real-world examples, statistical evidence, and expert opinions throughout the essay will provide substantial support for the arguments presented.

Conclusion:

It is the summit of the essay’s exploration, offering a moment to look back on the terrain covered. The conclusion should restate the thesis in light of the discussions presented in the body. It should summarize the key points made, reflecting on the multifaceted influence of social media in contemporary society. The essay should end with a thought-provoking statement or question about the future role of social media, tying back to the initial hooks and ensuring a comprehensive and engaging end to the discourse.

Tips for Writing Essays on Social Media

In the ever-evolving realm of digital dialogue, mastering the art of essay writing on social media is akin to navigating a complex web of virtual interactions and influences. Writing an essay on social media requires a blend of analytical insight, factual accuracy, and a nuanced understanding of the digital landscape. Here are some tips to craft a compelling essay:

• Incorporate Statistical Data and Case Studies

Integrate statistical data and relevant case studies to lend credibility to your arguments. For instance, usage statistics, growth trends, and demographic information can provide a solid foundation for your points. Case studies, especially those highlighting its impact on businesses, politics, or societal change, offer concrete examples that illustrate your arguments. Ensure your sources are current and reputable to maintain the essay’s integrity.

• Balance Personal Insights with Factual Information

While personal insights can add a unique perspective to your essay, balancing them with factual information is crucial. Personal observations and experiences can make your essay relatable and engaging, but grounding these insights in factual data ensures credibility and helps avoid bias.

• Respect Privacy

When discussing real-world examples or case studies, especially those involving individuals or specific organizations, be mindful of privacy concerns. Avoid sharing sensitive information, and always respect the confidentiality of your sources.

• Maintain an Objective Tone

It is a polarizing topic, but maintaining an objective tone in your essay is essential. Avoid emotional language and ensure that your arguments are supported by evidence. An objective approach allows readers to form opinions based on the information presented.

• Use Jargon Wisely

While using social media-specific terminology can make your essay relevant and informed, it’s important to use jargon judiciously. Avoid overuse and ensure that terms are clearly defined for readers who might not be familiar with their lingo.

Examples of Social Media Essays

Title: The Dichotomy of Social Media: A Tool for Connection and a Platform for Division

Introduction

In the digital era, social media has emerged as a paradoxical entity. It serves as a bridge connecting distant corners of the world and a battleground for conflicting ideologies. This essay explores this dichotomy, utilizing statistical data, case studies, and real-world examples to understand its multifaceted impact on society.

Section 1 – Connection Through Social Media:

Social media’s primary allure lies in its ability to connect. A report by the Pew Research Center shows that 72% of American adults use some form of social media, where interactions transcend geographical and cultural barriers. This statistic highlights the platform’s popularity and role in fostering global connections. An exemplary case study of this is the #MeToo movement. Originating as a hashtag on Twitter, it grew into a global campaign against sexual harassment, demonstrating its power to mobilize and unify people for a cause.

However, personal insights suggest that while it bridges distances, it can also create a sense of isolation. Users often report feeling disconnected from their immediate surroundings, hinting at the platform’s double-edged nature. Despite enabling connections on a global scale, social media can paradoxically alienate individuals from their local context.

Section 2 – The Platform for Division

Conversely, social media can amplify societal divisions. Its algorithm-driven content can create echo chambers, reinforcing users’ preexisting beliefs. A study by the Knight Foundation found that it tends to polarize users, especially in political contexts, leading to increased division. This is further exacerbated by the spread of misinformation, as seen in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election case, where it was used to disseminate false information, influencing public opinion and deepening societal divides.

Respecting privacy and maintaining an objective tone, it is crucial to acknowledge that social media is not divisive. Its influence is determined by both its usage and content. Thus, it is the obligation of both platforms to govern content and consumers to access information.

In conclusion, it is a complex tool. It has the unparalleled ability to connect individuals worldwide while possessing the power to divide. Balancing the personal insights with factual information presented, it’s clear that its influence is a reflection of how society chooses to wield it. As digital citizens, it is imperative to use it judiciously, understanding its potential to unite and divide.

Delving into the intricacies of social media’s impact necessitates not just a keen eye for detail but an analytical mindset to dissect its multifaceted layers. Analysis is paramount because it allows us to navigate through the vast sea of information, distinguishing between mere opinion and well-supported argumentation.

This essay utilizes tips for writing a social media essay. Statistical data from the Pew Research Center and the Knight Foundation lend credibility to the arguments. The use of the #MeToo movement as a case study illustrates its positive impact, while the reference to the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election demonstrates its negative aspects. The essay balances personal insights with factual information, respects privacy, maintains an objective tone, and appropriately uses jargon. The structure is clear and logical, with distinct sections for each aspect of its impact, making it an informative and well-rounded analysis of its role in modern society.

Navigating the Social Media Labyrinth: Key Insights

In the digital age, the impact of social media on various aspects of human life has become a critical area of study. This article has provided a comprehensive guide for crafting insightful and impactful essays on this subject, blending personal experiences with analytical rigor. Through a detailed examination of topics ranging from mental health and social dynamics to business and politics, it has underscored the dual nature of social media as both a unifying and divisive force. The inclusion of statistical data and case studies has enriched the discussion, offering a grounded perspective on the nuanced effects of these platforms.

The tips and structures outlined serve as a valuable framework for writers to navigate the complex interplay between social media and societal shifts. As we conclude, it’s clear that understanding social media’s role requires a delicate balance of critical analysis and open-mindedness. Reflecting on its influence, this article guides the creation of thoughtful essays and encourages readers to ponder the future of digital interactions and their implications for the fabric of society.

Readers also enjoyed

WHY WAIT? PLACE AN ORDER RIGHT NOW!

Just fill out the form, press the button, and have no worries!

We use cookies to give you the best experience possible. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy.

• A-Z Publications

Annual Review of Economics

Volume 12, 2020, review article, political effects of the internet and social media.

• Ekaterina Zhuravskaya 1 , Maria Petrova 2,3,4,5,6 , and Ruben Enikolopov 2,3,4,5,6
• View Affiliations Hide Affiliations Affiliations: 1 Paris School of Economics, École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales, 75014 Paris, France; email: [email protected] 2 Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain 3 New Economic School, Moscow 121353, Russia 4 Institute of Political Economy and Governance, 08005 Barcelona, Spain 5 Graduate School of Economics, 08005 Barcelona, Spain 6 Catalan Institute for Research and Advanced Studies (ICREA), 08010 Barcelona, Spain
• Vol. 12:415-438 (Volume publication date August 2020) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-081919-050239
• First published as a Review in Advance on May 26, 2020
• Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved

How do the Internet and social media affect political outcomes? We review empirical evidence from the recent political economy literature, focusing primarily on work that considers traits that distinguish the Internet and social media from traditional off-line media, such as low barriers to entry and reliance on user-generated content. We discuss the main results about the effects of the Internet in general, and social media in particular, on voting, street protests, attitudes toward government, political polarization, xenophobia, and politicians’ behavior. We also review evidence on the role of social media in the dissemination of fake news, and we summarize results about the strategies employed by autocratic regimes to censor the Internet and to use social media for surveillance and propaganda. We conclude by highlighting open questions about how the Internet and social media shape politics in democracies and autocracies.

Article metrics loading...

Full text loading...

Literature Cited

• Acemoglu D , Hassan TA , Tahoun A 2018 . The power of the street: evidence from Egypt's Arab Spring. Rev. Financ. Stud. 31 : 1– 42 [Google Scholar]
• Adena M , Enikolopov R , Petrova M , Santarosa V , Zhuravskaya E 2015 . Radio and the rise of the Nazis in prewar Germany. Q. J. Econ. 130 : 1885– 939 [Google Scholar]
• Algan Y , Guriev S , Papaioannou E , Passari E 2017 . The European trust crisis and the rise of populism. Brook. Pap. Econ. Act. Fall 309– 82 [Google Scholar]
• Allcott H , Braghieri L , Eichmeyer S , Gentzkow M 2020 . The welfare effects of social media. Am. Econ. Rev. 110 : 3 629– 76 [Google Scholar]
• Allcott H , Gentzkow M. 2017 . Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J. Econ. Perspect. 31 : 211– 36 [Google Scholar]
• Allcott H , Gentzkow M , Yu C 2019 . Trends in the diffusion of misinformation on social media. Res. Politics 6 : https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168019848554 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
• Amorim G , Costa Lima R , Sampaio B 2018 . Broadband Internet and protests: evidence from the Occupy movement Work. Pap., Univ. Fed. Pernambuco Recife, Braz.: [Google Scholar]
• Ananyev M , Xefteris D , Zudenkova G , Petrova M 2019 . Information and communication technologies, protests, and censorship Work. Pap., Universitat Pompeu Fabra Barcelona: [Google Scholar]
• Autor D , Dorn D , Hanson G , Majlesi K 2016 . Importing political polarization? The electoral consequences of rising trade exposure NBER Work. Pap 22637 [Google Scholar]
• Autor D , Dorn D , Hanson G , Majlesi K 2017 . A note on the effect of rising trade exposure on the 2016 presidential elections Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol Cambridge: [Google Scholar]
• Bail CA , Guay B , Maloney E , Combs A , Hillygus DS et al. 2020 . Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017. PNAS 117 : 243– 50 [Google Scholar]
• Bakshy E , Messing S , Adamic LA 2015 . Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348 : 1130– 32 [Google Scholar]
• Barberá P. 2015 . How social media reduces mass political polarization: evidence from Germany, Spain, and the US Work. Pap., New York Univ New York: [Google Scholar]
• Barberá P , Wang N , Bonneau R , Jost JT , Nagler J et al. 2015 . The critical periphery in the growth of social protests. PLOS ONE 10 : e0143611 [Google Scholar]
• Barrera O , Guriev S , Henry E , Zhuravskaya E 2020 . Facts, alternative facts, and fact checking in times of post-truth politics. J. Public Econ. 182 : 104123 [Google Scholar]
• Besley T , Prat A. 2006 . Handcuffs for the grabbing hand? Media capture and government accountability. Am. Econ. Rev. 96 : 720– 36 [Google Scholar]
• Bessone P , Campante F , Ferraz C , Souza PC 2019 . Internet access, social media, and the behavior of politicians: evidence from Brazil Work. Pap., Mass. Inst. Technol Cambridge: [Google Scholar]
• Bond RM , Fariss CJ , Jones JJ , Kramer ADI , Marlow C et al. 2012 . A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 489 : 295– 98 [Google Scholar]
• Boxell L , Gentzkow M , Shapiro JM 2017 . Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. PNAS 114 : 10612– 17 [Google Scholar]
• Bursztyn L , Egorov G , Enikolopov R , Petrova M 2019 . Social media and xenophobia: evidence from Russia NBER Work. Pap 26567 [Google Scholar]
• Cagé J. 2020 . Media competition, information provision and political participation: evidence from French local newspapers and elections, 1944–2014. J. Public Econ. 185 : 104077 [Google Scholar]
• Campante F , Durante R , Sobbrio F 2018 . Politics 2.0: the multifaceted effect of broadband Internet on political participation. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 16 : 1094– 136 [Google Scholar]
• Cantoni D , Yang DY , Yuchtman N , Zhang YJ 2019 . Protests as strategic games: experimental evidence from Hong Kong's antiauthoritarian movement. Q. J. Econ. 134 : 1021– 77 [Google Scholar]
• Chen Y , Yang DY. 2019 . The impact of media censorship: 1984 or brave new world. Am. Econ. Rev. 109 : 2294– 332 [Google Scholar]
• Colantone I , Stanig P. 2018 . The trade origins of economic nationalism: import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. Am. J. Political Sci. 62 : 936– 53 [Google Scholar]
• Conover M , Ratkiewicz J , Francisco M , Goncalves B , Menczer F , Flammini A 2011 . Political polarization on Twitter Paper presented at the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media Barcelona, Spain: July 17– 21 [Google Scholar]
• Dal Bó E , Finan F , Folke O , Persson T , Rickne J 2018 . Economic losers and political winners: Sweden's radical right Work. Pap., Univ. Calif Berkeley: [Google Scholar]
• DellaVigna S , Gentzkow M. 2010 . Persuasion: empirical evidence. Annu. Rev. Econ. 2 : 643– 69 [Google Scholar]
• DellaVigna S , La Ferrara E 2015 . Economic and social impacts of the media. Handbook of Media Economics 1 S Anderson, J Waldfogel, D Stromberg 723– 68 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
• Diamond L , Plattner M. 2010 . Liberation technology. J. Democr. 21 : 69– 83 [Google Scholar]
• Diermeier D. 2011 . Reputation Rules: Strategies for Building Your Company's Most Valuable Asset New York: McGraw-Hill [Google Scholar]
• Donati D. 2019 . Mobile Internet access and political outcomes: evidence from South Africa Work. Pap., Univ. Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Spain: [Google Scholar]
• Dustmann C , Eichengreen B , Otten S , Sapir A , Tabellini G , Zoega G 2017 . Europe's Trust Deficit: Causes and Remedies London: Cent. Econ. Policy Res. [Google Scholar]
• Edmond C. 2013 . Information manipulation, coordination, and regime change. Rev. Econ. Stud. 80 : 1422– 58 [Google Scholar]
• Egorov G , Guriev S , Sonin K 2009 . Why resource-poor dictators allow freer media: a theory and evidence from panel data. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 103 : 645– 68 [Google Scholar]
• Eichengreen B. 2018 . The Populist Temptation: Economic Grievance and Political Reaction in the Modern Era New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Enikolopov R , Makarin A , Petrova M 2020 . Social media and protest participation: evidence from Russia. Econometrica In press [Google Scholar]
• Enikolopov R , Makarin A , Petrova M , Polishchuk L 2017 . Social image, networks, and protest participation Work. Pap., Univ. Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Spain: [Google Scholar]
• Enikolopov R , Petrova M. 2015 . Media capture. Handbook of Media Economics 1 S Anderson,J Waldfogel, D Stromberg 687– 700 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
• Enikolopov R , Petrova M , Sonin K 2018 . Social media and corruption. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 10 : 150– 74 [Google Scholar]
• Falck O , Gold R , Heblich S 2014 . E-lections: voting behavior and the Internet. Am. Econ. Rev. 104 : 2238– 65 [Google Scholar]
• Farrell H. 2012 . The consequences of the Internet for politics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 15 : 35– 52 [Google Scholar]
• Fergusson L , Molina C. 2019 . Facebook causes protests CEDE Work. Pap. 41, Univ. Los Andes Bogotá, Colombia: [Google Scholar]
• Fetzer T. 2019 . Did austerity cause Brexit. Am. Econ. Rev. 109 : 11 3849– 86 [Google Scholar]
• Field M , Wright M. 2018 . Russian trolls sent thousands of pro-Leave messages on day of Brexit referendum, Twitter data reveals. Telegraph Oct. 17 https://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/10/17/russian-iranian-twitter-trolls-sent-10-million-tweets-fake-news/ [Google Scholar]
• Frey CB , Berger T , Chen C 2018 . Political machinery: Did robots swing the 2016 U.S. presidential election?. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 34 : 418– 42 [Google Scholar]
• Furceri D , Papageorgiou C , Ahir H 2019 . Global incidents of corruption index Work. Pap., Int. Monet. Fund Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
• Gavazza A , Nardotto M , Valletti T 2019 . Internet and politics: evidence from U.K. local elections and local government policies. Rev. Econ. Stud. 86 : 2092– 135 [Google Scholar]
• Gennaioli N , Tabellini G. 2019 . Identity, beliefs, and political conflict Work. Pap., Bocconi Univ., Milan Italy: [Google Scholar]
• Gentzkow M , Shapiro JM. 2006 . Media bias and reputation. J. Political Econ. 114 : 280– 316 [Google Scholar]
• Gentzkow M , Shapiro JM. 2011 . Ideological segregation online and offline. Q. J. Econ. 126 : 1799– 839 [Google Scholar]
• Ghonim W. 2012 . Revolution 2.0: The Power of the People Is Greater than the People in Power: A Memoir New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt [Google Scholar]
• Gladwell M. 2010 . Small change: why the revolution won't be tweeted. The New Yorker Sept 27 [Google Scholar]
• González F. 2019 . Collective action in networks: evidence from the Chilean student movement Work. Pap., Pontif. Univ. Catol. Chile Santiago: [Google Scholar]
• González-Bailón S , Borge-Holthoefer J , Rivero A , Moreno Y 2011 . The dynamics of protest recruitment through an online network. Sci. Rep. 1 : 197 [Google Scholar]
• González-Bailón S , Wang N. 2016 . Networked discontent: the anatomy of protest campaigns in social media. Soc. Netw. 44 : 95– 104 [Google Scholar]
• Gorodnichenko Y , Pham T , Talavera O 2018 . Social media, sentiment and public opinions: evidence from #Brexit and #USElection NBER Work. Pap 24631 [Google Scholar]
• Grinberg N , Joseph K , Friedland L , Swire-Thompson B , Lazer D 2019 . Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Science 363 : 374– 78 [Google Scholar]
• Guess A , Lach S , Reifler J 2018 . Selective exposure to misinformation: evidence from the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Work. Pap., Princeton Univ Princeton, NJ: [Google Scholar]
• Guess A , Nagler J , Tucker J 2019 . Less than you think: prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Sci. Adv. 5 : eaau4586 [Google Scholar]
• Guiso L , Herrera H , Morelli M , Sonno T 2018 . Populism: demand and supply EIEF Work. Pap. 1703, Einaudi Inst. Econ. Finance Rome: [Google Scholar]
• Guriev S , Melnikov N , Zhuravskaya E 2020 . 3G Internet and confidence in government CEPR Work. Pap. 14022, Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London: [Google Scholar]
• Halberstam Y , Knight B. 2016 . Homophily, group size, and the diffusion of political information in social networks: evidence from Twitter. J. Public Econ. 143 : 73– 88 [Google Scholar]
• Hendel I , Nyhan B , Reifler J 2017 . Consumers activism: the cottage cheese boycott. RAND J. Econ. 48 : 972– 1003 [Google Scholar]
• Henry E , Zhuravskaya E , Guriev S 2020 . Checking and sharing alt-facts CEPR Work. Pap. 14738, Cent. Econ. Policy Res. London: [Google Scholar]
• Hobbs WR , Roberts ME. 2018 . How sudden censorship can increase access to information. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112 : 621– 36 [Google Scholar]
• Huang H , Yeh YY. 2019 . Information from abroad: foreign media, selective exposure and political support in China. Br. J. Political Sci. 49 : 611– 36 [Google Scholar]
• Independent 2019 . Rise in hate crime is the product of our divisive age—social media giants must now step up to the plate. Independent Feb. 5 https://www.independent.co.uk/voices/editorials/hate-crime-all-party-parliamentary-group-social-media-facebook-twitter-instagram-pinterest-a8764451.html [Google Scholar]
• Inglehart R. 2018 . The age of insecurity: Can democracy save itself. Foreign Aff 97 : 20– 28 [Google Scholar]
• Jones JJ , Bond RM , Bakshy E , Eckles D , Fowler JH 2017 . Social influence and political mobilization: further evidence from a randomized experiment in the 2012 U.S. presidential election. PLOS ONE 12 : e0173851 [Google Scholar]
• King G , Pan J , Roberts ME 2013 . How censorship in China allows government criticism but silences collective expression. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107 : 1– 18 [Google Scholar]
• King G , Pan J , Roberts ME 2014 . Reverse-engineering censorship in China: randomized experimentation and participant observation. Science 345 : 1251722 [Google Scholar]
• King G , Pan J , Roberts ME 2017 . How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111 : 484– 501 [Google Scholar]
• Krastev I. 2018 . Eastern Europe's illiberal revolution: the long road to democratic decline. Foreign Aff 97 : 49– 56 [Google Scholar]
• Larson J , Nagler J , Ronen J , Tucker J 2019 . Social networks and protest participation: evidence from 130 million Twitter users. Am. J. Political Sci. 63 : 690– 705 [Google Scholar]
• Laub Z. 2019 . Hate speech on social media: global comparisons Backgr. Rep., Counc. Foreign Relat New York: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/hate-speech-social-media-global-comparisons [Google Scholar]
• Lelkes Y , Sood G , Iyengar S 2017 . The hostile audience: the effect of access to broadband Internet on partisan affect. Am. J. Political Sci. 61 : 5– 20 [Google Scholar]
• Liu-Thompkins Y. 2019 . A decade of online advertising research: what we learned and what we need to know. J. Advert. 48 : https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2018.1556138 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
• Lorentzen P. 2014 . China's strategic censorship. Am. J. Political Sci. 58 : 402– 14 [Google Scholar]
• Manacorda M , Tesei A. 2020 . Liberation technology: mobile phones and political mobilization in Africa. Econometrica 88 : 533– 67 [Google Scholar]
• Martin D , Shapiro J , Nedashkovskaya M 2018 . Recent trends in online foreign influence efforts. J. Inform. Warfare 18 : https://www.jinfowar.com/journal/volume-18-issue-3/recent-trends-online-foreign-influence-efforts [Google Scholar]
• Miner L. 2015 . The unintended consequences of Internet diffusion: evidence from Malaysia. J. Public Econ. 132 : 66– 78 [Google Scholar]
• Mitchell A , Gottfried J , Fedeli S , Stocking G , Walker M 2019 . Many Americans say made-up news is a critical problem that needs to be fixed Tech. Rep., Pew Res. Cent Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
• Mocanu D , Rossi L , Zhang Q , Karsai M , Quattrociocchi W 2015 . Collective attention in the age of (mis)information. Comput. Hum. Behav. 51 : 1198– 204 [Google Scholar]
• Morozov E. 2011 . The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom New York: Perseus [Google Scholar]
• Mosquera R , Odunowo M , McNamara T , Guo X , Petrie R 2020 . The economic effects of Facebook. Exp. Econ. 23 : 575 – 602 [Google Scholar]
• Mounk Y , Foa RS. 2018 . The end of the democratic century: autocracy's global ascendance. Foreign Aff 97 : 29– 38 [Google Scholar]
• Müller JW. 2016 . What Is Populism ? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press [Google Scholar]
• Müller K , Schwarz CR. 2018 . Fanning the flames of hate: social media and hate crime CAGE Online Work. Pap. Ser. 373, Univ. Warwick Coventry, UK: [Google Scholar]
• Müller K , Schwarz CR. 2019 . From hashtag to hate crime: Twitter and anti-minority sentiment Work. Pap., Princeton Univ Princeton, NJ: [Google Scholar]
• Nyhan B , Porter E , Reifler J , Wood T 2019 . Taking fact-checks literally but not seriously? The effects of journalistic fact-checking on factual beliefs and candidate favorability. Political Behav https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09528-x [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
• Petrova M , Sen A , Yildirim P 2020 . Social media and political contributions: the impact of new technology on political competition Work. Pap., Univ. Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona Spain: [Google Scholar]
• Pomerantsev P. 2019 . This Is Not Propaganda: Adventures in the War Against Reality New York: Faber & Faber [Google Scholar]
• Qin B , Strömberg D , Wu Y 2017 . Why does China allow freer social media? Protests versus surveillance and propaganda. J. Econ. Perspect. 31 : 117– 40 [Google Scholar]
• Qin B , Strömberg D , Wu Y 2019 . Social media, information networks, and protests in China Work. Pap., Stockholm Univ Stockholm, Swed.: [Google Scholar]
• Roberts ME. 2018 . Censored: Distraction and Diversion Inside China's Great Firewall Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Rosenberg M , Confessore N , Cadwalladr C 2018 . How Trump consultants exploited the Facebook data of millions. New York Times March 17 https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/17/us/politics/cambridge-analytica-trump-campaign.html [Google Scholar]
• Rotesi T. 2018 . Do social media matter? The impact of Twitter on political participation Work. Pap., Bocconi Univ., Milan Italy: [Google Scholar]
• Schaub M , Morisi D. 2019 . Voter mobilisation in the echo chamber: broadband Internet and the rise of populism in Europe. Eur. J. Political Res. In press https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12373 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
• Settle JE. 2018 . Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Shane S. 2017 . The fake Americans Russia created to influence the election. New York Times Sept. 7 https://www.nytimes.com/2017/09/07/us/politics/russia-facebook-twitter-election.html [Google Scholar]
• Sifry ML. 2011 . Wikileaks and the Age of Transparency Berkeley, CA: Counterpoint [Google Scholar]
• Silverman C. 2016 . This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on Facebook. BuzzFeed Nov. 16 www.buzzfeed.com/craigsilverman/viral-fake-election-news-outperformed-real-news-on-facebook [Google Scholar]
• Steinert-Threlkeld ZC , Mocanu D , Vespignani A , Fowler J 2015 . Online social networks and offline protest. EPJ Data Sci 4 : 19 [Google Scholar]
• Sunstein CR. 2001 . Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Sunstein CR. 2017 . #republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
• Swire B , Berinsky A , Lewandowsky, Ecker U 2017 . Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon. R. Soc. Open Sci. 4 : https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160802 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
• Theocharis Y , Barberá P , Fazekas Z , Popa SA , Parnet O 2016 . A bad workman blames his tweets: the consequences of citizens' uncivil Twitter use when interacting with party candidates. J. Commun. 66 : 1007– 31 [Google Scholar]
• Tucker JA , Roberts ME , Barberá P , Theocharis Y 2017 . From liberation to turmoil: social media and democracy. J. Democr. 28 : 46– 59 [Google Scholar]
• Tufekci Z. 2018 . How social media took us from Tahrir Square to Donald Trump. MIT Technology Review Aug 14 [Google Scholar]
• Van Kessel S. 2015 . Populist Parties in Europe London: Palgrave Macmillan [Google Scholar]
• Vosoughi S , Roy D , Aral S 2018 . The spread of true and false news online. Science 359 : 1146– 51 [Google Scholar]
• Article Type: Review Article

Most Read This Month

Most cited most cited rss feed, power laws in economics and finance, the gravity model, the china shock: learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade, microeconomics of technology adoption, financial literacy, financial education, and economic outcomes, gender and competition, corruption in developing countries, the economics of human development and social mobility, the roots of gender inequality in developing countries, weak instruments in instrumental variables regression: theory and practice.

Upto 60% Off on UPSC Online Courses

• UPSC Online
• UPSC offline and Hybrid
• UPSC Optional Coaching
• UPPCS Online
• BPSC Online
• MPSC Online
• MPPSC Online
• WBPSC Online
• OPSC Online
• UPPCS Offline Coaching
• BPSC Offline Coaching
• UPSC Test Series
• State PSC Test Series
• DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS
• SUBJECT WISE CURRENT AFFAIRS
• DAILY EDITORIAL ANALYSIS
• DAILY CURRENT AFFAIRS QUIZ
• Daily Prelims(MCQs) Practice
• Daily Mains Answer Writing
• Free Resources

• Offline Centres
• NCERT Notes
• UDAAN Notes
• UPSC Syllabus
• UPSC Prelims PYQs
• UPSC Mains PYQs

Impact of Social Media on Indian Politics

In the digital age, the convergence of communication and technology has given rise to a social media that has transcended geographical boundaries and revolutionized political engagement.  

Impact of Social Media On Indian Politics

In the context of Indian politics, the impact of social media is both profound and far-reaching.

• According to data from analytics firm Social Blade, infotainment creator Dhruv Rathee gained 2.5 million subscribers on YouTube in April alone.
• Similarly, since January, television journalists turned-digital news influencers such as Ravish Kumar and Abhisar Sharma, have seen a significant bump in monthly views on their channels—a rise of 175% and 115%, respectively.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Course

About Social Media & Its Usage

• Refers: It refers to means of interactions among people in which they create, share, and/or exchange information and ideas in virtual communities and networks.
• Statistics: As per Data Reportal, India was home to 462.0 million social media users in January 2024, equating to 32.2 percent of the total population. 
• Connecting with people to share updates about government schemes and flagship programmes.
• Share about upcoming national events.

• During Covid, social media was a boon as people could directly contact for help.

The Rise of Digital Democracy

• Digital Revolution: In recent years, India has witnessed an exponential growth in internet penetration and smartphone usage, catapulting millions of citizens onto various social media platforms. 

• Democratization of Political Discourse: This digital revolution has democratized political discourse, providing individuals from diverse socio-economic backgrounds with a virtual platform to voice their opinions, connect with like-minded individuals, and hold elected representatives accountable.

• Micro-Targeting and Personalization: Political parties are using data analytics and artificial intelligence to tailor their messages and target specific demographics with precision. 
• Influencer Marketing: Influencers and social media personalities wield significant influence over their followers. Political parties are using this phenomenon by collaborating with influencers to amplify their messaging, increase visibility and sway public opinion.
• Real-Time Communication: Using social media platforms, from live streaming rallies to hosting interactive sessions, politicians are leveraging these platforms to cultivate a more authentic and accessible image.

Laws & Regulations on Governing Media

• Section 69-A: It gives the right to the authority to take down any content on the internet against the sovereignty and integrity of India and the security of the states, apart from other reasons. 
• The Press Council of India: It is a statutory body that keeps vigil on fake news. It is the self-regulatory watchdog of the press, for the press and by the press, that operates under the Press Council Act of 1978.
• Laws Governing Media Conduct During Elections: During elections, media regulation primarily falls outside the purview of the Election Commission. However, the Commission is tasked with enforcing laws and court directives that may intersect with media activities.
• Section 126 of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: It prohibits the display of any election-related content via cinematograph, television, or similar devices during the 48-hour period leading up to the conclusion of the polls.
• Section 126A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: It prohibits the conduct of exit polls and the dissemination of their results during specified periods, including the time leading up to the commencement of polls in the first phase and a half-hour after the close of polls for the last phase across all states and union territories.
• Section 127A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951: It governs the printing and publication of election-related materials such as pamphlets and posters, mandating that they bear the names and addresses of the printer and publisher.
• Section 171H of the Indian Penal Code: It prohibits the incurring of expenditures on advertisements and other activities related to elections without the authorization of the contesting candidate.

Enroll now for UPSC Online Classes

Positive Impact of Social Media on Indian Politics

• Example: Pariksha Pe Charcha, the event holds interaction between teachers and students who are given an opportunity to meet and communicate with PM Modi.
• Moreover, it has paved the way for citizen journalism, enabling ordinary individuals to report news and hold those in power accountable.
• Revolutionizing Election Campaigns: Hashtags, live sessions and group chats became indispensable for political parties, enabling them to interact directly with constituents, address concerns, and showcase achievements. 
• Examples: Movements like the Anti-Corruption Movement and the Nirbhaya protests found a platform on social media, enabling individuals to express grievances, organize protests, and garner public support. 
• Reshaping Campaign Funding: Crowdfunding and micro-donations through social media have democratized the funding process, enabling smaller parties and independent candidates to compete with more established players. 
• Reshaping Data Analytics: The advent of data analytics and sentiment-tracking tools has revolutionized election forecasting and public sentiment analysis and offers valuable insights for campaign strategists.
• Example: The Saksham App of ECI provides a number of features to help PwDs register to vote, find their polling station, and cast their vote.

Arising Challenges that Need to be Tackled

• Fake News and Misinformation: The proliferation of fake news and misinformation poses a significant threat to the integrity of political conversations. The rapid sharing of unverified content can distort facts and manipulate public opinion. 

• It poses a risk to societal unity and constructive discourse. Moreover, the anonymity granted by social media can foster online harassment and the spread of hate speech.
• Example: The German study found local outages of Facebook (due to technical faults or internet interruptions, for example) decreased violence in those locations. Also, 50% less anti-refugee sentiment on social media would reduce violent incidents by 12.6%.

• Example: India has over 820 million active internet users, with more coming from rural areas. The number of non-active internet users is declining. Women lag behind men in internet usage.
• Unequal Participation: Social media distorts policymakers’ perception of public opinion as it is believed that these social media platforms tend to represent every walk of life, but not everyone’s voice is heard equally.
• Disparity: The distribution of effects around the world was also striking. Positive effects on political participation and information consumption were most pronounced in emerging democracies in South America, Africa and Asia. Negative effects were more evident in established democracies in Europe and the United States.

Way Forward

• Media Literacy: There is a need for investing in media literacy programs to equip citizens with the critical thinking skills necessary to identify fact from fiction and navigate the digital landscape responsibly.
• Transparency and Accountability: Political parties and social media platforms must adopt transparency and accountability measures to combat misinformation, protect user data, and uphold ethical standards.
• Maintaining a balance between freedom of the press and addressing misinformation or fake news is required.
• Digital Inclusion: Bridging the digital divide through targeted interventions aimed at expanding access to digital infrastructure, promoting digital literacy, and fostering inclusive online spaces for political engagement.
• Role by Election Commission of India (ECI): The ECI must ensure parity of treatment between political advertising on social media and traditional media and should strictly enforce model code of conduct and should increase vigilance on cyber activities of political parties.

The symbiotic relationship between social media and Indian politics is a double-edged sword, replete with opportunities and challenges. As technology evolves, it is imperative for policymakers, tech companies, and society at large to collaboratively navigate this terrain, harnessing the benefits of social media while mitigating its potential pitfalls.

To get PDF version, Please click on "Print PDF" button.

• Recent Post
• Related Post
• Most Viewed Post

News in Shorts: 08 August 2024

Chhattisgarh approves country’s third largest tiger reserv...

Rising Ozone Pollution in Urban India: CSE Report

India’s Own Natural Methane Mitigator

Draft Broadcast Services Bill 2024

Hidden Hormone

Social Stock Exchange

Prime- minister’s egypt state visit, arsenic and fluoride in groundwater, who launches icd 11 – a traditional medicine module 2:..., latest comments, recent editorial.

An Antitrust Complaint Against Google

Could India Experience a Bangladesh like Crisis?

Powering Up to Get to the $30-trillion Economy Poi...

Why Centre’s Move To Revamp Waqf Boards Has ...

The Social Benefits Of Stock Market Speculation

India’s Clean Energy Transition, Powering In...

Popular current affairs

Chhattisgarh approves country’s third largest ti...

Our Courses

THE MOST LEARNING PLATFORM

Learn From India's Best Faculty

Our Initiatives

Beginner’s roadmap, quick links.

PW-Only IAS came together specifically to carry their individual visions in a mission mode. Infusing affordability with quality and building a team where maximum members represent their experiences of Mains and Interview Stage and hence, their reliability to better understand and solve student issues.

Subscribe our Newsletter

Sign up now for our exclusive newsletter and be the first to know about our latest Initiatives, Quality Content, and much more.

Contact Details

G-Floor,4-B Pusha Road, New Delhi, 110060

• +91 9920613613
• [email protected]

Download Our App

Biginner's roadmap, suscribe now form, fill the required details to get early access of quality content..

Join Us Now

(Promise! We Will Not Spam You.)

CURRENT AF.

<div class="new-fform">

Select centre Online Mode Hybrid Mode PWonlyIAS Delhi (ORN) PWonlyIAS Delhi (MN) PWonlyIAS Lucknow PWonlyIAS Patna Other

Select course UPSC Online PSC ONline UPSC + PSC ONLINE UPSC Offline PSC Offline UPSC+PSC Offline UPSC Hybrid PSC Hybrid UPSC+PSC Hybrid Other

</div>

Numbers, Facts and Trends Shaping Your World

Read our research on:

Full Topic List

Regions & Countries

• Publications
• Our Methods
• Short Reads
• Tools & Resources

Read Our Research On:

• Social Media Seen as Mostly Good for Democracy Across Many Nations, But U.S. is a Major Outlier
• 2. Views of social media and its impacts on society

Table of Contents

• Most do not think they can influence politics in their country
• Widespread smartphone ownership while very few do not own a mobile phone at all
• Most say they use social media sites
• Frequent posting about social or political issues on social media is uncommon
• Acknowledgments
• Appendix A: Classifying democracies
• Appendix B: Negative Impact of the Internet and Social Media Index
• Appendix C: Political categorization
• Classifying parties as populist
• Classifying parties as left, right or center
• Appendix E: Country-specific examples of smartphones
• Appendix F: Country-specific examples of social media sites
• Methodology

When asked whether social media is a good or bad thing for democracy in their country, a median of 57% across 19 countries say that it is a good thing. In almost every country, close to half or more say this, with the sentiment most common in Singapore, where roughly three-quarters believe social media is a good thing for democracy in their country. However, in the Netherlands and France, about four-in-ten agree. And in the U.S., only around a third think social media is positive for democracy – the smallest share among all 19 countries surveyed.

In eight countries, those who believe that the political system in their country allows them to have an influence on politics are also more likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy. This gap is most evident in Belgium, where 62% of those who feel their political system allows them to have a say in politics also say that social media is a good thing for democracy in their country, compared with 44% among those who say that their political system does not allow them much influence on politics.

Those who view the spread of false information online as a major threat to their country are less likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy, compared with those who view the spread of misinformation online as either a minor threat or not a threat at all. This is most clearly observed in the Netherlands, where only four-in-ten (39%) among those who see the spread of false information online as a major threat say that social media has been a good thing for democracy in their country, as opposed to the nearly six-in-ten (57%) among those who do not consider the spread of misinformation online to be a threat who say the same. This pattern is evident in eight other countries as well.

Views also vary by age. Older adults in 12 countries are less likely to say that social media is a good thing for democracy in their country when compared to their younger counterparts. In Japan, France, Israel, Hungary, the UK and Australia, the gap between the youngest and oldest age groups is at least 20 percentage points and ranges as high as 41 points in Poland, where nearly nine-in-ten (87%) younger adults say that social media has been a good thing for democracy in the country and only 46% of adults over 50 say the same.

The perceived impacts of the internet and social media on society

The publics surveyed believe the internet and social media are affecting societies. Across the six issues tested, few tend to say they see no changes due to increased connectivity – instead seeing things changing both positively and negatively – and often both at the same time. 

A median of 84% say technological connectivity has made people easier to manipulate with false information and rumors – the most among the six issues tested. Despite this, medians of 73% describe people being more informed about both current events in other countries and about events in their own country. Indeed, in most countries, those who think social media has made it easier to manipulate people with misinformation and rumors are also more likely to think that social media has made people more informed.

When it comes to politics, the internet and social media are generally seen as disruptive, with a median of 65% saying that people are now more divided in their political opinions. Some of this may be due to the sense – shared by a median of 44% across the 19 countries – that access to the internet and social media has led people to be less civil in the way they talk about politics. Despite this, slightly more people (a median of 45%) still say connectivity has made people more accepting of people from different ethnic groups, religions and races than say it has made people less accepting (22%) or had no effect (29%). 

There is widespread concern over misinformation – and a sense that people are more susceptible to manipulation

Previously reported results indicate that a median of 70% across the 19 countries surveyed believe that the spread of false information online is a major threat to their country. In places like Canada, Germany and Malaysia, more people name this as a threat than say the same of any of the other issues asked about. 

This sense of threat is related to the widespread belief that people today are now easier to manipulate with false information and rumors thanks to the internet and social media. Around half or more in every country surveyed shares this view. And in places like the Netherlands, Australia and the UK, around nine-in-ten see people as more manipulable.

In many places, younger people – who tend to be more likely to use social media (for more on usage, see Chapter 3 ) – are also more likely to say it makes people easier to manipulate with false information and rumors. For example, in South Korea, 90% of those under age 30 say social media makes people easier to manipulate, compared with 65% of those 50 and older. (Interestingly, U.S.-focused research has found older adults are more likely to share misinformation than younger ones.) People with more education are also often more likely than those with less education to say that social media has led to people being easier to manipulate.

In 2018, when Pew Research Center asked a similar question about whether access to mobile phones, the internet and social media has made people easier to manipulate with false information and rumors, the results were largely similar. Across the 11 emerging economies surveyed as part of that project , at least half in every country thought this was the case and in many places, around three-quarters or more saw this as an issue. Large shares in many places were also specifically concerned that people in their country might be manipulated by domestic politicians. For more on how the two surveys compare, see “ In advanced and emerging economies, similar views on how social media affects democracy and society .”

Spotlight on the U.S.: Attitudes and experiences with misinformation

Misinformation has long been seen as a source of concern for Americans. In 2016 , for example, in the wake of the U.S. presidential election, 64% of U.S. adults thought completely made-up news had caused a great deal of confusion about the basic facts of current events. At the time, around a third felt that they often encountered political news online that was completely made up and another half said they often encountered news that was not fully accurate. Moreover, about a quarter (23%) said they had shared such stories – whether knowingly or not.

When asked in 2019 who was the cause of made-up news, Americans largely singled out two groups of people: political leaders (57%) and activists (53%). Fewer placed blame on journalists (36%), foreign actors (35%) or the public (26%). A large majority of Americans that year (82%) also described themselves as either “very” or “somewhat” concerned about the potential impact of made-up news on the 2020 presidential election. People who followed political and election news more closely and those with higher levels of political knowledge also tended to be more concerned.

Among adult American Twitter users in 2021, in particular, there was widespread concern about misinformation: 53% said inaccurate or misleading information is a major problem on the platform and 33% reported seeing a lot of that type of content when using the site. 

As of 2021 , around half (48%) of Americans thought the government should take steps to restrict false information, even if it meant losing freedom to access and publish content – a share that had increased somewhat substantially since 2018, when 39% felt the same.

Most say people are more informed about current events – foreign and domestic – thanks to social media and the internet

A majority in every country surveyed thinks that access to the internet and social media has made people in their country more informed about domestic current events. In Sweden, Japan, Greece and the Netherlands, around eight-in-ten or more share this view, while in Malaysia, a smaller majority (56%) says the same.

Younger adults tend to see social media making people more informed than older adults do. Older adults, for their part, don’t necessarily see the internet and social media making people less informed about what’s happening in their country; rather, they’re somewhat more likely to describe these platforms as having little effect on people’s information levels. In the case of the U.S., for example, 71% of adults under 30 say social media has made people more informed about current events in the U.S., compared with 60% of those ages 50 and older. But those ages 50 and older are about twice as likely to say social media has not had much impact on how informed people are compared with those under 30: 19% vs. 11%, respectively.

In seven of the surveyed countries, people with higher levels of education are more likely than those with lower levels to see social media informing the public on current events in their own country.

Majorities in every country also agree that the internet and social media are making people more informed about current events happening in other countries. The two questions are extremely highly correlated ( r = 0.94), meaning that in most places where people say social media is making people more informed about domestic events, they also say the same of international events. (See the topline for detailed results for both questions, by country.)

In the 2018 survey of emerging economies , results of a slightly different question also found that a majority in every country – and around seven-in-ten or more in most places – said people were more informed thanks to social media, the internet and smartphones, rather than less. 

In some countries, those who think social media has made it easier to manipulate people with misinformation and rumors are also more likely to think that social media has made people more informed. This finding, too, was similar in the 2018 11-country study of emerging economies: Generally speaking, individuals who are most attuned to the potential benefits technology can bring to the political domain are also the ones most anxious about the possible harms. 

Spotlight on the U.S.: Social media use and news consumption

In the U.S. , around half of adults say they either get news often (17%) or sometimes (33%) from social media. When it comes to where Americans regularly get news on social media, Facebook outpaces all other social media sites. Roughly a third of U.S. adults (31%) say they regularly get news from Facebook. While Twitter is only used by about three-in-ten U.S. adults (27%), about half of its users (53%) turn to the site to regularly get news there. And a quarter of U.S. adults regularly get news from YouTube, while smaller shares get news from Instagram (13%), TikTok (10%) or Reddit (8%). Notably, TikTok has seen rapid growth as a source of news among younger Americans in recent years.

On several social media sites asked about, adults under 30 make up the largest share of those who regularly get news on the site. For example, half or more of regular news consumers on Snapchat (67%), TikTok (52%) or Reddit (50%) are ages 18 to 29. 

While this survey finds that 64% of Americans think the public has become more informed thanks to social media, results of Center analyses do show that Americans who mainly got election and political information on social media during the 2020 election were less knowledgeable and less engaged than those who primarily got their news through other methods (like cable TV, print, etc.).

Majorities or pluralities tend to see social media leading to more political divisions

Around half or more in almost every country surveyed think social media has made people more divided in their political opinions. The U.S., South Korea and the Netherlands are particularly likely to hold this view. As a separate analysis shows, the former two also stand out for being the countries where people are most likely to report conflicts between people who support different political parties . While perceived political division in the Netherlands is somewhat lower, it, too, stands apart: Between 2021 and 2022, the share who said there were conflicts increased by 23 percentage points – among the highest year-on-year shifts evident in the survey.

More broadly, across each of the countries surveyed, people who see social division between people who support different political parties, are, in general, more likely to see social media leading people to be more divided in their political opinions.

In a number of countries, younger people are somewhat more likely to see social media enlarging political differences than older people. More educated people, too, often see social media exacerbating political divisions more than those with less education. 

Similarly, in the survey of 11 emerging economies conducted in 2018, results of a slightly different question indicated that around four-in-ten or more in every country – and a majority in most places – thought social media had made people more divided.

Publics diverge over whether social media has made people more accepting of differences

There is less consensus over what role social media has played when it comes to tolerance: A 19-country median of 45% say it has made people more accepting of people from different ethnic backgrounds, religions and races, while a median of 22% say it has made them less so, and 29% say that it has not had much impact either way.

South Korea, Singapore, Italy and Japan are the most likely to see social media making people more tolerant. On the flip side, the Netherlands and Hungary stand out as the two countries where a plurality says the internet and social media have made people less accepting of people with racial or religious differences. Most other societies are somewhat divided, as in the case of the U.S., where around a third of the public falls into each of the three groups.

Younger people are more likely than older ones in most countries to say that social media has increased tolerance. This is the case, for example, in Canada, where 54% of adults under 30 say social media has contributed to people being more accepting of people from different ethnic groups, religions and races, compared with a third of those ages 50 and older. In some places – and in Canada – older people are more likely to see social media leading to less tolerance, though in other places, older people are simply less likely to see much impact from the technology.

In most countries, people who see social media leading to more divisions between people with different political opinions are more likely to say social media has made people less accepting of those racially and religiously different from them than those who say social media is having no effect on political division. People who see more conflicts between partisans in their society are also more likely than those who see fewer divisions to place some of the blame on social media, describing it as making people less accepting of differences.  

Results of an analysis of the 11-country poll did find that people who used smartphones and social media were more likely to regularly interact with people from diverse backgrounds – though the question did not ask about acceptance , just about interactions. The publics in these emerging economies were also somewhat divided when it came to their opinions on how social media has led to people being more or less accepting of those with different viewpoints.

Mixed views on whether social media has made people discuss politics civilly

Across the countries surveyed, a median of 46% say access to the internet and social media has made people less civil when they talk about politics. This is more than the 23% who say it has made them more civil – though a median of 26% see little impact either way.

In the U.S., the Netherlands and Australia, a majority sees the internet and social media making people less civil. Roughly seven-in-ten Americans say this. Singapore stands out as the only country where around half see these technologies increasing civility. All other countries surveyed are somewhat divided.

People with higher levels of education tend to see less civility thanks to social media relative to those with lower levels of education.

In most places surveyed, those who think social media has made people more divided politically, compared with those who say it has had no impact on divisions, are also more likely to say social media has made people less civil in how they talk about politics.

Majorities view social media as a way to raise awareness among the public and elected officials

Across advanced economies, people generally recognize social media as useful for bringing the public’s and elected officials’ attention to certain issues, for changing people’s minds and for influencing policy choices. A median of 77% across the 19 countries surveyed say social media is an effective way to raise public awareness about sociopolitical issues. Those in the UK are particularly optimistic about social media as a way of bringing public attention to a topic, with about nine-in-ten holding this belief. People in France and Belgium are the least convinced about social media’s role in raising public awareness, but majorities in both countries still say it’s effective for highlighting certain issues among the public.

Many also consider social media effective for changing people’s minds on social or political issues (65% median). Confidence in social media’s effect on changing people’s minds is strongest in South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia. Germans, Belgians, Israelis and French adults are more skeptical, with no more than about half seeing social media as effective for changing people’s minds on sociopolitical issues.

Views on social media as a way to bring the attention of elected officials to certain issues are similar. A median of 64% consider social media effective for directing elected officials’ attention to issues, and this view is especially prevalent in South Korea, Singapore and Malaysia. People in Belgium, Hungary and France are less convinced.

Somewhat fewer consider social media effective for influencing policy decisions (61% median). Israelis are particularly doubtful of social media as a way for affecting policy change: A majority of Israelis say social media is an ineffective way of influencing policy decisions, and about half in France, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany agree. About a fifth in Poland also did not provide an answer.

An additional question was asked in the U.S. about social media’s role in creating sustained social movements; roughly seven-in-ten Americans say social media is effective for this. Younger Americans, as well as those with more education or higher incomes, are more likely than others to hold this view. Social media users and those who say social media has been generally good for U.S. democracy are also more likely to believe social media is effective at creating sustained social movements.

Age plays a role in how people in many of the 19 nations surveyed view social media’s role in public discourse. Those ages 18 to 29 are especially likely to see social media as effective for raising public awareness. For example, in France, 70% of those ages 18 to 29 see social media as an effective way of raising public awareness. Only 48% of those 50 and older share this view, a difference of 22 percentage points.

Similarly, younger adults are also more likely to consider social media an effective way for changing people’s minds on issues. The difference is greatest in Poland and Germany, where younger adults are 24 points more likely than their older counterparts to see social media this way. There are fewer differences between younger and older adults when it comes to social media’s effectiveness for directing elected officials’ attention and influencing policy decisions. Younger adults are also generally more likely to be social media users and provide answers to these questions.

Education and income are other demographic characteristics related to people’s view of social media as a way to influence public discourse. In 11 countries, those with incomes higher than the median income are more likely than those with lower incomes to consider social media effective for raising public awareness about sociopolitical issues. Those with more education are similarly more likely to consider social media effective for elevating sociopolitical issues in the public consciousness in eight countries. People with lower levels of education and income are somewhat less likely than others to provide answers to questions about social media’s effectiveness for influencing policies, changing minds and bringing attention to issues.

Social media usage is also connected to how people evaluate these platforms as a way to affect public discourse and policy choices. In nearly all countries, social media users are more likely than those who are not on social media to say social media is effective for raising public awareness, and social media users are also more likely to consider social media useful for changing people’s minds in 11 of 19 countries. The differences are greatest in Israel in both cases. Israeli social media users are 47 points more likely than non-users to say social media is effective for raising awareness and 38 points more likely to consider it effective for changing people’s minds on sociopolitical issues. Different views between social media users and non-users are less common when it comes to social media as an effective way for bringing elected officials’ attention to issues or influencing policy decisions. Social media users are also more likely than non-users to answer these questions.

Among social media users, those who are more active are more likely to consider social media an effective avenue for shaping people’s views and attention. Those who post about political or social issues at least sometimes on social media have a greater chance of seeing social media as effective for raising awareness for sociopolitical issues than those who post rarely or never in 16 countries. For example, in Spain, 84% of social media users who post sometimes or often see social media as an effective way to bring awareness to issues, compared to 71% of users who never or rarely post. Similarly, social media users who post more frequently are more likely to see social media as effective for changing minds in 13 countries, for influencing policy decisions in 15 countries, and bringing elected officials’ attention to issues in 12 nations.

People’s views of social media as a way to spread awareness or affect change are additionally related to how they see democracy. The beliefs that social media is effective for influencing policy decisions and for bringing issues to the attention of elected officials or the public are especially common among people who also believe they have a say in politics. For example, in Germany, 60% of people who say people like them have at least a fair amount of influence on politics also say social media is effective for affecting policy choices. In comparison, 43% of Germans who do not think they have a say in politics also think social media can influence policy decisions.

Sign up for our weekly newsletter

Fresh data delivery Saturday mornings

Sign up for The Briefing

Weekly updates on the world of news & information

• Global Tech & Cybersecurity
• International Political Values
• Internet Connectivity
• Misinformation
• Political Discourse
• Politics & Media
• Politics Online
• Smartphones
• Social Media
• Social Media & the News
• Trust, Facts & Democracy
• U.S. Democracy

72% of Americans say the U.S. used to be a good example of democracy, but isn’t anymore

Satisfaction with democracy has declined in recent years in high-income nations, more than 80% of americans believe elected officials don’t care what people like them think, support for democracy is strong in hong kong and taiwan, how people in 24 countries think democracy can improve, most popular, report materials.

• Detailed tables: Internet, smartphone and social media use in advanced economies (2022)
• American Trends Panel Wave 105
• Spring 2022 Survey Data

901 E St. NW, Suite 300 Washington, DC 20004 USA (+1) 202-419-4300 | Main (+1) 202-857-8562 | Fax (+1) 202-419-4372 |  Media Inquiries

Research Topics

• Email Newsletters

ABOUT PEW RESEARCH CENTER  Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research Center does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of  The Pew Charitable Trusts .

© 2024 Pew Research Center

Feb 15, 2023

6 Example Essays on Social Media | Advantages, Effects, and Outlines

Got an essay assignment about the effects of social media we got you covered check out our examples and outlines below.

Social media has become one of our society's most prominent ways of communication and information sharing in a very short time. It has changed how we communicate and has given us a platform to express our views and opinions and connect with others. It keeps us informed about the world around us. Social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and LinkedIn have brought individuals from all over the world together, breaking down geographical borders and fostering a genuinely global community.

However, social media comes with its difficulties. With the rise of misinformation, cyberbullying, and privacy problems, it's critical to utilize these platforms properly and be aware of the risks. Students in the academic world are frequently assigned essays about the impact of social media on numerous elements of our lives, such as relationships, politics, and culture. These essays necessitate a thorough comprehension of the subject matter, critical thinking, and the ability to synthesize and convey information clearly and succinctly.

But where do you begin? It can be challenging to know where to start with so much information available. Jenni.ai comes in handy here. Jenni.ai is an AI application built exclusively for students to help them write essays more quickly and easily. Jenni.ai provides students with inspiration and assistance on how to approach their essays with its enormous database of sample essays on a variety of themes, including social media. Jenni.ai is the solution you've been looking for if you're experiencing writer's block or need assistance getting started.

So, whether you're a student looking to better your essay writing skills or want to remain up to date on the latest social media advancements, Jenni.ai is here to help. Jenni.ai is the ideal tool for helping you write your finest essay ever, thanks to its simple design, an extensive database of example essays, and cutting-edge AI technology. So, why delay? Sign up for a free trial of Jenni.ai today and begin exploring the worlds of social networking and essay writing!

Want to learn how to write an argumentative essay? Check out these inspiring examples!

We will provide various examples of social media essays so you may get a feel for the genre.

6 Examples of Social Media Essays

Here are 6 examples of Social Media Essays:

The Impact of Social Media on Relationships and Communication

Introduction:.

The way we share information and build relationships has evolved as a direct result of the prevalence of social media in our daily lives. The influence of social media on interpersonal connections and conversation is a hot topic. Although social media has many positive effects, such as bringing people together regardless of physical proximity and making communication quicker and more accessible, it also has a dark side that can affect interpersonal connections and dialogue.

Positive Effects:

Connecting People Across Distances

One of social media's most significant benefits is its ability to connect individuals across long distances. People can use social media platforms to interact and stay in touch with friends and family far away. People can now maintain intimate relationships with those they care about, even when physically separated.

Improved Communication Speed and Efficiency

Additionally, the proliferation of social media sites has accelerated and simplified communication. Thanks to instant messaging, users can have short, timely conversations rather than lengthy ones via email. Furthermore, social media facilitates group communication, such as with classmates or employees, by providing a unified forum for such activities.

Negative Effects:

Decreased Face-to-Face Communication

The decline in in-person interaction is one of social media's most pernicious consequences on interpersonal connections and dialogue. People's reliance on digital communication over in-person contact has increased along with the popularity of social media. Face-to-face interaction has suffered as a result, which has adverse effects on interpersonal relationships and the development of social skills.

Decreased Emotional Intimacy

Another adverse effect of social media on relationships and communication is decreased emotional intimacy. Digital communication lacks the nonverbal cues and facial expressions critical in building emotional connections with others. This can make it more difficult for people to develop close and meaningful relationships, leading to increased loneliness and isolation.

Increased Conflict and Miscommunication

Finally, social media can also lead to increased conflict and miscommunication. The anonymity and distance provided by digital communication can lead to misunderstandings and hurtful comments that might not have been made face-to-face. Additionally, social media can provide a platform for cyberbullying , which can have severe consequences for the victim's mental health and well-being.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, the impact of social media on relationships and communication is a complex issue with both positive and negative effects. While social media platforms offer many benefits, such as connecting people across distances and enabling faster and more accessible communication, they also have a dark side that can negatively affect relationships and communication. It is up to individuals to use social media responsibly and to prioritize in-person communication in their relationships and interactions with others.

The Role of Social Media in the Spread of Misinformation and Fake News

Social media has revolutionized the way information is shared and disseminated. However, the ease and speed at which data can be spread on social media also make it a powerful tool for spreading misinformation and fake news. Misinformation and fake news can seriously affect public opinion, influence political decisions, and even cause harm to individuals and communities.

The Pervasiveness of Misinformation and Fake News on Social Media

Misinformation and fake news are prevalent on social media platforms, where they can spread quickly and reach a large audience. This is partly due to the way social media algorithms work, which prioritizes content likely to generate engagement, such as sensational or controversial stories. As a result, false information can spread rapidly and be widely shared before it is fact-checked or debunked.

The Influence of Social Media on Public Opinion

Social media can significantly impact public opinion, as people are likelier to believe the information they see shared by their friends and followers. This can lead to a self-reinforcing cycle, where misinformation and fake news are spread and reinforced, even in the face of evidence to the contrary.

The Challenge of Correcting Misinformation and Fake News

Correcting misinformation and fake news on social media can be a challenging task. This is partly due to the speed at which false information can spread and the difficulty of reaching the same audience exposed to the wrong information in the first place. Additionally, some individuals may be resistant to accepting correction, primarily if the incorrect information supports their beliefs or biases.

In conclusion, the function of social media in disseminating misinformation and fake news is complex and urgent. While social media has revolutionized the sharing of information, it has also made it simpler for false information to propagate and be widely believed. Individuals must be accountable for the information they share and consume, and social media firms must take measures to prevent the spread of disinformation and fake news on their platforms.

The Effects of Social Media on Mental Health and Well-Being

Social media has become an integral part of modern life, with billions of people around the world using platforms like Facebook, Instagram, and Twitter to stay connected with others and access information. However, while social media has many benefits, it can also negatively affect mental health and well-being.

Comparison and Low Self-Esteem

One of the key ways that social media can affect mental health is by promoting feelings of comparison and low self-esteem. People often present a curated version of their lives on social media, highlighting their successes and hiding their struggles. This can lead others to compare themselves unfavorably, leading to feelings of inadequacy and low self-esteem.

Cyberbullying and Online Harassment

Another way that social media can negatively impact mental health is through cyberbullying and online harassment. Social media provides a platform for anonymous individuals to harass and abuse others, leading to feelings of anxiety, fear, and depression.

Social Isolation

Despite its name, social media can also contribute to feelings of isolation. At the same time, people may have many online friends but need more meaningful in-person connections and support. This can lead to feelings of loneliness and depression.

Addiction and Overuse

Finally, social media can be addictive, leading to overuse and negatively impacting mental health and well-being. People may spend hours each day scrolling through their feeds, neglecting other important areas of their lives, such as work, family, and self-care.

In sum, social media has positive and negative consequences on one's psychological and emotional well-being. Realizing this, and taking measures like reducing one's social media use, reaching out to loved ones for help, and prioritizing one's well-being, are crucial. In addition, it's vital that social media giants take ownership of their platforms and actively encourage excellent mental health and well-being.

The Use of Social Media in Political Activism and Social Movements

Social media has recently become increasingly crucial in political action and social movements. Platforms such as Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram have given people new ways to express themselves, organize protests, and raise awareness about social and political issues.

Raising Awareness and Mobilizing Action

One of the most important uses of social media in political activity and social movements has been to raise awareness about important issues and mobilize action. Hashtags such as #MeToo and #BlackLivesMatter, for example, have brought attention to sexual harassment and racial injustice, respectively. Similarly, social media has been used to organize protests and other political actions, allowing people to band together and express themselves on a bigger scale.

Connecting with like-minded individuals

A second method in that social media has been utilized in political activity and social movements is to unite like-minded individuals. Through social media, individuals can join online groups, share knowledge and resources, and work with others to accomplish shared objectives. This has been especially significant for geographically scattered individuals or those without access to traditional means of political organizing.

Challenges and Limitations

As a vehicle for political action and social movements, social media has faced many obstacles and restrictions despite its many advantages. For instance, the propagation of misinformation and fake news on social media can impede attempts to disseminate accurate and reliable information. In addition, social media corporations have been condemned for censorship and insufficient protection of user rights.

In conclusion, social media has emerged as a potent instrument for political activism and social movements, giving voice to previously unheard communities and galvanizing support for change. Social media presents many opportunities for communication and collaboration. Still, users and institutions must be conscious of the risks and limitations of these tools to promote their responsible and productive usage.

The Potential Privacy Concerns Raised by Social Media Use and Data Collection Practices

With billions of users each day on sites like Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram, social media has ingrained itself into every aspect of our lives. While these platforms offer a straightforward method to communicate with others and exchange information, they also raise significant concerns over data collecting and privacy. This article will examine the possible privacy issues posed by social media use and data-gathering techniques.

Data Collection and Sharing

The gathering and sharing of personal data are significant privacy issues brought up by social media use. Social networking sites gather user data, including details about their relationships, hobbies, and routines. This information is made available to third-party businesses for various uses, such as marketing and advertising. This can lead to serious concerns about who has access to and uses our personal information.

Lack of Control Over Personal Information

The absence of user control over personal information is a significant privacy issue brought up by social media usage. Social media makes it challenging to limit who has access to and how data is utilized once it has been posted. Sensitive information may end up being extensively disseminated and may be used maliciously as a result.

Personalized Marketing

Social media companies utilize the information they gather about users to target them with adverts relevant to their interests and usage patterns. Although this could be useful, it might also cause consumers to worry about their privacy since they might feel that their personal information is being used without their permission. Furthermore, there are issues with the integrity of the data being used to target users and the possibility of prejudice based on individual traits.

Government Surveillance

Using social media might spark worries about government surveillance. There are significant concerns regarding privacy and free expression when governments in some nations utilize social media platforms to follow and monitor residents.

In conclusion, social media use raises significant concerns regarding data collecting and privacy. While these platforms make it easy to interact with people and exchange information, they also gather a lot of personal information, which raises questions about who may access it and how it will be used. Users should be aware of these privacy issues and take precautions to safeguard their personal information, such as exercising caution when choosing what details to disclose on social media and keeping their information sharing with other firms to a minimum.

The Ethical and Privacy Concerns Surrounding Social Media Use And Data Collection

Our use of social media to communicate with loved ones, acquire information, and even conduct business has become a crucial part of our everyday lives. The extensive use of social media does, however, raise some ethical and privacy issues that must be resolved. The influence of social media use and data collecting on user rights, the accountability of social media businesses, and the need for improved regulation are all topics that will be covered in this article.

Effect on Individual Privacy:

Social networking sites gather tons of personal data from their users, including delicate information like search history, location data, and even health data. Each user's detailed profile may be created with this data and sold to advertising or used for other reasons. Concerns regarding the privacy of personal information might arise because social media businesses can use this data to target users with customized adverts.

Additionally, individuals might need to know how much their personal information is being gathered and exploited. Data breaches or the unauthorized sharing of personal information with other parties may result in instances where sensitive information is exposed. Users should be aware of the privacy rules of social media firms and take precautions to secure their data.

Responsibility of Social Media Companies:

Social media firms should ensure that they responsibly and ethically gather and use user information. This entails establishing strong security measures to safeguard sensitive information and ensuring users are informed of what information is being collected and how it is used.

Many social media businesses, nevertheless, have come under fire for not upholding these obligations. For instance, the Cambridge Analytica incident highlighted how Facebook users' personal information was exploited for political objectives without their knowledge. This demonstrates the necessity of social media corporations being held responsible for their deeds and ensuring that they are safeguarding the security and privacy of their users.

Better Regulation Is Needed

There is a need for tighter regulation in this field, given the effect, social media has on individual privacy as well as the obligations of social media firms. The creation of laws and regulations that ensure social media companies are gathering and using user information ethically and responsibly, as well as making sure users are aware of their rights and have the ability to control the information that is being collected about them, are all part of this.

Additionally, legislation should ensure that social media businesses are held responsible for their behavior, for example, by levying fines for data breaches or the unauthorized use of personal data. This will provide social media businesses with a significant incentive to prioritize their users' privacy and security and ensure they are upholding their obligations.

In conclusion, social media has fundamentally changed how we engage and communicate with one another, but this increased convenience also raises several ethical and privacy issues. Essential concerns that need to be addressed include the effect of social media on individual privacy, the accountability of social media businesses, and the requirement for greater regulation to safeguard user rights. We can make everyone's online experience safer and more secure by looking more closely at these issues.

In conclusion, social media is a complex and multifaceted topic that has recently captured the world's attention. With its ever-growing influence on our lives, it's no surprise that it has become a popular subject for students to explore in their writing. Whether you are writing an argumentative essay on the impact of social media on privacy, a persuasive essay on the role of social media in politics, or a descriptive essay on the changes social media has brought to the way we communicate, there are countless angles to approach this subject.

However, writing a comprehensive and well-researched essay on social media can be daunting. It requires a thorough understanding of the topic and the ability to articulate your ideas clearly and concisely. This is where Jenni.ai comes in. Our AI-powered tool is designed to help students like you save time and energy and focus on what truly matters - your education. With Jenni.ai , you'll have access to a wealth of examples and receive personalized writing suggestions and feedback.

Whether you're a student who's just starting your writing journey or looking to perfect your craft, Jenni.ai has everything you need to succeed. Our tool provides you with the necessary resources to write with confidence and clarity, no matter your experience level. You'll be able to experiment with different styles, explore new ideas , and refine your writing skills.

So why waste your time and energy struggling to write an essay on your own when you can have Jenni.ai by your side? Sign up for our free trial today and experience the difference for yourself! With Jenni.ai, you'll have the resources you need to write confidently, clearly, and creatively. Get started today and see just how easy and efficient writing can be!

Start Writing With Jenni Today

Sign up for a free Jenni AI account today. Unlock your research potential and experience the difference for yourself. Your journey to academic excellence starts here.

Home — Essay Samples — Sociology — Social Media — Social Media Impact On Society

Social Media Impact on Society

• Categories: Social Media

About this sample

Words: 614 |

Published: Mar 13, 2024

Words: 614 | Page: 1 | 4 min read

Cite this Essay

Let us write you an essay from scratch

• 450+ experts on 30 subjects ready to help
• Custom essay delivered in as few as 3 hours

Get high-quality help

Dr Jacklynne

Verified writer

• Expert in: Sociology

+ 120 experts online

By clicking “Check Writers’ Offers”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy . We’ll occasionally send you promo and account related email

No need to pay just yet!

Related Essays

2 pages / 1056 words

2 pages / 745 words

3 pages / 1269 words

5 pages / 2318 words

Remember! This is just a sample.

You can get your custom paper by one of our expert writers.

121 writers online

Still can’t find what you need?

Browse our vast selection of original essay samples, each expertly formatted and styled

Related Essays on Social Media

The era of social media has revolutionized how we connect, communicate, and share information. However, beneath the glossy filters and curated posts lies a pervasive issue - the prevalence of fake content. This essay delves into [...]

The rise of fake news in the era of social media has given rise to a complex and multifaceted challenge that society must grapple with. The rapid dissemination of misleading or fabricated information through online platforms has [...]

Bulmer, J. G., McLeod, J. M., & Rice, R. E. (2009). Television and Political Life: Studies in Six European Countries. Springer Science & Business Media.Fulcher, J., & Scott, J. (2011). Sociology. Oxford University Press.Kitts, [...]

Clarke, Roger. 'Dataveillance by Governments: The Technique of Computer Matching.' In Information Systems and Dataveillance, edited by Roger Clarke and Richard Wright, 129-142. Sydney, Australia: Australian Computer Society, [...]

One of our rights in the United States is freedom of speech, which is guaranteed by the First Amendment. The First Amendment of the United States Constitution, “…prohibits the making of any law respecting an establishment of [...]

Many of us in this day and age can’t live without our cellphones and especially our social media accounts. We use our social media to get our news, to find out what events are going on in the world, in our communities, in our [...]

Related Topics

By clicking “Send”, you agree to our Terms of service and Privacy statement . We will occasionally send you account related emails.

Where do you want us to send this sample?

By clicking “Continue”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy policy.

Be careful. This essay is not unique

This essay was donated by a student and is likely to have been used and submitted before

Download this Sample

Free samples may contain mistakes and not unique parts

Sorry, we could not paraphrase this essay. Our professional writers can rewrite it and get you a unique paper.

Please check your inbox.

We can write you a custom essay that will follow your exact instructions and meet the deadlines. Let's fix your grades together!

Get Your Personalized Essay in 3 Hours or Less!

We use cookies to personalyze your web-site experience. By continuing we’ll assume you board with our cookie policy .

• Instructions Followed To The Letter
• Deadlines Met At Every Stage
• Unique And Plagiarism Free

Survey data to unveil the power of political crowdsourcing on social media

• Tariq, Rehan
• Zolkepli, Izzal Asnira
• Isawasan, Pradeep
• Tan, Chekfoung
• Alhammad, Muna Mohammad

This paper describes a dataset collected from a survey carried out in the United Kingdom, Malaysia, and Pakistan, to understand the variables that impact political trust. The data was collected from September to November 2021 via an online survey on Google Forms, and 472 valid responses were obtained. Drawing on relevant literature, the survey instrument was designed to cover the respondents' opinions concerning partisanship, social media utilization, online social capital, voluntary online and offline political participation, and political trust. The dataset offers useful insights for institutional practitioners and policymakers working in the domains of democracy and political communication, facilitating policy formulation to bolster political trust through collaborative crowdsourcing.

• Political communication;
• Partisanship;
• Social capital;
• Political trust;
• Social networking sites

Advertisement

Where Tim Walz Stands on the Issues

As governor of Minnesota, he has enacted policies to secure abortion protections, provide free meals for schoolchildren, allow recreational marijuana and set renewable energy goals.

• Share full article

By Maggie Astor

• Aug. 6, 2024

Gov. Tim Walz of Minnesota, the newly announced running mate to Vice President Kamala Harris, has worked with his state’s Democratic-controlled Legislature to enact an ambitious agenda of liberal policies: free college tuition for low-income students, free meals for schoolchildren, legal recreational marijuana and protections for transgender people.

“You don’t win elections to bank political capital,” Mr. Walz wrote last year about his approach to governing. “You win elections to burn political capital and improve lives.”

Republicans have slammed these policies as big-government liberalism and accused Mr. Walz of taking a hard left turn since he represented a politically divided district in Congress years ago.

Here is an overview of where Mr. Walz stands on some key issues.

Mr. Walz signed a bill last year that guaranteed Minnesotans a “fundamental right to make autonomous decisions” about reproductive health care on issues such as abortion, contraception and fertility treatments.

Abortion was already protected by a Minnesota Supreme Court decision, but the new law guarded against a future court reversing that precedent as the U.S. Supreme Court did with Roe v. Wade, and Mr. Walz said this year that he was also open to an amendment to the state’s Constitution that would codify abortion rights.

Another bill he signed legally shields patients, and their medical providers, if they receive an abortion in Minnesota after traveling from a state where abortion is banned.

We are having trouble retrieving the article content.

Please enable JavaScript in your browser settings.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access. If you are in Reader mode please exit and  log into  your Times account, or  subscribe  for all of The Times.

Thank you for your patience while we verify access.

Already a subscriber?  Log in .

Want all of The Times?  Subscribe .

• Social Science
• Social Media

Social media and its impacts on politics

• September 2018
• This person is not on ResearchGate, or hasn't claimed this research yet.

• Vellore Institute of Technology

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• Ahmad Raz Khan
• Vijayashree Karanth K M

• Anita Kanavalli

• Natascha Bing

• Gözde Yavuz
• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

Texas’ youngest students are struggling with their learning, educators say

A national study found young children are faring worse academically than their peers before the pandemic. The problem’s scope in Texas is unclear.

Sign up for The Brief , The Texas Tribune’s daily newsletter that keeps readers up to speed on the most essential Texas news.

Students who started school during or after the COVID-19 pandemic have a harder time saying goodbye to their parents when they drop them off, Plains Independent School District Superintendent Robert McClain said.

Third graders are behind in their reading, teacher Heather Harris said, so the district hired a reading specialist to work with their youngest students.

They’re also struggling in math, San Antonio ISD Superintendent Jaime Aquino said.

“When I go into classrooms of students who are currently fourth graders or fifth graders who were either kindergarten or first grade [during the pandemic], you can see that there is a lack of mathematical fluency around basic facts,” he said.

Texas school administrators, educators and education policy experts say they’re seeing troubling signs that students in the earliest grades are not doing as well academically as children who started school before the pandemic. State and federal officials devoted significant resources to help students affected by the pandemic but they mostly focused on older children whose schooling was disrupted. Experts worry that the state’s youngest students will have a harder time catching up without intervention.

A recent study by Curriculum Associates Research looked at national academic growth trends in the last four years and compared them with pre-pandemic data. It found younger students — like those who were enrolled in kindergarten or first grade in 2021 — were the furthest behind in both reading and math compared to their peers before the pandemic.

According to the report, those students may be struggling because of disruptions in their early childhood experiences, difficulties building up foundational skills like phonics or number recognition, problems engaging with virtual learning during the pandemic or insufficient resources being devoted to help children in the earliest grades.

Aquino, San Antonio ISD’s superintendent, said attendance in early grades is lower than before the pandemic, which is impacting foundational learning.

“We told families to stay home during the pandemic. Now we’re sending the message: You have to be in school,” Aquino said.

Low pre-K enrollment during the pandemic may be another factor. Children who attend pre-K are nearly twice as likely to be ready for kindergarten, said Miguel Solis, president of the education research nonprofit Commit Partnership.

In the school year 2019-2020, there were 249,226 students enrolled in pre-kindergarten in Texas, according to state data. This number dropped by nearly 50,000 in the following year.

Low academic attainment can compound in ways that become increasingly difficult to fix. Harris, the Plains ISD teacher, said it’s hard for third-grade students who fall behind to catch up because their teachers will likely not be able to spend much time helping them develop foundational skills they already should have learned.

“Pre-K through second, you’re learning to read, and then third grade on up, you’re reading to learn. So there’s that huge switch of what you’re teaching,” she said.

Mary Lynn Pruneda, an education analyst at the public policy think tank Texas 2036, said the Curriculum Associates Research study raises concerns about young learners but it’s difficult to pinpoint the impact in Texas because of a lack of data.

“We have very limited data on how younger students are doing that’s consistent across grade levels,” Pruneda said.

Without data to help diagnose the problem, students are being set up for continually low results in the state’s standardized test, she said.

There are some indications of how the problem might be manifesting in Texas. In Dallas County, for example, declines in math and reading scores between 2023 and 2024 were most acute among third graders, who would have been in kindergarten during the pandemic, Solis said.

Solis said the state needs to start collecting literacy data for early grades to identify students who are not on track and intervene. He’s hopeful because some lawmakers in both the Texas House and Senate have already expressed interest in taking a close look at how young students learn foundational skills, he said.

“We can’t wait until the third grade STAAR to see how younger students are progressing,” he said.

Pruneda said one step Texas can take to start reversing the trend is raising spending in public education — something educators are desperate for — to help school districts hire and retain the best teachers possible. The superintendents of both Plains and San Antonio ISDs said it is imperative for the Texas Legislature to approve a significant funding boost next year after lawmakers failed last year to do so amid the fight over school vouchers .

High-impact tutoring, like the one legislators mandated for grades 3-8, may also help early-grade students, she said.

The full program is now LIVE for the 2024 Texas Tribune Festival , happening Sept. 5–7 in downtown Austin. Explore the program featuring more than 100 unforgettable conversations on topics covering education, the economy, Texas and national politics, criminal justice, the border, the 2024 elections and so much more. See the full program.

Texans need truth. Help us report it.

Independent Texas reporting needs your support. The Texas Tribune delivers fact-based journalism for Texans, by Texans — and our community of members, the readers who donate, make our work possible. Help us bring you and millions of others in-depth news and information. Will you support our nonprofit newsroom with a donation of any amount?

Support independent Texas news

Become a member. Join today.

Choose an amount or learn more about membership .

Information about the authors

[email protected]

@aseebhaiya

Learn about The Texas Tribune’s policies , including our partnership with The Trust Project to increase transparency in news.

Explore related story topics

Public education