10 importance of literature review essay

Why is it important to do a literature review in research?

The importance of scientific communication in the healthcare industry

The Importance and Role of Biostatistics in Clinical Research

 “A substantive, thorough, sophisticated literature review is a precondition for doing substantive, thorough, sophisticated research”. Boote and Baile 2005

Authors of manuscripts treat writing a literature review as a routine work or a mere formality. But a seasoned one knows the purpose and importance of a well-written literature review.  Since it is one of the basic needs for researches at any level, they have to be done vigilantly. Only then the reader will know that the basics of research have not been neglected.

The aim of any literature review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of existing knowledge in a particular field without adding any new contributions.   Being built on existing knowledge they help the researcher to even turn the wheels of the topic of research.  It is possible only with profound knowledge of what is wrong in the existing findings in detail to overpower them.  For other researches, the literature review gives the direction to be headed for its success. 

The common perception of literature review and reality:

As per the common belief, literature reviews are only a summary of the sources related to the research. And many authors of scientific manuscripts believe that they are only surveys of what are the researches are done on the chosen topic.  But on the contrary, it uses published information from pertinent and relevant sources like

• Scholarly books
• Scientific papers
• Latest studies in the field
• Established school of thoughts
• Relevant articles from renowned scientific journals

and many more for a field of study or theory or a particular problem to do the following:

• Summarize into a brief account of all information
• Synthesize the information by restructuring and reorganizing
• Critical evaluation of a concept or a school of thought or ideas
• Familiarize the authors to the extent of knowledge in the particular field
• Encapsulate
• Compare & contrast

By doing the above on the relevant information, it provides the reader of the scientific manuscript with the following for a better understanding of it:

• It establishes the authors’  in-depth understanding and knowledge of their field subject
• It gives the background of the research
• Portrays the scientific manuscript plan of examining the research result
• Illuminates on how the knowledge has changed within the field
• Highlights what has already been done in a particular field
• Information of the generally accepted facts, emerging and current state of the topic of research
• Identifies the research gap that is still unexplored or under-researched fields
• Demonstrates how the research fits within a larger field of study
• Provides an overview of the sources explored during the research of a particular topic

Importance of literature review in research:

The importance of literature review in scientific manuscripts can be condensed into an analytical feature to enable the multifold reach of its significance.  It adds value to the legitimacy of the research in many ways:

• Provides the interpretation of existing literature in light of updated developments in the field to help in establishing the consistency in knowledge and relevancy of existing materials
• It helps in calculating the impact of the latest information in the field by mapping their progress of knowledge.
• It brings out the dialects of contradictions between various thoughts within the field to establish facts
• The research gaps scrutinized initially are further explored to establish the latest facts of theories to add value to the field
• Indicates the current research place in the schema of a particular field
• Provides information for relevancy and coherency to check the research
• Apart from elucidating the continuance of knowledge, it also points out areas that require further investigation and thus aid as a starting point of any future research
• Justifies the research and sets up the research question
• Sets up a theoretical framework comprising the concepts and theories of the research upon which its success can be judged
• Helps to adopt a more appropriate methodology for the research by examining the strengths and weaknesses of existing research in the same field
• Increases the significance of the results by comparing it with the existing literature
• Provides a point of reference by writing the findings in the scientific manuscript
• Helps to get the due credit from the audience for having done the fact-finding and fact-checking mission in the scientific manuscripts
• The more the reference of relevant sources of it could increase more of its trustworthiness with the readers
• Helps to prevent plagiarism by tailoring and uniquely tweaking the scientific manuscript not to repeat other’s original idea
• By preventing plagiarism , it saves the scientific manuscript from rejection and thus also saves a lot of time and money
• Helps to evaluate, condense and synthesize gist in the author’s own words to sharpen the research focus
• Helps to compare and contrast to  show the originality and uniqueness of the research than that of the existing other researches
• Rationalizes the need for conducting the particular research in a specified field
• Helps to collect data accurately for allowing any new methodology of research than the existing ones
• Enables the readers of the manuscript to answer the following questions of its readers for its better chances for publication
• What do the researchers know?
• What do they not know?
• Is the scientific manuscript reliable and trustworthy?
• What are the knowledge gaps of the researcher?

22. It helps the readers to identify the following for further reading of the scientific manuscript:

• What has been already established, discredited and accepted in the particular field of research
• Areas of controversy and conflicts among different schools of thought
• Unsolved problems and issues in the connected field of research
• The emerging trends and approaches
• How the research extends, builds upon and leaves behind from the previous research

A profound literature review with many relevant sources of reference will enhance the chances of the scientific manuscript publication in renowned and reputed scientific journals .

References:

http://www.math.montana.edu/jobo/phdprep/phd6.pdf

journal Publishing services  |  Scientific Editing Services  |  Medical Writing Services  |  scientific research writing service  |  Scientific communication services

Related Topics:

Meta Analysis

Scientific Research Paper Writing

Medical Research Paper Writing

Scientific Communication in healthcare

pubrica academy

Related posts.

Importance Of Proofreading For Scientific Writing Methods and Significance

Statistical analyses of case-control studies

Selecting material (e.g. excipient, active pharmaceutical ingredient, packaging material) for drug development

Comments are closed.

Literature Review - what is a Literature Review, why it is important and how it is done

What are literature reviews, goals of literature reviews, types of literature reviews, about this guide/licence.

• Strategies to Find Sources
• Evaluating Literature Reviews and Sources
• Tips for Writing Literature Reviews
• Writing Literature Review: Useful Sites
• Citation Resources
• Other Academic Writings
• Useful Resources

Help is Just a Click Away

Search our FAQ Knowledge base, ask a question, chat, send comments...

Go to LibAnswers

 What is a literature review? "A literature review is an account of what has been published on a topic by accredited scholars and researchers. In writing the literature review, your purpose is to convey to your reader what knowledge and ideas have been established on a topic, and what their strengths and weaknesses are. As a piece of writing, the literature review must be defined by a guiding concept (e.g., your research objective, the problem or issue you are discussing, or your argumentative thesis). It is not just a descriptive list of the material available, or a set of summaries. " - Quote from Taylor, D. (n.d) "The literature review: A few tips on conducting it"

Source NC State University Libraries. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license.

What are the goals of creating a Literature Review?

• To develop a theory or evaluate an existing theory
• To summarize the historical or existing state of a research topic
• Identify a problem in a field of research 

- Baumeister, R.F. & Leary, M.R. (1997). "Writing narrative literature reviews," Review of General Psychology , 1(3), 311-320.

When do you need to write a Literature Review?

• When writing a prospectus or a thesis/dissertation
• When writing a research paper
• When writing a grant proposal

In all these cases you need to dedicate a chapter in these works to showcase what have been written about your research topic and to point out how your own research will shed a new light into these body of scholarship.

Literature reviews are also written as standalone articles as a way to survey a particular research topic in-depth. This type of literature reviews look at a topic from a historical perspective to see how the understanding of the topic have change through time.

What kinds of literature reviews are written?

• Narrative Review: The purpose of this type of review is to describe the current state of the research on a specific topic/research and to offer a critical analysis of the literature reviewed. Studies are grouped by research/theoretical categories, and themes and trends, strengths and weakness, and gaps are identified. The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed.
• Book review essays/ Historiographical review essays : This is a type of review that focus on a small set of research books on a particular topic " to locate these books within current scholarship, critical methodologies, and approaches" in the field. - LARR
• Systematic review : "The authors of a systematic review use a specific procedure to search the research literature, select the studies to include in their review, and critically evaluate the studies they find." (p. 139). Nelson, L.K. (2013). Research in Communication Sciences and Disorders . San Diego, CA: Plural Publishing.
• Meta-analysis : "Meta-analysis is a method of reviewing research findings in a quantitative fashion by transforming the data from individual studies into what is called an effect size and then pooling and analyzing this information. The basic goal in meta-analysis is to explain why different outcomes have occurred in different studies." (p. 197). Roberts, M.C. & Ilardi, S.S. (2003). Handbook of Research Methods in Clinical Psychology . Malden, MA: Blackwell Pub.
• Meta-synthesis : "Qualitative meta-synthesis is a type of qualitative study that uses as data the findings from other qualitative studies linked by the same or related topic." (p.312). Zimmer, L. (2006). "Qualitative meta-synthesis: A question of dialoguing with texts," Journal of Advanced Nursing , 53(3), 311-318.

Guide adapted from "Literature Review" , a guide developed by Marisol Ramos used under CC BY 4.0 /modified from original.

• Next: Strategies to Find Sources >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 10:56 AM
• URL: https://lit.libguides.com/Literature-Review

The Library, Technological University of the Shannon: Midwest

What is a Literature Review? How to Write It (with Examples)

A literature review is a critical analysis and synthesis of existing research on a particular topic. It provides an overview of the current state of knowledge, identifies gaps, and highlights key findings in the literature. 1 The purpose of a literature review is to situate your own research within the context of existing scholarship, demonstrating your understanding of the topic and showing how your work contributes to the ongoing conversation in the field. Learning how to write a literature review is a critical tool for successful research. Your ability to summarize and synthesize prior research pertaining to a certain topic demonstrates your grasp on the topic of study, and assists in the learning process. 

Table of Contents

• What is the purpose of literature review? 
• a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction: 
• b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes: 
• c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs: 
• d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts: 

How to write a good literature review 

• Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question: 
• Decide on the Scope of Your Review: 
• Select Databases for Searches: 
• Conduct Searches and Keep Track: 
• Review the Literature: 
• Organize and Write Your Literature Review: 
• How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal? 
• Frequently asked questions 

What is a literature review?

A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with the existing literature, establishes the context for their own research, and contributes to scholarly conversations on the topic. One of the purposes of a literature review is also to help researchers avoid duplicating previous work and ensure that their research is informed by and builds upon the existing body of knowledge.

What is the purpose of literature review?

A literature review serves several important purposes within academic and research contexts. Here are some key objectives and functions of a literature review: 2  

1. Contextualizing the Research Problem: The literature review provides a background and context for the research problem under investigation. It helps to situate the study within the existing body of knowledge. 

2. Identifying Gaps in Knowledge: By identifying gaps, contradictions, or areas requiring further research, the researcher can shape the research question and justify the significance of the study. This is crucial for ensuring that the new research contributes something novel to the field. 

Find academic papers related to your research topic faster. Try Research on Paperpal  

3. Understanding Theoretical and Conceptual Frameworks: Literature reviews help researchers gain an understanding of the theoretical and conceptual frameworks used in previous studies. This aids in the development of a theoretical framework for the current research. 

4. Providing Methodological Insights: Another purpose of literature reviews is that it allows researchers to learn about the methodologies employed in previous studies. This can help in choosing appropriate research methods for the current study and avoiding pitfalls that others may have encountered. 

5. Establishing Credibility: A well-conducted literature review demonstrates the researcher’s familiarity with existing scholarship, establishing their credibility and expertise in the field. It also helps in building a solid foundation for the new research. 

6. Informing Hypotheses or Research Questions: The literature review guides the formulation of hypotheses or research questions by highlighting relevant findings and areas of uncertainty in existing literature. 

Literature review example

Let’s delve deeper with a literature review example: Let’s say your literature review is about the impact of climate change on biodiversity. You might format your literature review into sections such as the effects of climate change on habitat loss and species extinction, phenological changes, and marine biodiversity. Each section would then summarize and analyze relevant studies in those areas, highlighting key findings and identifying gaps in the research. The review would conclude by emphasizing the need for further research on specific aspects of the relationship between climate change and biodiversity. The following literature review template provides a glimpse into the recommended literature review structure and content, demonstrating how research findings are organized around specific themes within a broader topic. 

Literature Review on Climate Change Impacts on Biodiversity:

Climate change is a global phenomenon with far-reaching consequences, including significant impacts on biodiversity. This literature review synthesizes key findings from various studies: 

a. Habitat Loss and Species Extinction:

Climate change-induced alterations in temperature and precipitation patterns contribute to habitat loss, affecting numerous species (Thomas et al., 2004). The review discusses how these changes increase the risk of extinction, particularly for species with specific habitat requirements. 

b. Range Shifts and Phenological Changes:

Observations of range shifts and changes in the timing of biological events (phenology) are documented in response to changing climatic conditions (Parmesan & Yohe, 2003). These shifts affect ecosystems and may lead to mismatches between species and their resources. 

c. Ocean Acidification and Coral Reefs:

The review explores the impact of climate change on marine biodiversity, emphasizing ocean acidification’s threat to coral reefs (Hoegh-Guldberg et al., 2007). Changes in pH levels negatively affect coral calcification, disrupting the delicate balance of marine ecosystems. 

d. Adaptive Strategies and Conservation Efforts:

Recognizing the urgency of the situation, the literature review discusses various adaptive strategies adopted by species and conservation efforts aimed at mitigating the impacts of climate change on biodiversity (Hannah et al., 2007). It emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary approaches for effective conservation planning. 

Strengthen your literature review with factual insights. Try Research on Paperpal for free!    

Writing a literature review involves summarizing and synthesizing existing research on a particular topic. A good literature review format should include the following elements. 

Introduction: The introduction sets the stage for your literature review, providing context and introducing the main focus of your review. 

• Opening Statement: Begin with a general statement about the broader topic and its significance in the field. 
• Scope and Purpose: Clearly define the scope of your literature review. Explain the specific research question or objective you aim to address. 
• Organizational Framework: Briefly outline the structure of your literature review, indicating how you will categorize and discuss the existing research. 
• Significance of the Study: Highlight why your literature review is important and how it contributes to the understanding of the chosen topic. 
• Thesis Statement: Conclude the introduction with a concise thesis statement that outlines the main argument or perspective you will develop in the body of the literature review. 

Body: The body of the literature review is where you provide a comprehensive analysis of existing literature, grouping studies based on themes, methodologies, or other relevant criteria. 

• Organize by Theme or Concept: Group studies that share common themes, concepts, or methodologies. Discuss each theme or concept in detail, summarizing key findings and identifying gaps or areas of disagreement. 
• Critical Analysis: Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of each study. Discuss the methodologies used, the quality of evidence, and the overall contribution of each work to the understanding of the topic. 
• Synthesis of Findings: Synthesize the information from different studies to highlight trends, patterns, or areas of consensus in the literature. 
• Identification of Gaps: Discuss any gaps or limitations in the existing research and explain how your review contributes to filling these gaps. 
• Transition between Sections: Provide smooth transitions between different themes or concepts to maintain the flow of your literature review. 

Write and Cite as you go with Paperpal Research. Start now for free.   

Conclusion: The conclusion of your literature review should summarize the main findings, highlight the contributions of the review, and suggest avenues for future research. 

• Summary of Key Findings: Recap the main findings from the literature and restate how they contribute to your research question or objective. 
• Contributions to the Field: Discuss the overall contribution of your literature review to the existing knowledge in the field. 
• Implications and Applications: Explore the practical implications of the findings and suggest how they might impact future research or practice. 
• Recommendations for Future Research: Identify areas that require further investigation and propose potential directions for future research in the field. 
• Final Thoughts: Conclude with a final reflection on the importance of your literature review and its relevance to the broader academic community. 

Conducting a literature review

Conducting a literature review is an essential step in research that involves reviewing and analyzing existing literature on a specific topic. It’s important to know how to do a literature review effectively, so here are the steps to follow: 1  

Choose a Topic and Define the Research Question:

• Select a topic that is relevant to your field of study. 
• Clearly define your research question or objective. Determine what specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? 

Decide on the Scope of Your Review:

• Determine the timeframe for your literature review. Are you focusing on recent developments, or do you want a historical overview? 
• Consider the geographical scope. Is your review global, or are you focusing on a specific region? 
• Define the inclusion and exclusion criteria. What types of sources will you include? Are there specific types of studies or publications you will exclude? 

Select Databases for Searches:

• Identify relevant databases for your field. Examples include PubMed, IEEE Xplore, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. 
• Consider searching in library catalogs, institutional repositories, and specialized databases related to your topic. 

Conduct Searches and Keep Track:

• Develop a systematic search strategy using keywords, Boolean operators (AND, OR, NOT), and other search techniques. 
• Record and document your search strategy for transparency and replicability. 
• Keep track of the articles, including publication details, abstracts, and links. Use citation management tools like EndNote, Zotero, or Mendeley to organize your references. 

Review the Literature:

• Evaluate the relevance and quality of each source. Consider the methodology, sample size, and results of studies. 
• Organize the literature by themes or key concepts. Identify patterns, trends, and gaps in the existing research. 
• Summarize key findings and arguments from each source. Compare and contrast different perspectives. 
• Identify areas where there is a consensus in the literature and where there are conflicting opinions. 
• Provide critical analysis and synthesis of the literature. What are the strengths and weaknesses of existing research? 

Organize and Write Your Literature Review:

• Literature review outline should be based on themes, chronological order, or methodological approaches. 
• Write a clear and coherent narrative that synthesizes the information gathered. 
• Use proper citations for each source and ensure consistency in your citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.). 
• Conclude your literature review by summarizing key findings, identifying gaps, and suggesting areas for future research. 

Whether you’re exploring a new research field or finding new angles to develop an existing topic, sifting through hundreds of papers can take more time than you have to spare. But what if you could find science-backed insights with verified citations in seconds? That’s the power of Paperpal’s new Research feature!  

How to write a literature review faster with Paperpal?

Paperpal, an AI writing assistant, integrates powerful academic search capabilities within its writing platform. With the Research feature, you get 100% factual insights, with citations backed by 250M+ verified research articles, directly within your writing interface with the option to save relevant references in your Citation Library. By eliminating the need to switch tabs to find answers to all your research questions, Paperpal saves time and helps you stay focused on your writing.   

Here’s how to use the Research feature:  

• Ask a question: Get started with a new document on paperpal.com. Click on the “Research” feature and type your question in plain English. Paperpal will scour over 250 million research articles, including conference papers and preprints, to provide you with accurate insights and citations. 
• Review and Save: Paperpal summarizes the information, while citing sources and listing relevant reads. You can quickly scan the results to identify relevant references and save these directly to your built-in citations library for later access. 
• Cite with Confidence: Paperpal makes it easy to incorporate relevant citations and references into your writing, ensuring your arguments are well-supported by credible sources. This translates to a polished, well-researched literature review. 

The literature review sample and detailed advice on writing and conducting a review will help you produce a well-structured report. But remember that a good literature review is an ongoing process, and it may be necessary to revisit and update it as your research progresses. By combining effortless research with an easy citation process, Paperpal Research streamlines the literature review process and empowers you to write faster and with more confidence. Try Paperpal Research now and see for yourself.  

Frequently asked questions

A literature review is a critical and comprehensive analysis of existing literature (published and unpublished works) on a specific topic or research question and provides a synthesis of the current state of knowledge in a particular field. A well-conducted literature review is crucial for researchers to build upon existing knowledge, avoid duplication of efforts, and contribute to the advancement of their field. It also helps researchers situate their work within a broader context and facilitates the development of a sound theoretical and conceptual framework for their studies.

Literature review is a crucial component of research writing, providing a solid background for a research paper’s investigation. The aim is to keep professionals up to date by providing an understanding of ongoing developments within a specific field, including research methods, and experimental techniques used in that field, and present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Also, the depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the scholar in his or her field.  

Before writing a literature review, it’s essential to undertake several preparatory steps to ensure that your review is well-researched, organized, and focused. This includes choosing a topic of general interest to you and doing exploratory research on that topic, writing an annotated bibliography, and noting major points, especially those that relate to the position you have taken on the topic. 

Literature reviews and academic research papers are essential components of scholarly work but serve different purposes within the academic realm. 3 A literature review aims to provide a foundation for understanding the current state of research on a particular topic, identify gaps or controversies, and lay the groundwork for future research. Therefore, it draws heavily from existing academic sources, including books, journal articles, and other scholarly publications. In contrast, an academic research paper aims to present new knowledge, contribute to the academic discourse, and advance the understanding of a specific research question. Therefore, it involves a mix of existing literature (in the introduction and literature review sections) and original data or findings obtained through research methods. 

Literature reviews are essential components of academic and research papers, and various strategies can be employed to conduct them effectively. If you want to know how to write a literature review for a research paper, here are four common approaches that are often used by researchers.  Chronological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the chronological order of publication. It helps to trace the development of a topic over time, showing how ideas, theories, and research have evolved.  Thematic Review: Thematic reviews focus on identifying and analyzing themes or topics that cut across different studies. Instead of organizing the literature chronologically, it is grouped by key themes or concepts, allowing for a comprehensive exploration of various aspects of the topic.  Methodological Review: This strategy involves organizing the literature based on the research methods employed in different studies. It helps to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of various methodologies and allows the reader to evaluate the reliability and validity of the research findings.  Theoretical Review: A theoretical review examines the literature based on the theoretical frameworks used in different studies. This approach helps to identify the key theories that have been applied to the topic and assess their contributions to the understanding of the subject.  It’s important to note that these strategies are not mutually exclusive, and a literature review may combine elements of more than one approach. The choice of strategy depends on the research question, the nature of the literature available, and the goals of the review. Additionally, other strategies, such as integrative reviews or systematic reviews, may be employed depending on the specific requirements of the research.

The literature review format can vary depending on the specific publication guidelines. However, there are some common elements and structures that are often followed. Here is a general guideline for the format of a literature review:  Introduction:   Provide an overview of the topic.  Define the scope and purpose of the literature review.  State the research question or objective.  Body:   Organize the literature by themes, concepts, or chronology.  Critically analyze and evaluate each source.  Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of the studies.  Highlight any methodological limitations or biases.  Identify patterns, connections, or contradictions in the existing research.  Conclusion:   Summarize the key points discussed in the literature review.  Highlight the research gap.  Address the research question or objective stated in the introduction.  Highlight the contributions of the review and suggest directions for future research.

Both annotated bibliographies and literature reviews involve the examination of scholarly sources. While annotated bibliographies focus on individual sources with brief annotations, literature reviews provide a more in-depth, integrated, and comprehensive analysis of existing literature on a specific topic. The key differences are as follows: 

References 

• Denney, A. S., & Tewksbury, R. (2013). How to write a literature review.  Journal of criminal justice education ,  24 (2), 218-234. 
• Pan, M. L. (2016).  Preparing literature reviews: Qualitative and quantitative approaches . Taylor & Francis. 
• Cantero, C. (2019). How to write a literature review.  San José State University Writing Center . 

Paperpal is an AI writing assistant that help academics write better, faster with real-time suggestions for in-depth language and grammar correction. Trained on millions of research manuscripts enhanced by professional academic editors, Paperpal delivers human precision at machine speed.  

Try it for free or upgrade to  Paperpal Prime , which unlocks unlimited access to premium features like academic translation, paraphrasing, contextual synonyms, consistency checks and more. It’s like always having a professional academic editor by your side! Go beyond limitations and experience the future of academic writing.  Get Paperpal Prime now at just US$19 a month!

Related Reads:

• Empirical Research: A Comprehensive Guide for Academics 
• How to Write a Scientific Paper in 10 Steps 
• How Long Should a Chapter Be?
• How to Use Paperpal to Generate Emails & Cover Letters?

6 Tips for Post-Doc Researchers to Take Their Career to the Next Level

Self-plagiarism in research: what it is and how to avoid it, you may also like, the ai revolution: authors’ role in upholding academic..., the future of academia: how ai tools are..., how to write a research proposal: (with examples..., how to write your research paper in apa..., how to choose a dissertation topic, how to write a phd research proposal, how to write an academic paragraph (step-by-step guide), five things authors need to know when using..., 7 best referencing tools and citation management software..., maintaining academic integrity with paperpal’s generative ai writing....

• University of Texas Libraries

Literature Reviews

• What is a literature review?
• Steps in the Literature Review Process
• Define your research question
• Determine inclusion and exclusion criteria
• Choose databases and search
• Review Results
• Synthesize Results
• Analyze Results
• Librarian Support
• Artificial Intelligence (AI) Tools

What is a Literature Review?

A literature or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific topic or research question. The literature that is reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. It contains the most pertinent studies and points to important past and current research and practices. It provides background and context, and shows how your research will contribute to the field. 

A literature review should: 

• Provide a comprehensive and updated review of the literature;
• Explain why this review has taken place;
• Articulate a position or hypothesis;
• Acknowledge and account for conflicting and corroborating points of view

From  S age Research Methods

Purpose of a Literature Review

A literature review can be written as an introduction to a study to:

• Demonstrate how a study fills a gap in research
• Compare a study with other research that's been done

Or it can be a separate work (a research article on its own) which:

• Organizes or describes a topic
• Describes variables within a particular issue/problem

Limitations of a Literature Review

Some of the limitations of a literature review are:

• It's a snapshot in time. Unlike other reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. There may be future developments that could make your work less relevant.
• It may be too focused. Some niche studies may miss the bigger picture.
• It can be difficult to be comprehensive. There is no way to make sure all the literature on a topic was considered.
• It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. There may be other places where people are publishing exemplary research. Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Also, make sure to include opposing views (and not just supporting evidence).

Source: Grant, Maria J., and Andrew Booth. “A Typology of Reviews: An Analysis of 14 Review Types and Associated Methodologies.” Health Information & Libraries Journal, vol. 26, no. 2, June 2009, pp. 91–108. Wiley Online Library, doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x.

Meryl Brodsky : Communication and Information Studies

Hannah Chapman Tripp : Biology, Neuroscience

Carolyn Cunningham : Human Development & Family Sciences, Psychology, Sociology

Larayne Dallas : Engineering

Janelle Hedstrom : Special Education, Curriculum & Instruction, Ed Leadership & Policy ​

Susan Macicak : Linguistics

Imelda Vetter : Dell Medical School

For help in other subject areas, please see the guide to library specialists by subject .

Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics and library support for literature reviews. While we try to offer these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to community members who have missed the session. Following is the most recent recording of the workshop, Conducting a Literature Review. To view the recording, a UT login is required.

• October 26, 2022 recording
• Last Updated: Jul 30, 2024 9:33 AM
• URL: https://guides.lib.utexas.edu/literaturereviews

A Guide to Literature Reviews

Importance of a good literature review.

• Conducting the Literature Review
• Structure and Writing Style
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Citation Management Software This link opens in a new window
• Acknowledgements

A literature review is not only a summary of key sources, but  has an organizational pattern which combines both summary and synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories . A summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research problem. The analytical features of a literature review might:

• Give a new interpretation of old material or combine new with old interpretations,
• Trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates,
• Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant research, or
• Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date.

The purpose of a literature review is to:

• Place each work in the context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied.
• Describe the relationship of each work to the others under consideration.
• Identify new ways to interpret prior research.
• Reveal any gaps that exist in the literature.
• Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies.
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort.
• Point the way in fulfilling a need for additional research.
• Locate your own research within the context of existing literature [very important].
• << Previous: Definition
• Next: Conducting the Literature Review >>
• Last Updated: Jul 3, 2024 3:13 PM
• URL: https://libguides.mcmaster.ca/litreview

Essays, Literature Reviews and Reports - Skills Guide

Literature review.

• Downloadable Resources
• Further Reading

What is a literature review?

A literature review is a collection of literature that is analysed (reviewed) and compared against each other to demonstrate an understanding of a topic. In a literature review you identify relevant theories and previous research in the area. Bell states that  "literature reviews should be succinct and.. give a picture of the state of knowledge and major questions in your topic area."

Literature reviews are usually a part of a dissertation, although some modules may require a standalone literature review.

Why are literature reviews important?

Literature reviews are important as they allow you to gain a thorough awareness and understanding of current work and perspectives in a research area to support and justify your research, as well as illustrating that there is a research gap and assisting in the analysis and interpretation of data.

What should I put into a literature review?

• The historical context.
• The contemporary context of your research.
• A discussion of the relevant underpinning concepts and theories.
• Definitions of the key terminology used in your own work.
• Current research in the field that can be challenged or extended by your own research.
• Justification of the significance of your research.

How do I structure a literature review?

Look carefully at what is expected from you for your literature review. Sometimes they might focus heavily on one piece of literature, while others may focus on two or three, and some would like a vast body of literature to be included. Whatever the expectation, they usually follow the same structure as an essay:

10% Introduction

80% Main Body

10% Conclusion

The introduction should explain how your literature review is organised.

The main body should be made up of headings and sub headings that map out your argument.

The conclusion should summarise the key arguments in a concise way.

When should I start writing my literature review?

Starting writing your literature review as early as possible can help you in understanding the research and understanding how it will be used. This will help in creating an overall structure when writing later versions of the literature review and in comparing and linking different pieces of research. 

There are example essay extracts available on Do It Write ( click here ) to help you understand what they're asking from you. 

• << Previous: Essay
• Next: Report >>
• Last Updated: Aug 23, 2023 3:50 PM
• URL: https://libguides.derby.ac.uk/essay-litreview-report

Literature Review: Purpose of a Literature Review

• Literature Review
• Purpose of a Literature Review
• Work in Progress
• Compiling & Writing
• Books, Articles, & Web Pages
• Types of Literature Reviews
• Departmental Differences
• Citation Styles & Plagiarism
• Know the Difference! Systematic Review vs. Literature Review

The purpose of a literature review is to:

• Provide a foundation of knowledge on a topic
• Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication and give credit to other researchers
• Identify inconstancies: gaps in research, conflicts in previous studies, open questions left from other research
• Identify the need for additional research (justifying your research)
• Identify the relationship of works in the context of their contribution to the topic and other works
• Place your own research within the context of existing literature, making a case for why further study is needed.

Videos & Tutorials

VIDEO: What is the role of a literature review in research? What's it mean to "review" the literature? Get the big picture of what to expect as part of the process. This video is published under a Creative Commons 3.0 BY-NC-SA US license. License, credits, and contact information can be found here: https://www.lib.ncsu.edu/tutorials/litreview/

Elements in a Literature Review

• Elements in a Literature Review txt of infographic
• << Previous: Literature Review
• Next: Searching >>
• Last Updated: Oct 19, 2023 12:07 PM
• URL: https://uscupstate.libguides.com/Literature_Review

Frequently asked questions

What is the purpose of a literature review.

There are several reasons to conduct a literature review at the beginning of a research project:

• To familiarize yourself with the current state of knowledge on your topic
• To ensure that you’re not just repeating what others have already done
• To identify gaps in knowledge and unresolved problems that your research can address
• To develop your theoretical framework and methodology
• To provide an overview of the key findings and debates on the topic

Writing the literature review shows your reader how your work relates to existing research and what new insights it will contribute.

Frequently asked questions: Academic writing

A rhetorical tautology is the repetition of an idea of concept using different words.

Rhetorical tautologies occur when additional words are used to convey a meaning that has already been expressed or implied. For example, the phrase “armed gunman” is a tautology because a “gunman” is by definition “armed.”

A logical tautology is a statement that is always true because it includes all logical possibilities.

Logical tautologies often take the form of “either/or” statements (e.g., “It will rain, or it will not rain”) or employ circular reasoning (e.g., “she is untrustworthy because she can’t be trusted”).

You may have seen both “appendices” or “appendixes” as pluralizations of “ appendix .” Either spelling can be used, but “appendices” is more common (including in APA Style ). Consistency is key here: make sure you use the same spelling throughout your paper.

The purpose of a lab report is to demonstrate your understanding of the scientific method with a hands-on lab experiment. Course instructors will often provide you with an experimental design and procedure. Your task is to write up how you actually performed the experiment and evaluate the outcome.

In contrast, a research paper requires you to independently develop an original argument. It involves more in-depth research and interpretation of sources and data.

A lab report is usually shorter than a research paper.

The sections of a lab report can vary between scientific fields and course requirements, but it usually contains the following:

• Title: expresses the topic of your study
• Abstract: summarizes your research aims, methods, results, and conclusions
• Introduction: establishes the context needed to understand the topic
• Method: describes the materials and procedures used in the experiment
• Results: reports all descriptive and inferential statistical analyses
• Discussion: interprets and evaluates results and identifies limitations
• Conclusion: sums up the main findings of your experiment
• References: list of all sources cited using a specific style (e.g. APA)
• Appendices: contains lengthy materials, procedures, tables or figures

A lab report conveys the aim, methods, results, and conclusions of a scientific experiment . Lab reports are commonly assigned in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields.

The abstract is the very last thing you write. You should only write it after your research is complete, so that you can accurately summarize the entirety of your thesis , dissertation or research paper .

If you’ve gone over the word limit set for your assignment, shorten your sentences and cut repetition and redundancy during the editing process. If you use a lot of long quotes , consider shortening them to just the essentials.

If you need to remove a lot of words, you may have to cut certain passages. Remember that everything in the text should be there to support your argument; look for any information that’s not essential to your point and remove it.

To make this process easier and faster, you can use a paraphrasing tool . With this tool, you can rewrite your text to make it simpler and shorter. If that’s not enough, you can copy-paste your paraphrased text into the summarizer . This tool will distill your text to its core message.

Revising, proofreading, and editing are different stages of the writing process .

• Revising is making structural and logical changes to your text—reformulating arguments and reordering information.
• Editing refers to making more local changes to things like sentence structure and phrasing to make sure your meaning is conveyed clearly and concisely.
• Proofreading involves looking at the text closely, line by line, to spot any typos and issues with consistency and correct them.

The literature review usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation . After the introduction , it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or methodology .

A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question .

It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation , or research paper , in order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge.

Avoid citing sources in your abstract . There are two reasons for this:

• The abstract should focus on your original research, not on the work of others.
• The abstract should be self-contained and fully understandable without reference to other sources.

There are some circumstances where you might need to mention other sources in an abstract: for example, if your research responds directly to another study or focuses on the work of a single theorist. In general, though, don’t include citations unless absolutely necessary.

An abstract is a concise summary of an academic text (such as a journal article or dissertation ). It serves two main purposes:

• To help potential readers determine the relevance of your paper for their own research.
• To communicate your key findings to those who don’t have time to read the whole paper.

Abstracts are often indexed along with keywords on academic databases, so they make your work more easily findable. Since the abstract is the first thing any reader sees, it’s important that it clearly and accurately summarizes the contents of your paper.

In a scientific paper, the methodology always comes after the introduction and before the results , discussion and conclusion . The same basic structure also applies to a thesis, dissertation , or research proposal .

Depending on the length and type of document, you might also include a literature review or theoretical framework before the methodology.

Whether you’re publishing a blog, submitting a research paper , or even just writing an important email, there are a few techniques you can use to make sure it’s error-free:

• Take a break : Set your work aside for at least a few hours so that you can look at it with fresh eyes.
• Proofread a printout : Staring at a screen for too long can cause fatigue – sit down with a pen and paper to check the final version.
• Use digital shortcuts : Take note of any recurring mistakes (for example, misspelling a particular word, switching between US and UK English , or inconsistently capitalizing a term), and use Find and Replace to fix it throughout the document.

If you want to be confident that an important text is error-free, it might be worth choosing a professional proofreading service instead.

Editing and proofreading are different steps in the process of revising a text.

Editing comes first, and can involve major changes to content, structure and language. The first stages of editing are often done by authors themselves, while a professional editor makes the final improvements to grammar and style (for example, by improving sentence structure and word choice ).

Proofreading is the final stage of checking a text before it is published or shared. It focuses on correcting minor errors and inconsistencies (for example, in punctuation and capitalization ). Proofreaders often also check for formatting issues, especially in print publishing.

The cost of proofreading depends on the type and length of text, the turnaround time, and the level of services required. Most proofreading companies charge per word or page, while freelancers sometimes charge an hourly rate.

For proofreading alone, which involves only basic corrections of typos and formatting mistakes, you might pay as little as $0.01 per word, but in many cases, your text will also require some level of editing , which costs slightly more.

It’s often possible to purchase combined proofreading and editing services and calculate the price in advance based on your requirements.

There are many different routes to becoming a professional proofreader or editor. The necessary qualifications depend on the field – to be an academic or scientific proofreader, for example, you will need at least a university degree in a relevant subject.

For most proofreading jobs, experience and demonstrated skills are more important than specific qualifications. Often your skills will be tested as part of the application process.

To learn practical proofreading skills, you can choose to take a course with a professional organization such as the Society for Editors and Proofreaders . Alternatively, you can apply to companies that offer specialized on-the-job training programmes, such as the Scribbr Academy .

Ask our team

Want to contact us directly? No problem.  We  are always here for you.

• Email [email protected]
• Start live chat
• Call +1 (510) 822-8066
• WhatsApp +31 20 261 6040

Our team helps students graduate by offering:

• A world-class citation generator
• Plagiarism Checker software powered by Turnitin
• Innovative Citation Checker software
• Professional proofreading services
• Over 300 helpful articles about academic writing, citing sources, plagiarism, and more

Scribbr specializes in editing study-related documents . We proofread:

• PhD dissertations
• Research proposals
• Personal statements
• Admission essays
• Motivation letters
• Reflection papers
• Journal articles
• Capstone projects

Scribbr’s Plagiarism Checker is powered by elements of Turnitin’s Similarity Checker , namely the plagiarism detection software and the Internet Archive and Premium Scholarly Publications content databases .

The add-on AI detector is powered by Scribbr’s proprietary software.

The Scribbr Citation Generator is developed using the open-source Citation Style Language (CSL) project and Frank Bennett’s citeproc-js . It’s the same technology used by dozens of other popular citation tools, including Mendeley and Zotero.

You can find all the citation styles and locales used in the Scribbr Citation Generator in our publicly accessible repository on Github .

An official website of the United States government

The .gov means it’s official. Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

The site is secure. The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

• Publications
• Account settings

Preview improvements coming to the PMC website in October 2024. Learn More or Try it out now .

• Advanced Search
• Journal List
• J Grad Med Educ
• v.8(3); 2016 Jul

The Literature Review: A Foundation for High-Quality Medical Education Research

a  These are subscription resources. Researchers should check with their librarian to determine their access rights.

Despite a surge in published scholarship in medical education 1 and rapid growth in journals that publish educational research, manuscript acceptance rates continue to fall. 2 Failure to conduct a thorough, accurate, and up-to-date literature review identifying an important problem and placing the study in context is consistently identified as one of the top reasons for rejection. 3 , 4 The purpose of this editorial is to provide a road map and practical recommendations for planning a literature review. By understanding the goals of a literature review and following a few basic processes, authors can enhance both the quality of their educational research and the likelihood of publication in the Journal of Graduate Medical Education ( JGME ) and in other journals.

The Literature Review Defined

In medical education, no organization has articulated a formal definition of a literature review for a research paper; thus, a literature review can take a number of forms. Depending on the type of article, target journal, and specific topic, these forms will vary in methodology, rigor, and depth. Several organizations have published guidelines for conducting an intensive literature search intended for formal systematic reviews, both broadly (eg, PRISMA) 5 and within medical education, 6 and there are excellent commentaries to guide authors of systematic reviews. 7 , 8

• A literature review forms the basis for high-quality medical education research and helps maximize relevance, originality, generalizability, and impact.
• A literature review provides context, informs methodology, maximizes innovation, avoids duplicative research, and ensures that professional standards are met.
• Literature reviews take time, are iterative, and should continue throughout the research process.
• Researchers should maximize the use of human resources (librarians, colleagues), search tools (databases/search engines), and existing literature (related articles).
• Keeping organized is critical.

Such work is outside the scope of this article, which focuses on literature reviews to inform reports of original medical education research. We define such a literature review as a synthetic review and summary of what is known and unknown regarding the topic of a scholarly body of work, including the current work's place within the existing knowledge . While this type of literature review may not require the intensive search processes mandated by systematic reviews, it merits a thoughtful and rigorous approach.

Purpose and Importance of the Literature Review

An understanding of the current literature is critical for all phases of a research study. Lingard 9 recently invoked the “journal-as-conversation” metaphor as a way of understanding how one's research fits into the larger medical education conversation. As she described it: “Imagine yourself joining a conversation at a social event. After you hang about eavesdropping to get the drift of what's being said (the conversational equivalent of the literature review), you join the conversation with a contribution that signals your shared interest in the topic, your knowledge of what's already been said, and your intention.” 9

The literature review helps any researcher “join the conversation” by providing context, informing methodology, identifying innovation, minimizing duplicative research, and ensuring that professional standards are met. Understanding the current literature also promotes scholarship, as proposed by Boyer, 10 by contributing to 5 of the 6 standards by which scholarly work should be evaluated. 11 Specifically, the review helps the researcher (1) articulate clear goals, (2) show evidence of adequate preparation, (3) select appropriate methods, (4) communicate relevant results, and (5) engage in reflective critique.

Failure to conduct a high-quality literature review is associated with several problems identified in the medical education literature, including studies that are repetitive, not grounded in theory, methodologically weak, and fail to expand knowledge beyond a single setting. 12 Indeed, medical education scholars complain that many studies repeat work already published and contribute little new knowledge—a likely cause of which is failure to conduct a proper literature review. 3 , 4

Likewise, studies that lack theoretical grounding or a conceptual framework make study design and interpretation difficult. 13 When theory is used in medical education studies, it is often invoked at a superficial level. As Norman 14 noted, when theory is used appropriately, it helps articulate variables that might be linked together and why, and it allows the researcher to make hypotheses and define a study's context and scope. Ultimately, a proper literature review is a first critical step toward identifying relevant conceptual frameworks.

Another problem is that many medical education studies are methodologically weak. 12 Good research requires trained investigators who can articulate relevant research questions, operationally define variables of interest, and choose the best method for specific research questions. Conducting a proper literature review helps both novice and experienced researchers select rigorous research methodologies.

Finally, many studies in medical education are “one-offs,” that is, single studies undertaken because the opportunity presented itself locally. Such studies frequently are not oriented toward progressive knowledge building and generalization to other settings. A firm grasp of the literature can encourage a programmatic approach to research.

Approaching the Literature Review

Considering these issues, journals have a responsibility to demand from authors a thoughtful synthesis of their study's position within the field, and it is the authors' responsibility to provide such a synthesis, based on a literature review. The aforementioned purposes of the literature review mandate that the review occurs throughout all phases of a study, from conception and design, to implementation and analysis, to manuscript preparation and submission.

Planning the literature review requires understanding of journal requirements, which vary greatly by journal ( table 1 ). Authors are advised to take note of common problems with reporting results of the literature review. Table 2 lists the most common problems that we have encountered as authors, reviewers, and editors.

Sample of Journals' Author Instructions for Literature Reviews Conducted as Part of Original Research Article a

Common Problem Areas for Reporting Literature Reviews in the Context of Scholarly Articles

Locating and Organizing the Literature

Three resources may facilitate identifying relevant literature: human resources, search tools, and related literature. As the process requires time, it is important to begin searching for literature early in the process (ie, the study design phase). Identifying and understanding relevant studies will increase the likelihood of designing a relevant, adaptable, generalizable, and novel study that is based on educational or learning theory and can maximize impact.

Human Resources

A medical librarian can help translate research interests into an effective search strategy, familiarize researchers with available information resources, provide information on organizing information, and introduce strategies for keeping current with emerging research. Often, librarians are also aware of research across their institutions and may be able to connect researchers with similar interests. Reaching out to colleagues for suggestions may help researchers quickly locate resources that would not otherwise be on their radar.

During this process, researchers will likely identify other researchers writing on aspects of their topic. Researchers should consider searching for the publications of these relevant researchers (see table 3 for search strategies). Additionally, institutional websites may include curriculum vitae of such relevant faculty with access to their entire publication record, including difficult to locate publications, such as book chapters, dissertations, and technical reports.

Strategies for Finding Related Researcher Publications in Databases and Search Engines

Search Tools and Related Literature

Researchers will locate the majority of needed information using databases and search engines. Excellent resources are available to guide researchers in the mechanics of literature searches. 15 , 16

Because medical education research draws on a variety of disciplines, researchers should include search tools with coverage beyond medicine (eg, psychology, nursing, education, and anthropology) and that cover several publication types, such as reports, standards, conference abstracts, and book chapters (see the box for several information resources). Many search tools include options for viewing citations of selected articles. Examining cited references provides additional articles for review and a sense of the influence of the selected article on its field.

Box Information Resources

• Web of Science a
• Education Resource Information Center (ERIC)
• Cumulative Index of Nursing & Allied Health (CINAHL) a
• Google Scholar

Once relevant articles are located, it is useful to mine those articles for additional citations. One strategy is to examine references of key articles, especially review articles, for relevant citations.

Getting Organized

As the aforementioned resources will likely provide a tremendous amount of information, organization is crucial. Researchers should determine which details are most important to their study (eg, participants, setting, methods, and outcomes) and generate a strategy for keeping those details organized and accessible. Increasingly, researchers utilize digital tools, such as Evernote, to capture such information, which enables accessibility across digital workspaces and search capabilities. Use of citation managers can also be helpful as they store citations and, in some cases, can generate bibliographies ( table 4 ).

Citation Managers

Knowing When to Say When

Researchers often ask how to know when they have located enough citations. Unfortunately, there is no magic or ideal number of citations to collect. One strategy for checking coverage of the literature is to inspect references of relevant articles. As researchers review references they will start noticing a repetition of the same articles with few new articles appearing. This can indicate that the researcher has covered the literature base on a particular topic.

Putting It All Together

In preparing to write a research paper, it is important to consider which citations to include and how they will inform the introduction and discussion sections. The “Instructions to Authors” for the targeted journal will often provide guidance on structuring the literature review (or introduction) and the number of total citations permitted for each article category. Reviewing articles of similar type published in the targeted journal can also provide guidance regarding structure and average lengths of the introduction and discussion sections.

When selecting references for the introduction consider those that illustrate core background theoretical and methodological concepts, as well as recent relevant studies. The introduction should be brief and present references not as a laundry list or narrative of available literature, but rather as a synthesized summary to provide context for the current study and to identify the gap in the literature that the study intends to fill. For the discussion, citations should be thoughtfully selected to compare and contrast the present study's findings with the current literature and to indicate how the present study moves the field forward.

To facilitate writing a literature review, journals are increasingly providing helpful features to guide authors. For example, the resources available through JGME include several articles on writing. 17 The journal Perspectives on Medical Education recently launched “The Writer's Craft,” which is intended to help medical educators improve their writing. Additionally, many institutions have writing centers that provide web-based materials on writing a literature review, and some even have writing coaches.

The literature review is a vital part of medical education research and should occur throughout the research process to help researchers design a strong study and effectively communicate study results and importance. To achieve these goals, researchers are advised to plan and execute the literature review carefully. The guidance in this editorial provides considerations and recommendations that may improve the quality of literature reviews.

How to Write a Literature Review

As every student knows, writing informative essay and research papers is an integral part of the educational program. You create a thesis, support it using valid sources, and formulate systematic ideas surrounding it. However, not all students know that they will also have to face another type of paper known as a Literature Review in college. Let's take a closer look at this with our custom essay writer .

Literature Review Definition

As this is a less common academic writing type, students often ask: "What is a literature review?" According to the definition, a literature review is a body of work that explores various publications within a specific subject area and sometimes within a set timeframe.

This type of writing requires you to read and analyze various sources that relate to the main subject and present each unique comprehension of the publications. Lastly, a literature review should combine a summary with a synthesis of the documents used. A summary is a brief overview of the important information in the publication; a synthesis is a re-organization of the information that gives the writing a new and unique meaning.

Typically, a literature review is a part of a larger paper, such as a thesis or dissertation. However, you may also be given it as a stand-alone assignment.

The Purpose

The main purpose of a literature review is to summarize and synthesize the ideas created by previous authors without implementing personal opinions or other additional information.

However, a literature review objective is not just to list summaries of sources; rather, it is to notice a central trend or principle in all of the publications. Just like a research paper has a thesis that guides it on rails, a literature review has the main organizing principle (MOP). The goal of this type of academic writing is to identify the MOP and show how it exists in all of your supporting documents.

Why is a literature review important? The value of such work is explained by the following goals it pursues:

• Highlights the significance of the main topic within a specific subject area.
• Demonstrates and explains the background of research for a particular subject matter.
• Helps to find out the key themes, principles, concepts, and researchers that exist within a topic.
• Helps to reveal relationships between existing ideas/studies on a topic.
• Reveals the main points of controversy and gaps within a topic.
• Suggests questions to drive primary research based on previous studies.

Here are some example topics for writing literature reviews:

• Exploring racism in "To Kill a Mockingbird," "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn," and "Uncle Tom's Cabin."
• Isolationism in "The Catcher in the Rye," "Frankenstein," and "1984"
• Understanding Moral Dilemmas in "Crime and Punishment," "The Scarlet Letter," and "The Lifeboat"
• Corruption of Power in "Macbeth," "All the King's Men," and "Animal Farm"
• Emotional and Physical survival in "Lord of the Flies," "Hatchet," and "Congo."

How Long Is a Literature Review?

When facing the need to write a literature review, students tend to wonder, "how long should a literature review be?" In some cases, the length of your paper's body may be determined by your instructor. Be sure to read the guidelines carefully to learn what is expected from you.

Keeping your literature review around 15-30% of your entire paper is recommended if you haven't been provided with specific guidelines. To give you a rough idea, that is about 2-3 pages for a 15-page paper. In case you are writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, its length should be specified in the instructions provided.

Literature Review Format: APA, MLA, and Chicago

The essay format you use should adhere to the citation style preferred by your instructor. Seek clarification from your instructor for several other components as well to establish a desired literature review format:

• How many sources should you review, and what kind of sources should they be (published materials, journal articles, or websites)?
• What format should you use to cite the sources?
• How long should the review be?
• Should your review consist of a summary, synthesis, or a personal critique?
• Should your review include subheadings or background information for your sources?

If you want to format your paper in APA style, then follow these rules:

• Use 1-inch page margins.
• Unless provided with other instructions, use double-spacing throughout the whole text.
• Make sure you choose a readable font. The preferred font for APA papers is Times New Roman set to 12-point size.
• Include a header at the top of every page (in capital letters). The page header must be a shortened version of your essay title and limited to 50 characters, including spacing and punctuation.
• Put page numbers in the upper right corner of every page.
• When shaping your literature review outline in APA, don't forget to include a title page. This page should include the paper's name, the author's name, and the institutional affiliation. Your title must be typed with upper and lowercase letters and centered in the upper part of the page; use no more than 12 words, and avoid using abbreviations and useless words.

For MLA style text, apply the following guidelines:

• Double your spacing across the entire paper.
• Set ½-inch indents for each new paragraph.
• The preferred font for MLA papers is Times New Roman set to 12-point size.
• Include a header at the top of your paper's first page or on the title page (note that MLA style does not require you to have a title page, but you are allowed to decide to include one). A header in this format should include your full name; the name of your instructor; the name of the class, course, or section number; and the due date of the assignment.
• Include a running head in the top right corner of each page in your paper. Place it one inch from the page's right margin and half an inch from the top margin. Only include your last name and the page number separated by a space in the running head. Do not put the abbreviation p. before page numbers.

Finally, if you are required to write a literature review in Chicago style, here are the key rules to follow:

• Set page margins to no less than 1 inch.
• Use double spacing across the entire text, except when it comes to table titles, figure captions, notes, blockquotes, and entries within the bibliography or References.
• Do not put spaces between paragraphs.
• Make sure you choose a clear and easily-readable font. The preferred fonts for Chicago papers are Times New Roman and Courier, set to no less than 10-point size, but preferably to 12-point size.
• A cover (title) page should include your full name, class information, and the date. Center the cover page and place it one-third below the top of the page.
• Place page numbers in the upper right corner of each page, including the cover page.

Read also about harvard format - popular style used in papers.

Structure of a Literature Review

How to structure a literature review: Like many other types of academic writing, a literature review follows a typical intro-body-conclusion style with 5 paragraphs overall. Now, let’s look at each component of the basic literature review structure in detail:

• Introduction

You should direct your reader(s) towards the MOP (main organizing principle). This means that your information must start from a broad perspective and gradually narrow down until it reaches your focal point.

Start by presenting your general concept (Corruption, for example). After the initial presentation, narrow your introduction's focus towards the MOP by mentioning the criteria you used to select the literature sources you have chosen (Macbeth, All the King's Men, and Animal Farm). Finally, the introduction will end with the presentation of your MOP that should directly link it to all three literature sources.

Body Paragraphs

Generally, each body paragraph will focus on a specific source of literature laid out in the essay's introduction. As each source has its own frame of reference for the MOP, it is crucial to structure the review in the most logically consistent way possible. This means the writing should be structured chronologically, thematically or methodologically.

Chronologically

Breaking down your sources based on their publication date is a solid way to keep a correct historical timeline. If applied properly, it can present the development of a certain concept over time and provide examples in the form of literature. However, sometimes there are better alternatives we can use to structure the body.

Thematically

Instead of taking the "timeline approach," another option can be looking at the link between your MOP and your sources. Sometimes, the main idea will just glare from a piece of literature. Other times, the author may have to seek examples to prove their point. An experienced writer will usually present their sources by order of strength. For example, in "To Kill A Mockingbird," the entire novel was centralized around racism; in "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn," racism was one of many themes.

Methodologically

As made obvious by the terminology, this type of structuring focuses on the methods used to present the central concept. For example, in "1984", George Orwell uses the law-and-order approach and shows the dangers of a dystopia for a social species.

In "Frankenstein," Mary Shelley exposes the character's physical traits as repulsive and horrifying, forcing him to suffer in an isolated environment. By showcasing the various methods used to portray the MOP, the writer can compare them based on things like severity, ethicality, and overall impact.

After presenting your key findings in the body paragraphs, there are 3 final objectives to complete in the essay's conclusion. First, the author should summarize the findings they have made or found, in other words, and briefly answer the question: "What have you learned?"

After discussing that information, the next step is to present the significance of the information about our current world today. In other words, how can the reader take the information and apply it to today's society? From that point, we finish off with a breadcrumb trail.

As the author, you want to leave the readers' trail of thought within the actual essay topic. This provides them with a means of further investigation—meaning that the reader may consider where the discussion will go next.

Writing an Outline for a Literature Review

Students often underestimate the importance of planning the structure of their papers in advance. However, this is not a wise approach. Having a rough APA literature review outline (or other style outlines) will not only help you follow the right format and structure but will also make the writing process simpler and help ensure that you include all of the important information without missing anything.

How to write a literature review outline: As you already know from the Structure section of this guide, every part of your literature review performs its own important role. Therefore, you should create your outline while keeping the general introduction-body-conclusion structure in mind and ensuring that each section meets its own objectives. However, it is important to remember that a literature review outline is slightly different from outlines of other types of essays because it does not provide new information. Instead, it focuses on existing studies relevant to the main topic. ‍

Here is a literature review outline example on the subject of the Ebola virus to help you get it right:

• Introduce the general topic. Provide background information on the Ebola virus: genome, pathogenesis, transmission, epidemiology, treatment, etc.
• Shape the main research question: What is the potential role of arthropods (mechanical or biological vectors) in the distribution of the Ebola virus?
• Methodology: For example, the information was searched through X databases to find relevant research articles about the Ebola virus and arthropods' role in its spreading. The data was extracted using a standardized form.
• Expected outcomes
• Overall trends in the literature on this topic: While the natural reservoir of the virus is still not known with certainty, many researchers believe that arthropods (and fruit bats, in particular) pay a significant role in the distribution of the virus.
• Subject 1: A brief overview of the particular piece of literature in general terms; an analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the research questions, methods, procedures, and outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak points, gaps, and contradictions.
• Subject 2: A brief overview of the particular piece of literature in general terms; an analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the research questions, methods, procedures, and outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak points, gaps, and contradictions.
• Subject 3:  A brief overview of the particular piece of literature in general terms; an analysis of the key aspects of the study; a review of the research questions, methods, procedures, and outcomes; and an overview of the strong and weak points, gaps, and contradictions.
• Indicate the relationships between the pieces of literature discussed. Emphasize key themes, common patterns, and trends. Talk about the pros and cons of the different approaches taken by the authors/researchers.
• State which studies seem to be the most influential.
• Emphasize the major contradictions and points of disagreement. Define the gaps still to be covered (if any).
• If applicable: define how your own study will contribute to further disclosure of the topic.

Hopefully, this sample outline will help you to structure your own paper. However, if you feel like you need some more advice on how to organize your review, don’t hesitate to search for more literature review outline examples in APA or other styles on the Web, or simply ask our writers to get a dissertation help .

Need Help With LITERATURE REVIEW?

Count on our literature review writing service to get it done! We will make your literature essay, we only need your paper requirements to save your precious time and nerves from writing it on your own!

How to Write a Good Literature Review

Whether you are writing a literature review within the framework of a large research project (e.g. thesis, dissertation, or other) or as a stand-alone assignment, the approach you should take to writing generally remains the same.

Whether you are writing a literature review within the framework of a large research project (e.g., thesis, dissertation, or other) or as a stand-alone assignment, the approach you should take to writing generally remains the same.

Now, as you know about the general rules and have a basic literature review outline template, let's define the steps to take to handle this task right with our service:

Step 1: Identifying the Topic

This is probably the only matter you may approach differently depending on whether your literature review comes within a research paper or a separate assignment altogether. If you are creating a literature review as a part of another work, you need to search for literature related to your main research questions and problems. Respectively, if you are writing it as a stand-alone task, you will have to pick a relevant topic and central question upon which you will collect the literature. Earlier in this guide, we suggested some engaging topics to guide your search.

Step 2: Conducting Research

When you have a clearly defined topic, it is time to start collecting literature for your review. We recommend starting by compiling a list of relevant keywords related to your central question—to make the entire research process much simpler and help you find relevant publications faster.

When you have a list of keywords, use them to search for valid and relevant sources. At this point, be sure to use only trusted sources, such as ones from university libraries, online scientific databases, etc.

Once you have found some sources, be sure to define whether or not they are actually relevant to your topic and research question. To save time, you can read abstracts to get general ideas of what the papers are about instead of the whole thing.

Pro Tip: When you finally find a few valid publications, take a look at their bibliographies to discover other relevant sources as well.

Step 3: Assess and Prioritize Sources

Throughout your research, you will likely find plenty of relevant literature to include in your literature review. At this point, students often make the mistake of trying to fit all the collected sources into their reviews. Instead, we suggest looking at what you've collected once more, evaluating the available sources, and selecting the most relevant ones. You most likely won't be able to read everything you find on a given topic and then be able to synthesize all of the sources into a single literature review. That's why prioritizing them is important.

To evaluate which sources are worth including in your review, keep in mind the following criteria:

• Credibility;
• Innovation;
• Key insights;

Furthermore, as you read the sources, don’t forget to take notes on everything you can incorporate into the review later. And be sure to get your citations in place early on. If you cite the selected sources at the initial stage, you will find it easier to create your annotated bibliography later on.

Step 4: Identify Relationships, Key Ideas, and Gaps

Before you can move on to outlining and writing your literature review, the final step is determining the relationships between the studies that already exist. Identifying the relationships will help you organize the existing knowledge, build a solid literature outline, and (if necessary) indicate your own research contribution to a specific field.

Some of the key points to keep an eye out for are:

• Main themes;
• Contradictions and debates;
• Influential studies or theories;
• Trends and patterns;

Here are a few examples: Common trends may include a focus on specific groups of people across different studies. Most researchers may have increased interest in certain aspects of the topic regarding key themes. Contradictions may include some disagreement concerning the theories and outcomes of a study. And finally, gaps most often refer to a lack of research on certain aspects of a topic.

Step 5: Make an Outline

Although students tend to neglect this stage, outlining is one of the most important steps in writing every academic paper. This is the easiest way to organize the body of your text and ensure that you haven't missed anything important. Besides, having a rough idea of what you will write about in the paper will help you get it right faster and more easily. Earlier in this guide, we already discussed the basic structure of a literature review and gave you an example of a good outline. At this workflow stage, you can use all of the knowledge you've gained from us to build your own outline.

Step 6: Move on to Writing

Having found and created all of your sources, notes, citations, and a detailed outline, you can finally get to the writing part of the process. At this stage, all you need to do is follow the plan you've created and keep in mind the overall structure and format defined in your professor's instructions.

Step 7: Adding the Final Touches

Most students make a common mistake and skip the final stage of the process, which includes proofreading and editing. We recommend taking enough time for these steps to ensure that your work will be worth the highest score. Do not underestimate the importance of proofreading and editing, and allocate enough time for these steps.

Pro Tip: Before moving on to proofreading and editing, be sure to set your literature review aside for a day or two. This will give you a chance to take your mind off it and then get back to proofreading with a fresh perspective. This tip will ensure that you won't miss out on any gaps or errors that might be present in your text.

These steps will help you create a top-notch literature review with ease! Want to get more advice on how to handle this body of work? Here are the top 3 tips you need to keep in mind when writing a literature review:

1. Good Sources

When working on a literature review, the most important thing any writer should remember is to find the best possible sources for their MOP. This means that you should select and filter through about 5-10 different options while doing initial research.

The stronger a piece of literature showcases the central point, the better the quality of the entire review.

2. Synthesize The Literature

Make sure to structure the review in the most effective way possible, whether it be chronologically, thematically, or methodologically. Understand what exactly you would like to say, and structure the source comparison accordingly.

3. Avoid Generalizations

Remember that each piece of literature will approach the MOP from a different angle. As the author, make sure to present the contrasts in approaches clearly and don't include general statements that offer no value.

Literature Review Examples

You can find two well-written literature reviews by the EssayPro writing team below. They will help you understand what the final product of a literature review should ideally look like.

The first literature review compares monolingual and bilingual language acquisition skills and uses various sources to prove its point:

The second literature review compares the impact of fear and pain on a protagonist’s overall development in various settings:

Both reviews will help you sharpen your skills and provide good guidelines for writing high-quality papers.

Get Help from an Essay Writer

Still aren’t sure whether you can handle literature review writing on your own? No worries because you can pay for essay writing and our service has got you covered! Boost your grades is to place an order in a few quick clicks and we will satisfy your write my paper request.

is an expert in nursing and healthcare, with a strong background in history, law, and literature. Holding advanced degrees in nursing and public health, his analytical approach and comprehensive knowledge help students navigate complex topics. On EssayPro blog, Adam provides insightful articles on everything from historical analysis to the intricacies of healthcare policies. In his downtime, he enjoys historical documentaries and volunteering at local clinics.

• Link to facebook
• Link to linkedin
• Link to twitter
• Link to youtube
• Writing Tips

5 Reasons the Literature Review Is Crucial to Your Paper

• 3-minute read
• 8th November 2016

People often treat writing the literature review in an academic paper as a formality. Usually, this means simply listing various studies vaguely related to their work and leaving it at that.

But this overlooks how important the literature review is to a well-written experimental report or research paper. As such, we thought we’d take a moment to go over what a literature review should do and why you should give it the attention it deserves.

What Is a Literature Review?

Common in the social and physical sciences, but also sometimes required in the humanities, a literature review is a summary of past research in your subject area.

Sometimes this is a standalone investigation of how an idea or field of inquiry has developed over time. However, more usually it’s the part of an academic paper, thesis or dissertation that sets out the background against which a study takes place.

There are several reasons why we do this.

Reason #1: To Demonstrate Understanding

In a college paper, you can use a literature review to demonstrate your understanding of the subject matter. This means identifying, summarizing and critically assessing past research that is relevant to your own work.

Reason #2: To Justify Your Research

The literature review also plays a big role in justifying your study and setting your research question . This is because examining past research allows you to identify gaps in the literature, which you can then attempt to fill or address with your own work.

Find this useful?

Subscribe to our newsletter and get writing tips from our editors straight to your inbox.

Reason #3: Setting a Theoretical Framework

It can help to think of the literature review as the foundations for your study, since the rest of your work will build upon the ideas and existing research you discuss therein.

A crucial part of this is formulating a theoretical framework , which comprises the concepts and theories that your work is based upon and against which its success will be judged.

Reason #4: Developing a Methodology

Conducting a literature review before beginning research also lets you see how similar studies have been conducted in the past. By examining the strengths and weaknesses of existing research, you can thus make sure you adopt the most appropriate methods, data sources and analytical techniques for your own work.

Reason #5: To Support Your Own Findings

The significance of any results you achieve will depend to some extent on how they compare to those reported in the existing literature. When you come to write up your findings, your literature review will therefore provide a crucial point of reference.

If your results replicate past research, for instance, you can say that your work supports existing theories. If your results are different, though, you’ll need to discuss why and whether the difference is important.

Share this article:

Post A New Comment

Got content that needs a quick turnaround? Let us polish your work. Explore our editorial business services.

5-minute read

Free Email Newsletter Template (2024)

Promoting a brand means sharing valuable insights to connect more deeply with your audience, and...

6-minute read

How to Write a Nonprofit Grant Proposal

If you’re seeking funding to support your charitable endeavors as a nonprofit organization, you’ll need...

9-minute read

How to Use Infographics to Boost Your Presentation

Is your content getting noticed? Capturing and maintaining an audience’s attention is a challenge when...

8-minute read

Why Interactive PDFs Are Better for Engagement

Are you looking to enhance engagement and captivate your audience through your professional documents? Interactive...

7-minute read

Seven Key Strategies for Voice Search Optimization

Voice search optimization is rapidly shaping the digital landscape, requiring content professionals to adapt their...

4-minute read

Five Creative Ways to Showcase Your Digital Portfolio

Are you a creative freelancer looking to make a lasting impression on potential clients or...

Make sure your writing is the best it can be with our expert English proofreading and editing.

Importance and Issues of Literature Review in Research

• November 2020
• Conference: 'Tackle a literature review' under the series 'Publish or Perish‘ organised by Mysore University Library and Mysore Librarians and Information Scientists Association (MyLISA) on November 30, 2013

• Indian Space Research Organization

Discover the world's research

• 25+ million members
• 160+ million publication pages
• 2.3+ billion citations
• TABINDA RANI, HAMIDA BIBI, ZARMINA BALOCH

• Recruit researchers
• Join for free
• Login Email Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google Welcome back! Please log in. Email · Hint Tip: Most researchers use their institutional email address as their ResearchGate login Password Forgot password? Keep me logged in Log in or Continue with Google No account? Sign up

• Resources Home 🏠
• Try SciSpace Copilot
• Search research papers
• Add Copilot Extension
• Try AI Detector
• Try Paraphraser
• Try Citation Generator
• April Papers
• June Papers
• July Papers

Types of Literature Review — A Guide for Researchers

Table of Contents

Researchers often face challenges when choosing the appropriate type of literature review for their study. Regardless of the type of research design and the topic of a research problem , they encounter numerous queries, including:

What is the right type of literature review my study demands?

• How do we gather the data?
• How to conduct one?
• How reliable are the review findings?
• How do we employ them in our research? And the list goes on.

If you’re also dealing with such a hefty questionnaire, this article is of help. Read through this piece of guide to get an exhaustive understanding of the different types of literature reviews and their step-by-step methodologies along with a dash of pros and cons discussed.

Heading from scratch!

What is a Literature Review?

A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of existing knowledge on a particular topic, which is quintessential to any research project. Researchers employ various literature reviews based on their research goals and methodologies. The review process involves assembling, critically evaluating, and synthesizing existing scientific publications relevant to the research question at hand. It serves multiple purposes, including identifying gaps in existing literature, providing theoretical background, and supporting the rationale for a research study.

What is the importance of a Literature review in research?

Literature review in research serves several key purposes, including:

• Background of the study: Provides proper context for the research. It helps researchers understand the historical development, theoretical perspectives, and key debates related to their research topic.
• Identification of research gaps: By reviewing existing literature, researchers can identify gaps or inconsistencies in knowledge, paving the way for new research questions and hypotheses relevant to their study.
• Theoretical framework development: Facilitates the development of theoretical frameworks by cultivating diverse perspectives and empirical findings. It helps researchers refine their conceptualizations and theoretical models.
• Methodological guidance: Offers methodological guidance by highlighting the documented research methods and techniques used in previous studies. It assists researchers in selecting appropriate research designs, data collection methods, and analytical tools.
• Quality assurance and upholding academic integrity: Conducting a thorough literature review demonstrates the rigor and scholarly integrity of the research. It ensures that researchers are aware of relevant studies and can accurately attribute ideas and findings to their original sources.

Types of Literature Review

Literature review plays a crucial role in guiding the research process , from providing the background of the study to research dissemination and contributing to the synthesis of the latest theoretical literature review findings in academia.

However, not all types of literature reviews are the same; they vary in terms of methodology, approach, and purpose. Let's have a look at the various types of literature reviews to gain a deeper understanding of their applications.

1. Narrative Literature Review

A narrative literature review, also known as a traditional literature review, involves analyzing and summarizing existing literature without adhering to a structured methodology. It typically provides a descriptive overview of key concepts, theories, and relevant findings of the research topic.

Unlike other types of literature reviews, narrative reviews reinforce a more traditional approach, emphasizing the interpretation and discussion of the research findings rather than strict adherence to methodological review criteria. It helps researchers explore diverse perspectives and insights based on the research topic and acts as preliminary work for further investigation.

Steps to Conduct a Narrative Literature Review

Source:- https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Steps-of-writing-a-narrative-review_fig1_354466408

Define the research question or topic:

The first step in conducting a narrative literature review is to clearly define the research question or topic of interest. Defining the scope and purpose of the review includes — What specific aspect of the topic do you want to explore? What are the main objectives of the research? Refine your research question based on the specific area you want to explore.

Conduct a thorough literature search

Once the research question is defined, you can conduct a comprehensive literature search. Explore and use relevant databases and search engines like SciSpace Discover to identify credible and pertinent, scholarly articles and publications.

Select relevant studies

Before choosing the right set of studies, it’s vital to determine inclusion (studies that should possess the required factors) and exclusion criteria for the literature and then carefully select papers. For example — Which studies or sources will be included based on relevance, quality, and publication date?

*Important (applies to all the reviews): Inclusion criteria are the factors a study must include (For example: Include only peer-reviewed articles published between 2022-2023, etc.). Exclusion criteria are the factors that wouldn’t be required for your search strategy (Example: exclude irrelevant papers, preprints, written in non-English, etc.)

Critically analyze the literature

Once the relevant studies are shortlisted, evaluate the methodology, findings, and limitations of each source and jot down key themes, patterns, and contradictions. You can use efficient AI tools to conduct a thorough literature review and analyze all the required information.

Synthesize and integrate the findings

Now, you can weave together the reviewed studies, underscoring significant findings such that new frameworks, contrasting viewpoints, and identifying knowledge gaps.

Discussion and conclusion

This is an important step before crafting a narrative review — summarize the main findings of the review and discuss their implications in the relevant field. For example — What are the practical implications for practitioners? What are the directions for future research for them?

Write a cohesive narrative review

Organize the review into coherent sections and structure your review logically, guiding the reader through the research landscape and offering valuable insights. Use clear and concise language to convey key points effectively.

Structure of Narrative Literature Review

A well-structured, narrative analysis or literature review typically includes the following components:

• Introduction: Provides an overview of the topic, objectives of the study, and rationale for the review.
• Background: Highlights relevant background information and establish the context for the review.
• Main Body: Indexes the literature into thematic sections or categories, discussing key findings, methodologies, and theoretical frameworks.
• Discussion: Analyze and synthesize the findings of the reviewed studies, stressing similarities, differences, and any gaps in the literature.
• Conclusion: Summarizes the main findings of the review, identifies implications for future research, and offers concluding remarks.

Pros and Cons of Narrative Literature Review

• Flexibility in methodology and doesn’t necessarily rely on structured methodologies
• Follows traditional approach and provides valuable and contextualized insights
• Suitable for exploring complex or interdisciplinary topics. For example — Climate change and human health, Cybersecurity and privacy in the digital age, and more
• Subjectivity in data selection and interpretation
• Potential for bias in the review process
• Lack of rigor compared to systematic reviews

Example of Well-Executed Narrative Literature Reviews

Paper title:  Examining Moral Injury in Clinical Practice: A Narrative Literature Review

Source: SciSpace

While narrative reviews offer flexibility, academic integrity remains paramount. So, ensure proper citation of all sources and maintain a transparent and factual approach throughout your critical narrative review, itself.

2. Systematic Review

A systematic literature review is one of the comprehensive types of literature review that follows a structured approach to assembling, analyzing, and synthesizing existing research relevant to a particular topic or question. It involves clearly defined criteria for exploring and choosing studies, as well as rigorous methods for evaluating the quality of relevant studies.

It plays a prominent role in evidence-based practice and decision-making across various domains, including healthcare, social sciences, education, health sciences, and more. By systematically investigating available literature, researchers can identify gaps in knowledge, evaluate the strength of evidence, and report future research directions.

Steps to Conduct Systematic Reviews

Source:- https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Steps-of-Systematic-Literature-Review_fig1_321422320

Here are the key steps involved in conducting a systematic literature review

Formulate a clear and focused research question

Clearly define the research question or objective of the review. It helps to centralize the literature search strategy and determine inclusion criteria for relevant studies.

Develop a thorough literature search strategy

Design a comprehensive search strategy to identify relevant studies. It involves scrutinizing scientific databases and all relevant articles in journals. Plus, seek suggestions from domain experts and review reference lists of relevant review articles.

Screening and selecting studies

Employ predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to systematically screen the identified studies. This screening process also typically involves multiple reviewers independently assessing the eligibility of each study.

Data extraction

Extract key information from selected studies using standardized forms or protocols. It includes study characteristics, methods, results, and conclusions.

Critical appraisal

Evaluate the methodological quality and potential biases of included studies. Various tools (BMC medical research methodology) and criteria can be implemented for critical evaluation depending on the study design and research quetions .

Data synthesis

Analyze and synthesize review findings from individual studies to draw encompassing conclusions or identify overarching patterns and explore heterogeneity among studies.

Interpretation and conclusion

Interpret the findings about the research question, considering the strengths and limitations of the research evidence. Draw conclusions and implications for further research.

The final step — Report writing

Craft a detailed report of the systematic literature review adhering to the established guidelines of PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). This ensures transparency and reproducibility of the review process.

By following these steps, a systematic literature review aims to provide a comprehensive and unbiased summary of existing evidence, help make informed decisions, and advance knowledge in the respective domain or field.

Structure of a systematic literature review

A well-structured systematic literature review typically consists of the following sections:

• Introduction: Provides background information on the research topic, outlines the review objectives, and enunciates the scope of the study.
• Methodology: Describes the literature search strategy, selection criteria, data extraction process, and other methods used for data synthesis, extraction, or other data analysis..
• Results: Presents the review findings, including a summary of the incorporated studies and their key findings.
• Discussion: Interprets the findings in light of the review objectives, discusses their implications, and identifies limitations or promising areas for future research.
• Conclusion: Summarizes the main review findings and provides suggestions based on the evidence presented in depth meta analysis.

*Important (applies to all the reviews): Remember, the specific structure of your literature review may vary depending on your topic, research question, and intended audience. However, adhering to a clear and logical hierarchy ensures your review effectively analyses and synthesizes knowledge and contributes valuable insights for readers.

Pros and Cons of Systematic Literature Review

• Adopts rigorous and transparent methodology
• Minimizes bias and enhances the reliability of the study
• Provides evidence-based insights
• Time and resource-intensive
• High dependency on the quality of available literature (literature research strategy should be accurate)
• Potential for publication bias

Example of Well-Executed Systematic Literature Review

Paper title: Systematic Reviews: Understanding the Best Evidence For Clinical Decision-making in Health Care: Pros and Cons.

Read this detailed article on how to use AI tools to conduct a systematic review for your research!

3. Scoping Literature Review

A scoping literature review is a methodological review type of literature review that adopts an iterative approach to systematically map the existing literature on a particular topic or research area. It involves identifying, selecting, and synthesizing relevant papers to provide an overview of the size and scope of available evidence. Scoping reviews are broader in scope and include a diverse range of study designs and methodologies especially focused on health services research.

The main purpose of a scoping literature review is to examine the extent, range, and nature of existing studies on a topic, thereby identifying gaps in research, inconsistencies, and areas for further investigation. Additionally, scoping reviews can help researchers identify suitable methodologies and formulate clinical recommendations. They also act as the frameworks for future systematic reviews or primary research studies.

Scoping reviews are primarily focused on —

• Emerging or evolving topics — where the research landscape is still growing or budding. Example — Whole Systems Approaches to Diet and Healthy Weight: A Scoping Review of Reviews .
• Broad and complex topics : With a vast amount of existing literature.
• Scenarios where a systematic review is not feasible: Due to limited resources or time constraints.

Steps to Conduct a Scoping Literature Review

While Scoping reviews are not as rigorous as systematic reviews, however, they still follow a structured approach. Here are the steps:

Identify the research question: Define the broad topic you want to explore.

Identify Relevant Studies: Conduct a comprehensive search of relevant literature using appropriate databases, keywords, and search strategies.

Select studies to be included in the review: Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, determine the appropriate studies to be included in the review.

Data extraction and charting : Extract relevant information from selected studies, such as year, author, main results, study characteristics, key findings, and methodological approaches.  However, it varies depending on the research question.

Collate, summarize, and report the results: Analyze and summarize the extracted data to identify key themes and trends. Then, present the findings of the scoping review in a clear and structured manner, following established guidelines and frameworks .

Structure of a Scoping Literature Review

A scoping literature review typically follows a structured format similar to a systematic review. It includes the following sections:

• Introduction: Introduce the research topic and objectives of the review, providing the historical context, and rationale for the study.
• Methods : Describe the methods used to conduct the review, including search strategies, study selection criteria, and data extraction procedures.
• Results: Present the findings of the review, including key themes, concepts, and patterns identified in the literature review.
• Discussion: Examine the implications of the findings, including strengths, limitations, and areas for further examination.
• Conclusion: Recapitulate the main findings of the review and their implications for future research, policy, or practice.

Pros and Cons of Scoping Literature Review

• Provides a comprehensive overview of existing literature
• Helps to identify gaps and areas for further research
• Suitable for exploring broad or complex research questions
• Doesn’t provide the depth of analysis offered by systematic reviews
• Subject to researcher bias in study selection and data extraction
• Requires careful consideration of literature search strategies and inclusion criteria to ensure comprehensiveness and validity.

In short, a scoping review helps map the literature on developing or emerging topics and identifying gaps. It might be considered as a step before conducting another type of review, such as a systematic review. Basically, acts as a precursor for other literature reviews.

Example of a Well-Executed Scoping Literature Review

Paper title: Health Chatbots in Africa Literature: A Scoping Review

Check out the key differences between Systematic and Scoping reviews — Evaluating literature review: systematic vs. scoping reviews

4. Integrative Literature Review

Integrative Literature Review (ILR) is a type of literature review that proposes a distinctive way to analyze and synthesize existing literature on a specific topic, providing a thorough understanding of research and identifying potential gaps for future research.

Unlike a systematic review, which emphasizes quantitative studies and follows strict inclusion criteria, an ILR embraces a more pliable approach. It works beyond simply summarizing findings — it critically analyzes, integrates, and interprets research from various methodologies (qualitative, quantitative, mixed methods) to provide a deeper understanding of the research landscape. ILRs provide a holistic and systematic overview of existing research, integrating findings from various methodologies. ILRs are ideal for exploring intricate research issues, examining manifold perspectives, and developing new research questions.

Steps to Conduct an Integrative Literature Review

• Identify the research question: Clearly define the research question or topic of interest as formulating a clear and focused research question is critical to leading the entire review process.
• Literature search strategy: Employ systematic search techniques to locate relevant literature across various databases and sources.
• Evaluate the quality of the included studies : Critically assess the methodology, rigor, and validity of each study by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to filter and select studies aligned with the research objectives.
• Data Extraction: Extract relevant data from selected studies using a structured approach.
• Synthesize the findings : Thoroughly analyze the selected literature, identify key themes, and synthesize findings to derive noteworthy insights.
• Critical appraisal: Critically evaluate the quality and validity of qualitative research and included studies by using BMC medical research methodology.
• Interpret and present your findings: Discuss the purpose and implications of your analysis, spotlighting key insights and limitations. Organize and present the findings coherently and systematically.

Structure of an Integrative Literature Review

• Introduction : Provide an overview of the research topic and the purpose of the integrative review.
• Methods: Describe the opted literature search strategy, selection criteria, and data extraction process.
• Results: Present the synthesized findings, including key themes, patterns, and contradictions.
• Discussion: Interpret the findings about the research question, emphasizing implications for theory, practice, and prospective research.
• Conclusion: Summarize the main findings, limitations, and contributions of the integrative review.

Pros and Cons of Integrative Literature Review

• Informs evidence-based practice and policy to the relevant stakeholders of the research.
• Contributes to theory development and methodological advancement, especially in the healthcare arena.
• Integrates diverse perspectives and findings
• Time-consuming process due to the extensive literature search and synthesis
• Requires advanced analytical and critical thinking skills
• Potential for bias in study selection and interpretation
• The quality of included studies may vary, affecting the validity of the review

Example of Integrative Literature Reviews

Paper Title: An Integrative Literature Review: The Dual Impact of Technological Tools on Health and Technostress Among Older Workers

5. Rapid Literature Review

A Rapid Literature Review (RLR) is the fastest type of literature review which makes use of a streamlined approach for synthesizing literature summaries, offering a quicker and more focused alternative to traditional systematic reviews. Despite employing identical research methods, it often simplifies or omits specific steps to expedite the process. It allows researchers to gain valuable insights into current research trends and identify key findings within a shorter timeframe, often ranging from a few days to a few weeks — unlike traditional literature reviews, which may take months or even years to complete.

When to Consider a Rapid Literature Review?

• When time impediments demand a swift summary of existing research
• For emerging topics where the latest literature requires quick evaluation
• To report pilot studies or preliminary research before embarking on a comprehensive systematic review

Steps to Conduct a Rapid Literature Review

• Define the research question or topic of interest. A well-defined question guides the search process and helps researchers focus on relevant studies.
• Determine key databases and sources of relevant literature to ensure comprehensive coverage.
• Develop literature search strategies using appropriate keywords and filters to fetch a pool of potential scientific articles.
• Screen search results based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria.
• Extract and summarize relevant information from the above-preferred studies.
• Synthesize findings to identify key themes, patterns, or gaps in the literature.
• Prepare a concise report or a summary of the RLR findings.

Structure of a Rapid Literature Review

An effective structure of an RLR typically includes the following sections:

• Introduction: Briefly introduce the research topic and objectives of the RLR.
• Methodology: Describe the search strategy, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and data extraction process.
• Results: Present a summary of the findings, including key themes or patterns identified.
• Discussion: Interpret the findings, discuss implications, and highlight any limitations or areas for further research
• Conclusion: Summarize the key findings and their implications for practice or future research

Pros and Cons of Rapid Literature Review

• RLRs can be completed quickly, authorizing timely decision-making
• RLRs are a cost-effective approach since they require fewer resources compared to traditional literature reviews
• Offers great accessibility as RLRs provide prompt access to synthesized evidence for stakeholders
• RLRs are flexible as they can be easily adapted for various research contexts and objectives
• RLR reports are limited and restricted, not as in-depth as systematic reviews, and do not provide comprehensive coverage of the literature compared to traditional reviews.
• Susceptible to bias because of the expedited nature of RLRs. It would increase the chance of overlooking relevant studies or biases in the selection process.
• Due to time constraints, RLR findings might not be robust enough as compared to systematic reviews.

Example of a Well-Executed Rapid Literature Review

Paper Title: What Is the Impact of ChatGPT on Education? A Rapid Review of the Literature

A Summary of Literature Review Types

Tools and Resources for Conducting Different Types of Literature Reviews

Online scientific databases.

Platforms such as SciSpace , PubMed , Scopus , Elsevier , and Web of Science provide access to a vast array of scholarly literature, facilitating the search and data retrieval process.

Reference management software

Tools like SciSpace Citation Generator , EndNote, Zotero , and Mendeley assist researchers in organizing, annotating, and citing relevant literature, streamlining the review process altogether.

Automate Literature Review with AI tools

Automate the literature review process by using tools like SciSpace literature review which helps you compare and contrast multiple papers all on one screen in an easy-to-read matrix format. You can effortlessly analyze and interpret the review findings tailored to your study. It also supports the review in 75+ languages, making it more manageable even for non-English speakers.

Goes without saying — literature review plays a pivotal role in academic research to identify the current trends and provide insights to pave the way for future research endeavors. Different types of literature review has their own strengths and limitations, making them suitable for different research designs and contexts. Whether conducting a narrative review, systematic review, scoping review, integrative review, or rapid literature review, researchers must cautiously consider the objectives, resources, and the nature of the research topic.

If you’re currently working on a literature review and still adopting a manual and traditional approach, switch to the automated AI literature review workspace and transform your traditional literature review into a rapid one by extracting all the latest and relevant data for your research!

There you go!

Frequently Asked Questions

Narrative reviews give a general overview of a topic based on the author's knowledge. They may lack clear criteria and can be biased. On the other hand, systematic reviews aim to answer specific research questions by following strict methods. They're thorough but time-consuming.

A systematic review collects and analyzes existing research to provide an overview of a topic, while a meta-analysis statistically combines data from multiple studies to draw conclusions about the overall effect of an intervention or relationship between variables.

A systematic review thoroughly analyzes existing research on a specific topic using strict methods. In contrast, a scoping review offers a broader overview of the literature without evaluating individual studies in depth.

A systematic review thoroughly examines existing research using a rigorous process, while a rapid review provides a quicker summary of evidence, often by simplifying some of the systematic review steps to meet shorter timelines.

A systematic review carefully examines many studies on a single topic using specific guidelines. Conversely, an integrative review blends various types of research to provide a more comprehensive understanding of the topic.

You might also like

Boosting Citations: A Comparative Analysis of Graphical Abstract vs. Video Abstract

The Impact of Visual Abstracts on Boosting Citations

Introducing SciSpace’s Citation Booster To Increase Research Visibility

How to write a literature review introduction (+ examples)

The introduction to a literature review serves as your reader’s guide through your academic work and thought process. Explore the significance of literature review introductions in review papers, academic papers, essays, theses, and dissertations. We delve into the purpose and necessity of these introductions, explore the essential components of literature review introductions, and provide step-by-step guidance on how to craft your own, along with examples.

Why you need an introduction for a literature review

In academic writing , the introduction for a literature review is an indispensable component. Effective academic writing requires proper paragraph structuring to guide your reader through your argumentation. This includes providing an introduction to your literature review.

It is imperative to remember that you should never start sharing your findings abruptly. Even if there isn’t a dedicated introduction section .

When you need an introduction for a literature review

There are three main scenarios in which you need an introduction for a literature review:

What to include in a literature review introduction

It is crucial to customize the content and depth of your literature review introduction according to the specific format of your academic work.

Academic literature review paper

The introduction of an academic literature review paper, which does not rely on empirical data, often necessitates a more extensive introduction than the brief literature review introductions typically found in empirical papers. It should encompass:

Regular literature review section in an academic article or essay

In a standard 8000-word journal article, the literature review section typically spans between 750 and 1250 words. The first few sentences or the first paragraph within this section often serve as an introduction. It should encompass:

Introduction to a literature review chapter in thesis or dissertation

Some students choose to incorporate a brief introductory section at the beginning of each chapter, including the literature review chapter. Alternatively, others opt to seamlessly integrate the introduction into the initial sentences of the literature review itself. Both approaches are acceptable, provided that you incorporate the following elements:

Examples of literature review introductions

Example 1: an effective introduction for an academic literature review paper.

To begin, let’s delve into the introduction of an academic literature review paper. We will examine the paper “How does culture influence innovation? A systematic literature review”, which was published in 2018 in the journal Management Decision.

Example 2: An effective introduction to a literature review section in an academic paper

The second example represents a typical academic paper, encompassing not only a literature review section but also empirical data, a case study, and other elements. We will closely examine the introduction to the literature review section in the paper “The environmentalism of the subalterns: a case study of environmental activism in Eastern Kurdistan/Rojhelat”, which was published in 2021 in the journal Local Environment.

Thus, the author successfully introduces the literature review, from which point onward it dives into the main concept (‘subalternity’) of the research, and reviews the literature on socio-economic justice and environmental degradation.

Examples 3-5: Effective introductions to literature review chapters

Numerous universities offer online repositories where you can access theses and dissertations from previous years, serving as valuable sources of reference. Many of these repositories, however, may require you to log in through your university account. Nevertheless, a few open-access repositories are accessible to anyone, such as the one by the University of Manchester . It’s important to note though that copyright restrictions apply to these resources, just as they would with published papers.

Master’s thesis literature review introduction

Phd thesis literature review chapter introduction.

The second example is Deep Learning on Semi-Structured Data and its Applications to Video-Game AI, Woof, W. (Author). 31 Dec 2020, a PhD thesis completed at the University of Manchester . In Chapter 2, the author offers a comprehensive introduction to the topic in four paragraphs, with the final paragraph serving as an overview of the chapter’s structure:

PhD thesis literature review introduction

The last example is the doctoral thesis Metacognitive strategies and beliefs: Child correlates and early experiences Chan, K. Y. M. (Author). 31 Dec 2020 . The author clearly conducted a systematic literature review, commencing the review section with a discussion of the methodology and approach employed in locating and analyzing the selected records.

Steps to write your own literature review introduction

Master academia, get new content delivered directly to your inbox, the best answers to "what are your plans for the future", 10 tips for engaging your audience in academic writing, related articles, minor revisions: sample peer review comments and examples, sample emails to your thesis supervisor, co-authorship guidelines to successfully co-author a scientific paper, how to select a journal for publication as a phd student.

Writing the Literature Review

Barry Mauer and John Venecek

Note: Not all research papers contain literature reviews in their finished or published form. Check your assignment and guidelines to see if one is required. Even if a literature review is not required, you still need to read the available scholarly literature on your topic so you can join the scholarly conversation.

• The Literature Review

What is the Purpose of the Review?

What is the scope of the review, strategies for getting started, types of literature reviews, composition guidelines, how to locate reviews by discipline, key takeaways.

We also provide the following activities:

Types of Literature Reviews [Refresher]

Writing the literature review [refresher], the literature review [1].

Conducting a literary studies research project involves time and effort, with much of it going towards the development of a literature review . A literature review might fill several pages of your research paper and usually appears soon after an introduction but before you present your detailed argument. A literature review provides your audience with an overview of the available research about your area(s) of study, including the literary work, your theory, and methodology. The literature review demonstrates how these scholarly discussions have changed over time, and it allows you to position your research in relation to research that has come before yours. Your aim is to present the discussion up to this point. Depending on the nature of the assignment, you may also include your critical commentary on prior research, noting among this material the weaker and stronger arguments, breakthroughs and dead ends, blind spots and opportunities, the invention of key terms and methods, mistakes as well as misreadings, and so on.

Once you have gathered the research materials you need for your literature review, you have another task: conducting an analysis on the research to see where your original contribution fits into the scholarly conversation. As the saying goes, “we are standing on the shoulders of giants.” Your job is to show a portrait of these giants to your audience, and to show how your work relates to the portrait. On many scholarly topics, literature reviews already exist. You may refer to such existing reviews within your own, indicating any materials might have been overlooked, new developments that have arisen since the publication of the existing literature review, and new perspectives or insights you have about the materials.

Some beginning researchers try to tear down the work of other researchers in an effort to make their own work look good by comparison. It rarely works. First, it tends to make your audience skeptical of your claims. Second, it ignores the fact that even the mistakes, blind spots, and failures of other researchers contribute something to our knowledge. Albert Einstein didn’t disrespect Sir Isaac Newton by saying Newton’s theory of space was wrong and terrible and that Einstein’s own theory was great by comparison. He built upon Newton’s work, showing how it could be improved. If, however, a researcher willfully set out to deceive or distort or to tear down the work of other scholars without good reason, then their work does not deserve such deference.

Most literature reviews appear after the introduction. It presents your reader with relevant information about the scholarly discussion up to now. Later in your paper, you discuss your contribution. Before you begin work on your literature review, let’s discuss what we mean by “literature”; understand the purpose and scope of the review; establish criteria for selecting, organizing, and interpreting your findings; and discuss how to connect your findings to your research question.

Many students seek to “find sources that agree with my claim or idea.” That approach is too narrow, in our view. If we use such an approach, we may get the following results:

• Because we can find sources that agree with almost any claim, readers will wonder whether your claims are weak and the sources are cherry picked.
• While literary scholars sometimes cite authorities to support their claims, they don’t rely only on authority. They respect authority, but not too much. Your own claims need to rely more on evidence (from the literary text, historical and biographical information), and your critical and creative reasoning skills.
• Scholarship is a conversation; thus, the goal is less about finding agreement and more about joining the conversation with the aim of making a valuable contribution to the discussion.

The literature review provides your reader with an overview of the existing research about your topic or problem. It provides the context necessary for your reader to catch up with the scholarly conversation and then to appreciate the value of your contribution to it. The literature review sharpens the focus of your research and demonstrates your knowledge and understanding of the scholarly conversation around your topic, which, in turn, helps establish your credibility as a researcher.

Creating the literature review involves more than gathering citations. It is a qualitative process through which you will discover what is already known about your topic, and identify the key authorities, methods, and theoretical foundations, so you can begin to position your contributions within the scholarly conversation.

Defining the scope of your review will also help you establish criteria to determine the relevance of the sources you are finding. At this stage, you are not reading in-depth; instead, you are skimming through what has already been published and identifying the major concepts, theories, methodologies, and methods present within these published works. You should also be identifying connections, tensions, and contradictions within the already published works of your topic or problem. This involves building on the knowledge of others and understanding what methods, measures, and models we have inherited from previous researchers in our field.

Literature Reviews: Common Errors Made When Conducting a Literature Review [12 min 22 sec]

Video provided courtesy of the Center for Quality Research (CQR)

A literature review helps your reader understand the relationship of your research project to the work of other scholars. It covers the existing knowledge about a problem, and allows you to show the relevance/significance of your contribution to the discussion. Your reader may or may not have read scholarly literature about the theories, methodologies, and literary works you are discussing. But they want to know that you have read it and have thought about it. Your literature review provides not only a summary of the existing scholarship for readers; it also offers your perspective on it.

Begin your work on the literature review by synthesizing the various sources in your annotated bibliography .

For advice on Synthesizing Sources, consider the following from The Purdue Online Writing Lab: [2]

Note that  synthesizing is not the same as summarizing .

• A summary restates the information in one or more sources without providing new insight or reaching new conclusions.
• A synthesis draws on multiple sources to reach a broader conclusion.
• Don’t force a relationship between sources if there isn’t one. Not all of your sources have to complement one another.
• Do your best to highlight the relationships between sources in very clear ways.
• Don’t ignore any outliers in your research. It’s important to take note of every perspective (even those that disagree with your broader conclusions).

Not all humanities research projects contain literature reviews, but many do. Keep in mind that the type of literature review you choose (see list below) pertains to the secondary research – other scholarly sources – and not to the primary literary work. For instance, a literature review about Kate Chopin’s writing will be your thoughts about the scholarship on Chopin and not about Chopin’s text itself. You are summarizing what you see in the scholarly literature about Chopin’s writing. The literature review puts you in the position of authority not just on Chopin’s writing but on the scholarship about her writing. You are seeking to understand what scholars have said about her work. Scholars might belong to different schools of thought (psychoanalytic, feminist, Marxist, etc.). They might make different arguments about Chopin. They might use different methodological approaches. 

If your research involves two or more theories, such as psychology and genre studies, you may need to create multiple literature reviews, one for each theory or methodology. If the theories overlap with each other significantly (i.e., Marxism and Cultural Studies), you may combine them. Your literature review need not include everything about the subject area – you would need to write a book to cover a single theory – but only those concepts and methods that are most relevant to your research problem.

Factors to Consider When Developing Your Literature Review

• Determine the Scope : How broad or narrow should your literature review be? You may want to focus on recent scholarship only, or on a particular school of thought in the literature. Your scope is determined by your purpose; what is it you aim to achieve with your research?
• Establish Criteria : We discussed the importance of defining the purpose and scope of your review on the previous page, but it’s worth reviewing here as well. This step will help you establish important criteria and focus your searching. For example, how many sources will you need? What types of sources (primary, secondary, statistics, media)? Is currency important? Do you know who the prominent authors or theorists are in your subject area? Take some time to map out these or other important factors before you begin searching journals and databases.
• Consider Your Audience : Unlike a work cited page or an annotated bibliography, both of which are lists of sources, a literature review is essayistic and can be considered a precursor to your final paper. Therefore, it should be written in your own voice, and it should be geared toward a specific audience. Considering audience during this early stage will help focus your final paper as well.
• Find Models : We’ll discuss the different types of literature reviews and how to locate examples in the section below. However, even if you’re undecided about what type of review will work best for you, you may want to review some example literature reviews to get a sense of what they look like before you begin your own.

One piece of advice before starting: look for existing literature reviews on your area of scholarship. You can build on the work that other scholars have put into reviewing the scholarly literature. There’s no need to completely “reinvent the wheel” if some of the work is already done.

Scholars sometimes publish “stand-alone” literature reviews that are not part of a larger work; such literature reviews are valuable contributions to the field, as they summarize the state of knowledge for other scholars.

Maria J. Grant and Andrew Booth’s “A Typology of Reviews” identifies 14 distinct types of literature reviews. Further, the UCLA library created a chart to complement the article and for easy comparison of those 14 types of reviews. This section provides a brief summary of the most common literature reviews. For a more complete analysis, please see the full article and the chart .

To choose the most appropriate structure, put yourself in your reader’s shoes and think through their need for information. The literature review is about providing context for your contribution. How much context do people need? Keep it to the minimum necessary; compressing a lot of information into a small amount of text is a must.

These structures are not meant to be straightjackets but tools to help you organize your research. If you find that the tool is working, then keep using it. If not, switch tools or modify the one you are using. Keep in mind that the types of literature reviews are just different ways of organizing information. So, you can discuss literary trends without organizing your review of secondary literature by trend; your discussion can be organized by theory or theme, for examples. In our literature reviews, we are not recounting other scholars’ arguments at length but merely providing key concepts so we can summarize the discussion so far and position our own claims. You don’t have to adhere strictly to one structure or another. They are just organizing tools that help you manage your material (and help your reader make sense of it).

Types of Reviews

• Traditional or narrative reviews : This approach will generate a comprehensive, critical analysis of the published research on your topic. However, rather than merely compiling as many sources as possible, use this approach to establish a theoretical framework for your paper, establish trends, and identify gaps in the research. This process should bring your research question into clearer focus and help define a thesis that you will argue for in your paper. This is perhaps the most common and general type of literature review. The examples listed below are all designed to serve a more specific purpose.
• Argumentative : The purpose of an argumentative literature review is to select sources for the purpose of supporting or refuting a specific claim. While this type of review can help the author make a strong case for or against an issue, they can also be prone to claims of bias. Later in this textbook, we will read about the distinction between warranted and unwarranted bias . One is ok and the other is not.
• Chronological : A chronological review is used when the author wants to demonstrate the progression of how a theory, methodology, or issue has progressed over time. This method is most effective when there is a clear chronological path to the research about a specific historical event or trend as opposed to a more recursive theoretical concept.
• By trend : This is similar to the chronological approach except it focuses on clearly-defined trends rather than date ranges. This would be most appropriate if you want to illustrate changing perspectives or attitudes about a given issue when specific date ranges are less important than the ebb and flow of the trend.
• Thematic : In this type of literature review, the author will select specific themes that he or she feels are important to understanding a larger topic or concept. Then, the author will organize the sources around those themes, which are often based on relevance or importance. The value of this method is that the process of organizing the review by theme is similar to constructing an argument. This can help the author see how resources connect to each other and determine how as well as why specific sources support their thesis.
• Theoretical : The goal of this type of review is to examine how theory has shaped the research on a given topic. It establishes existing theoretical models, their connections, and how extensively they have been developed in the published research. For example, Jada applied critical race theory to her analysis of Sonny’s Blues , but she might also consider conducting a more comprehensive review of other theoretical frameworks such as feminism, Marxism, or postmodernism. Doing so could provide insight into alternate readings, and help her identify theoretical gaps such as unexplored or under-developed approaches to Baldwin’s work.
• Methodological : The approach focuses on the various methodologies used by researchers in a specific area rather than an analysis of their findings. In this case, you would create a framework of approaches to data collection related to your topic or research question. This is perhaps more common in education or the social and hard sciences where published research often includes a methods section, but it is sometimes appropriate for the digital humanities as well.
• Scoping : The aim of a scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview or map of the published research or evidence related to a research question. This might be considered a prelude to a systematic review that would take the scoping review one step further toward answering a clearly defined research question. See below for more details.
• Systematic : The systematic review is most appropriate when you have a clearly-defined research question and have established criteria for the types of sources you need. In this way, the systematic review is less exploratory than other types of reviews. Rather, it is comprehensive, strategic, and focused on answering a specific research question. For this reason, the systematic review is more common in the health and social sciences, where comprehensiveness is more important. Literature reviews in the Humanities are not usually exhaustive but tend to show only the most representative or salient developments in the scholarship.
• Meta-analysis : Does your research deal with statistics or large amounts of data? If so, then a meta-analysis might be best for you rather than providing a critical review, the meta-analysis will summarize and synthesize the results of numerous studies that involve statistics or data to provide a more comprehensive picture than would be possible from just one study.

An argumentative literature review presents and takes sides in scholarly arguments about the literary work. It makes arguments about other scholars’ work. It does not necessarily involve a claim that the literary work is itself making an argument. Likewise, a chronological literature review presents the scholarly literature in chronological order.

You don’t need to keep strictly to one type. Scholars often combine features from various types of literature reviews. A sample review that combines the follow types –

• Argumentative
• Theoretical
• Methodological

– is the excellent work of Eiranen, Reetta, Mari Hatavara, Ville Kivimäki, Maria Mäkelä & Raisa Maria Toivo (2022) “ Narrative and Experience: Interdisciplinary Methodologies between History and Narratology , ” Scandinavian Journal of History , 47:1, 1-15

When writing your literature review, please follow these pointers:

• Conduct systematic searches
• Use Evidence
• Be Selective
• Use Quotes Sparingly
• Summarize & Synthesize
• Use Caution when Paraphrasing
• Use Your Own Voice

Advice from James Mason University’s “Literature Reviews: An Overview”

A note on synthesizing : Don’t make the common mistake of summarizing individual studies or articles one after the other. The goal is to synthesize — that is, to make observations about groups of studies. Synthesis often uses language like this:

• Much of the literature on [topic x ] focuses on [major themes].
• In recent years, researchers have begun investigating [facets a , b , and c ] of [topic x ].
• The studies in this review of [topic x ] confirm / suggest / call into question / support [idea / practice / finding / method / theory / guideline y ].
• In the reviewed studies [variable x ] was generally associated with higher / lower rates of [outcome y ].
• A limitation of some / most / all of these studies is [ y ].

Please see this sample annotated literature review  from James Mason University.

Structure of a literature review [2]

• Problematization: The 2 to 3 pages of problematization are a distinct, iterative, step. It may take doing such a statement a few times before moving forward to writing the actual paper.
• Search: Write down your keyword sets, your updated keyword sets, and databases. It is perfectly within a reviewer’s rights to ask for these details.
• Summary: Really getting to know major themes requires some annotation of articles. You want to identify core papers and themes and write about them. This helps you really learn the material. [ChatGPT or Wikipedia are no substitute for deep engagement with a paper.]
• Argument: Either outline or create a slide deck that help you express the arguments in your paper. Read them out loud. Have friends look at them. Present them. [Every literature review has an argument. If not, it’s a summary. A summary does not merit publication in a top outlet.]
• Unpacking: Once you’ve nailed the short pitch, unpack the full argument. [ a) Take time in each major section to map out a) the argument, b) the supporting evidence, and the takeaway. b) Take those major sections, reconcile them, make sure they don’t overlap, then move on to writing. c) Sketch out the paper’s sections, tables, figures, and appendices.]
• Writing: Writing is the easy part. You can always put words to the screen. [Revising and improving is hard. Make time to write every day. Improving requires feedback. Find a writing partner to give feedback. Create your tables and figures. Write to them. Make sure the words in the paper align to the visuals.]
• Communicate: When the paper is done, go back and create a paper presentation. [I do this for the papers that I’m most serious about. The act of storyboarding helps me sort out the small pieces of the story that don’t fit together. If I really want it to succeed, I present it. The act of presenting helps me get it right. My best papers sometimes take seven or eight presentations to get it right. Then I return to the paper and fine tune it. Only then, does it have a shot at a top outlet.]

Literature reviews can be published as part of a scholarly article, often after the introduction and sometimes with a header, but they can also be published as a standalone essay. To find examples of what reviews look like in your discipline, choose an appropriate subject database (such as MLA for literary criticism) and conduct a keyword search with the term “Literature Review” added in quotes:

Not only do these examples demonstrate how to structure different types of literature reviews, but some offer insights into trends and directions for future research. In the next section, we’ll take a closer look at some reading strategies to help guide you through this process.

Since scholars already have produced literature reviews on various scholarly conversations, you don’t always need to “reinvent the wheel” (start a literature review from nothing). You can find a published literature review and update it or amend it; scholars do that all the time. However, you must properly cite work you incorporate from others.

• What types of literature review will you be using for your paper? Why did you make this selection over others? If you haven’t made a selection yet, which types are you considering?
• What specific challenges do you face in following a literature review structure?
• If there are any elements of your assignment that need clarification, please list them.
• What was the most important lesson you learned from this page? What point was confusing or difficult to understand?
• In the “Back Matter” of this book, you will find a page titled “Rubrics.” On that page, we provide a rubric for Creating a Literature Review ↵
• Richard West, Brigham Young University, amended by Jason Thatcher, Temple University - https://www.linkedin.com/posts/jason-thatcher-0329764_academicwriting-topten2023-activity-7146507675021766656-BB0O ↵

Writing the Literature Review Copyright © 2021 by Barry Mauer and John Venecek is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License , except where otherwise noted.

Share This Book

Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.

To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to  upgrade your browser .

Enter the email address you signed up with and we'll email you a reset link.

• We're Hiring!
• Help Center

Importance of Literature Review

research proposal as a problem to investigate, it usually has to be fairly narrow and focused, and because of this it can be difficult to appreciate how one's research subject is connected to other related areas. Therefore, the overall purpose of a literature review is to demonstrate this, and to help the reader to understand how your study fits into a broader context. This paper seeks to examine this topic of literature review, its significance and role in research proposal and report. It will start by explaining in detail what literature is; by citation of different scholars and its constituent components, such as the theoretical framework. Thereafter, it will look at the importance of literature review and its role in research proposals and reports. Finally, a conclusion will be written based on this topic. A Literature Review is a critical review of existing knowledge on areas such as theories, critiques, methodologies, research findings, assessment and evaluations on a particular topic. A literature review involves a critical evaluation identifying similarities and differences between existing literatures and the work being undertaken. It reviews what have already been done in the context of a topic. Therefore, on the basis of the existing knowledge, people can build up innovative idea and concept for further research purpose (Cooper, 1998). In doing empirical literature review is reading reports of other relevant studies conducted by different researchers. In doing so, a researcher gets knowledge and experiences that were established by other researchers when conducting their studies. While Conceptual framework is a set of coherent ideas or concepts organised in a manner that makes them easy to communicate to others. It represents less formal structure and used for specific concepts and propositions derived from empirical observation and intuition (ibid). According Aveyard, H. (2010) Theoretical framework is a theoretical perspective. It can be simply a theory, but can also be more general a basic approach to understanding something. Typically, a theoretical framework consists of concepts, together with their definitions, and existing framework must demonstrate an understanding of theories, and existing framework demonstrate an understanding of theories and concepts that are relevant to the topic of your research proposal and that will relate it to the broader fields of knowledge in the class you are taking.

Related Papers

Journal of African Interdisciplinary Studies

Ronald Mensah

This article critically discusses, the relationship between conceptual framework and theoretical framework drawing on their differences and similarities. The article has made it very clear that whereas the theoretical framework is drawn from the existing theoretical literature that you review about your research topic, a conceptual framework is a much broader concept that encompasses practically all aspects of your research. The latter refers to the entire conceptualisation of your research project. It is the big picture, or vision, comprising the totality of research. Methodologically, the paper used systematic and experiential literature review to draw supporting scholarly literature by authorities in the field and made inferences, sound reasonings and logical deductions from these authorities. The primary aim of this paper is to help researchers and students to understand the convergence and the divergence of theoretical and conceptual frameworks in order to appropriately be applied in research and academic writing discourses. Understanding the conceptual framework affects research in many ways. For instance, it assists the researcher in identifying and constructing his/her worldview on the phenomenon to be investigated. Also, it is the simplest way through which a researcher presents his/her asserted remedies to the milieu he/she has created. In addition, this accentuates the reasons why a research topic is worth studying, the assumptions of a researcher, the scholars he/she agrees with and disagrees with and how he/she conceptually grounds his/her approach. Paying attention, to the theoretical framework and its impact on research, it can be mentioned that theoretical framework provides a structure for what to look for in the data, for how you think of how what you see in the data fits together, and helps you to discuss your findings more clearly, in light of what existing theories say. It helps the researcher to make connections between the abstract and concrete elements observed in the data. In conclusion, both theoretical framework and conceptual framework are good variables which are used to inform a study to arrive at logical findings and conclusions. It is therefore recommended by researchers that; a good theoretical framework should be capable of informing the concepts in a research work.

Abey Dubale

Martin Otundo Richard

ABSTRACT A number of researchers either in scientific, social or academic researchers have found it difficult to differentiate between the theoretical and conceptual framework and their importance. This is a simple overview of the basic differences and some similarities between the theoretical and conceptual framework that is aimed at helping the learners and other researchers get a fast grasp of what can help them use the two effectively in their studies. A summary has been provided at the last part of the document that can aid one get the required information in his or her research.

Tonette S Rocco , Maria Plakhotnik

Abstract This essay starts with a discussion of the literature review, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework as components of a manuscript. This discussion includes similarities and distinctions among these components and their relation to other sections of a manuscript such as the problem statement, discussion, and implications. The essay concludes with an overview of the literature review, theoretical framework, and conceptual framework as separate types of manuscripts.

Ewnetu Tamene

The impetus of this paper is the irreplaceable role yet confusing use of the term " conceptual framework " in research literature. Even though, there is a consensus among scholars of various field of study that conceptual framework is essential element of research endeavors, yet it is used interchangeably with theoretical framework, that create confusion. As a PhD student on the pre-proposal work, this makes me more anxious. Then my intent is to explore its conceptual meaning and purposes by bringing together similar meanings from different scholars with a view to shed some light on its understanding and its use in research. Hence, in attempting to address this, the following key terms; Concept, conceptual framework research design and theoretical framework are defined briefly as to help decipher the conceptual ties among them and illuminate the conceptual meaning and purpose of conceptual framework. The schematic representation of conceptual framework is developed based on the conceptual meaning provided by scholars. In doing this it is attempted to show conceptual meaning of conceptual framework in relation to research design, paradigms and philosophical assumptions that delineate it from theoretical framework. Conceptual framework serves essential role in inductive research design, while theoretical framework serves similar role in deductive research design.

This is an opinion piece on the subject of whether or not 'theoretical' and 'conceptual' frameworks are conceptual synonyms, or they refer to different constructs. Although, generally, a lot of liter ature uses these two terms interchangeably – suggesting that they are conceptually equivalent, the researcher argues that these are two different constructs – both by definition and as actualised during the research process. Thus, in this paper, the researcher starts by developing his argument by examining the role of theory in research, and then draws a distinction between areas of research that typically follow deductive versus inductive approaches, with regard to both the review of literature and data collection. The researcher then subsequently argues that whereas a deductive approach to literature review typically makes use of theories and theoretical frameworks, the induct ive approach tends to lead to the development of a conceptual framework – which may take the form of a (conceptua l) model. Examples depicting this distinction are advanced.

Nauka i društvo

Darko M Marković

Conceptual framework is the foundation of scientific research, and it is formed from previous knowledge about the researched phenomenon. It is an integral part of theoretical framework, made with the aim to include key terms, presented within the bibliography, and create a suitable platform to develop the research correctly. More often with students preparing their final papers, and not so rarely with established researchers, the problem arises when it comes to conceptualizing research. A common unknown is how to divide conceptual from theoretical framework, and what conceptual framework of scientific research actually is. The aim of this paper is to clarify conceptualization of scientific research, and, by clarifying it, to point out the significance of differentiation between conceptual and theoretical framework, going on to give basic guidelines on how to form one, and therefore ease the understanding of it and application in scientific research.

Aliya Ahmed

Elock E Shikalepo

Conducting educational research involves various stages, with an interdependence and inter-relationship which can be both iterative and progressive in nature. One of these stages is the review of literature sources related to the focus of the research. Reviewing related literature involves tracing, examining, critiquing, evaluating and eventually recommending various forms of contents to the intents of the research based on the content’s typicality, relevance, correctness and appropriateness to what the research intends to achieve. The main variables as stated in the title of the research, the research questions, the research objectives and the hypotheses, dictates the literature sources to review. Reviewing literature focuses on the existing related topics that bear relevance to the title of the research and through which reviewing, appropriate theories can be picked up as the review of related topics and phrases goes on. As soon as the related topics are reviewed and main points noted, the reviewing process proceeds to review the theories underpinning the study. Some of these theories would have been established while reviewing the related topics and can now gain momentum, while other theories can now be generated considering the title, research questions, research objectives and findings of the topics reviewed and discussed earlier. Reviewing related topics generates main points of arguments, solutions, gaps and propositions. Similarly, reviewing theories does produce the same set of corresponding or contrasting agreements, gaps and propositions. Despite reviewing different sources of literature, it is the same research at hand, with same objectives and same methodological layout. Hence, a need to shape a strategic, literature direction for the research by consolidating the key findings of the different sources reviewed, in view of the intents of the research. The process of consolidating the multiplicity of key literature findings relevant to the research into a whole single unit, with one standpoint revealing the strategic literature direction for the research, is called constructing a conceptual framework. The end product of this construction is the conceptual framework, which is the informed and consolidated results presented narratively or schematically, revealing the strategic position of the study in relation to what exists in literature.

pinky adona

Many students, both in the undergraduate and graduate levels, have difficulty discriminating the theoretical from the conceptual framework. This requires a good understanding of both frameworks in order to conduct a good investigation. This article explains the two concepts in easily understandable language. Read on to find out. Many graduating college students and even graduate students have difficulty coming up with the conceptual framework and the theoretical framework of their thesis, a required section in thesis writing that serves as the students' map on their first venture into research. The conceptual framework is almost always confused with the theoretical framework of the study. What is the difference between the conceptual and the theoretical framework? A conceptual framework is the researcher's idea on how the research problem will have to be explored. This is founded on the theoretical framework, which lies on a much broader scale of resolution. The theoretical framework dwells on time tested theories that embody the findings of numerous investigations on how phenomena occur. The theoretical framework provides a general representation of relationships between things in a given phenomenon. The conceptual framework, on the other hand, embodies the specific direction by which the research will have to be undertaken. Statistically speaking, the conceptual framework describes the relationship between specific variables identified in the study. It also outlines the input, process and output of the whole investigation. The conceptual framework is also called the research paradigm. Examples of the Theoretical and the Conceptual Framework The difference between theoretical framework and conceptual framework can be further clarified by the following examples on both concepts: Theoretical Framework: Stimulus elicits response. Conceptual Framework: New teaching method improves students' academic performance. Notice in the illustrative example that the theoretical framework basically differs from the conceptual framework in terms of scope. The theoretical framework describes a broader relationship between things. When stimulus is applied, response is expected. The conceptual framework is much more specific in defining this relationship. The conceptual framework specifies the variables that will have to be explored in the investigation. In this example, the variable " teaching method " represents stimulus while

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

RELATED PAPERS

zalma zalma

African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance

Rene Phetlhu

Jeanette Berman

Sufrida Fida

Medical Teacher

Liz Anderson , Richard Pitt , Chris Green , Carol John , Cath O'Halloran , sarah hean

Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences

Stefan Partelow

Dr. Daniel Udo-Akang

Jacob Dankasa

Dayana Mastura, FCCA(UK), MBA

International Journal of P R O F E S S I O N A L Business Review

African Journal of Inter/Multidisciplinary Studies

Bunmi I . Omodan (PhD)

Rakesh Kumar

Journal of Practical Studies in Education

Journal of Science Teacher Education

Judith Lederman

olawale akinselure

Njinga & Sepé Journal

REVISTA (JOURNAL) NJINGA e SEPE (ISSN:2764-1244)

Perioperative Nursing Clinics

Philipa Idogho

International Journal of Scientific Research and Management

manoah muchanga

Joseph KK Ho

RELATED TOPICS

•   We're Hiring!
•   Help Center
• Find new research papers in:
• Health Sciences
• Earth Sciences
• Cognitive Science
• Mathematics
• Computer Science
• Academia ©2024

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

• View all journals
• Explore content
• About the journal
• Publish with us
• Sign up for alerts
• Open access
• Published: 10 August 2024

Mapping biomimicry research to sustainable development goals

• Raghu Raman 1 ,
• Aswathy Sreenivasan 2 ,
• M. Suresh 2 &
• Prema Nedungadi 3  

Scientific Reports volume  14 , Article number:  18613 ( 2024 ) Cite this article

Metrics details

• Environmental sciences
• Environmental social sciences

This study systematically evaluates biomimicry research within the context of sustainable development goals (SDGs) to discern the interdisciplinary interplay between biomimicry and SDGs. The alignment of biomimicry with key SDGs showcases its interdisciplinary nature and potential to offer solutions across the health, sustainability, and energy sectors. This study identified two primary thematic clusters. The first thematic cluster focused on health, partnership, and life on land (SDGs 3, 17, and 15), highlighting biomimicry's role in healthcare innovations, sustainable collaboration, and land management. This cluster demonstrates the potential of biomimicry to contribute to medical technologies, emphasizing the need for cross-sectoral partnerships and ecosystem preservation. The second thematic cluster revolves around clean water, energy, infrastructure, and marine life (SDGs 6, 7, 9, and 14), showcasing nature-inspired solutions for sustainable development challenges, including energy generation and water purification. The prominence of SDG 7 within this cluster indicates that biomimicry significantly contributes to sustainable energy practices. The analysis of thematic clusters further revealed the broad applicability of biomimicry and its role in enhancing sustainable energy access and promoting ecosystem conservation. Emerging research topics, such as metaheuristics, nanogenerators, exosomes, and bioprinting, indicate a dynamic field poised for significant advancements. By mapping the connections between biomimicry and SDGs, this study provides a comprehensive overview of the field's trajectory, emphasizing its importance in advancing global sustainability efforts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Assessing the sustainability of the European Green Deal and its interlin kages with the SDGs

Greater gains for Australia by tackling all SDGs but the last steps will be the most challenging

Six Transformations to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals

Introduction.

Biomimicry, which combines 'bio' (life) and 'mimicry' (imitation), uses nature's patterns to solve human problems, aligning with the SDGs by fostering innovations 1 . This discipline studies natural processes to inspire sustainable designs and promote responsible consumption and production 2 . Biomimicry emphasizes sustainability, ideation, and education in reconnecting with nature to achieve the SDGs 3 . Collaboration among designers, technologists, and business experts is vital for translating natural mechanisms into commercial solutions 4 . Biomimetics, which aims for radical innovations by replicating living systems, strives for breakthroughs in economic growth 5 . By promoting systemic change through the emulation of nature's regenerative processes, biomimicry's alignment with the SDGs could enhance sustainability efforts. Merging biomimicry insights with SDGs could exceed sustainability benchmarks.

Integrating biomimicry with sustainable development goals (SDGs) is crucial for addressing global challenges. The SDGs offer a blueprint for global well-being and environmental stewardship by 2030 6 . They aim to protect the environment and foster social and economic development. Biomimicry provides innovative approaches to these objectives, drawing from natural strategies. While SDGs offer clear targets, biomimicry complements these by providing a unique lens for solutions 7 . The investigation of biomimicry in conjunction with the SDGs is based on the understanding that the development of biologically inspired materials, structures, and systems offers a novel and sustainable solution to design problems, particularly in the built environment 8 . By mimicking nature's answers to complicated challenges, biomimicry produces creative, clever, long-lasting, and environmentally responsible ideas.

The SDGs outline a comprehensive sustainability agenda targeting social equity, environmental conservation, and poverty alleviation 9 . The use of biomimicry in research can lead to the development of solutions that mimic natural efficiency 10 , revolutionizing industries with resource-efficient technologies and enhancing sustainability. This synergy could lead to environmentally friendly products, improved energy solutions, and effective waste management systems. Integrating biomimicry into industry and education promotes environmental stewardship and ecological appreciation 11 . Marrying biomimicry research with SDGs has accelerated progress toward sustainable development.

Biomimicry can provide insightful and useful solutions consistent with sustainability ideals by imitating the adaptability and efficiency observed in biological systems 12 . The built environment's use of biomimicry has a greater sustainable impact when circular design features are included 13 . Reusing materials, cutting waste, and designing systems that work with natural cycles are all stressed in a circular design. Combining biomimicry and circular design promotes social inclusion, environmental resilience, resourcefulness, and compassionate governance, all of which lead to peaceful coexistence with the environment. This all-encompassing strategy demonstrates a dedication to tackling the larger social and environmental concerns that the SDGs represent and design challenges 14 . Complementing these studies, Wamane 7 examined the intersection of biomimicry, the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) framework, and circular economy principles, advocating for an economic paradigm shift toward sustainability.

A key aspect of realizing the impact of biomimicry on SDGs is the successful translation and commercialization of biomimicry discoveries. This involves overcoming barriers such as skill gaps, the engineering mindset, commercial acumen, and funding. Insights from the "The State of Nature-Inspired-Innovation in the UK" report provide a comprehensive analysis of these challenges and potential strategies to address them, underscoring the importance of integrating commercial perspectives into biomimicry research.

This research employs bibliometric techniques to assess the integration and coherence within circular economy policy-making, emphasizing the potential for a synergistic relationship between environmental stewardship, economic growth, and social equity to foster a sustainable future.

In addressing the notable gap in comprehensive research concerning the contribution of biomimicry solutions to specific SDGs, this study offers significant insights into the interdisciplinary applications of biomimicry and its potential to advance global sustainability efforts. Our investigation aims to bridge this research gap through a systematic analysis, resulting in the formulation of the following research questions:

RQ1: How does an interdisciplinary analysis of biomimicry research align with and contribute to advancing specific SDGs?

RQ2: What emerging topics within biomimicry research are gaining prominence, and how do they relate to the SDGs?

RQ3 : What are the barriers to the translation and commercialization of biomimicry innovations, and how can these barriers be overcome to enhance their impact on SDGs?

RQ4: Based on the identified gaps in research and the potential for interdisciplinary collaboration, what innovative areas within biomimicry can be further explored to address underrepresented SDGs?

The remainder of this paper is arranged as follows. Section " Literature review " focuses on the literature background of biomimicry, followed by methods (section " Methods ") and results and discussion, including emerging research topics (section " Results and discussion "). Section " Conclusion " concludes with recommendations and limitations.

Literature review

The potential of biomimicry solutions for sustainability has long been recognized, yet there is a notable lack of comprehensive studies that explore how biomimicry can address specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) (Table 1 ). This research aims to fill this gap by investigating relevant themes and building upon the literature in this field.

Biomimicry, with its roots tracing back to approximately 500 BC, began with Greek philosophers who developed classical concepts of beauty and drew inspiration from natural organisms for balanced design 15 . This foundational idea of looking to nature for design principles continued through history, as exemplified by Leonardo Da Vinci's creation of a flying machine inspired by birds in 1482. This early instance of biomimicry influenced subsequent advancements, including the Wright brothers' development of the airplane in 1948 12 , 15 . The term "bionics," coined in 1958 to describe "the science of natural systems or their analogs," evolved into "biomimicry" by 1982. Janine Benyus's 1997 book, “Biomimicry: Innovation Inspired by Nature,” and the founding of the Biomimicry Institute (Biomimicry 16 ) were pivotal, positioning nature as a guide and model for sustainable design. Benyus’s work underscores the potential of biomimicry in tackling contemporary environmental challenges such as climate change and ecosystem degradation 12 , 17 .

In recent years, the call for more targeted research in biomimicry has grown, particularly in terms of architecture and energy use. Meena et al. 18 and Varshabi et al. 19 highlighted the need for biomimicry to address energy efficiency in building design, stressing the potential of nature-inspired solutions to reduce energy consumption and enhance sustainability. This perspective aligns with that of Perricone et al. 20 , who explored the differences between artificial and natural systems, noting that biomimetic designs, which mimic the principles of organism construction, can significantly improve resource utilization and ecosystem restoration. Aggarwal and Verma 21 contributed to this discourse by mapping the evolution and applications of biomimicry through scientometric analysis, revealing the growing significance of nature-inspired optimization methodologies, especially in clustering techniques. Their work suggested that these methodologies not only provide innovative solutions but also reflect a deeper integration of biomimetic principles in technological advancements. Building on this, Pinzón and Austin 22 emphasized the infancy of biomimicry in the context of renewable energy, advocating for more research to explore how nature can inspire new energy solutions. Their work connects with that of Carniel et al. 23 , who introduced a natural language processing (NLP) technique to identify research themes in biomimicry across disciplines, facilitating a holistic understanding of current trends and future directions.

To further illustrate the practical applications of biomimicry, Nasser et al. 24 presented the Harmony Search Algorithm (HSA), a nature-inspired optimization technique. Their bibliometric analysis demonstrated the algorithm's effectiveness in reducing energy and resource consumption, highlighting the practical benefits of biomimicry in technological innovation. Rusu et al. 25 expanded on these themes by documenting significant advancements in soft robotics, showing how biomimicry influences design principles and applications in this rapidly evolving field. Their findings underscore the diverse applications of biomimetic principles, from robotics to building design. Shashwat et al. 26 emphasized the role of bioinspired solutions in enhancing energy efficiency within the built environment, promoting the use of high solar reflectance surfaces that mimic natural materials. This perspective is in line with that of Pires et al. 27 , who evaluated the application of biomimicry in dental restorative materials and identified a need for more clinical studies to realize the full potential of biomimetic innovations in healthcare. Liu et al. 28 explored the application of nature-inspired design principles in software-defined networks, demonstrating how biomimetic algorithms can optimize resource and energy utilization in complex systems. This study builds on the broader narrative of biomimicry's potential to transform various sectors by offering efficient, sustainable solutions. Finally, Hinkelman et al. 29 synthesized these insights by discussing the transdisciplinary applications of ecosystem biomimicry, which supports sustainable development goals by integrating biomimetic principles across engineering and environmental disciplines. This comprehensive approach underscores the transformative potential of biomimicry, suggesting that continued interdisciplinary research and innovation are crucial for addressing global sustainability challenges effectively.

PRISMA framework

This study utilizes the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) framework to structure its analysis, following the established five-step protocol: formulating research questions, defining a search strategy, executing a literature search, screening identified literature, and analyzing the findings (Page et al., 2021). The application of the PRISMA guidelines across various research domains, including the SDGs, is well documented 30 .

To ensure a comprehensive search, we searched the Scopus database, a widely utilized resource for bibliometric studies 31 (Donthu et al. 82 ), which led to the discovery of 46,141 publications from 2013 to 2023. This period marked significant research activity following the introduction of the SDGs at the Rio + 20 summit in 2012. Publications were identified using the following terms in the title and abstract: “ (biomimic* OR biomimetic* OR bioinspired OR bioinsp* OR bionic* OR nature-inspired OR "biologically inspired" OR bioinspiration OR biomimesis OR biognosis).”

During the screening phase, publications lacking complete author details were reviewed, narrowing the field to 46,083 publications for further analysis. The eligibility phase utilized proprietary algorithms to map publications to the 17 SDGs, informed by initiatives such as the University of Auckland (Auckland’s SDG mapping 32 ) and Elsevier's SDG Mapping Initiatives (Elsevier's SDG Mapping 33 ). The selection of the Elsevier SDG Mapping Initiative for this study was based on its seamless integration with Scopus, facilitating the use of predefined search queries for each SDG and employing a machine learning model that has been refined through expert review. This approach has been utilized in various studies to analyze research trends within emerging fields. For example, the exploration of green hydrogen was detailed by Raman et al. 34 , while investigations into Fake News and the Dark Web were conducted by Raman et al. 35 , 36 , 37 and Rama et al. 38 , respectively. These examples demonstrate the efficacy of SDG mapping in elucidating how research outputs align with and contribute to sustainable development goals in these emerging domains. This phase identified 13,287 publications as mapped to SDGs. In the inclusion phase, stringent criteria further filtered the publications to English-language journals and review articles, culminating in 13,271 publications deemed suitable for in-depth analysis. This process ensures a comprehensive and high-quality dataset for the study, reflecting the robust and systematic approach afforded by the PRISMA framework in evaluating literature relevant to SDGs.

Our keyword search strategy, while comprehensive, may capture papers that do not genuinely contribute to the field. To mitigate this, we employed manual verification. After the automated search, the authors conducted a manual review of a subset of the final set of identified papers to assess their relevance and authenticity in the context of biomimicry. The subset was based on 20 highly cited papers from each year. We believe that papers that are frequently cited within the community are more likely to be accurately classified. The authors mainly reviewed the introduction, methodology, and results sections to confirm the relevance and authenticity of the papers. However, we acknowledge that these steps may not fully eliminate the inclusion of irrelevant papers, which could skew the results of our meta-analysis.

SDG framework

The examination of sustainable development goals (SDGs) reveals their interconnected nature, where the achievement of one goal often supports progress in others. Studies by Le Blanc (2015) and Allison et al. (2016) have mapped out the complex web of relationships among the SDGs, identifying both strong and subtle linkages across different objectives. To visualize these connections, we employed a cocitation mapping approach using VOSviewer 39 , which allows us to depict the semantic relationships between SDGs through their cocitation rates in scholarly works. This approach generates a visual map where each SDG is represented as a node, with the node size reflecting the goal's research prominence and the thickness of the lines between nodes indicating the frequency of cocitations among the goals. This visual representation reveals the SDGs as an intricate but unified framework, emphasizing the collaborative nature of global sustainability initiatives.

Topic prominence percentile

The Scopus prominence percentile is a crucial metric indicating the visibility and impact of emerging research topics within the scientific community. High-ranking topics in this percentile are rapidly gaining attention, highlighting emerging trends and areas poised for significant advancements. This tool enables researchers and policymakers to identify and focus on innovative topics, ensuring that their efforts align with the forefront of scientific development 35 , 36 , 37 . Topics above the 99.9th percentile were used in this study.

Results and discussion

Rq1: sdg framework and interdisciplinary research (rq4).

This study evaluates biomimicry research through the framework of SDGs. A cocitation SDG map shows two clusters and provides insights into the interplay between biomimicry themes and SDGs, highlighting the cross-disciplinary nature of this research (Fig.  1 ). The blue box hidden behind the “3 – Good Health and Well-being” and “7 – Affordable and Clean Energy” is “11 – Sustainable cities and Communities”. The blue box hidden behind “15 – Life on Land” is “16 – Peace, Justice and Strong institutions”.

Interdisciplinary SDG network of biomimicry research.

Cluster 1 (Red): Biomimetic innovations for health, partnership, and life on land

This cluster comprises a diverse array of research articles that explore the application of biomimicry across various SDGs 3 (health), 17 (partnership), and 15 (land). The papers in this cluster delve into innovative biomimetic ideas, each contributing uniquely to the intersection of sustainable development and biological inspiration. SDG 3, emphasizing good health and well-being for all, is significantly represented, indicating a global effort to leverage biomimicry for advancements in healthcare, such as new medication delivery systems and medical technologies. Similarly, the frequent citations of SDG 17 underscore the vital role of partnerships in achieving sustainable growth, especially where bioinspired solutions require interdisciplinary collaboration to address complex challenges. Finally, the prominence of 15 SDG citations reflects a commitment to preserving terrestrial ecosystems, where biomimicry is increasingly applied in land management, demonstrating nature's adaptability and resilience as a model for sustainable practices. Table 2 lists the top 5 relevant papers from Cluster 1, further illustrating the multifaceted application of biomimicry in addressing these SDGs.

A unique binary variant of the gray wolf optimization (GWO) technique, designed especially for feature selection in classification tasks, was presented by Emary et al. 40 . GWO is a method inspired by the social hierarchy and hunting behavior of gray wolves to find the best solutions to complex problems. This bioinspired optimization technique was used to optimize SDG15, which also highlights its ecological benefits. The results of the study highlight the effectiveness of binary gray wolf optimization in identifying the feature space for ideal pairings and promoting environmental sustainability and biodiversity. Lin et al. 41 focused on SDG 3 by examining catalytically active nanomaterials as potential candidates for artificial enzymes. While acknowledging the limits of naturally occurring enzymes, this study explores how nanobiotechnology can address problems in the food, pharmaceutical, and agrochemical sectors.

The investigation of enzymatic nanomaterials aligns with health-related objectives, highlighting the potential for major improvements in human health. Parodi et al. 42 used biomimetic leukocyte membranes to functionalize synthetic nanoparticles, extending biomimicry into the biomedical domain. To meet SDG 3, this research presents "leukolike vectors," which are nanoporous silicon particles that can communicate with cells, evade the immune system, and deliver specific payloads. In line with the SDGs about health, this study emphasizes the possible uses of biomimetic structures in cancer detection and treatments. A novel strategy for biological photothermal nanodot-based anticancer therapy utilizing peptide‒porphyrin conjugate self-assembly was presented by Zou et al. 43 . For therapeutic reasons, efficient light-to-heat conversion can be achieved by imitating the structure of biological structures. By providing a unique biomimetic approach to cancer treatment and demonstrating the potential of self-assembling biomaterials in biomedical applications, this research advances SDG 3. Finally, Wang et al. 44 presented Monarch butterfly optimization (MBO), which is a bioinspired algorithm that mimics the migration patterns of monarch butterflies to solve optimization problems effectively. This method presents a novel approach to optimization, mimicking the migration of monarch butterflies, aligning with SDG 9. Comparative analyses highlight MBO's exceptional performance and demonstrate its capacity to address intricate issues about business and innovation, supporting objectives for long-term collaboration and sector expansion.

The publications in Cluster 1 show a wide range of biomimetic developments, from ecological optimization to new optimization techniques and biomedical applications. These varied contributions highlight how biomimicry can advance sustainable development in health, symbiosis, and terrestrial life.

Cluster 2 (green): Nature-inspired solutions for clean water, energy, and infrastructure

Cluster 2, which focuses on the innovative application of biomimicry in sustainable development, represents a range of research that aligns with SDGs 6 (sanitation), 7 (energy), 9 (infrastructure), and 14 (water). This cluster is characterized by studies that draw inspiration from natural processes and structures to offer creative solutions to sustainability-related challenges. The papers in this cluster, detailed in Table 3 , demonstrate how biomimicry can address key global concerns in a varied and compelling manner.

Within this cluster, the high citation counts for SDG 7 underscore the significance of accessible clean energy, a domain where biomimicry contributes innovative energy generation and storage solutions inspired by natural processes. This aligns with the growing emphasis on sustainable energy practices. The prominence of SDG 9 citations further highlights the global focus on innovation and sustainable industry, where biomimicry's role in developing nature-inspired designs is crucial for building robust systems and resilient infrastructure. Furthermore, the substantial citations for SDG 6 reflect a dedicated effort toward ensuring access to clean water and sanitation for all. In this regard, biomimicry principles are being applied in water purification technologies, illustrating how sustainable solutions modeled after natural processes can effectively meet clean water objectives.

The study by Sydney Gladman et al. (2016), which presented the idea of shape-morphing systems inspired by nastic plant motions, is one notable addition to this cluster. This discovery creates new opportunities for tissue engineering, autonomous robotics, and smart textile applications by encoding composite hydrogel designs that exhibit anisotropic swelling behavior. The emphasis of SDG 9 on promoting industry, innovation, and infrastructure aligns with this biomimetic strategy. SDGs 7 and 13 are addressed in the study of Li et al. 45 , which is about engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. This work contributes to the goals of inexpensive, clean energy and climate action by investigating methods such as band structure engineering and bionic engineering to increase the efficiency of solar water splitting. Li et al. 46 conducted a thorough study highlighting the importance of catalysts for the selective photoreduction of CO2 into solar fuels. This review offers valuable insights into the use of semiconductor catalysts for selective photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Our work advances sustainable energy solutions by investigating biomimetic, metal-based, and metal-free cocatalysts and contributes to SDGs 7 and 13. Wang et al. 47 address the critical problem of water pollution. Creating materials with superlyophilic and superlyophobic qualities offers a creative method for effectively separating water and oil. This contributes to the goals of clean water, industry, innovation, and life below the water. It also correlates with SDGs 6, 9, and 14. Singh et al. 48 also explored the 'green' synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles for environmental remediation, which furthers SDG 9. This review demonstrates the environmentally benign and sustainable features of green synthesis and its potential to lessen the environmental impact of conventional synthesis methods.

Cluster 2 provides nature-inspired solutions for clean water, renewable energy, and sustainable infrastructure, demonstrating the scope and importance of biomimicry. The varied applications discussed in these papers help overcome difficult problems and advance sustainable development in line with several SDGs.

RQ2: Emerging research topics

Temporal evolution of emerging topics.

Figure  2 displays the publication counts for various emerging topics from 2013 to 2022, indicating growth trends over the years. For 'Metaheuristics', there is a notable increase in publications peaking in approximately 2020, suggesting a surge in interest. 'Strain sensor' research steadily increased, reaching its highest publication frequency toward the end of the period, which is indicative of growing relevance in the field. 'Bioprinting' sharply increased over the next decade, subsequently maintaining high interest, which highlights its sustained innovation. In contrast, 'Actuators' showed fluctuating publication counts, with a recent upward trend. 'Cancer' research, while historically a major topic, displayed a spike in publications in approximately 2018, possibly reflecting a breakthrough or increased research funding. 'Myeloperoxidase' has a smaller presence in the literature, with a modest peak in 2019. The number of 'Water '-related publications remains relatively low but shows a slight increase, suggesting a gradual but increasing recognition of its importance. Research on exosomes has significantly advanced, particularly since 2018, signifying a greater area of focus. 'Mechanical' topic publications have moderate fluctuations without a clear trend, indicating steady research interest. 'Micromotors' experienced an initial publication surge, followed by a decline and then a recent resurgence, possibly due to new technological applications. 'Nanogenerators' have shown a dramatic increase in interest, particularly in recent years, while 'Hydrogel' publications have varied, with a recent decline, which may point toward a shift in research focus or maturity of the topic.

Evolution of emerging topics according to publications (y-axis denotes the number of publications; x-axis denotes the year of publication).

Figure  3 presents the distribution of various research topics based on their prominence percentile and total number of publications. Topics above the 99.9th percentile and to the right of the vertical threshold line represent the most emergent and prolific topics of study. Next, we examine the topics within each of the four quadrants, focusing on how each topic has developed over the years in relation to SDGs and the key phrases associated with each topic.

Distribution of research topics based on prominence percentile and total number of publications.

Next, we examine each research topic in four quadrants, assessing their evolution concerning SDGs. We also analyze the keyphrase cloud to identify which keyphrases are most relevant (indicated by their font size) and whether they are growing or not. In the key phrase cloud, green indicates an increasing relevance of the key phrase, grey signifies that its relevance remains constant, and blue represents a declining relevance of the key phrase.

Niche biomimetic applications

These are topics with a lower number of publications and prominence percentiles, indicating specialized or emerging areas of research that are not yet widely recognized or pursued (Quadrant 1—bottom left).

Myeloperoxidase; colorimetric; chromogenic compounds

The inclusion of myeloperoxidase indicates that inflammation and the immune system are the main research topics. The focus on chromogenic and colorimetric molecules suggests a relationship to analytical techniques for identifying biological materials. The evolution of the research is depicted in Fig.  4 a shows an evolving emphasis on various sustainable development goals (SDGs) over time. The research trajectory, initially rooted in SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), has progressively branched out to encompass SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), reflecting an expanding scope of inquiry within the forestry sciences. More recently, the focus has transitioned toward SDG 15 (Life on Land), indicating an increased recognition of the interconnectedness between forest ecosystems and broader environmental and sustainability goals. This trend underscores the growing complexity and multidisciplinary nature of forestry research, highlighting the need to address comprehensive ecological concerns along with human well-being and sustainable development.

Evolution of research ( a ) and key phrases ( b ).

The word cloud in Fig.  4 b highlights key phrases such as 'Biocompatible', 'Actuator', and 'Self-healing Hydrogel', reflecting a focus on advanced materials, while terms such as 'Elastic Modulus' and 'Polymeric Networks' suggest an emphasis on the structural properties essential for creating innovative diagnostic and environmental sensing tools. Such developments are pertinent to health monitoring and water purification, resonating with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) and SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation). The prominence of 'Self-healing' and 'Bioinspired' indicates a shift toward materials that emulate natural processes for durability and longevity, supporting sustainable industry practices aligned with SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production), contributing to the overarching aim of sustainable development.

Next, we analyzed the top 3 cited publications. Catalytically active nanomaterials, or nanozymes, are exciting candidates for artificial enzymes, according to Lin et al. 41 . The authors explore the structural features and biomimetics applications of these enzymes, classifying them as metal-, carbon-, and metal oxide-based nanomaterials. This study emphasizes the benefits of enzymes over natural enzymes, including their high stability, variable catalytic activity, and controlled production. Wang et al. 49 developed biomimetic nanoflowers made from nanozymes to cause intracellular oxidative damage in hypoxic malignancies. Under both normoxic and hypoxic conditions, the nanoflowers demonstrated catalytic efficiency. By overcoming the constraints of existing systems that depend on oxygen availability or external stimuli, this novel technique represents a viable treatment option for malignant neoplasms. Gao et al. 50 investigated the use of a dual inorganic nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reaction as a biomimetic approach for nanocatalytic tumor therapy. This approach produces a high level of therapeutic efficacy by cascading catalytic events inside the tumor microenvironment. This study highlights the potential of inorganic nanozymes for achieving high therapeutic efficacy and outstanding biosafety, which adds to the growing interest in nanocatalytic tumor therapy.

Water; hydrophobicity; aerogels

With an emphasis on hydrophobicity, aerogel use, and water-related features, this topic relates to materials science and indicates interest in cutting-edge materials with unique qualities. From Fig.  5 a, we can see that, initially, the focus was directed toward SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation), which is intrinsically related to the research theme, as biomimetic approaches are leveraged to develop innovative water purification and management solutions. As the research progressed, the scope expanded to intersect with SDG 14 (Life Below Water) and SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), signifying a broadened impact of biomimetic innovations in marine ecosystem conservation and energy-efficient materials. The gradual involvement with SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure) and SDG 13 (climate action) indicates the interdisciplinary reach of this research, which aims to influence industrial practices and climate change mitigation strategies.

The word cloud in Fig.  5 b reinforces this narrative by showcasing key phrases such as 'Hydrophobic', 'Bioinspired', 'Emulsion', and 'Oil Pollution', which reflect the emphasis on developing materials and technologies that mimic natural water repellency and separation processes. 'Aerogel' and 'polydopamine', along with 'Underwater' and 'Biomimetic Cleaning', suggest a strong focus on creating lightweight, efficient materials capable of self-cleaning and oil spill remediation. These keywords encapsulate the essence of the research theme, demonstrating a clear alignment with the targeted SDGs and the overall aim of sustainable development through biomimicry.

Three highly referenced works that have made substantial contributions to the field of biomimetic materials for oil/water separation are included in the table. The development of superlyophilic and superlyophobic materials for effective oil/water separation was examined by Wang et al. 47 . This review highlights the applications of these materials in separating different oil-and-water combinations by classifying them according to their surface wettability qualities. The excellent efficiency, selectivity, and recyclability of the materials—which present a viable treatment option for industrial oily wastewater and oil spills—are highlighted in the paper. Su et al. 51 explored the evolution of super wettability systems. The studies included superhydrophobicity, superoleophobicity, and undersea counterparts, among other extreme wettabilities. The kinetics, material structures, and wetting conditions related to obtaining superwettability are covered in the article. This demonstrates the wide range of uses for these materials in chemistry and materials science, including self-cleaning fabrics and systems for separating oil and water. Zhang et al. 52 presented a bioinspired multifunctional foam with self-cleaning and oil/water separation capabilities. To construct a polyurethane foam with superhydrophobicity and superoleophobicity, this study used porous biomaterials and superhydrophobic self-cleaning lotus leaves. Foam works well for separating oil from water because of its slight weight and ability to float on water. It also shows exceptional resistance to corrosive liquids. According to the article, multifunctional foams for large-scale oil spill cleaning might be designed using a low-cost fabrication technology that could be widely adopted.

Growing interest in bioinspired healthcare

These topics have a higher prominence percentile but a lower number of publications, suggesting growing interest and importance in the field despite a smaller body of research (Quadrant 2—top left).

Exosomes; extracellular vesicles; MicroRNAs

Exosomes and extracellular vesicles are essential for intercellular communication, and reference to microRNAs implies a focus on genetic regulation. The evolution of this topic reflects an increasing alignment with specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over the years. The initial research focused on SDG 3 (good health and well-being) has expanded to encompass SDG 9 (industry, innovation, and infrastructure) and SDG 6 (clean water and sanitation), showcasing the multifaceted impact of biomimetic research in healthcare (Fig.  6 a). The research trajectory into SDG 9 and SDG 6 suggests broader application of bioinspired technologies beyond healthcare, potentially influencing sustainable industrial processes and water treatment technologies, respectively.

The word cloud (Fig.  6 b) underscores the central role of 'Extracellular Vesicles' and 'Exosomes' as platforms for 'Targeted Drug Delivery' and 'Nanocarrier' systems, which are key innovations in medical biotechnology. The prominence of terms such as 'Bioinspired', 'Biomimetic', 'Liposome', and 'Gold Nanoparticle' illustrates the inspiration drawn from biological systems for developing advanced materials and delivery mechanisms. These key phrases indicate significant advancements in 'Controlled Drug Delivery Systems', 'Cancer Chemotherapy', and 'Molecular Imaging', which have contributed to improved diagnostics and treatment options, consistent with the objectives of SDG 3.

The work by Jang et al. 53 , which introduced bioinspired exosome-mimetic nanovesicles for improved drug delivery to tumor tissues, is one of the most cited articles. These nanovesicles, which resemble exosomes but have higher creation yields, target cells and slow the growth of tumors in a promising way. Yong et al.'s 54 work presented an effective drug carrier for targeted cancer chemotherapy, focusing on biocompatible tumor cell-exocytosed exosome-biomimetic porous silicon nanoparticles. A paper by Cheng et al. 55 discussed the difficulties in delivering proteins intracellularly. This study suggested a biomimetic nanoparticle platform that uses extracellular vesicle membranes and metal–organic frameworks. These highly cited studies highlight the importance of biomimetic techniques in improving drug delivery systems for improved therapeutic interventions.

Nanogenerators; piezoelectric; energy harvesting

This topic advises concentrating on technology for energy harvesting, especially for those that use piezoelectric materials and nanogenerators. We see a rising focus on medical applications of biomimetics, from diagnostics to energy harvesting mimicking biological systems.

The evolution of this research topic reflects a broader contribution to the SDGs by not only addressing healthcare needs but also by promoting sustainable energy practices and supporting resilient infrastructure through biomimetic innovation (Fig.  7 a). Initially, the emphasis on SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) suggested the early application of biomimetic principles in healthcare, particularly in medical devices and diagnostics leveraging piezoelectric effects. Over time, the transition toward SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) indicates an expansion of bioinspired technologies into sustainable energy solutions and industrial applications. Nanogenerators and energy harvesting techniques draw inspiration from biological processes and structures, aiming to optimize energy efficiency and contribute to clean energy initiatives.

The word cloud in Fig.  7 b emphasizes key phrases such as 'Piezoelectric', 'Energy Harvesting', 'Tactile Sensor', 'Triboelectricity', and 'Nanogenerators', highlighting the core technologies that are being developed. These terms, along with 'Bioinspired', 'Wearable Electronic Devices', and 'Energy Conversion Efficiency', illustrate the convergence of natural principles with advanced material science to create innovative solutions for energy generation and sensor technology.

Yang et al.'s 56 study in Advanced Materials presented the first triboelectrification-based bionic membrane sensor. Wearable medical monitoring and biometric authentication systems will find new uses for this sensor since it allows self-powered physiological and behavioral measurements, such as noninvasive human health evaluation, anti-interference throat voice recording, and multimodal biometric authentication. A thorough analysis of the state-of-the-art in piezoelectric energy harvesting was presented by Sezer and Koç 57 . This article addresses the fundamentals, components, and uses of piezoelectric generators, highlighting their development, drawbacks, and prospects. It also predicts a time when piezoelectric technology will power many electronics. The 2021 paper by Zhao et al. 58 examines the use of cellulose-based materials in flexible electronics. This section describes the benefits of these materials and the latest developments in intelligent electronic device creation, including biomimetic electronic skins, optoelectronics, sensors, and optoelectronic devices. This review sheds light on the possible drawbacks and opportunities for wearable technology and bioelectronic systems based on cellulose.

Leading edge of biomimetic sensing and electronics

This quadrant represents topics with both a high number of publications and a prominence percentile, indicating well-established and influential research areas (Quadrant 3—top right).

Strain sensor; flexible electronics; sensor

Figure  8 a highlights the progress of research on bioinspired innovations, particularly in the development of strain sensors and flexible electronics for adaptive sensing technologies. Initially, concentrated on health applications aligned with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), the focus has expanded. The integration of SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) indicates a shift toward industrial applications, while the incorporation of SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) suggests a commitment to energy-efficient solutions. Additionally, the mention of SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities) and SDG 12 (Responsible Consumption and Production) reflects the broadening scope to include urban sustainability and eco-friendly manufacturing practices.

Figure  8 b provides insight into the key phrases associated with this research topic, highlighting terms such as 'Bioinspired', 'Self-healing', 'Wearable Electronic Devices', 'Flexible Electronics', and 'Pressure Sensor'. These key phrases speak to the innovative approaches for creating sensors and electronics that are not only inspired by biological systems but also capable of seamlessly integrating human activity and environmental needs. The mention of 'Wearable Sensors' and 'Tactile Sensor' indicates a focus on user interaction and sensitivity, which is crucial for medical applications and smart infrastructure.

The top three articles with the most citations represent the cutting edge of this topic’s study. Chortos et al. 59 investigated how skin characteristics can be replicated for medicinal and prosthetic uses. Kim et al. 60 focused on creating ultrathin silicon nanoribbon sensors for smart prosthetic skin, opening up new possibilities for bionic systems with many sensors. A bioinspired microhairy sensor for ultraconformability on nonflat surfaces was introduced in Pang et al.'s 61 article, which significantly improved signal-to-noise ratios for accurate physiological measurements.

Cancer; photoacoustics; theranostic nanomedicine

Modern technologies such as photoacoustics, theranostic nanomedicine, and cancer research suggest that novel cancer diagnosis and therapy methods are highly needed. Figure  9 a traces the research focus that has evolved across various SDGs over time, commencing with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), which is indicative of the central role of health in biomimetic research. It then extends into SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), illustrating the cross-disciplinary applications of biomimetic technologies from healthcare to the energy and industrial sectors.

Figure  9 b provides a snapshot of the prominent keywords within this research theme, featuring terms such as “photodynamic therapy”, “photothermal chemotherapy”, “nanocarrier”, and “controlled drug delivery”. These terms underscore the innovative therapeutic strategies that mimic biological mechanisms for targeted cancer treatment. 'Bioinspired' and 'Biomimetic Synthesis' reflect the approach of deriving design principles from natural systems for the development of advanced materials and medical devices. 'Theranostic nanomedicine' integrates diagnosis and therapy, demonstrating a trend toward personalized and precision medicine.

A study conducted by Yu et al. 62 presented a novel approach for synergistic chemiexcited photodynamic-starvation therapy against metastatic tumors: a biomimetic nanoreactor, or bio-NR. Bio-NRs use hollow mesoporous silica nanoparticles to catalyze the conversion of glucose to hydrogen peroxide for starvation therapy while also producing singlet oxygen for photodynamic therapy. Bio-NR is promising for treating cancer metastasis because its coating on cancer cells improves its biological qualities. Yang et al.'s 63 study focused on a biocompatible Gd-integrated CuS nanotheranostic agent created via a biomimetic approach. This drug has low systemic side effects and good photothermal conversion efficiency, making it suitable for skin cancer therapy. It also performs well in imaging. The ultrasmall copper sulfide nanoparticles generated within ferritin nanocages are described in Wang et al.’s 64 publication. This work highlights the possibility of photoacoustic imaging-guided photothermal therapy with improved therapeutic efficiency and biocompatibility. These highly referenced articles highlight the significance of biomimetic techniques in furthering nanotheranostics and cancer therapy.

Established biomimetic foundations

Here, there are topics with a greater number of publications but a lower prominence percentile, which may imply areas where there has been significant research but that may be waning in influence or undergoing a shift in focus (Quadrant 4—bottom right).

Metaheuristics; Fireflies; Chiroptera

This topic is a fascinating mix of subjects. Using Firefly and Chiroptera in metaheuristic optimization algorithms provides a bioinspired method for resolving challenging issues. The thematic progression of research papers suggests the maturation of biomimetic disciplines that resonate with several SDGs (Fig.  10 a). The shift from initially aligning with SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being) extends to intersecting with goals such as SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure), SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), SDG 11 (Sustainable Cities and Communities), SDG 13 (Climate Action), and SDG 15 (Life on Land). This diversification reflects the expansive utility of biomimetic approaches, from health applications to broader environmental and societal challenges.

The top keyphrases, such as 'Swarm Intelligence', 'Global Optimization', 'Cuckoo Search Algorithm', and 'Particle Swarm Optimization', are shown in Fig.  10 b highlights the utilization of nature-inspired algorithms for solving complex optimization problems. These terms, along with the 'Firefly Algorithm' and 'Bat Algorithm', underscore the transition of natural phenomena into computational algorithms that mimic the behavioral patterns of biological organisms, offering robust solutions in various fields, including resource management, logistics, and engineering design.

The three highly referenced metaheuristic publications centered around the “Moth Flame Optimization (MFO),” Salp Swarm Algorithm (SSA),” and Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA).” The WOA, authored by Mirjalili and Lewis 65 , is a competitive solution for mathematical optimization and structural design issues because it emulates the social behavior of humpback whales. Inspired by the swarming behavior of salps, Mirjalili et al. 66 introduced the SSA and multiobjective SSA. This shows how well they function in optimizing a variety of engineering design difficulties. Finally, Mirjalili 67 suggested the MFO algorithm, which is modeled after the navigational strategy of moths and exhibits competitive performance in resolving benchmark and real-world engineering issues.

Bioprinting; three-dimensional printing; tissue engineering

The emphasis on sophisticated manufacturing methods for biological applications in this field suggests a keen interest in the nexus of biology and technology, especially in tissue engineering. As shown in Fig.  11 a, the topic's evolution encompasses Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that have transitioned over the years, including SDG 3 (Good Health and Well-being), which is inherently connected to the advancement of medical technologies and tissue engineering for health applications. This research also touches upon SDG 6 (Clean Water and Sanitation) and SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy), suggesting applications of bioprinting technologies in the environmental sustainability and energy sectors. The progression toward SDG 9 (Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure) and SDG 15 (Life on Land) reflects a broader impact, where biomimetic principles are applied to foster innovation in industrial processes and contribute to the preservation of terrestrial ecosystems.

Key phrases emerging from the word cloud in Fig.  11 b, such as “Hydrogel”, “Biofabrication”, “Tissue Scaffold”, and “Regenerative Medicine”, highlight the specialized methodologies and materials that are inspired by natural processes and structures. Terms such as 'Three-Dimensional Printing' and 'Bioprinting' underscore the technological advancements in creating complex biological structures, aiming to revolutionize the field of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

Three widely referenced papers about advances in 3D printing—particularly in bioprinting, soft matter, and the incorporation of biological tissue with functional electronics—are described next. Truby and Lewis’s 68 review of light- and ink-based 3D printing techniques is ground-breaking. This highlights the technology's capacity to create soft matter with tunable properties and its potential applications in robotics, shape-morphing systems, biologically inspired composites, and soft sensors. Ozbolat, and Hospodiuk 69 provide a thorough analysis of “extrusion-based bioprinting (EBB).” The adaptability of EBB in printing different biologics is discussed in the paper, with a focus on its uses in pharmaceutics, primary research, and clinical contexts. Future directions and challenges in EBB technology are also discussed. Using 3D printing, Mannoor et al. 70 presented a novel method for fusing organic tissue with functioning electronics. In the proof-of-concept, a hydrogel matrix seeded with cells and an interwoven conductive polymer containing silver nanoparticles are 3D printed to create a bionic ear. The improved auditory sensing capabilities of the printed ear show how this novel technology allows biological and nanoelectronic features to work together harmoniously.

RQ3: Translation and commercialization

Biomimicry offers promising solutions for sustainability in commercial industries with environmentally sustainable product innovation and energy savings with reduced resource commitment 71 . However, translating biomimicry innovations from research to commercialization presents challenges, including product validation, regulatory hurdles, and the need for strategic investment, innovative financial models, and interdisciplinary collaboration 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 . Ethical considerations highlight the need for universally applicable ethical guidelines regarding the moral debates surrounding biomimicry, such as motivations for pursuing such approaches and the valuation of nature 75 .

Addressing these barriers requires interdisciplinary collaboration, targeted education, and training programs. Strategic investment in biomimicry research and development is also crucial. Encouraging an engineering mindset that integrates biomimicry principles into conventional practices and developing commercial acumen among researchers is essential for navigating the market landscape 76 . Securing sufficient funding is essential for the development, testing, and scaling of these innovations 76 .

Successful case studies illustrate that the strategic integration of biomimicry enhances corporate sustainability and innovation (Larson & Meier 2017). In biomedical research, biomimetic approaches such as novel scaffolds and artificial skins have made significant strides (Zhang 2012). Architecture benefits through energy-efficient building facades modeled after natural cooling systems (Webb et al. 2017). The textile industry uses biomimicry to create sustainable, high-performance fabrics 77 .

RQ4: Interdisciplinary collaboration

Agricultural innovations (sdgs 1—no poverty and 2—zero hunger).

Environmental degradation, biodiversity loss, poverty, and hunger highlight the need for sustainable agricultural methods to mimic natural ecosystems. This includes computational models for ecological interactions, field experiments for biomimetic techniques, and novel materials inspired by natural soil processes. Research can develop solutions such as artificial photosynthesis for energy capture, polyculture systems mimicking ecosystem diversity, and bioinspired materials for soil regeneration and water retention 28 . These innovations can improve sustainability and energy efficiency in agriculture, addressing poverty and hunger through sustainable farming practices.

Educational models (SDG 4—Quality education)

Integrating sustainability principles and biomimicry into educational curricula at all levels presents opportunities for innovation. Collaborations between educators, environmental scientists, and designers can create immersive learning experiences that promote sustainability. This includes interdisciplinary curricula with biomimicry case studies, digital tools, and simulations for exploring biomimetic designs, and participatory learning approaches for engaging students with natural environments. Designing biomimicry-based educational tools and programs can help students engage in hands-on, project-based learning 10 , fostering a deeper understanding of sustainable living and problem-solving.

Gender-inclusive design (SDG 5—Gender inequality)

Gender biases in design and innovation call for research into biomimetic designs and technologies that facilitate gender equality. This includes participatory design processes involving women as cocreators, studying natural systems for inclusive strategies, and applying biomimetic principles to develop technologies supporting gender equality. Bioinspired technologies can address women's specific needs, enhancing access to education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. Interdisciplinary approaches involving gender studies, engineering, and environmental science can uncover new pathways for inclusive innovation.

Inclusive urban solutions (SDG 11—Sustainable cities and communities)

Rapid urbanization challenges such as housing shortages, environmental degradation, and unsustainable transportation systems require innovative solutions. Methodologies include systems thinking in urban planning, simulation tools for modeling biomimetic solutions, and pilot projects testing bioinspired urban innovations. Research on biomimetic architecture for affordable housing, green infrastructure for climate resilience, and bioinspired transportation systems can offer solutions. Collaborative efforts among architects, urban planners, ecologists, and sociologists are essential 78 .

Peace and justice (SDG 16—Peace, justice and institutions)

Social conflicts and weak institutions necessitate innovative approaches that integrate political science, sociology, and biology. Methods involve case studies, theoretical modeling, and participatory action research to develop strategies for peacebuilding and institutional development.

This research provides a comprehensive exploration of the multifaceted dimensions of biomimicry, SDG alignment, and interdisciplinary topics, demonstrating a clear trajectory of growth and relevance. Interdisciplinary collaboration has emerged as a pivotal strategy for unlocking the full potential of biomimicry in addressing underexplored SDGs.

While answering RQ1, the interdisciplinary analysis underscores the significant alignment of biomimicry research with several SDGs. This reflects the interdisciplinary nature of biomimicry and its ability to generate solutions for societal challenges. The analysis of two thematic clusters revealed the broad applicability of biomimicry across various sustainable development goals (SDGs). The first cluster includes health, partnership, and life on land (SDGs 3, 17, and 15), highlighting biomimicry's potential in medical technologies, sustainability collaborations, and land management. The second cluster encompasses clean water, energy, infrastructure, and marine life (SDGs 6, 7, 9, and 14), demonstrating innovative approaches to clean energy generation, sustainable infrastructure, and water purification.

In response to RQ2, this study highlights emerging topics within biomimicry research, such as metaheuristics and nanogenerators, which reflect a dynamic and evolving field that is swiftly gaining attention. These topics, alongside sensors, flexible electronics, and strain sensors, denote evolving research objectives and societal demands, pointing to new areas of study and innovation. This focus on interdisciplinary topics within biomimicry underscores the field’s adaptability and responsiveness to the shifting landscapes of technological and societal challenges.

In addressing RQ3, biomimicry holds potential for sustainable innovation but faces challenges in commercialization. Biomimicry inspires diverse technological and product innovations, driving sustainable advancements (Lurie-Luke 84 ). Overcoming these barriers through strategic investment, training, interdisciplinary collaboration, and ethical guidelines is essential for unlocking their full potential.

For RQ4 , the recommendations are formulated based on underexplored SDGs like 1, 4, 5, and 10 where biomimicry could play a pivotal role.

Future research could apply generative AI models to this dataset to validate the findings and explore additional insights. While our current study did not explore this topic, we see significant potential for this approach. Generative AI models can process extensive datasets and reveal patterns, potentially offering insights into biomimetic research correlations. The interpretation required for context-specific analysis remains challenging for generative AI 36 , 37

Our study provides valuable insights, but some limitations are worth considering. The chosen database might limit the comprehensiveness of the research captured, potentially excluding relevant work from other sources. Additionally, while the combination of cocitation mapping and BERTopic modeling provides a powerful analysis, both methods have inherent limitations. They may oversimplify the complexities of the field or introduce bias during theme interpretation, even with advanced techniques. Furthermore, our use of citations to thematically clustered publications as a proxy for impact inherits the limitations of citation analysis, such as biases toward established ideas and potential misinterpretations 79 , 80 . Another limitation of our study is the potential for missing accurate SDG mappings, as multiple SDG mapping initiatives are available, and our reliance on a single, Scopus-integrated method may not capture all relevant associations. Consequently, this could have resulted in the exclusion of papers that were appropriately aligned with certain SDGs but were not identified by our chosen mapping approach. Given these limitations, this study provides a valuable snapshot for understanding biomimicry research.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article and its supplementary information files.

El-Zeiny, R. M. A. Biomimicry as a problem solving methodology in interior architecture. Procedia. Soc. 50 , 502–512 (2012).

Article   Google Scholar  

Othmani, N. I., Sahak, N. M. & Yunos, M. Y. M. Biomimicry in agrotechnology: Future solution of water problem for the agriculture industry?. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 756 (1), 012051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/756/1/012051 (2021).

Bensaude-Vincent, B. Bioinformed emerging technologies and their relation to the sustainability aims of biomimicry. Environ. Values 28 (5), 551–571 (2019).

Chirazi, J. E. Commercialization journeys: Bringing biomimetic innovation to the market. In Biomim. Mat., Des. and Habit. (pp. 393–436). Elsevier (2022).

Vincent, J. F., Bogatyreva, O. A., Bogatyrev, N. R., Bowyer, A. & Pahl, A. K. Biomimetics: Its practice and theory. J. R. Soc. Interface 3 (9), 471–482 (2006).

Article   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Pogge, T. & Sengupta, M. The sustainable development goals: A plan for building a better world?. J. Glob. Ethics 11 (1), 56–64 (2015).

Wamane, G. V. A “new deal” for a sustainable future: Enhancing circular economy by employing ESG principles and biomimicry for efficiency. Manag. Environ. Qual. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2022-0189 (2023).

Butt, A. N. & Dimitrijević, B. Multidisciplinary and transdisciplinary collaboration in nature-based design of sustainable architecture and urbanism. Sustainability 14 (16), 10339 (2022).

Gupta, J. & Vegelin, C. Sustainable development goals and inclusive development. INEA 16 , 433–448 (2016).

Google Scholar  

Hayes, S., Desha, C. & Baumeister, D. Learning from nature—Biomimicry innovation to support infrastructure sustainability and resilience. TFSC 161 , 120287 (2020).

Toner, J., Desha, C., Reis, K., Hes, D. & Hayes, S. Integrating ecological knowledge into regenerative design: A rapid practice review. Sustainability 15 (17), 13271 (2023).

Jamei, E. & Vrcelj, Z. Biomimicry and the built environment, learning from nature’s solutions. Appl. Sci. 11 (16), 7514 (2021).

Blanco, E., Pedersen Zari, M., Raskin, K. & Clergeau, P. Urban ecosystem-level biomimicry and regenerative design: Linking ecosystem functioning and urban built environments. Sustainability 13 (1), 404 (2021).

Rebecca, C. Climate Action Through Biomimcry: Innovation for the SDGs. Sustainable Brands. https://sustainablebrands.com/read/product-service-design-innovation/climate-action-through-biomimicry-innovation-for-the-sdgs . (Accessed on January 9, 2024) (2020).

Vierra, S. Biomimicry: Designing to model nature. Whole Build. Des. Guide 1–10 (2011).

Biomimicry Institute. Case Studies of Commercialisation of Biomimicry Innovations (2023).

Fayemi, P. E., Wanieck, K., Zollfrank, C., Maranzana, N. & Aoussat, A. Biomimetics: Process, tools and practice. Bioinsp. Biomim. 12 (1), 011002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-3190/12/1/011002 (2017).

Article   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Meena, A. K., D’Costa, D., Bhavsar, S., Kshirsagar, M. & Kulkarni, S. Applications of biomimicry in construction and architecture: A bibliometric analysis. Lib. Phil. Prac. Lincoln, NE, USA , 1–17 (2021).

Varshabi, N., Arslan Selçuk, S. & Mutlu Avinç, G. Biomimicry for energy-efficient building design: A bibliometric analysis. Biomimetics 7 (1), 21 (2022).

Perricone, V., Langella, C. & Santulli, C. Sustainable Biomimetics: A Discussion on Differences in Scale, Complexity, and Organization Between the Natural and Artificial World. In Bion. Sustain. Design 171–193 (Springer Nature Singapore, 2022).

Aggarwal, S., & Verma, A. Scientometric analysis of research trends in clustering and nature inspired techniques. In AIP Conf. Proc. (Vol. 2576, No. 1). AIP Publishing (2022, December).

Pinzón, O. A. & Austin, M. C. Nature as an Inspiration to Exploit Renewable Energy Sources: A Review on Trends and Biological Strategies. In 2022 8th International Engineering, Sciences and Technology Conference (IESTEC) 463–468 (IEEE, 2022).

Carniel, T., Cazenille, L., Dalle, J. M. & Halloy, J. Using natural language processing to find research topics in Living Machines conferences and their intersections with Bioinspiration & Biomimetics publications. Bioinsp. & Biomim 17 (6), 065008 (2022).

Nasser, H. K. et al. Harmony search algorithm for solving combinatorial optimization problems: Bibliometric analysis. Math. Model. Eng. Prob. 10 (3), 906 (2023).

Rusu, D. M. et al. Soft robotics: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. Micromachines 14 (2), 359. https://doi.org/10.3390/mi14020359 (2023).

Shashwat, S. et al. A review on bioinspired strategies for an energy-efficient built environment. Energy Build. 296 , 113382 (2023).

Pires, P. M. et al. Bioactive restorative materials applied over coronal dentine—A bibliometric and critical review. Bioengineering 10 (6), 731. https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering10060731 (2023).

Liu, H., Liao, X. & Du, B. The applications of nature-inspired meta-heuristic algorithms for decreasing the energy consumption of software-defined networks: A comprehensive and systematic literature review. Sustain. Comput.: Inform. Syst. 39 , 100895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2023.100895 (2023).

Hinkelman, K., Yang, Y. & Zuo, W. Design methodologies and engineering applications for ecosystem biomimicry: An interdisciplinary review spanning cyber, physical, and cyber-physical systems. Bioinsp. Biomim. 18 (2), 021001 (2023).

Raman, R., Lathabhai, H., Mandal, S., Kumar, C. & Nedungadi, P. Contribution of business research to sustainable development goals: bibliometrics and science mapping analysis. Sustainability 15 (17), 12982 (2023).

Nedungadi, P. et al. Mapping autism’s research landscape: Trends in autism screening and its alignment with sustainable development goals. Front. Psychiatry 14 , 1294254 (2024).

Auckland's SDG Mapping. University of Auckland's SDG Mapping initiative from https://www.sdgmapping.auckland.ac.nz , accessed on 4th February 2024

Elsevier's SDG Mapping - Elsevier's SDG Mapping Initiative from https://www.elsevier.com/about/partnerships/sdg-research-mapping-initiative , accessed on 4th February 2024

Raman, R., Nair, V. K., Prakash, V., Patwardhan, A. & Nedungadi, P. Green-hydrogen research: What have we achieved, and where are we going? Bibliometrics analysis. Energy Rep. 8 , 9242–9260 (2022).

Raman, R. et al. Fake news research trends, linkages to generative artificial intelligence and sustainable development goals. Heliyon 10 (3), e24727 (2024).

Raman, R. et al. ChatGPT: Literate or intelligent about UN sustainable development goals?. Plos one 19 (4), e0297521 (2024).

Raman, R., Calyam, P. & Achuthan, K. ChatGPT or bard: Who is a better certified ethical hacker?. Comput. Secur. 140 , 103804 (2024).

Rama, R., Nair, V. K., Nedungadi, P., Ray, I. & Achuthan, K. Darkweb research: Past, present, and future trends and mapping to sustainable development goals. Heliyon 9 (11), e22269 (2023).

Van Eck, N. J. & Waltman, L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 84 , 523–538 (2010).

Emary, E., Zawbaa, H. M. & Hassanien, A. E. Binary gray wolf optimization approaches for feature selection. Neurocomputing 172 , 371–381 (2016).

Lin, Y., Ren, J. & Qu, X. Catalytically active nanomaterials: a promising candidate for artificial enzymes. Acc. Chem. Res. 47 (4), 1097–1105 (2014).

Parodi, A. et al. Synthetic nanoparticles functionalized with biomimetic leukocyte membranes possess cell-like functions. Nat. Nanotechnol. 8 (1), 61–68 (2013).

Article   ADS   PubMed   Google Scholar  

Zou, Q. et al. Biological photothermal nanodots based on self-assembly of peptide–porphyrin conjugates for antitumor therapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139 (5), 1921–1927 (2017).

Wang, G. G., Deb, S. & Cui, Z. Monarch butterfly optimization. Neural Comput. Appl. 31 , 1995–2014 (2019).

Li, X. et al. Engineering heterogeneous semiconductors for solar water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. 3 (6), 2485–2534 (2015).

Li, X., Yu, J., Jaroniec, M. & Chen, X. Cocatalysts for selective photoreduction of CO 2 into solar fuels. Chem. Rev. 119 (6), 3962–4179 (2019).

Wang, B., Liang, W., Guo, Z. & Liu, W. Biomimetic superlyophobic and superlyophilic materials applied for oil/water separation: A new strategy beyond nature. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44 (1), 336–361 (2015).

Singh, J. et al. ‘Green’synthesis of metals and their oxide nanoparticles: Applications for environmental remediation. J. Nanobiotechnology 16 (1), 1–24 (2018).

Wang, Z. et al. Biomimetic nanoflowers by self-assembling nanozymes to induce intracellular oxidative damage against hypoxic tumors. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 3334 (2018).

Article   ADS   PubMed   PubMed Central   Google Scholar  

Gao, S. et al. Nanocatalytic tumor therapy by biomimetic dual inorganic nanozyme-catalyzed cascade reaction. Adv. Sci. 6 (3), 1801733 (2019).

Su, B., Tian, Y. & Jiang, L. Bioinspired interfaces with superwettability: From materials to chemistry. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138 (6), 1727–1748 (2016).

Zhang, X., Li, Z., Liu, K. & Jiang, L. Bioinspired multifunctional foam with self-cleaning and oil/water separation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 23 (22), 2881–2886 (2013).

Jang, S. C. et al. Bioinspired exosome-mimetic nanovesicles for targeted delivery of chemotherapeutics to malignant tumors. ACS Nano 7 (9), 7698–7710 (2013).

Yong, T. et al. Tumor exosome-based nanoparticles are efficient drug carriers for chemotherapy. Nat. Commun. 10 (1), 3838 (2019).

Cheng, G. et al. Self-assembly of extracellular vesicle-like metal–organic framework nanoparticles for protection and intracellular delivery of biofunctional proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140 (23), 7282–7291 (2018).

Yang, J. et al. Eardrum-inspired active sensors for self-powered cardiovascular system characterization and throat-attached anti-interference voice recognition. Adv. Mater. 27 (8), 1316–1326 (2015).

Sezer, N. & Koç, M. A comprehensive review on the state-of-the-art of piezoelectric energy harvesting. Nano Energy 80 , 105567 (2021).

Zhao, D. et al. Cellulose-based flexible functional materials for emerging intelligent electronics. Adv. Mater. 33 (28), 2000619 (2021).

Chortos, A., Liu, J. & Bao, Z. Pursuing prosthetic electronic skin. Nat. mater. 15 (9), 937–950 (2016).

Kim, J. et al. Stretchable silicon nanoribbon electronics for skin prosthesis. Nat. Commun. 5 (1), 5747 (2014).

Pang, C. et al. Highly skin-conformal microhairy sensor for pulse signal amplification. Adv. Mater. 27 (4), 634–640 (2015).

Yu, Z., Zhou, P., Pan, W., Li, N. & Tang, B. A biomimetic nanoreactor for synergistic chemiexcited photodynamic and starvation therapy against tumor metastasis. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 5044 (2018).

Yang, W. et al. Albumin-bioinspired Gd: CuS nanotheranostic agent for in vivo photoacoustic/magnetic resonance imaging-guided tumor-targeted photothermal therapy. ACS Nano 10 (11), 10245–10257 (2016).

Wang, Z. et al. Biomineralization-inspired synthesis of copper sulfide–ferritin nanocages as cancer theranostics. ACS Nano 10 (3), 3453–3460 (2016).

Mirjalili, S. & Lewis, A. The whale optimization algorithm. Adv. Eng. Softw. 95 , 51–67 (2016).

Mirjalili, S. et al. Salp Swarm Algorithm: A bioinspired optimizer for engineering design problems. Adv. Eng. Softw. 114 , 163–191 (2017).

Mirjalili, S. Moth-flame optimization algorithm: A novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowl. Based Syst. 89 , 228–249 (2015).

Truby, R. L. & Lewis, J. A. Printing soft matter in three dimensions. Nature 540 (7633), 371–378 (2016).

Ozbolat, I. T. & Hospodiuk, M. Current advances and future perspectives in extrusion-based bioprinting. Biomater. 76 , 321–343 (2016).

Mannoor, M. S. et al. 3D printed bionic ears. Nano Lett. 13 (6), 2634–2639 (2013).

Kennedy, E. B. & Marting, T. A. Biomimicry: Streamlining the front end of innovation for environmentally sustainable products. Res. Technol. Manage. 59 (4), 40–48 (2016).

Chazhaev, M. Economic potential of biotechnologies: challenges and windows of opportunity. BIO Web Conf. 76 , 10002 (2023).

Kasatova, A. A., Vagizova, V. I. & Tufetulov, A. M. Stages of biotechnology commercialization in the system of interaction between financial and innovative industrial structures. Acad. Strateg. Manag. J. 15 , 191 (2016).

Rovalo, E., McCardle, J., Smith, E. & Hooker, G. Growing the practice of biomimicry: Opportunities for mission-based organisations based on a global survey of practitioners. Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag. 32 (1), 71–87 (2020).

Broeckhoven, C. & Winters, S. Biomimethics: a critical perspective on the ethical implications of biomimetics in technological innovation. Bioinspir. Biomim. 18 (5), 053001 (2023).

Article   ADS   Google Scholar  

Biomimicry Innovation Lab. The State of Nature-Inspired Innovation in the UK. Retrieved from https://www.biomimicryinnovationlab.com/blog/the-state-of-nature-inspired-innovation-in-the-uk (2023).

Weerasinghe, D. U., Perera, S. & Dissanayake, D. Application of biomimicry for sustainable functionalization of textiles: Review of current status and prospectus. Textile Res. J. 89 (22), 4282–4294 (2019).

Madmar, S., Shah, M. Z., Matusin, A. M. R. A. & Ilhan, A. A. Applications of biomimicry to urban planning: interrogating the relevance of emerging approaches to design cities by inspiring from nature. IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 1274 (1), 012015 (2023).

Letrud, K. & Hernes, S. Affirmative citation bias in scientific myth debunking: A three-in-one case study. PLoS One 14 (9), e0222213 (2019).

McCain, K. W. Obliteration by incorporation. Beyond bibliometrics: Harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact. J. Scientometr. Res. 4 (1), 129–149 (2014).

Benyus, J. M. (1997). Biomimicry: Innovation inspired by nature.

Donthu, N., Kumar, S., Pandey, N., Pandey, N., & Mishra, A. (2021). Mapping the electronic word-of-mouth (eWOM) research: A systematic review and bibliometric analysis. J. Bus. Res. , 135 , 758–773.

Sydney Gladman, A., Matsumoto, E. A., Nuzzo, R. G., Mahadevan, L., & Lewis, J. A. (2016). Biomimetic 4D printing. Nature materials , 15 (4), 413–418.

Lurie-Luke, E. Product and technology innovation: What can biomimicry inspire?. Biotechnology advances , 32 (8), 1494–1505 (2014).

Download references

This research received no specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Amrita School of Business, Amritapuri, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India

Raghu Raman

Amrita School of Business, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu, India

Aswathy Sreenivasan & M. Suresh

Amrita School of Computing, Amritapuri, Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham, Kollam, Kerala, India

Prema Nedungadi

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

R.R.—Conceptualization; supervision; methodology; data curation; visualization; writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing. A.S.—Data curation; Writing—original draft; and Writing—review and editing. M.S.—writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing. P.N.—Data curation; writing—original draft; and writing—review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Raghu Raman .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article.

Raman, R., Sreenivasan, A., Suresh, M. et al. Mapping biomimicry research to sustainable development goals. Sci Rep 14 , 18613 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69230-9

Download citation

Received : 28 April 2024

Accepted : 01 August 2024

Published : 10 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-69230-9

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Sustainable development goal
• Network map
• Thematic areas

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines . If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Quick links

• Explore articles by subject
• Guide to authors
• Editorial policies

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Anthropocene newsletter — what matters in anthropocene research, free to your inbox weekly.

In need of a sustainable and just fashion industry: identifying challenges and opportunities through a systematic literature review in a Global North/Global South perspective

• Open access
• Published: 08 August 2024
• Volume 5 , article number  186 , ( 2024 )

Cite this article

You have full access to this open access article

• Francesca Bonelli 1 ,
• Rocco Caferra 1 &
• Piergiuseppe Morone 1  

193 Accesses

Explore all metrics

Since the late twentieth century, the global fashion industry has been increasingly embracing the business model known as fast fashion. Characterised by rapid production cycles, fleeting trends, low-cost garments and large-scale production, fast fashion seems to meet consumer demand for affordable and trendy clothing. However, its environmental impact as a major polluter poses significant challenges to sustainability and circularity initiatives. This article presents the results of a systematic literature review, exploring the unsustainable consequences of fast fashion, focusing on both demand and supply side, from a geographical perspective. Using a Global North–Global South framework, it explores differences in socio-economic structures, consumption and production patterns, access to resources and environmental impacts. The analysis suggests that a fair and equitable transition towards a sustainable and circular fashion industry will require the links between business, society and nature to be reconsidered, to avoid perpetuating the inequalities associated with the global linear capitalist economy. The findings highlight the importance of both markets and institutions in sustainable growth. In the Global North, the most frequently discussed topics relate to investment and research and development with respect to new technologies or system innovations often with the support of well-structured political guidance. Conversely, in the Global sustainable initiatives tend to be scattered, country-specific and intricately tied to particular socio-economic and cultural contexts.

Similar content being viewed by others

Sustainable Fashion: The Case of a Mexican BCorp

Dilemmas of Development and the Reconstruction of Fashion

Sustainability, Saudi Arabia and Luxury Fashion Context: An Oxymoron or a New Way?

Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.

1 Introduction

As Payne outlines [ 1 ], fashion is both an industrial and a cultural phenomenon that is deeply intertwined with the converging environmental, social and economic challenges of the twenty-first century. Following World War II, when production shifted from the home or small workshops to factories orientated towards mass production, fashion became one of the world’s largest industries. Today, it is a major global and globalised industry, characterised by ‘low predictability, high impulse purchase, shorter life cycle, and high volatility of market demand’ [ 2 ].

The term ‘fast fashion’ was coined in the 1990s, when the Spanish brand Zara first opened a store in New York and quickly emerged as a standout and highly imitable model of efficiency and speed.

The rise of fast fashion was primarily driven by changes in consumer behaviour and increased fashion consciousness, coupled with the transition of mass-production globalised retailers from a production—to a market-centric approach [ 3 ]. Direct engagement between retailers and consumers was essential for maintaining the industry pace. In particular, the late 1990s saw a surge in demand for fashion, fuelled by the popularity of fashion shows and the shift to shopping as a form of entertainment [ 4 ]. Mass-production retailers such as Zara, H&M, UNIQLO, GAP and Primark Forever 21 and Topshop expanded rapidly, due to globalisation, and met growing demand by swiftly delivering ‘high fashion at a low price’, within a ‘throw-away market’ paradigm [ 3 , 5 ]. Vertical integration was adopted to reduce production times and promote flexibility, collaboration and communication in accordance with more complex global supply chains [ 6 ]. The late 1990s also marked the advent of e-commerce, with fast fashion retailers such as H&M entering the digital arena [ 4 ]. E-commerce furthered the globalisation and democratisation of fast fashion, making products and services more accessible across diverse and international markets [ 7 ]. Retailers leveraged e-commerce to reduce purchasing and supply management costs, improve communication strategies and enhance competitiveness through innovation. For consumers, e-commerce simplified purchasing decisions, leading to time and cost savings [ 8 ]. The 2020 pandemic, resulting in a significant economic downturn for fashion companies [ 9 ], accelerated the adoption of e-commerce as a crucial business solution and primary source of market innovation [ 10 ]. Chinese fashion retailers such as Temu and Shein pushed this model a step further, with nearly exclusive online sales.

Notwithstanding the advantages of this new business model, it also presented significant disadvantages. In particular, the technological innovations, GDP growth, globalisation and shifts in retail markets that have arisen as a result of fast fashion have introduced several adverse environmental and ecological impacts [ 11 ]. Considering climate change, the fashion industry is accountable for 8–10% of global greenhouse gas emissions –a figure projected to increase by 60% by 2030, according to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [ 12 ]. The UNEP has also blamed fast fashion for triggering the ‘triple planetary crisis’ [ 6 ]. In more detail, it is responsible for the consumption of vast quantities of raw materials, including farmland and fossil fuels (especially oil), and the conversion of plastic fibres [ 13 ]. Other impacts relate to water depletion and pollution. For instance, the extensive use of chemical compounds and the incineration of synthetic plastic fibres (i.e., polyester, nylon, acrylic), make fashion the second-largest contributor to water pollution after agriculture [ 14 ].

Fast fashion’s linear model of production shows a contrasting dynamic when viewed from a Global North–Global South perspective. Derived from the ‘Third World’ model introduced by the United Nations in the 1940s, the terms ‘Global North’ and ‘Global South’ describe regions that are socio-economically and politically opposed [ 15 ]. The Global South encompasses economically unstable and underdeveloped countries characterised by a low average per capita income, high disparity in living standards and limited access to resources (leading to a heavy reliance on primary product exports). Conversely, the Global North encompasses countries with a high average per capita income, advanced technology and infrastructure, and macroeconomic and political stability [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Footnote 1 These differences stem from a global capitalist economy that relies on the ‘economy-first model of development’. The integration of the Global South (formerly referred to as the Third World) into this model began in the 1950s, with the emergence of decolonisation movements. However, the enduring social and economic effects of colonialism, coupled with continuous dependency on former colonial ties and development strategies emulating the virtuous model of developed countries according to the path-dependency principle, have led to the perpetuation and sharpening of inequalities in global governance, economic development and international relations [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 ]. As highlighted by Hurrell and Kingsbury (1992) [ 22 ], this imbalance has become a significant source of conflict between the Global North and the Global South, especially concerning the environment. The COP27 (2022) stands as a stark example of the concerns expressed by the Global South regarding the unequal distribution of responsibilities and burdens in climate change mitigation efforts. Such political and socio-ecological inequalities also contribute to shaping production-consumption patterns [ 23 ].

These considerations extend to the global fashion industry, representing a crucial player in the global economy whose hazardous make-take-waste paradigm yields cumulative negative effects that are unevenly distributed across world regions.

Fast fashion’s high pace of overproduction and ‘purchase-discard’ consumption model result in an abundance of unwanted clothes, contributing to a significant mass of textile waste [ 24 ]. According to the US Environmental Protection Agency, the average American consumer generates 82 pounds of textile waste each year [ 25 ].

To address the issue of overproduction, efforts have been made to implement circular economic principles, resulting in a proliferation of global exports of second-hand clothing from the Global North to the Global South [ 24 , 26 ]. However, this practice of reuse, known as the ‘international second-hand clothing trade’ [ 27 ], represents the human tendency to merely ‘export or displace ecological problems, rather than truly solve them’ [ 28 ]. In fact, the flow of international second-hand clothing from the affluent Global North to the developing Global South constitutes a form of pollution shifting or waste dumping, potentially inflicting damage on the receiving nations. Evidence of this phenomenon lies in the qualitative difference in donated garments between international markets: high-quality garments are acquired by charities or companies in the Global North and resold locally, while medium-quality garments are exported to Eastern European retail shops and low-quality items find their way to Africa, Asia and South America [ 29 , 30 ]. Indeed, much of the used clothing that is exported from the Global North to the Global South lacks market value and ends up as waste in water streams, landfills, oceans or incinerators. This troubling issue was reported by ‘Trashion’ [ 31 ], which discovered that approximately 50% of the 600,000 kg of used clothing exported by Belgium to Kenya in 2021 was waste that could be neither resold or recycled.

Furthermore, challenges may arise even when high-quality clothes are traded in Global South markets. The volume and low prices of exported clothing, facilitated by political agreements on the trade of used clothing (i.e., the new post-Cotonou agreement, the ‘Everything but Arms’ initiative), hinder the growth of local textile industries. Rather than promoting employment opportunities, local product consumption and economic development, this fosters a heavy reliance on the Global North and contributes to the marginalisation of residents in the poorest countries [ 32 , 33 ].

The extensive asymmetries in the fast fashion industry between the Global North and the Global South, particularly in terms of sourcing and the generation and disposal of waste, hinder sustainable environmental and economic development and the transition towards a circular economic model [ 34 ]. Therefore, to prevent the perpetuation of colonialist-like power dynamics (as evident in the global waste trade often referred to as ‘ecological imperialism’ [ 35 ]), discussions of sustainable development and circularity must prioritise justice and address inequalities, to meet diverse needs and visions across the globe [ 34 , 36 ]. Echoing Boenhhert’s (2015) [ 37 ] perspective on the circular economy as a comprehensive approach to redesigning economic and social relations, a rebalancing of relations between the Global North and the Global South cannot overlook power dynamics. These dynamics are evident in not only the economic imperative to reduce and improve the quality of production and consumption, but also the circular economy's endeavour to ‘close the loop’, merging economic growth with sustainability [ 38 ].

The present analysis delves into the unequally distributed environmental impacts associated with the fast fashion industry, considering market interactions between consumers (i.e., demand side) and producers (i.e., supply side). Furthermore, it situates these interactions within the broader context of Global North–Global South power dynamics, as reflected in the economy-first model of development. The analysis not only uncovers the unsustainable and geographically diverse impacts of fast fashion, but it also sheds light on emerging strategies and initiatives in the discourse on fashion and sustainability. Within this context, the Global North and the Global South are considered two poles in which exchanges (or a lack thereof) of initiatives, knowledge and strategies may occur among consumers and producers.

In the following section (Sect.  2 ), we present our research questions and explain our methodological choice of a systematic literature review (SLR). We also outline the protocol used to answer our research questions, which resulted in the creation of analytical clusters. Section  3 delves into the qualitative findings of the SLR, dedicating specific subsections to the key narratives that emerged from the cluster analysis. Section  4 provides a thorough discussion of the results obtained, drawing insights for the multilevel gap between the Global North and the Global South. Finally, Sect.  5 presents concluding remarks regarding the shaping of a future discourse aimed at achieving a globally equitable and sustainable fashion industry, encompassing both production and consumption.

2 Research question

In the present study, we analysed the phenomenon of fast fashion through two distinct yet complementary lenses: (i) consumer and producer perspectives, rooted in (ii) a macro geographical focus distinguishing between the Global North and the Global South. Starting with a review of the literature, our exploration mainly centred on the environmental impact and unsustainability of the growing fast fashion industry, emphasising regional disparities. The research question explored both production and consumption, addressing the widening gap between the Global North and the Global South fostered by the fast fashion industry. Specifically, the literature review aimed at answering the following questions:

How does the empirical divide between the Global North and the Global South manifest in the economic literature on fast fashion, particularly in analyses of consumers and producers?

Are producers from the Global North and the Global South concerned about the unsustainable environmental impacts of fast fashion? Are they making efforts to transition their businesses towards more circular models? What factors influence consumer awareness, intentions and behaviours towards fast fashion? Are there notable differences or similarities between the Global North and the Global South regarding these aspects? Are there ongoing initiatives promoting sustainable consumption patterns?

What does the revised literature reveal about the role of globally adopting circular consumption and production practices in the fashion industry in bridging the Global North–Global South divide?

2.1 Methodology

The core of the qualitative-quantitative analysis was an SLR. The SLR methodology, as outlined by Moher et al. [ 39 ], relies on a ‘clearly formulated question that uses systematic and explicit methods to identify, select, and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect and analyse data from the studies that are included in the review’ [ 39 ]. This method is particularly useful for revealing the current state of the art on a topic and identifying gaps and areas requiring further research [ 40 ]. Given the complexity and novelty of the selected topic, we deemed an SLR most suitable for addressing our research questions, as it would allow us to determine a literary and bibliographic framework within which to identify relevant emerging narratives. Papers were identified following the PRISMA protocol, which outlines a specific flow of information across four research stages.

The flow diagram depicted in Fig.  1 outlines the methodological steps (i.e., identification, screening, eligibility, inclusion) [ 20 ] of the SLR. These steps, starting with identification, enabled us to select relevant publications to address our research questions.

Systematic review flow diagram

2.2 Identification

The identification process relied on the electronic database of scholarly publications Scopus, which allowed us to search across titles, abstracts and keywords in the literature. After deeming search terms such as ‘fast fashion AND Global North AND Global South’ too narrow in scope, and terms such as ‘fast fashion AND global value chain’ too broad, we ultimately selected the keyword search ‘fast fashion AND sustainability’.

The research spanned the years 2009–2023, with 2023 chosen as the end date in order to include the most recent studies. However, due to the temporal limitations of the 2023 dataset, for which collection ceased in March of that year, its representativeness in the graph is inherently limited. The year 2009 was chosen as the starting point as it marked the onset of the effects of the first globalisation crisis (beginning in October 2008), bringing to light the uneven development of the economy, the consequences of sourcing goods and services globally and the flow of capital [ 41 ]. Figure  2 depicts the annual growth in fast fashion and sustainability publications over the study period.

Annual scientific production, 2009–2023

Ultimately, our search resulted in a set of 293 publications, which we transferred to a Microsoft Excel file for the purposes of manual screening.

2.3 Screening

Screening and selection were performed manually, through a title and abstract review of the 293 papers. Eighty-one papers were excluded on the basis of their irrelevance to the subject matter. Specifically, to answer our research question and narrow the scope of the review our focus was on economic publications, addressing the impact of the fast fashion linear versus circular production and consumption model, and centred on: consumer awareness and/or behaviour and/or preferences, producer/retailer/brand marketing strategies and/or circular business models, and the interaction between consumers and producers. Systematic reviews were also included, as these offered an overview of the publishing landscape [ 42 , 43 ].

2.4 Eligibility

Each of the remaining 212 papers were assessed for eligibility, with the aim of rooting the SLR within Global North–South dynamics. Only those publications that had a clear geographical focus, i.e., context set in either Global South or Global North countries, or in a comparative approach were included. Papers that addressed mere consumers’/producers’ trends or advancement patterns and strategies towards sustainability, without discerning differences between the Global North and the Global South, or without rooting their analysis in a certain geographical context were excluded.

A set of 117 eligible papers was identified, comprised of publications focused on: (i) consumers, producers, or consumers and producers; and (ii) the Global North, the Global South or a Global North–Global South comparison.

The dataset was further sorted according to countries’ unique contributions to the scientific literature on fast fashion and sustainability, providing an overview of the distribution of geographical areas present in our identified publication set. The 117 research articles originated from 37 countries, representing both the Global North and the Global South. However, as Fig.  3 shows, certain countries contributed more significantly, as indicated by the dark blue colour (e.g., the UK with 32 articles; the US with 25; China with 14; South Korea with 9; Australia with 8; Brazil with 7), while the contribution of other countries was less significant (e.g., Japan with 3 articles, Ecuador with 2; Chile, Saudi Arabia, Tanzania, the Philippines, Croatia, Ireland and the Czech Republic with 1).

World map showing countries’ unique contributions to the scientific literature on fast fashion and sustainability

2.5 Inclusion

The 117 papers were categorised into four clusters, according to their focus: (i) consumers in the Global North, (ii) producers in the Global North, (iii) consumers in the Global South and (iv) producers in the Global South. These analytical clusters were not created using algorithms or inferential methods, but established qualitatively, with the results interpreted at two levels: (i) market dynamics and interactions (consumers and/or producers; (ii) geographical dynamics and interactions (i.e., Global North and/or Global South). Some papers were assigned to more than one of the abovementioned clusters.

Subsequently, the abstract of each paper was read in order to identify emerging narrative for each cluster of articles.

The following section reports the findings from the qualitative analysis of the 117 identified papers, organised according to each conceptual cluster. The first subsection reports the narratives of papers concerning the Global North and consumers (n = 28 publications from 2014–2023). The second subsection describes the narratives of papers discussing the Global North and producers (n = 24 publications from 2009–2023). Subsections 3 and 4 analyse Global South narratives. Section  3 focuses on consumers (n = 11 publications from 2017–2022) and Sect.  4 focuses on producers (n = 11 publications from 2017–2021).

The final subsection explores the narratives of papers pertaining to more than one of the abovementioned clusters. The content of these papers determined five further clusters of analysis: (i) the Global North and producers and consumers (n = 15 from 2016–2023); (ii) the Global South and producers and consumers (n = 5 publications from 2016–2022); (iii) the Global North versus the Global South and consumers (n = 3 from 2011–2022; (iv) the Global North versus the Global South and producers (n = 14 publications from 2016–2022); and (v) the Global North versus the Global South and consumers and producers (n = 6 from 2018–2022).

Figure  4 depicts the distribution of articles among the conceptual clusters, showing the frequency of articles per cluster.

Distribution of articles in each conceptual cluster

Figure  5 provides a visually concise summary of the SLR findings that shall be reported and discussed in the following sections. The vertical axis depicts upstream and downstream issues, while the horizontal axis represents the Global North and the Global South. Within each quadrant, the identified narratives are displayed. The upper left quadrant focuses on Global North consumer narratives, while the upper right quadrant represents the Global South consumer cluster. The lower left quadrant reflects Global North producer narratives, and the lower right quadrant pertains to Global South producers. The axes delineate overlapping narratives. The vertical axis (i.e., upstream and downstream) contains cross-cutting narratives for consumers (i.e., upstream) and producers (i.e., downstream), for both the Global North (up) and Global South (down). The horizontal axis (Global North and Global South) represents narratives cross-cutting the producer and consumer categories in the Global North (left) and Global South (right). The circle in the centre regroups the narratives encompassing all four quadrants: the Global North, the Global South, consumers and producers.

Emerging narratives grouped by conceptual cluster

3.1 Global North and consumers

The most frequent narrative in this category explored socio-cognitive aspects of consumer behaviour within the framework of the rational economic agent. Terms such as 'consciousness’, ‘knowledge’, ‘cognition’, ‘intentions’, ‘attitude’ and ‘behaviour’ frequently underscored the significance of the socio-cognitive sphere in matters of consumer preference. The central question usually revolved around how ‘consumers’ level of environmental consciousness impacts their purchase decisions and consumption behaviour’ [ 44 ], investigating potential value-action gaps or intention-behaviour gaps.

Papers [ 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 ] often analysed empirical data obtained through interviews, surveys and consumer questionnaires. These methods were applied not only to determine consumer preferences, but also explored existing knowledge and attitudes, providing empirical evidence to support initiatives to promote more environmentally friendly purchasing behaviors. Specifically, considering the environmental risks associated with the fast fashion industry, the focus on raising consumer consciousness was found to align with the theme of responsible consumption within a circular bioeconomy perspective. However, external factors (e.g., stressful events such as COVID-19) can impact consumer behaviour, encouraging impulsive buying [ 49 ]. The data indicated a consumer preference for sustainable fashion items, while revealing a lack of accurate and transparent knowledge among consumers about all stages of the supply chain [ 51 ]. Additionally, some papers found that consumer preferences did not automatically translate into purchasing behaviour, as consumer willingness to pay also played a key role in determining such decisions, alongside with cognitive and behavioural factors [ 45 , 52 ]. Despite this complexity, consumers were found to exhibit a willingness to pay higher prices for sustainable products, suggesting a potential for sustained market volume [ 50 ].

The studies in this group also explored consumers’ demographic characteristics, focusing particularly on generational cohort and gender. Concerning generational cohort, the papers primarily centred on Generation X, whose members (i.e., millennials) are most exposed to the intention-behaviour gap: while overconsuming fast fashion, they are also increasingly sensitive to sustainability issues [ 53 ]. Thus, education about sustainable production and responsible consumerism in the clothing industry was identified as a key factor for this cohort, as highlighted by a case study about an educational project conducted in Germany [ 54 ]. With respect to gender, women were identified as more ‘careful’ about their responsible consumption, showing a preference for slow fashion apparel and garments [ 45 , 51 ], or at least appearing ‘more knowledgeable about this topic than men’ [ 55 ].

Within the analysis of consumer purchasing choices, slow fashion also emerged as an intriguing research trend [ 52 ]. Some papers presented interesting case studies. For instance, Holgar [ 56 ] used wardrobe research to empirically test consumers’ everyday clothing practices, and Polajnar and Šrimpf Vendramin explored textile waste management among Ljubljana residents and the waste-management network in Slovenia [ 57 ].

3.2 Global North and producers

The most explored narrative in this cluster pertained to the identification of solutions and alternatives concerning circular business models, sustainability, transparent global value chains, and waste and emission reductions, aimed at a paradigm shift in the fashion industry towards more conscientious and circular business practices. For instance, rethinking production modes and supply chains could occur by embracing a multi-echelon closed-loop supply chain (CLSC) [ 58 ]. Such an approach would aim at maintaining market competitiveness while promoting sustainable development [ 58 ]. Studies analysed major global fashion companies, in—both the luxury and mass market sectors. Transformation was recognised as necessary for meeting evolving consumer demands (characterised by a growing sensitivity to environmentally friendly products), to comply with supranational and international strategies (e.g., the UN Fashion Charter and the Fashion Pact, the EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles) and to participate in sustainability initiatives (e.g., European Textile Network) [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].

In contrast, practices such as ‘greenwashing’ and ‘greenhushing’ were recognised as limiting fashion firms' sustainable production opportunities and market competitiveness, as well as positive consumers perception towards them. Therefore, to achieve a truly circular approach, these practices must be replaced by genuine green marketing strategies [ 63 , 64 , 65 ]. Strategies such as waste management, recycling, by-products reduction, the use of green technologies, and rental platforms were recommended. For instance, rental platforms in Canada were found to be positively linked to sustainable fashion [ 66 ]. To reverse the make-take-waste paradigm, the Swedish fashion industry adopted circular economy principles in its supply chain [ 67 ]. Additionally, the German second-hand clothing industry used digitalisation to establish a competitive business model [ 68 ]. Given the need to close the loop of the linear fashion scheme, new processes and transaction schemes were also explored. The transition towards a slow-fashion production paradigm was recognized to entail a radical redefinition of value propositions, emphasising craftsmanship, nature and localism [ 60 , 69 ], guided by transparent business practices and commercial sustainability [ 70 ], following the 3Rs (i.e., reduce, reuse, recycle) [ 71 ]. This aligns with the approach developed by the French national program for managing post-consumer textiles and clothing, which, promoted innovation in recycling practices through extended producer responsibility policies [ 72 ].

Other papers focused on specific business trends, such as those observed in the luxury fashion sector, which has embraced ethical and sustainable measures prioritizing distinction and recycling [ 73 , 74 ]. Moreover, the emerging ‘eco-chic’ trend highlights that long-lasting and environmentally friendly garments are not restricted to luxury brands, but may also be produced by mass retailers [ 75 ].

3.3 Global South and consumers

The environmental challenges and repercussions of the fast fashion industry are located and widespread throughout the Global South. It is in this region that Western companies typically concentrate their fast fashion production processes and discard their used clothing. These issues were addressed from the perspective of consumers in this region, analysing their concerns and engagement. One effective strategy highlighted for mitigating the negative impacts of excessive clothing production and disposal was the establishment of a new sustainable consumption model to prolong product life cycles. Such models might be achieved through the promotion of reuse, recycling and resale activities among consumers, which have already gained traction within the second-hand clothing market. In Africa, for instance, many individuals were found to wear second-hand garments exported from the Global North [ 76 ]. Additionally, in the Global South, the embrace of authentic elements inherent to small village settings and local communities (i.e., nature, history, culture, traditions) was recognised as a viable approach to combatting consumerism and fostering sustainable practices [ 77 , 78 ], highlighting a key difference from the narratives focused on the Global North. In the context of the Global North and consumers, the acknowledgment of sustainability practices influenced by cultural collectivist values was observed within a specific community with ties to the Global South: African Americans, whose heritage is marked by specific cultural values contributing to these practices [ 79 ].

Another avenue for minimising the environmental impact of the clothing industry while extending garment lifetimes was identified as the promotion of sustainable purchasing behaviours and intentions [ 80 , 81 , 82 ]. In this regard, slow fashion and eco-fashion emerged as promising approaches. These trends encourage environmentally conscious and responsible consumers by promoting greater product knowledge, active involvement in the clothing creation and design process, and the adoption of circular textile products [ 80 , 81 , 82 ]. Ultimately, the adoption of these paradigms may also enhance consumer well-being.

3.4 Global South and producers

The first key narrative in this category surrounded the unethical working conditions and sourcing practices within the fast fashion industry. Countries in this region bear the most significant socio-economic consequences of the fashion value chain, as they not only receive the majority of global textile waste, but they also host the most resource-intensive manufacturing processes, as a result of outsourcing [ 83 ]. Thus, economic and environmental factors assume greater significance.

The transition towards sustainable business models in the Global South may be hindered by information deficiency. While enterprises in the Global South were found to make significant effort to comply with corporate social responsibility (CSR) models [ 84 ], a comparative analysis among young designers based in China, India, Bangladesh and Pakistan showed that producers in the Global South often lack information about sustainability practices and how to implement them [ 85 ]. Interestingly, a significant disparity between the Global North and the Global South emerged in the papers, showing that Generation X individuals in the Global North tend to be notably concerned about sustainability issues, while the same is not true for their counterparts in the Global South.

As outlined in the preceding subsection, culture and perceptions play important roles, also among producers. For instance, Remu Apparel, a slow fashion company in Ecuador, promoted the adoption of slow fashion by reconceptualising traditional masculinity [ 86 ]. Filipino ukay-ukay culture (i.e., ‘digging up of piles of used clothes until finding a desirable item’ [ 87 ]) provides another intriguing example of the importance of the cultural factor.

To foster sustainable growth, producers must focus on the developing circular economic practices in Global South markets. Given the immense scale of some of these markets, (e.g., the textile and garment industry in Brazil [ 88 , 89 ] and China [ 90 ]) businesses must develop a strategic vision for sustainable economic growth.

3.5 Overlapping narratives

Various factors intersect with the categories of consumers and producers in the fashion industry. Through their primary activities of (over)consumption and (over)production, both contribute significantly to environmental degradation, via the generation of waste and the depletion of raw materials, respectively.

In papers examining consumer–producer dynamics in the Global North, a central narrative revolved around the development of a holistic circular business model for fashion, to allow both producers and consumers to embrace the benefits of a circular economy within the fashion industry [ 91 ]. Initiatives such as the Dutch circular textile mission and the European Union-funded Horizon 2020 project TCBL (Textile and Clothing Business Labs) were recognised as an example of system innovations in this direction [ 92 , 93 ]. The simultaneous engagement of producers and consumers was stated to occur through bottom-up and top-down processes [ 94 ]. With respect to top-down processes, producers must prioritise the provision of transparent and easily understandable information to consumers [ 95 ], while developing products with clear sustainable attributes, in order to demonstrate their commitment to socio-environmental responsibility. Such an approach would not only enhance consumer loyalty and satisfaction, but it would also increase willingness to pay for sustainable product [ 96 , 97 ]. The brand ECOALF is exemplar in this regard, with a focus on sustainable fashion and effective communication strategies aimed at consumers [ 98 ]. Regarding bottom-up processes, papers described that local consumers should actively propose sustainable initiatives for local and/or global implementation [ 1 , 99 ]. In particular, social manufacturing, which involves consumers directly in the production process through do-it-yourself (DIY) and do-it-together (DIT) practices, was recognised as facilitating the transfer of environmental knowledge and promoting green innovations [ 100 ]. Additionally, unsuccessful aspects of consumer–producer interaction were considered, particularly with respect to textile waste management strategies and recycling technology. A case study comparing the UK and Korean recycling systems revealed the latter’s lesser preparedness to address textile waste streams [ 101 ]. Moreover, geographical location was found to play a relevant role, as Portugal produces more textile waste than Croatia, leading to a higher environmental impact [ 102 ].

Narratives considering consumer–producer interactions in the Global South underscored how the rise of fast fashion in emerging economies has created both sustainability concerns and opportunities. Economic agents in these regions were found to be positively supporting the concept of sustainable fashion and the idea of transformable garments; attitudes, subjective norms and perceptions, and again cultural factors, were considered influential factors in the adoption of sustainable behaviours, such as recycling activities or secondhand [ 103 , 104 , 105 ], even among distinct sectors, like secondhand luxury fashion [ 105 ]. Transparent and informative communication about sustainable practices was found to enhance consumer trust, foster positive feelings and mitigate perceptions of producer hypocrisy [ 106 , 107 ]. Despite acknowledging the room for improvement in sustainability practices, studies focused on producers and consumers in the Global South highlighted the substantial work required to effectively transform aspirations into feasible solutions. For example, a study in Brazil revealed consumer reluctance, even among those claiming environmental consciousness, to pay a premium for eco-friendly products [ 107 ]. Similarly, concerns about production costs, practicality, adaptability, and marketability were found on the production side [ 103 ].

Among the papers adopting a comparative geographical perspective (i.e., Global North vs. Global South) with respect to consumers, the analysis aimed at bridging the gap in consumer perceptions and behaviours across the different global regions. On the one hand, consumers from both the Global North and the Global South were found to be positively influenced by eco-fashion in their decision-making and behaviour [ 108 ]. However, a notable disparity persists between consumers in the Global North and those in the Global South regarding purchasing intentions, perceptions, and adoption of circular apparel behaviour, with consumers in the Global South facing more significant challenges in this regard [ 109 ]. However, similarities were also detected between consumers in different geographical regions, irrespective of their affiliation to the Global North or the Global South. Specifically, individuals residing in certain natural geographies (e.g., islands) tend to be more nature-friendly in comparison to residents in corresponding continental areas, as shown in a study comparing the residents of an island regions in the US and in Ecuador [ 110 ].

Papers comparing producers in the Global North with those in the Global South considered the uneven distribution of environmental, ecological and social consequences, recognising the greater impacts suffered by the weaker region (i.e., the Global South), due to the extensive use of petroleum-based fibres and the offshoring of production by fast fashion companies in the Global North. The papers showed that recent business strategies have begun to integrate social and sustainability aspects, emphasising the importance of transparent, circular business practices [ 111 , 112 ]. This shift was also recognised in Global North firms that have adopted social and environmental sustainability as a selection criterion for their sourcing locations [ 113 ] or relocating specific stages of the supply chain [ 114 ]. Transnational and multilevel perspectives and localized, cross-border initiatives aimed at tackling unequal ecological consequences (worldwide) are necessary [ 115 ]. These initiatives were thought to emerge when supply chains would cease to be organised solely around large retailers and brand-name firms in the Global North, and extend into the Global South. In this regard, the media could play a prominent role in the provision of transparent information aimed at establishing a sustainable global supply chain [ 116 ]. Feasible strategies were identified, including: (i) reusing and remanufacturing unwanted second-hand clothing by incorporating local craft and design, as seen among retailers and artisans in Tanzania and fashion remanufacturers and retailers in the UK [ 117 ]; and (ii) implementing effective sustainable supply chain management (SSCM) through investments in decarbonisation and energy infrastructure, engagement with suppliers and consumers, and the revaluation of product design standards [ 118 ].

In papers taking an all-encompassing approach, initial considerations regarding the fashion industry’s polluting production model, in terms of environmental degradation, are followed by more specific differences concerning ‘onshoring’ versus ‘offshoring’ dynamics: from textile waste to working conditions. These dynamics were investigated by using different research methods: LCA methods to compare global impacts [ 119 ], and systematic literature reviews [ 120 , 121 ] to highlight gaps and themes in the academic literature on global fashion. More advanced areas of research development have also been explored: immersive technologies aimed at educating and sensitizing global audiences about traditional textile companies and responsible consumption of goods, also in countries such China where Generation Z consumers are showing a growing willingness to purchase sustainable clothes [ 122 ]. Finally, studies directed attention to all three sustainability pillars (i.e., environmental, social, economic) as important areas for future research and action. In summary, the papers emphasize the need for joint action involving industry, policymakers, consumers and scientists to promote sustainable production and ethical consumption practices, aimed at achieving equity and the UN Sustainable Development Goals [ 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 ].

4 Discussion

This paper has explored the different dynamics of fast fashion in two major regions of the world, based on an SLR. The findings reveal a gap at various levels, in terms of both bibliographic attributes and content. This aspect suggests the existence of differing scholarly attentions and framings in covering the topic.

First, there is a time-lag in the research. Figure  2 illustrates a significant scarcity of relevant research during the years 2009–2015. However, from 2015 onwards, a gradual increase in publications is evident, with a modest peak in 2017. The period 2017–2022 demonstrates exponential growth in the number of annual publications, with a high peak in 2022. These turning points coincide with significant shifts and transformations in the fashion industry, as echoed in the literature. For instance, 2016 was labelled as one of the most ‘disruptive’ years for the fashion market, characterised by shocks, challenges and uncertainty [ 125 ]. Moreover, the year 2017 marked a significant shift in the fashion industry, characterised by organic growth and digitalisation, signalling the end of the West's dominance, particularly in European and North American countries, and the emergence of Asia–Pacific and Latin American regions as new leading players in the industry [ 125 , 126 ]. Interestingly, our dataset reveals that Global South narratives focusing on consumers, producers and consumer–producer interactions began to emerge in the years 2016–2017, whereas narratives focusing on the Global North emerged as early as 2009. In the aftermath of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2021–2022, there was a notable increase in awareness and action against the impacts of climate change and resource overconsumption [ 127 ]. This shift also influenced the discourse around fast fashion, resulting in a specific scholarly focus on sustainable business models, overconsumption, overproduction, unsustainable practices and sustainable consumption behaviours [ 128 , 129 ]. Notably, each cluster within this specified timeframe spanned 2021 or 2022.

A skewed trend was evident in the distribution of research contributions, whereby the majority of contributions centred on the Global North, with 28 out of 117 focusing on consumers and 24 out of 117 focusing on producers. In contrast, a smaller number of contributions explored the Global South, with 11 out of 117 focusing on consumers and 11 out of 117 focusing on producers. A dual focus on consumers and producers within the same region was more frequently observed than Global North versus Global South comparisons. In fact, the most fruitful space for comparison was that of the Global North, particularly regarding consumer–producer interactions (15 out of 117 papers vs. 5 out of 117 for the Global South). Moreover, only 6 out of 117 papers were comprehensively comparative.

This trend is corroborated by Fig.  3 , which illustrates the scientific production by country. In the figure, there is a notable disparity in academic publishing between countries, particularly in the Global South. Unsurprisingly, Brazil and China appear among the top contributors. Both countries are experiencing a demographic megatrend characterised by an expanding middle class [ 130 , 131 ], leading to increased purchasing power. This megatrend is also likely to impact trends in production and consumption, including demand for apparel [ 131 , 132 ]. Perhaps for this reason, in the narratives, these two countries were the only ones mentioned as ‘big markets’ where attention was being given to strategic business strategies [ 88 , 89 , 90 ]. Conversely, more extensive contributions stemmed from countries in the Global North, encompassing countries from Europe, America, Oceania and Asia.

Considering the identified narratives and themes, our findings show that consumers and producers, both in the Global North and the Global South, are identified in literature as sharing concerns about the present and future condition of the fast fashion industry. The narratives explored solutions at various stages of the fashion supply chain, aimed at enhancing environmental awareness; pro-environmental behaviours; and green, circular and transparent economic principles. Notwithstanding the significant challenges required to effectively translate these efforts into viable solutions (due to information asymmetries between the Global North and the Global South; intra-regional and inter-regional interactions between economic actors; differing levels of awareness; and economic, environmental and social interventions in ‘onshoring’ versus ‘offshoring’ dynamics), literature addressing a commitment to achieving a socially, economically and environmentally sustainable fashion industry is evident in the analysis of the literature of both regions, with respect to both consumers and producers. However, the extent of the identified efforts appears to vary.

The development of sustainable production and consumption systems occurs within social and ecological frameworks, and is affected by technological change, information technologies, market and business strategies, and behavioural change [ 23 , 133 , 134 ]. A common trend may be observed in this regard, with slow fashion and eco-fashion (emphasising social responsibility and sustainability) valued in both the Global North and the Global South. These alternatives prioritise the use of local resources, distributed economies, transparent production systems connecting producers directly with consumers, and sustainable products [ 135 , 136 ], and they have been identified as important avenues for current and future sustainability in both regions [ 52 , 60 , 69 , 70 , 72 , 75 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 86 ].

However, in this eco-humanistic perspective, Footnote 2 different levels of importance are attributed to the two dominating systems [ 134 ]—that of values (used here as a proxy for social, environmental, traditional and historical elements) and that of economics (used here as a proxy for business strategies, economic principles, digitalization, behavioral and cognitive characteristics).

In the Global South, waste management initiatives (e.g., those aimed at reuse, recycling and resale), the development of green technologies and circular principles, the adoption of contemporary models of corporate social responsibility (CSR) to address the growing second-hand clothing market, and the exploration of certain behavioural and cognitive characteristic informing environmentally conscious and responsible consumers with strong product knowledge who receive transparent and informative information from producers, may be investigated as economic patterns. Notably, these considerations are embedded in discussions of social and ecological factors, highlighting locality, culture, traditional values and nature. Significantly, change is proposed to stem from local values and social structures, reflecting a bottom-up approach. Such initiatives, originating in local communities, may pertain to producers—as highlighted in the case studies from Ecuador and the Philippines [ 86 , 87 ]—and/or consumers—as seen in the practice of hand-me-down clothing and sharing [ 76 , 77 , 78 ], with the aim of promoting green economic development with respect to the environment (social and natural).

Conversely, in the Global North, circular and sustainable initiatives are more strictly aligned with economic considerations, with market strategies informing a circular transition driven by competitiveness and profitability [ 1 , 58 , 70 ]. Thus, efforts are directed towards the abandonment of communicative, business and marketing practices such as greenwashing or greenhushing, in favour of circular economy principles in the supply chain [ 58 , 67 ], digitalization [ 68 ], transparent business practices, the development of commercial sustainability, and the 3Rs principle [ 71 ], even when the goal is to promote new values and a localist, collectivistic attitude [ 60 , 69 ]. Similarly, consumer preferences are explored using cognitive and behavioural components and social characteristics, alongside market considerations (e.g., willingness to pay) [ 45 , 50 , 52 ]. While, only when analysing a specific community interestingly rooted in the cultural heritage of the Global South, the potential and effective role of traditional community values is mentioned [ 79 ]. Interactions between producers and consumers with respect to the adoption of sustainability are explored through examples of transparent business models that are openly committed to social and environmental responsibility [ 96 , 98 ] (i.e., systemic innovations [ 92 , 93 ]), and consumers' active involvement in production processes [ 1 , 99 ], rather than attitudes, subjective norms, and perceptions [ 104 , 107 ]. Even when explored at a national policy level [ 72 ], these transformations find their rationale in the necessity to comply with supranational and international strategies (e.g., the UN Fashion Charter and the Fashion Pact, EU Strategy for Sustainable and Circular Textiles) and sustainability initiatives (e.g., European Textile Network) [ 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 ].

Existing inequalities in global governance and economic relations among the Global North and the Global South relations [ 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ] are mirrored in the analysis of the approaches each region is taking to achieve sustainability in the fashion industry.

In 2018 Wu et al. [ 137 ] observed that the decoupling of developing countries from unsustainable practices was fluctuating and lacking in regularity—a trend echoed in our discussion. In fact, the shift in the fashion industry towards sustainable development predominantly occurs within the developed and politically active Global North. Conversely, in the Global South, this transition is contingent upon country-specific factors, including socio-economic and cultural contexts. In the Global North, structured, innovative and transparent market strategies for sustainable consumption and production patterns are implemented under political guidance. It is imperative that these strategies be adopted globally, extending to the Global South. This may be achieved, for instance, through an active commitment to corporate social and environmental responsibility in sourcing decisions and the integration of the Global South into sustainable supply chain management through investment in decarbonisation and energy infrastructure [ 111 , 112 , 113 , 114 , 118 ]. Furthermore, there is a need for joint action between the Global South and the Global North at a governmental level, within an inclusive framework [ 115 , 119 , 120 , 121 , 122 , 123 , 124 ]. This is due to the differing capacities of developed and developing countries to address the challenges of unsustainable consumption and production. In the Global North, sustainable development is already reliant on structural systemic innovations and policy guidance [ 137 , 138 ].

5 Conclusions

If, on the one hand, the present SLR acknowledges that the analysed existing literature on the topic underlines a genuine commitment to the long-term development of a sustainable fashion industry, with attention given to Global North–Global South dynamics (as particularly evident with respect to, e.g., waste and outsourcing), it is notable that this landscape remains fragmented, as highlighted by the discussed temporal and geographical distribution of research.

Emphasising the need to achieve all three pillars of sustainability, and broadening the scope of the investigation to encompass the Global South, future research should employ comparative approaches centred on the creation of a common good (i.e., common interests and solutions) between developed and developing countries [ 139 ]. This may involve recognising the unequal consequences of global trends and combining green digitalisation and new technologies with the preservation of local and cultural values to encourage mindful consumption and production (as emphasised, for instance, in the concepts of slow fashion and eco-fashion). Envisioning a comprehensive eco-humanistic vision, the integration of growth and development with the social and natural environment, alongside advancements in science and technology (including ICT and immersive technologies), may result in a sustainable development system worldwide [ 134 ].

While our analysis adopted an economic perspective, focusing on the disparity between the Global North and the Global South, we recognise the importance of directing scholars’ attention in challenging existing power dynamics within the traditional economic paradigm, starting with acknowledging the literature gap evident in the differing bibliographic attributes and content narratives according to world region. To strengthen the development of a sustainable and circular fashion industry, while fostering sustainable and socio-ecologically equitable production and consumption patterns, future research must address the gap in environmental responsibility, global governance and economic relations between the Global North and the Global South [ 21 , 23 , 138 , 140 ]. Although our research questions did not explicitly address governance, this topic emerged as an interesting analytical thread. Thus, future research could explore the role played by governance in consumer–producer interactions, and its impact on the imbalanced Global North–Global South dynamic. Reflecting on this aspect could yield valuable insights for empirical applications to further progress towards global sustainability targets, emphasising social and ecological considerations alongside economic dynamics of production and consumption. This, in turn, may actively support collaborative initiatives such as the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and the United Nations Alliance for Sustainable Fashion, while also contributing to the creation of new ones.

Data availability

Data are available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Between the 1960s and 1990s, some Global South countries became developed economies, following industrialisation, technological innovation and a rise in living standards. These countries include South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan and Hong Kong—the so-called ‘Asian Tigers’ [ 15 ].

According to Michnowski [ 134 ] eco-humanism is ‘a partnership-based co-operation for the common good of all people (rich and poor, from countries highly developed and behind in development), their descendants, and natural environment—commonly supported by science and high technology’.

Payne A. The life-cycle of the fashion garment and the role of Australian mass market designers. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain. 2011;7(3):237–46. https://doi.org/10.18848/1832-2077/CGP/v07i03/54938 .

Article   Google Scholar  

Fernie J, Sparks L. Logistics and retail management, insights into current practice and trends from leading experts. London: Kogan Page; 1998.

Google Scholar  

Bhardwaj V, Fairhust A. Fast Fashion: response to changes in the fashion industry. Int Rev Retail Distrib Consum Res. 2010;1(20):165–73. https://doi.org/10.1080/09593960903498300 .

Turban E, Whiteside J, King D, Outland J. Introduction to electronic commerce and social commerce. 4th ed. Springer: Springer Texts in Business and Economics; 2017.

Book   Google Scholar  

Barnes L, Lea-Greenwood G. Pre-loved? Analysing the Dubai Luxe Resale Market. In: Athwal KN, Henninger EC, editors. Palgrave advances in luxury. London: Springer Nature; 2018. p. 63–78.

United Nations Environment Programme. The Triple Planetary Crisis: Forging a new relationship between people and the earth. 2020. https://www.unep.org/news-and-stories/speech/triple-planetary-crisis-forging-new-relationship-between-people-and-earth . Accessed 22 Aug 2023.

Blázquez M. Fashion shopping in multichannel retail: the role of technology in enhancing the customer experience. Int J Electron Commerce. 2014;18(4):97–116.

Wei Z, Zhou L. E-Commerce case study of fast fashion industry. In: Du Z, editor. Intelligence computation and evolutionary computation: results of 2012 international conference of intelligence computation and evolutionary computation ICEC 2012 Held July 7, 2012 in Wuhan, China. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2013. p. 261–70.

The Business of Fashion & McKinsey & Company. The State of Fashion 2020, Coronavirus Update. 2020. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Retail/Our%20Insights/Its%20time%20to%20rewire%20the%20fashion%20system%20State%20of%20Fashion%20coronavirus%20update/The-State-of-Fashion-2020-Coronavirus-Update-final.ashx . Accessed 29 Mar 2023.

Bilińska-Reformat K, Dewalska-Opitek A. E-commerce as the predominant business model of fast fashion retailers in the era of global COVID 19 pandemics. Proc Comput Sci. 2021;192:2479–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.09.017 .

Anguelov N. The dirty side of the garment industry. Fast fashion and its negative impact on environment and society. New York: CRC Press; 2016.

United Nations Climate Change. UN helps fashion industry shift to low carbon. 2018. https://unfccc.int/news/un-helps-fashion-industry-shift-to-low-carbon . Accessed 27 Aug 2023.

The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. A new textiles economy: redesigning fashion’s future. 2017. https://emf.thirdlight.com/file/24/IwnEDbfI5JTFoAIw_2QI2Yg-6y/A-New-Textiles-Economy_Summary-of-Findings_Updated_1-12-17.pdf . Accessed 23 July 2023.

Quantis International. Measuring Fashion. Environmental Impact of the Global Apparel and Footwear Industries Study. 2018. https://quantis.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/measuringfashion_globalimpactstudy_full-report_quantis_cwf_2018a.pdf . Accessed 29 Aug 2023.

Kowalski AM. Global south-global north differences. In: Leal Filho W, Azul AM, Luciana Brandli L, Lange Salvia A, Gökçin Özuyar P, Wall T, editors. No poverty (encyclopedia of the UN sustainable development goals). Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 389–400.

Lancaster C. Developing countries: winners or losers. In: Kugler RL, Frost EL, editors. The global century: Globalization and national security. 2nd ed. Washington DC: National Defense University; 2001. p. 653–64.

Odeh LE. A comparative analysis of global north and global south economies. J Sustain Dev Afr. 2010;12(3):338–48.

Hamilton GG, Gereffi G. Global commodity chains, market makers, and the rise of demand-responsive economies. In: Bair J, editor. Frontiers of commodity chain research. Standford University Press; 2009. p. 136–61. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780804779760-009 .

Chapter   Google Scholar  

Gereffi G, Humphrey J, Kaplinsky R, Sturgeon TJ. Introduction: globalisation, value chains and development. In: Gereffi G, Kaplinsky R, editors. IDS bulletin: the value of value chains, vol. 31. 3rd ed. Brighton: Sussex University Institute of Development Studies; 2001. p. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1759-5436.2001.mp32003001 .

Cox RW. A perspective on globalization. In: Mittelman JH, editor. Globalization: critical reflections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner; 1996. p. 21–30.

Mittelman JH. Globalization: critical reflections. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers; 1996.

Tukker A, Emmert S, Charter M, Vezzoli C, Sto E, Andersen MM, Geerken T, Tischner U, Lahlou S. Fostering change to sustainable consumption and production: an evidence based view. J Clean Prod. 2008;16(11):1218–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.08.015 .

Hurrell A, Kingsbury B. An introduction. In: Hurrell A, Kingsbury B, editors. The international politics of the environment. Oxford University Press; 1992. p. 39.

Mathai MV, Isenhour C, Stevis D, Vergragt P, Bengtsson M, Lorek S, Forgh Mortensen L, Coscieme L, Scott D, Waheed A, Alfredsson E. The Political economy of (un)sustainable production and consumption: a multidisciplinary synthesis for research and action. Resour Conserv Recycl. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105265 .

Marcello Falcone P, Yılan G, Morone P. Transitioning towards circularity in the fashion industry: some answers from science and future implications. In: Ren J, Zhang L, editors. Circular economy and waste valorization. Industrial ecology and environmental management. Springer International Publishing; 2022. p. 2. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04725-1_4 .

USEPA. Facts and figures about materials, waste and recycling: textiles: material-specific data. 2021. https://www.epa.gov/facts-and-figures-about-materials-waste-and-recycling/textiles-material-specific-data . Accessed 17 May 2022. Accessed 28 ch 2024.

Brooks A. The hidden world of fast fashion and second-hand clothes. London: CPI Group; 2015.

Dryzek J. Rational ecology: environment and political economy. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1987.

Ljungkvist H, Watson D, Elander M. Developments in global markets for used textiles and implications for reuse and recycling. Mistra Future Fashion, IVL Swedish Environmental Research Institute PO Box.2018;210(60). http://mistrafuturefashion.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/Mistra-Future-Fashion-2018.04-M-Elander-D.3.3.4.1.pdf . Acccessed 3 Apr 2024.

Cobbing M, Daaji S, Kopp M, Wohlgemut V. Poisoned Gifts. From donations to the dumpsite: textiles waste disguised as second-hand clothes exported to East Africa. Hamburg: Greenpeace v.E; 2022. https://www.greenpeace.org/static/planet4-international-stateless/2022/04/9f50d3de-greenpeace-germany-poisoned-fast-fashion-briefing-factsheet-april-2022.pdf . Accessed 17 Aug 2023.

Changing Markets Foundation. Trashion. https://changingmarkets.org/ . Accessed 28 Aug 2023.

Frazer G. Used clothing donations and apparel production in Africa. Econ J. 2008;118:1764–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02190.x .

Haggblade S. The flip side of fashion: used clothing exports to the third world. J Dev Stud. 1990;26(3):505–21.

Ashton WS, Farne Fratini C, Isenhour C, Krueger R. Justice, equity and the circular economy: introduction to the special double issue. Local Environm. 2022;27:1173–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2118247 .

Cotta B. What goes around, comes around? Access and allocation problems in Global North-South waste trade. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ. 2020;20(2):255–69.

Corvellec H, Böhm S, Stowell A, Valenzuela F. Introduction to the special issue on the contested realities of the circular economy. Cult Organ. 2020;26(2):97–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2020.1717733 .

Boehnert J. Ecological literacy in design education-A theoretical introduction. FormAkademisk. 2015. https://doi.org/10.7577/formakademisk.1405 .

Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J Clean Prod. 2016;114:11–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.007 .

Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman JD. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. PLoS Med. 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 .

Feak CB, Swales SM. Telling a research story: writing a literature review. English in Today’s Research World; 2009.

Brown G. Beyond the crash: overcoming the first crisis of globalization. 1st ed. Simon and Schuster; 2010.

Salleh S, Thokala P, Brennan A, Hughes R, Booth A. Simulation modelling in healthcare: an umbrella review of systematic literature reviews. Pharmacoeconomics. 2017;35:937–49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-017-0523-3 .

Jamali D, Karam C. Corporate social responsibility in developing countries as an emerging field of study. Int J Manag Rev. 2018;20(1):32–61. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12112 .

Long X, Nasiry J. Sustainability in the fast fashion industry. Electron J. 2019. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3486502 .

Zhang B, Zhang Y, Zhou P. Consumer attitude towards sustainability of fast fashion products in the UK. Sustainability. 2021;13(4):1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041646 .

Colasante A, D’Adamo I. The circular economy and bioeconomy in the fashion sector: emergence of a sustainability bias. J Clean Prod. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129774 .

Cesarina Mason M, Pauluzzo R, Muhammad UR. Recycling habits and environmental responses to fast-fashion consumption: enhancing the theory of planned behavior to predict Generation Y consumers’ purchase decisions. Waste Manag. 2022;139:146–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.012 .

Palomo-Lovinski N, Hahn K. American consumer perceptions of sustainable fashion, fast fashion, and mass fashion practices. Int J Environ Cult Econ Soc Sustain. 2020;16(1):15–27. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1115/CGP/v16i01/15-27 .

Gawior B, Polasik M, Del Olmo JL. Credit card use, hedonic motivations, and impulse buying behavior in fast fashion physical stores during COVID-19: the sustainability paradox. Sustainability. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14074133 .

Friedrich D. Comparative analysis of sustainability measures in the apparel industry: an empirical consumer and market study in Germany. J Environ Manage. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112536 .

Blazquez M, Henninger CE, Alexander B, Franquesa C. Consumers’ knowledge and intentions towards sustainability: a Spanish fashion perspective. Fash Pract. 2020;12(1):34–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/17569370.2019.1669326 .

Chi T, Gerard J, Yu Y, Wang Y. A study of U.S. consumers’ intention to purchase slow fashion apparel: understanding the key determinants. Int J Fash Des Technol Educ. 2021;14(1):101–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2021.1872714 .

Cairns MC, Ritch LE, Bereziat C. Think eco, be eco? The tension between attitudes and behaviours of millennial fashion consumers. Int J Consum Stud. 2022;46(4):1262–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12756 .

Tama D, Cüreklibatir Encan B, Öndoǧan Z. University students’ attitude towards clothes in terms of environmental sustainability and slow fashion. Tekstil ve Konfeksiyon. 2017;27(2):191–7.

Papasolomou I, Melanthiou Y, Tsamouridis A. The fast fashion vs environment debate: consumers’ level of awareness, feelings, and behaviour towards sustainability within the fast-fashion sector. J Mark Commun. 2023;29(2):191–209. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2022.2154059 .

Holgar M. Systemic fashion change and wardrobe research-related tools for supporting consumers. Int J Crime Justice Soc Democr. 2022;11(2):129–42.

Polajnar Horvat K, Šrimpf VK. Issues surrounding behavior towards discarded textiles and garments in Ljubljana. Sustain (Switzerland). 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116491 .

Roudbari ES, Fatemi Ghomi SMT, Eicker U. Designing a multi-objective closed-loop supply chain: a two-stage stochastic programming, method applied to the garment industry in Montréal, Canada. Environ Dev Sustain. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02953-3 .

Centobelli P, Abbate S, Nadeem PS, Garza-Reyes AJ. Slowing the fast fashion industry: an all-round perspective. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100684 .

Abbate S, Centobelli P, Cerchione R. From fast to slow: an exploratory analysis of circular business models in the Italian apparel industry. Int J Prod Econ. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108824 .

Martínez-Martínez A, Cegarra-Navarro JG, Garcia-Perez A, De Valon T. Active listening to customers: eco-innovation through value co-creation in the textile industry. J Knowl Manag. 2022;27(7):1810–29. https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2022-0309 .

Pérez-Bou S, Cantista I. Politics, sustainability and innovation in fast fashion and luxury fashion groups. Int J Fashion Des Technol Educ. 2022;16(1):46–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2022.2113153 .

Adamkiewicz J, Kochańska E, Adamkiewicz I, Łukasik RM. Greenwashing and sustainable fashion industry. Curr Opin Green Sustain Chem. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2022.100710 .

Market Research Report Fast track. “Greenhushing”—why are some apparel brands under-reporting or hiding their sustainability credentials? Performance Apparel Markets. 2022;75:4–12.

Bilsel H, Gezgin M. The use of the green marketing concept in brand communications: the case of the H&M fashion brand. In: Sezgin B, Tetik T, Vatanartıran Ö, editors. Transformation of the industry in a brand new normal: media, music, and performing arts. Peter Lang; 2022. p. 79–102.

Amasawa E, Brydges T, Henninger CE, Kimita K. Can rental platforms contribute to more sustainable fashion consumption? Evidence from a mixed-method study. Clean Responsible Consumption. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clrc.2023.100103 .

Brydges T. Closing the loop on take, make, waste: Investigating circular economy practices in the Swedish fashion industry. J Clean Prod. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126245 .

Derwanz H. Digitalizing local markets: The secondhand market for pre-owned clothing in Hamburg, Germany. Res Econ Anthropol. 2021;41:135–61. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0190-128120210000041007 .

Hong J, Chun J. Analysis of designer brands aiming for the value of slow fashion -focused on john alexander skelton and geoffrey B. Small J Korean Soc Cloth Text. 2021;45(1):136–54.

Bray A. Creating a slow fashion collection—a designer–maker’s process. Scope. 2017;15:29–35.

Fitzsimmons S, Ma L, Ulku AM. Incentivizing sustainability: price optimization for a closed-loop apparel supply chain. IEOM Society International; 2019.

Bukhari M, Carrasco-Gallego R, Ponce-Cueto E. Developing a national programme for textiles and clothing recovery. Waste Manag Res. 2018;36(4):321–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734242X18759190 .

Calefato P. In: Muthu SS, editor. Sustainable Luxury and fashion: from global standardisation to critical customisation. environmental footprints and eco-design of products and processes. New York: Springer; 2017. p. 107–23.

Cimatti B, Campana G, Carluccio L. Eco design and sustainable manufacturing in fashion: a case study in the luxury personal accessories industry. Procedia Manuf. 2017;8:393–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2017.02.050 .

Bruzzi S, Gibson PC. Introduction: the changed fashion landscape of the new millennium. In: Bruzzi S, Gibson PC, editors. Fashion cultures revisited: theories, explorations and analysis. London: Routledge; 2013. p. 1–8.

Sumo PD, Ji X, Cai L. SWOT framework based on fuzzy logic, AHP, and fuzzy TOPSIS for sustainable retail second-hand clothing in Liberia. Fibres Text East Eur. 2022;30(6):27–44. https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2022-0050 .

Al-Naggar N. Consumable ideologies: designing sustainable behaviours in Kuwait. In: Eluwawalage D, Esseghaier M, Nurse J, Petican L, editors. Trending now: new developments in fashion studies. Leiden: Brill; 2019. p. 343–9.

Febrianti RAM, Tambalean M, Pandhami G. The influence of brand image, shopping lifestyle, and fashion involvement to the impulse buying. Rev Int Geogr Educ Online. 2021;11(5):2041–51.

Collins L, Min S, Yurchisin J. Exploring the practice of african americans’ hand-me-down clothing from the perspective of sustainability”. Int J Soc Sustain Econ Soc Cult Context. 2019;15(1):11–24. https://doi.org/10.18848/2325-1115/CGP/v15i01/11-24 .

Liu A, Baines E, Ku L. Slow fashion is positively linked to consumers’ well-being: evidence from an online questionnaire study in China. Sustain (Switzerland). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113990 .

Chiu FT. A study in elderly fashion and zero waste clothing design. In: Kuroso M, editor. Human-computer interaction. Perspectives on design. HCI; 2019. p. 427–38.

Shamsi MA, Chaudhary A, Anwar I, Dasgupta R, Sharma S. Nexus between environmental consciousness and consumers’ purchase intention toward circular textile products in India: a moderated-mediation approach. Sustain (Switzerland). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142012953 .

Kuhrana K, Mutu SS. Are low- and middle-income countries profiting from fast fashion? J Fash Mark Manag. 2022;26(2):289–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JFMM-12-2020-0260 .

Nguyen HT, Le Doan MD, Minh Ho TT, Nguyen P-M. Enhancing sustainability in the contemporary model of CSR: a case of fast fashion industry in developing countries. Soc Responsib J. 2020;17(4):578–91. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-03-2019-0108 .

Shen L, Sethi MH. Sustainable fashion and young fashion designers: are fashion schools teaching sustainability? Fibres Text East Eur. 2021;29(5):9–13.

Pohlmann A, Muñoz-Valencia R. Stumbling into sustainability: the effectual marketing approach of Ecuadorian entrepreneurs to reframe masculinity and accelerate the adoption of slow fashion. Crit Stud Men’s Fash. 2021;8(1–2):223–43. https://doi.org/10.1386/csmf_00042_1 .

Biana HT. The Philippine Ukay-Ukay culture as sustainable fashion. DLSU B&E Rev. 2020;30(1):154–64.

Anicet A, Dias E. Fashion business oriented for sustainability. In: Almeida HA, Almendra R, Bartolo MH, Bartolo P, da Silva F, Lemos AN, Roseta F, editors. Challenges for technology innovation: an agenda for the future. 1st ed. CRC PRESS; 2017. p. 77–82.

Galatti LG, Baruque-Ramos J. Brazilian potential for circular fashion through strengthening local production. SN Appl Sci. 2019. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1487-z .

Zhuang L. The changing landscape for Chinese small business: the case of “Bags of Luck.” EEMCS. 2011;1(1):1–12.

Papamichael I, Voukkali I, Loizia P, Rodrıguez-Espinosa T, Navarro-Pedreño J, Zorpas AA. Textile waste in the concept of circularity. Sustain Chem Pharm. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scp.2023.100993 .

Reike D, Hekkert MP, Negro SO. Understanding circular economy transitions: the case of circular textiles. Bus Strat Env. 2023;32(3):1032–58. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.3114 .

Marsh J, Boszhard I, Contargyris A, Cullen J, Junge K, Molinari F, Osella M, Raspanti C. A value-driven business ecosystem for industrial transformation: the case of the EU’s H2020 “Textile and Clothing Business Labs.” Sustain Sci Pract Policy. 2022;8(1):263–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487733.2022.2039491 .

Jung S, Jin B. Sustainable development of slow fashion businesses: customer value approach. Sustain. 2016. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060540 .

Costantini J, Costantini K. Communications on sustainability in the apparel industry: readability of information on sustainability on apparel brands’ web sites in the United Kingdom. Sustain. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142013257 .

Dabija DC, Câmpian V, Pop RA, Băbuț R. Generating loyalty towards fast fashion stores: a cross-generational approach based on store attributes and socio-environmental responsibility. Oecon Copernic. 2022;13(3):891–934. https://doi.org/10.24136/oc.2022.026 .

Moon H, Lee HH. Environmentally friendly apparel products: the effects of value perceptions. Soc Behav Pers Int J. 2018;46(8):1373–84. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6392 .

Núñez-Barriopedro E, Llombart Tárrega MD. New Trends in marketing aimed at the fourth sector in the fashion industry. In: Sánchez-Hernández MI, Carvalho L, Rego C, Lucas MR, Noronha A, editors. Entrepreneurship in the fourth sector. Studies on entrepreneurship, structural change and industrial dynamics. Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 245–61. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68390-0_12 .

Durrani M. “People gather for stranger things, so why not this?” Learning sustainable sensibilities through communal garment-mending practices. Sustain. 2018. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072218 .

Karnad V, Udavier V. Social manufacturing in the fashion industry to generate sustainable fashion value creation. Dig Manuf Technol Sustain Anthropometr Apparel. 2022;9(4):555–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823969-8.00010-1 .

Kim CS, Kim KR. A case study comparing textile recycling systems of Korea and the UK to promote sustainability. J Text Apparel Tech Manag. 2016;10(1).

Kalambura S, Pedro S, Paixão S. Fast fashion—sustainability and climate change: a comparative study of Portugal and Croatia. Socijalna Ekologija. 2020;29(2):269–91.

Rahman O, Gong M. Sustainable practices and transformable fashion design–Chinese professional and consumer perspectives. Int J Fashion Des Technol Educ. 2016;9(3):233–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/17543266.2016.1167256 .

O’Reilly S, Kumar A. Closing the loop: An exploratory study of reverse ready-made garment supply chains in Delhi NCR. Int J Logist Manag. 2016;27(2):486–510. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJLM-03-2015-0050 .

Barnes L, Lea-Greenwood G. Pre-loved? Analysing the Dubai Luxe resale market. In: Ryding D, Henninger C, Blazquez Cano M, editors. Vintage Luxury Fashion. Palgrave advances in luxury. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2018. p. 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71985-6_5 .

Wei X, Jung S. Benefit appeals and perceived corporate hypocrisy: implications for the CSR performance of fast fashion brands. J Prod Brand Manag. 2022;31(2):206–17. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-04-2020-2850 .

Gomes de Oliveira L, Miranda FG, de Paula Dias MA. Sustainable practices in slow and fast fashion stores: what does the customer perceive? Clean Eng Technol. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2022.100413 .

Ryding D, Caratù M, Vignali G. Eco fashion brands and consumption: is the attitude-behaviour gap narrowing for the millennial generation? Int J Bus Global. 2022;30(2):131–54. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2022.122672 .

Gomes GM, Moreira N, Bouman T, Ometto AR, van der Weff E. Towards circular economy for more sustainable apparel consumption: testing the value-belief-norm theory in Brazil and in The Netherlands. Sustain (Switzerland). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14020618 .

Pohlman A. The sustainability awareness effect of geography on hedonic fashion consumption and connection with nature—evidence from Galápagos and Hawaii. Crit Stud Men’s Fash. 2021;8(1–2):205–21. https://doi.org/10.1386/csmf_00041_1 .

Arrigo E. Offshore outsourcing in fast fashion companies: a dual strategy of global and local sourcing? In: Bilgin MH, Danis H, Demir E, García-Gómez CD, editors. Eurasian business and economics perspectives. Springer International Publishing; 2021. p. 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77438-7_5 .

Beyer K, Arnold M. Circular approaches and business model innovations for social sustainability in the textile industry. In: Arnold NG, Beyer K, Cebulla H, Matthes A, Schumann A, editors. Sustainable textile and fashion value chains: drivers, concepts, theories and solutions. Springer International Publishing; 2020. p. 341–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22018-1_19 .

Arrigo E. Global sourcing in fast fashion retailers: sourcing locations and sustainability considerations. Sustainability (Switzerland). 2020;12(2):1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020508 .

Shen B. Sustainable fashion supply chain: lessons from H&M. Sustain (Switzerland). 2014;6(9):6236–649. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6096236 .

Fletcher K, Maki R. Transnational fashion sustainability: between and across the Gulf and the UK. Fash Theory J Dress Body Cult. 2022;26(4):509–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/1362704X.2022.2046864 .

Hartmann J. Toward a more complete theory of sustainable supply chain management: the role of media attention. Supply Chain Manag. 2020;26(4):532–47. https://doi.org/10.1108/SCM-01-2020-0043 .

Sinha P, Dissanayake G, Mahwera D, Kahabi C. Creating a global vision for sustainable fashion. Pak Text J. 2012;61(1):46–54.

Turker D, Altuntas C. Sustainable supply chain management in the fast fashion industry: an analysis of corporate reports. Eur Manag J. 2014;32(5):837–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.02.001 .

Clarke-Sather A, Cobb K. Onshoring fashion: worker sustainability impacts of global and local apparel production. J Clean Prod. 2019;208:1206–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.073 .

Bailey K, Basu A, Sharma S. The environmental impacts of fast fashion on water quality: a systematic review. Water (Switzerland). 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14071073 .

Prado NM, de Paula e Silva MH, Kaneko CSK, da Silva DV, Giusti G, Saavedra YMB, Silva DAL. Sustainability in fashion retail: literature review and bibliometric analysis. Gestao e Producao. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1590/1806-9649-2022v29e13322 .

Cross K, Jiang Y, Steed J. Harris tweed: a global case study. Fash Style Pop Cult. 2021;8(4):475–94. https://doi.org/10.1386/fspc_00102_1 .

Parveen R, Alajmi A. Global environmental, social and economic issues in the fast fashion industry. In: Proceedings of the 32nd international business information management association conference, IBIMA. 2018. p. 5500–08.

Bick R, Halsey E, Ekenga CC. The global environmental injustice of fast fashion. Environ Health. 2018;17:1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7 .

The Business of Fashion & McKinsey & Company. The State of Fashion 2017. 2017. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/McKinsey/Industries/Retail/Our%20Insights/The%20state%20of%20fashion/The-state-of-fashion-2017-McK-BoF-report.pdf . Accessed 9 Apr 2024.

The Business of Fashion & McKinsey & Company. The State of Fashion 2018. 2018. https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/retail/our%20insights/renewed%20optimism%20for%20the%20fashion%20industry/the-state-of-fashion-2018-final.ashx . Accessed 9 il 2024.

Ciornea R. Is the transition to bioeconomy a sustainable solution in fast-fashion industry, considering the overconsumption?-Premises for future research. Mark Inf Decis J. 2020;3:27–44.

Nanda R, Raj DK, Choudhary RA. Comprehensive review on consumers behavior towards sustainable fashion and its relativity in fast fashion. Man-Made Text India. 2022;50(12):403–7.

Penz E, Drewes KL. What shapes pro-environmental attitudes and intention for sustainable fashion consumption during a stressful time event? Sustain. 2022. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215331 .

Clément M, Rougier E, Berrou JP, Combarnous F, Darbon D. “What’s in the middle”: scratching beneath the surface of the middle class (es) in Brazil, Côte d’Ivoire, Turkey and Vietnam. World Dev. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2022.105988 .

Kharas H. The unprecedented expansion of the global middle class: an update. Global economy and development. Washington, DC: Brookings; 2017.

The Business of Fashion & McKinsey & Company. The State of Fashion. 2024. https://www.mckinsey.com/de/~/media/mckinsey/locations/europe%20and%20middle%20east/deutschland/news/presse/2023/2023-11-28%20state%20of%20fashion%202024/sof24_report.pdf . Accessed 10 Apr 2024.

Meadows DH, Randers J, Meadows DL. Limits to growth, the 30-years update. Vermount: Chelsea Green Publishing Company; 2004.

Michnowski L. Eco-humanism and popular system dynamics as preconditions for sustainable development. Probl Sustain Dev. 2008;3(2):31–50.

Fletcher K. Slow fashion: an invitation for systems change. Fash Pract. 2008;2(2):260–5. https://doi.org/10.2752/175693810X12774625387594 .

Clark H. Slow + fashion—an oxymoron—or a promise to the future. Fashion Theory J Dress Body Cult. 2008;12(4):427–46. https://doi.org/10.2752/175174108X346922 .

Wu Y, Zhu Q, Zhu B. Decoupling analysis of world economic growth and CO 2 emissions: a study comparing developed and developing countries. J Clean Prod. 2018;190:94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.139 .

Akenji L, Bengsston M. Making sustainable consumption and production the Core of sustainable development goals. Sustain. 2014;6:513–29. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6020513 .

Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Commission “Our Common Future” Report). 1987.

Buzdugan S, Payne A. The long battle for global governance. London: Routledge; 2016.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out within the PEACE (Protecting the Environment: Advances in Circular Economy) which received funding from the “Fondo per il Programma Nazionale di Ricerca e Progetti di Rilevante Interesse Nazionale (PRIN)” Investimento 1.1-D.D. 104.02-02- 2022, 2022ZFBMA4. This manuscript reflects only the authors' views and opinions, and can be considered responsible for them.

Author information

Authors and affiliations.

Bioeconomy in Transition Research Group, UnitelmaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy

Francesca Bonelli, Rocco Caferra & Piergiuseppe Morone

You can also search for this author in PubMed   Google Scholar

Contributions

F.B. wrote the main manuscript text, R.C. prepared Fig.  2 . P.M. and R.C. supervised the manuscript preparation. All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Piergiuseppe Morone .

Ethics declarations

Competing interests.

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note.

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary material 1., rights and permissions.

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ .

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Bonelli, F., Caferra, R. & Morone, P. In need of a sustainable and just fashion industry: identifying challenges and opportunities through a systematic literature review in a Global North/Global South perspective. Discov Sustain 5 , 186 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00400-5

Download citation

Received : 05 December 2023

Accepted : 05 August 2024

Published : 08 August 2024

DOI : https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-024-00400-5

Share this article

Anyone you share the following link with will be able to read this content:

Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.

Provided by the Springer Nature SharedIt content-sharing initiative

• Fast fashion
• Sustainable production and consumption
• Global North
• Global South

Advertisement

• Find a journal
• Publish with us
• Track your research

Information

• Author Services

Initiatives

You are accessing a machine-readable page. In order to be human-readable, please install an RSS reader.

All articles published by MDPI are made immediately available worldwide under an open access license. No special permission is required to reuse all or part of the article published by MDPI, including figures and tables. For articles published under an open access Creative Common CC BY license, any part of the article may be reused without permission provided that the original article is clearly cited. For more information, please refer to https://www.mdpi.com/openaccess .

Feature papers represent the most advanced research with significant potential for high impact in the field. A Feature Paper should be a substantial original Article that involves several techniques or approaches, provides an outlook for future research directions and describes possible research applications.

Feature papers are submitted upon individual invitation or recommendation by the scientific editors and must receive positive feedback from the reviewers.

Editor’s Choice articles are based on recommendations by the scientific editors of MDPI journals from around the world. Editors select a small number of articles recently published in the journal that they believe will be particularly interesting to readers, or important in the respective research area. The aim is to provide a snapshot of some of the most exciting work published in the various research areas of the journal.

Original Submission Date Received: .

• Active Journals
• Find a Journal
• Proceedings Series
• For Authors
• For Reviewers
• For Editors
• For Librarians
• For Publishers
• For Societies
• For Conference Organizers
• Open Access Policy
• Institutional Open Access Program
• Special Issues Guidelines
• Editorial Process
• Research and Publication Ethics
• Article Processing Charges
• Testimonials
• Preprints.org
• SciProfiles
• Encyclopedia

Article Menu

• Subscribe SciFeed
• Recommended Articles
• Google Scholar
• on Google Scholar
• Table of Contents

Find support for a specific problem in the support section of our website.

Please let us know what you think of our products and services.

Visit our dedicated information section to learn more about MDPI.

JSmol Viewer

Barriers to implementing environmental sustainability in uae construction project management: identification and comparison of iso 14001-certified and non-certified firms.

1. Introduction

2. literature review, 2.1. integrating sustainability into construction project management, 2.2. the implementation of iso 14001 in the construction industry, 3. research gap and study justification.

• What are the barriers to implementing environmental sustainability practices in UAE construction project management?
• Which barriers have the greatest impact on implementing environmental sustainability practices in UAE construction project management?
• Does the level of importance of barriers differ significantly between ISO 14001-certified and non-certified firms?

4. Methodology

4.1. questionnaire design, 4.2. data collection, 4.3. data analysis methods, 6. discussion, 6.1. overall analysis of barriers, 6.2. factor analysis of barriers, 6.3. comparative analysis: iso 14001-certified vs. non-iso certified firms, 6.4. addressing the barriers, 6.4.1. insufficient support from policymakers, 6.4.2. weak management decision-making, 7. conclusions, author contributions, institutional review board statement, informed consent statement, data availability statement, conflicts of interest.

• Arocho, I.; Rasdorf, W.; Hummer, J.; Lewis, P. Time and cost characterisation of emissions from non-road diesel equipment for infrastructure projects. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2016 , 10 , 123–134. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gharzeldeen, M.; Beheiry, S. Investigating the use of green design parameters in UAE construction. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2015 , 8 , 93–101. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Liu, G.; Yang, H.; Fu, Y.; Mao, C.; Xu, P.; Hong, J.; Li, R. Cyber-physical system-based real-time monitoring and visualization of greenhouse gas emissions of prefabricated construction. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 246 , 119059. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Benachio, G.; Freitas, M.; Tavares, S. Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 260 , 121046. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• BIMhow. Impact of the Construction Industry on the Environment. Available online: http://www.bimhow.com/impact-of-the-construction-industry-on-the-environment (accessed on 22 May 2023).
• Sáez, P.; Osmani, M. A diagnosis of construction and demolition waste generation and recovery practice in the European Union. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 241 , 118400. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bamgbade, J.; Kamaruddeen, A.; Nawi, M.; Adeleke, A.; Salimon, M.; Ajibike, W. Analysis of some factors driving ecological sustainability in construction firms. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 208 , 1537–1545. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chen, W.; Jin, R.; Xu, Y.; Wanatowski, D.; Li, B.; Yan, L.; Pan, Z.; Yang, Y. Adopting recycled aggregates as sustainable construction materials: A review of the scientific literature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019 , 218 , 483–496. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yates, J. Design and construction for sustainable industrial construction. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2014 , 140 , 673. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ISO 14001 ; Environmental Management Systems—Requirements with Guidance for Use. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015.
• Kabirifar, K.; Mojtahedi, M.; Wang, C.; Tam, V. Construction and demolition waste management contributing factors coupled with reduce, reuse, and recycle strategies for effective waste management: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 263 , 121265. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ISO. The ISO Survey of Management System Standard Certifications—2022—Explanatory Note ; International Organization for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2023; Available online: https://www.iso.org/committee/54998.html?t=KomURwikWDLiuB1P1c7SjLMLEAgXOA7emZHKGWyn8f3KQUTU3m287NxnpA3DIuxm&view=documents#section-isodocuments-top (accessed on 6 April 2024).
• Banihashemi, S.; Hosseini, M.R.; Golizadeh, H.; Sankaran, S. Critical success factors (CSFs) for integration of sustainability into construction project management practices in developing countries. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017 , 35 , 1103–1119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Carvalho, M.; Rabechini, R. Can project sustainability management impact project success? an empirical study applying a contingent approach. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2017 , 35 , 1120–1132. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bashir, H.; Ojiako, U.; Haridy, S.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Musa, R. Implementation of environmentally sustainable practices and their association with ISO 14001 certification in the construction industry of the United Arab Emirates. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 2022 , 18 , 55–69. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turk, A. ISO 14000 environmental management system in construction: An examination of its application in Turkey. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2009 , 20 , 713–733. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Al-Hajj, A.; Hamani, K. Material waste in the UAE construction industry: Main causes and minimization practices. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2011 , 7 , 221–235. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• El-Sayegh, S.M.; AbdRaboh, T.; Elian, D.; ElJarad, N.; Ahmad, Y. Developing a bi-parameter bidding model integrating price and sustainable construction practices. Int. J. Constr. Manag. 2020 , 22 , 2191–2198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Estidama. Building Rating System, Design & Construction. The Pearl Rating System for Estidama. Version 1.0. 2010. Available online: https://bit.ly/3sH9SQs (accessed on 22 May 2022).
• Alencar, L.; Alencar, M.; Lima, L.; Trindade, E.; Silva, L. Sustainability in the construction industry: A systematic review of the literature. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 289 , 125730. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Araujo, A.; Carneiro, A.; Palha, R. Sustainable construction management: A systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 256 , 120350. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Goh, C.; Chong, H.; Jack, L.; Faris, A. Revisiting triple bottom line within the context of sustainable construction: A systematic review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 252 , 119884. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Murtagh, N.; Scott, L.; Fan, J. VSI editorial—Sustainable and resilient construction: Current status and future challenges. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 268 , 122264. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Udomsap, A.; Hallinger, P. A bibliometric review of research on sustainable construction, 1994–2018. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 254 , 120073. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chofreh, A.G.; Goni, F.A.; Malik, M.N.; Khan, H.H.; Klemeš, J.J. The imperative and research directions of sustainable project management. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 238 , 117810. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sabini, L.; Muzio, D.; Alderman, N. 25 years of ‘sustainable projects’: What we know and what the literature says. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 2019 , 37 , 820–838. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Stanitsas, M.; Kirytopoulos, K.; Leopoulos, V. Integrating sustainability indicators into project management: The case of construction industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2021 , 279 , 123774. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Silvius, A.; Schipper, R. A conceptual model for exploring the relationship between sustainability and project success. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2015 , 64 , 334–342. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Haavaldsen, T.; Laedre, O.; Volden, G.; Lohne, J. On the concept of sustainability—Assessing the sustainability of large public infrastructure investment projects. Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2014 , 7 , 2–12. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Armenia, S.; Dangelico, R.; Nonino, F.; Pompei, A. Sustainable project management: A conceptualization-oriented review and a framework proposal for future studies. Sustainability 2019 , 11 , 2664. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Dasović, B.M.; Galić, M.; Klanšek, U. A survey on integration of optimization and project management tools for sustainable construction scheduling. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 3405. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gijzel, D.; Bosch-Rekveldt, M.; Schraven, D.; Hertogh, M. Integrating sustainability into major infrastructure projects: Four perspectives on sustainable tunnel development. Sustainability 2019 , 12 , 6. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hasheminasab, H.; Gholipour, Y.; Kharrazi, M.; Streimikiene, D. A quantitative sustainability assessment framework for petroleum refinery projects. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2021 , 28 , 15305–15319. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• O’Connor, J.; Torres, N.; Woo, J. Sustainability actions during the construction phase. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 2016 , 142 , 04016016. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yu, W.; Cheng, S.; Ho, W.; Chang, Y. Measuring the sustainability of construction projects throughout their lifecycle: A Taiwan lesson. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 1523. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kibert, C. Sustainable Construction: Green Building Design and Delivery ; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2013. [ Google Scholar ]
• Toljaga-Nikolić, D.; Todorović, M.; Dobrota, M.; Obradović, T.; Obradović, V. Project management and sustainability: Playing trick or treat with the planet. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 8619. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Gunduz, M.; Almuajebh, M. Critical success factors for sustainable construction project management. Sustainability 2020 , 12 , 1990. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Yusof, N.; Iranmanesh, M.; Awang, H. Pro-environmental practices among Malaysian construction practitioners. Adv. Environ. Biol. 2015 , 9 , 117–119. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Willar, D.; Waney, E.V.Y.; Pangemanan, D.D.G.; Mait, R.E.G. Sustainable construction practices in the execution of infrastructure projects: The extent of implementation. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2021 , 10 , 106–124. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Pham, H.; Kim, S.; Luu, T. Managerial perceptions on barriers to sustainable construction in developing countries: Vietnam case. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2020 , 22 , 2979–3003. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Zuofa, T.; Ochieng, E. Sustainability in construction project delivery: A study of experienced project managers in Nigeria. Proj. Manag. J. 2016 , 47 , 44–55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mansell, P.; Philbin, S.; Konstantinou, E. Redefining the use of sustainable development goals at the organization and project levels—A survey of engineers. Adm. Sci. 2020 , 10 , 55. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Onubi, H.O.; Yusof, N.; Hassan, A.S. Understanding the mechanism through which adoption of green construction site practices impacts economic performance. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 254 , 120170. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Durdyev, S.; Ismail, S.; Ihtiyar, A.; Abu Bakar, N.F.S.; Darko, A. A partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) of barriers to sustainable construction in Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2018 , 204 , 564–572. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Elkhalifa, A. The magnitude of barriers facing the development of the construction and building materials industries in developing countries, with special reference to Sudan in Africa. Habitat Int. 2016 , 54 , 189–198. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kamranfar, S.; Damirchi, F.; Pourvaziri, M.; Xalikovich, P.A.; Mahmoudkelayeh, S.; Moezzi, R.; Vadiee, A. A partial least squares structural equation modelling analysis of the primary barriers to sustainable construction in Iran. Sustainability 2023 , 15 , 13762. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kineber, A.F.; Kissi, E.; Hamed, M.M. Identifying and assessing sustainability implementation barriers for residential building projects: A case of Ghana. Sustainability 2022 , 14 , 15606. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Opoku, A.; Cruickshank, H.; Ahmed, V. Organizational leadership role in the delivery of sustainable construction projects in the UK. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2015 , 5 , 154–169. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Opoku, D.-G.J.; Ayarkwa, J.; Agyekum, K. Barriers to environmental sustainability of construction projects. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2019 , 8 , 292–306. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• De Oliveira, J.C.F.; de Melo, F.J.C. Barriers and drivers of sustainable construction: A systematic literature review. Int. J. Serv. Oper. Manag. 2024 , 47 , 3. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ahmed, S.; El-Sayegh, S. The challenges of sustainable construction projects delivery—Evidence from the UAE. Archit. Eng. Des. Manag. 2022 , 18 , 299–312. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fathalizadeh, A.; Hosseini, M.R.; Vaezzadeh, S.S.; Edwards, D.J.; Martek, I.; Shooshtarian, S. Barriers to sustainable construction project management: The case of Iran. Smart Sustain. Built Environ. 2022 , 11 , 717–739. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Khural, R.A.; Shashi; Ertz, M.; Cerchione, R. Moving toward sustainability and circularity in hill road construction: A study of barriers, practices, and performance. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2024 , 31 , 1608–1641. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Mosgaard, M.; Bundgaard, A.; Kristensen, H. ISO 14001 practices—A study of environmental objectives in Danish organizations. J. Clean. Prod. 2022 , 331 , 129799. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• ISO 14004 ; Environmental Management Systems—General Guidelines on Implementation. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2016.
• ISO 14006 ; Environmental Management Systems—Guidelines for Incorporating Ecodesign. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2020.
• ISO 14015 ; Environmental Management—Guidelines for Environmental due Diligence Assessment. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022.
• ISO 14064 ; Greenhouse Gases. ISO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2018.
• Mosgaard, M.; Kristensen, H. Companies that discontinue their ISO 14001 certification–reasons, consequences and impact on practice. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 260 , 121052. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sambasivan, M.; Fei, N. Evaluation of critical success factors of implementation of ISO 14001 using analytic hierarchy process (AHP): A case study from Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2008 , 16 , 1424–1433. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Chiarini, A. Factors for succeeding in ISO 14001 implementation in the Italian construction industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2019 , 28 , 794–803. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Johnstone, L. The construction of environmental performance in ISO 14001-certified SMEs. J. Clean. Prod. 2020 , 263 , 121559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• To, W.; Lam, K. Green project management from employees’ perspective in Hong Kong’s engineering and construction sectors. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2021 , 29 , 1890–1907. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Treacy, R.; Humphreys, P.; McIvor, R.; Lo, C. ISO 14001 certification and operating performance: A practice-based view. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2019 , 208 , 319–328. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bravi, L.; Santos, G.; Pagano, A.; Murmura, F. Environmental management system according to ISO 14001: 2015 as a driver to sustainable development. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 2020 , 27 , 2599–2614. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Phan, T.; Baird, K. The comprehensiveness of environmental management systems: The influence of institutional pressures and the impact on environmental performance. J. Environ. Manag. 2015 , 160 , 45–56. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Waxin, M.; Knuteson, S.; Bartholomew, A. Drivers and challenges for implementing ISO 14001 environmental management systems in an emerging Gulf Arab country. Environ. Manag. 2017 , 63 , 495–506. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Boiral, O.; Heras-Saizarbitoria, I.; Brotherton, M. Corporate biodiversity management through certifiable standards. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2018 , 27 , 389–402. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Garrido, E.; González, C.; Orcos, R. ISO 14001 and CO 2 emissions: An analysis of the contingent role of country features. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2020 , 29 , 698–710. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ikram, M.; Zhang, Q.; Sroufe, R.; Shah, S. Towards a sustainable environment: The nexus between ISO 14001, renewable energy consumption, access to electricity, agriculture and CO 2 emissions in SAARC countries. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2020 , 22 , 218–230. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Brahmana, R.; Kontesa, M. Does clean technology weaken the environmental impact on the financial performance? Insight from global oil and gas companies. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2021 , 30 , 3411–3423. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Heras-Saizarbitoria, I.; Arana, L.; Boiral, O. Outcomes of environmental management systems: The role of motivations and firms’ characteristics. Bus. Strategy Environ. 2016 , 25 , 545–559. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Wu, W.; An, S.; Wu, C.H.; Tsai, S.; Yang, K. An empirical study on green environmental system certification affects financing cost of high energy consumption enterprises—Taking metallurgical enterprises as an example. J. Clean. Prod. 2019 , 244 , 118848. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Turk, A. The benefits associated with ISO 14001 certification for construction firms: Turkish case. J. Clean. Prod. 2009 , 17 , 559–569. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Cronbach, L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951 , 16 , 297–334. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Rummel, R.J. Applied Factor Analysis ; Northwestern University Press: Evanston, IL, USA, 1988. [ Google Scholar ]
• Awang, A.; Khalid, S.A.; Yusof, A.A.; Kassim, K.M.; Ismail, M.; Zain, R.S.; Madar, A.R.S. Entrepreneurial orientation and performance relations of Malaysian Bumiputera SMEs: The impact of some perceived environmental factors. Int. J. Bus. Manag. 2009 , 4 , 84–96. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bashir, H.A.; Alzebdeh, K.; Al Riyami, A.M. Factor analysis of obstacles restraining productivity improvement programs in manufacturing enterprises in Oman. J. Ind. Eng. 2014 , 2014 , 195018. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hamdan, B.; Bashir, H.; Cheaitou, A. A novel clustering method for breaking down the symmetric multiple traveling salesman problem. J. Ind. Eng. Manag. 2021 , 14 , 199–218. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Ortiz, J.D.; Avouris, D.M.; Schiller, S.J.; Luvall, J.C.; Lekki, J.D.; Tokars, R.P.; Anderson, R.C.; Shuchman, R.; Sayers, M.; Becker, R. Evaluating visible derivative spectroscopy by varimax-rotated, principal component analysis of aerial hyperspectral images from the western basin of Lake Erie. J. Great Lakes Res. 2019 , 45 , 522–535. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kvam, P.; Vidakovic, B.; Kim, S.-J. Non-Parametric Statistics with Applications to Science and Engineering with R ; Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics; John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2022. [ Google Scholar ]
• Serpell, A.; Kort, J.; Vera, S. Awareness, actions, drivers and barriers of sustainable construction in Chile. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2013 , 19 , 272–288. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Djokoto, S.D.; Dadzie, J.; Ohemeng-Ababio, E. Barriers to sustainable construction in the Ghanaian construction industry: Consultants perspectives. J. Sustain. Dev. 2014 , 7 , 134–152. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Martin, D.M.; Schouten, J. Sustainable Marketing ; Pearson Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2011; p. 264. [ Google Scholar ]
• Willard, B. The New Sustainability Advantage: Seven Business Case Benefits of a Triple Bottom Line ; New Society Publishers: Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, 2012. [ Google Scholar ]
• Albastaki, F.M.; Bashir, H.; Ojiako, U.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Haridy, S. Modeling and analyzing critical success factors for implementing environmentally sustainable practices in a public utilities organization: A case study. Manag. Environ. Qual. 2021 , 32 , 768–786. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Hafezi, M.; Zolfagharinia, H. Green product development and environmental performance: Investigating the role of government regulations. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2018 , 204 , 395–410. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sun, J. Analyses of green products in duopoly market on the base of environment quality model. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Eng. 2012 , 1 , 22. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kolaventi, S.S.; Momand, H.; Tezeswi, T.P.; Kumar, M.V.N.S. Implementing site waste-management plans, recycling in India: Barriers, benefits, measures. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Engineering Sustainability ; Thomas Telford Ltd.: London, UK, 2021. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Iqbal, M.; Ma, J.; Ahmad, N. Promoting sustainable construction through energy-efficient technologies: An analysis of promotional strategies using interpretive structural modeling. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021 , 18 , 3479–3502. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Bright, D.S.; Cortes, A.H.; Hartmann, E.; Parboteeah, K.P.; Pierce, J.L.; Reece, M.; Shah, A.; Terjesen, S.; Weiss, J.; White, M.A.; et al. Principles of Management ; OpenStax: Houston, TX, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-0-9986257-7-5. [ Google Scholar ]
• Di Fabio, A.; Peiró, J.M. Human capital sustainability leadership to promote sustainable development and healthy organizations: A new scale. Sustainability 2018 , 10 , 2413. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Fry, L.W.; Egel, E. Global leadership for sustainability. Sustainability 2021 , 13 , 6360. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Sadiq, N.; Khan, A.H. ISO 14001 Step by Step: A Practical Guide ; IT Governance Ltd.: Ely, UK, 2019. [ Google Scholar ]
• Weina, A.; Yanling, Y. Role of knowledge management on the sustainable environment: Assessing the moderating effect of innovative culture. Front. Psychol. 2022 , 13 , 861813. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ] [ PubMed ]
• Bal, M.; Bryde, D.; Fearon, D.; Ochieng, E. Stakeholder engagement: Achieving sustainability in the construction sector. Sustainability 2013 , 5 , 695–710. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Kaur, A.; Lodhia, S. Stakeholder engagement in sustainability accounting and reporting: A study of Australian local councils. Account. Audit. Account. J. 2018 , 31 , 338–368. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Alhammad, M.; Eames, M.; Vinai, R. Enhancing building energy efficiency through building information modeling (BIM) and building energy modeling (BEM) integration: A systematic review. Buildings 2024 , 14 , 581. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]
• Epstein, M.J.; Buhovac, A.R. Solving the sustainability implementation challenge. Organ. Dyn. 2010 , 39 , 306–315. [ Google Scholar ] [ CrossRef ]

Click here to enlarge figure

Share and Cite

Bashir, H.; Al-Hawarneh, A.; Haridy, S.; Shamsuzzaman, M.; Aydin, R. Barriers to Implementing Environmental Sustainability in UAE Construction Project Management: Identification and Comparison of ISO 14001-Certified and Non-Certified Firms. Sustainability 2024 , 16 , 6779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166779

Bashir H, Al-Hawarneh A, Haridy S, Shamsuzzaman M, Aydin R. Barriers to Implementing Environmental Sustainability in UAE Construction Project Management: Identification and Comparison of ISO 14001-Certified and Non-Certified Firms. Sustainability . 2024; 16(16):6779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166779

Bashir, Hamdi, Ammar Al-Hawarneh, Salah Haridy, Mohammed Shamsuzzaman, and Ridvan Aydin. 2024. "Barriers to Implementing Environmental Sustainability in UAE Construction Project Management: Identification and Comparison of ISO 14001-Certified and Non-Certified Firms" Sustainability 16, no. 16: 6779. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16166779

Article Metrics

Article access statistics, further information, mdpi initiatives, follow mdpi.

Subscribe to receive issue release notifications and newsletters from MDPI journals

How to cite ChatGPT

Use discount code STYLEBLOG15 for 15% off APA Style print products with free shipping in the United States.

We, the APA Style team, are not robots. We can all pass a CAPTCHA test , and we know our roles in a Turing test . And, like so many nonrobot human beings this year, we’ve spent a fair amount of time reading, learning, and thinking about issues related to large language models, artificial intelligence (AI), AI-generated text, and specifically ChatGPT . We’ve also been gathering opinions and feedback about the use and citation of ChatGPT. Thank you to everyone who has contributed and shared ideas, opinions, research, and feedback.

In this post, I discuss situations where students and researchers use ChatGPT to create text and to facilitate their research, not to write the full text of their paper or manuscript. We know instructors have differing opinions about how or even whether students should use ChatGPT, and we’ll be continuing to collect feedback about instructor and student questions. As always, defer to instructor guidelines when writing student papers. For more about guidelines and policies about student and author use of ChatGPT, see the last section of this post.

Quoting or reproducing the text created by ChatGPT in your paper

If you’ve used ChatGPT or other AI tools in your research, describe how you used the tool in your Method section or in a comparable section of your paper. For literature reviews or other types of essays or response or reaction papers, you might describe how you used the tool in your introduction. In your text, provide the prompt you used and then any portion of the relevant text that was generated in response.

Unfortunately, the results of a ChatGPT “chat” are not retrievable by other readers, and although nonretrievable data or quotations in APA Style papers are usually cited as personal communications , with ChatGPT-generated text there is no person communicating. Quoting ChatGPT’s text from a chat session is therefore more like sharing an algorithm’s output; thus, credit the author of the algorithm with a reference list entry and the corresponding in-text citation.

When prompted with “Is the left brain right brain divide real or a metaphor?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that although the two brain hemispheres are somewhat specialized, “the notation that people can be characterized as ‘left-brained’ or ‘right-brained’ is considered to be an oversimplification and a popular myth” (OpenAI, 2023).

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

You may also put the full text of long responses from ChatGPT in an appendix of your paper or in online supplemental materials, so readers have access to the exact text that was generated. It is particularly important to document the exact text created because ChatGPT will generate a unique response in each chat session, even if given the same prompt. If you create appendices or supplemental materials, remember that each should be called out at least once in the body of your APA Style paper.

When given a follow-up prompt of “What is a more accurate representation?” the ChatGPT-generated text indicated that “different brain regions work together to support various cognitive processes” and “the functional specialization of different regions can change in response to experience and environmental factors” (OpenAI, 2023; see Appendix A for the full transcript).

Creating a reference to ChatGPT or other AI models and software

The in-text citations and references above are adapted from the reference template for software in Section 10.10 of the Publication Manual (American Psychological Association, 2020, Chapter 10). Although here we focus on ChatGPT, because these guidelines are based on the software template, they can be adapted to note the use of other large language models (e.g., Bard), algorithms, and similar software.

The reference and in-text citations for ChatGPT are formatted as follows:

• Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
• Narrative citation: OpenAI (2023)

Let’s break that reference down and look at the four elements (author, date, title, and source):

Author: The author of the model is OpenAI.

Date: The date is the year of the version you used. Following the template in Section 10.10, you need to include only the year, not the exact date. The version number provides the specific date information a reader might need.

Title: The name of the model is “ChatGPT,” so that serves as the title and is italicized in your reference, as shown in the template. Although OpenAI labels unique iterations (i.e., ChatGPT-3, ChatGPT-4), they are using “ChatGPT” as the general name of the model, with updates identified with version numbers.

The version number is included after the title in parentheses. The format for the version number in ChatGPT references includes the date because that is how OpenAI is labeling the versions. Different large language models or software might use different version numbering; use the version number in the format the author or publisher provides, which may be a numbering system (e.g., Version 2.0) or other methods.

Bracketed text is used in references for additional descriptions when they are needed to help a reader understand what’s being cited. References for a number of common sources, such as journal articles and books, do not include bracketed descriptions, but things outside of the typical peer-reviewed system often do. In the case of a reference for ChatGPT, provide the descriptor “Large language model” in square brackets. OpenAI describes ChatGPT-4 as a “large multimodal model,” so that description may be provided instead if you are using ChatGPT-4. Later versions and software or models from other companies may need different descriptions, based on how the publishers describe the model. The goal of the bracketed text is to briefly describe the kind of model to your reader.

Source: When the publisher name and the author name are the same, do not repeat the publisher name in the source element of the reference, and move directly to the URL. This is the case for ChatGPT. The URL for ChatGPT is https://chat.openai.com/chat . For other models or products for which you may create a reference, use the URL that links as directly as possible to the source (i.e., the page where you can access the model, not the publisher’s homepage).

Other questions about citing ChatGPT

You may have noticed the confidence with which ChatGPT described the ideas of brain lateralization and how the brain operates, without citing any sources. I asked for a list of sources to support those claims and ChatGPT provided five references—four of which I was able to find online. The fifth does not seem to be a real article; the digital object identifier given for that reference belongs to a different article, and I was not able to find any article with the authors, date, title, and source details that ChatGPT provided. Authors using ChatGPT or similar AI tools for research should consider making this scrutiny of the primary sources a standard process. If the sources are real, accurate, and relevant, it may be better to read those original sources to learn from that research and paraphrase or quote from those articles, as applicable, than to use the model’s interpretation of them.

We’ve also received a number of other questions about ChatGPT. Should students be allowed to use it? What guidelines should instructors create for students using AI? Does using AI-generated text constitute plagiarism? Should authors who use ChatGPT credit ChatGPT or OpenAI in their byline? What are the copyright implications ?

On these questions, researchers, editors, instructors, and others are actively debating and creating parameters and guidelines. Many of you have sent us feedback, and we encourage you to continue to do so in the comments below. We will also study the policies and procedures being established by instructors, publishers, and academic institutions, with a goal of creating guidelines that reflect the many real-world applications of AI-generated text.

For questions about manuscript byline credit, plagiarism, and related ChatGPT and AI topics, the APA Style team is seeking the recommendations of APA Journals editors. APA Style guidelines based on those recommendations will be posted on this blog and on the APA Style site later this year.

Update: APA Journals has published policies on the use of generative AI in scholarly materials .

We, the APA Style team humans, appreciate your patience as we navigate these unique challenges and new ways of thinking about how authors, researchers, and students learn, write, and work with new technologies.

American Psychological Association. (2020). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (7th ed.). https://doi.org/10.1037/0000165-000

Related and recent

Comments are disabled due to your privacy settings. To re-enable, please adjust your cookie preferences.

APA Style Monthly

Subscribe to the APA Style Monthly newsletter to get tips, updates, and resources delivered directly to your inbox.

Welcome! Thank you for subscribing.

APA Style Guidelines

Browse APA Style writing guidelines by category

• Abbreviations
• Bias-Free Language
• Capitalization
• In-Text Citations
• Italics and Quotation Marks
• Paper Format
• Punctuation
• Research and Publication
• Spelling and Hyphenation
• Tables and Figures

Full index of topics

Data, analysis, convening and action.

The world’s largest and most diverse environmental network.

• IUCN WORLD CONSERVATION CONGRESS
• REGIONAL CONSERVATION FORA
• CONTRIBUTIONS FOR NATURE
• IUCN ENGAGE (LOGIN REQUIRED)

IUCN tools, publications and other resources.

• News & Events
• Eastern and Southern Africa
• Eastern Europe and Central Asia
• Mediterranean
• Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean
• North America
• South America
• West and Central Africa
• IUCN Academy
• IUCN Contributions for Nature
• IUCN Library
• IUCN Red List of Threatened Species TM
• IUCN Green List of Protected and Conserved Areas
• IUCN World Heritage Outlook
• IUCN Leaders Forum
• Protected Planet
• Union Portal (login required)
• IUCN Engage (login required)
• Commission portal (login required)

Get Involved

Our resources share the knowledge gathered by IUCN’s unique global community of 16,000+ experts. They include databases, tools, standards, guidelines and policy recommendations. We author hundreds of books, assessments, reports, briefs and research papers every year.

IUCN Issues Briefs provide key information on selected issues central to IUCN’s work. They are aimed at policy-makers, journalists or anyone looking for an accessible overview of the often complex issues related to nature conservation and sustainable development.

Conservation tools

IUCN's conservation tools consist of conservation databases, metrics and other knowledge products. These products have helped hundreds of organisations design, monitor and implement just and effective conservation.

IUCN produces publications on a wide range of topics to share our expertise on nature, conservation and sustainable development. Publications include reports, analyses, best practices, standards, periodicals from IUCN Commissions and numerous other types of knowledge from the Union.

Search all resources

• Sunday 28 July 28 2024, 11:00 – 16:30 (TBC)
• Courtyard Marriot (Frangipani Room)