reverse chronological order essay

• Craft and Criticism
• Fiction and Poetry
• News and Culture
• Lit Hub Radio
• Reading Lists

• Literary Criticism
• Craft and Advice
• In Conversation
• On Translation
• Short Story
• From the Novel
• Bookstores and Libraries
• Film and TV
• Art and Photography
• Freeman’s
• The Virtual Book Channel
• The Lit Hub Podcast
• The Critic and Her Publics
• Fiction/Non/Fiction
• I’m a Writer But
• Windham-Campbell Prizes Podcast
• Write-minded
• First Draft: A Dialogue on Writing
• Behind the Mic
• Lit Century
• Tor Presents: Voyage Into Genre
• Beyond the Page
• The Cosmic Library
• Emergence Magazine
• The History of Literature
• The Best of the Decade
• Best Reviewed Books
• BookMarks Daily Giveaway
• The Daily Thrill
• CrimeReads Daily Giveaway

When a Story is Best Told Backwards

Samantha harvey on the melancholy of reverse narratives.

When we listen to stories as children our whole being can rest on one small tremoring question —And then . . . ?  When we watch TV we return after the ad-break because of that question, and it’s why we turn the page when we read; there’s something on the next page or on the pages beyond — however dramatic or subtle — that we want to find out. And then is the engine of all storytelling.

Nestled within that impulse to know what comes next is the understanding of cause and effect — of a giving rise to b giving rise to c . This is our very experience of living. We live in what appears to us as forward-moving time, of cause followed by effect, of traceable paths from this moment to the next, and perhaps we’re most confounded and unnerved by life when those paths are only dimly traceable, or not traceable at all — when we just don’t understand how or why something has come to be.

Given how fundamental the and then is to storytelling, I was a little deflated and concerned when my last novel came to me quite fully in reverse order. My novels have never come to me as fully-formed as this, or as ready to be written — so I knew I had to grasp what was given. But to write in reverse order?

I’ve grappled overtly with time in my previous novels, I think because I’m preoccupied, baffled by the way time impacts us, the way our experience of it is so changeable, the way it marches forward while our memories accumulate teeteringly, unreliably, in its wake. The novel, in its beautiful elasticity, can explore all of that. For a novel to play around with the conventions of time is almost stock-in-trade — it can splice time, shuffle it, flash back or forwards, jump centuries in a single sentence or dwell for 200 pages on a single moment. It has no budgeting limits if it wants to change its set, suddenly, from 500 BC to 1953 to 2018. It has no logistical barriers. “Now” is a moveable feast. It can stretch and shrink moments as it wants.

But, its narrative is powered all the same by that one propulsive question: And then? So what are the consequences when that narrative is told backwards — when the then we impulsively yearn for has already happened?

When I embarked on writing this novel, I discovered one vital thing very early on: the question And then? does in fact, of course, have just as much currency in a reverse narrative as in a forward one. The reader’s impulse to know what is going to happen next is unswerving and undeterred by direction of travel. The reader wants to know what will happen next in the narrative; whether that next is the next day or the day before is actually of little consequence. It’s about what happens on page 11 if you’re on page 10, or in chapter 4 if you’re on chapter 3 — just as it would be in any other story.

The thing that changes is nuance, emphasis. Let’s say I know in chapter 3 that somebody dies. When, in chapters 4 and 5, I come to witness their illness and fight for survival, my And then? question is no longer “Will she die?” but “How did she come to die?” The emphasis shifts from what to how / why . Or, since what happens is always, irresistibly a question on the reader’s lips, it’s perhaps better to say that the motivation for the question shifts — what now propels it is the how and why. The curiosity is relieved of its task of finding out what the outcome is, and can expend itself instead on how and why it came about.

I was struck when reading Evie Wyld’s All the Birds, Singing , for example, by how urgent and compulsive its reverse narrative is. The novel has two parallel stories which begin from the same present moment, one running forwards and one backwards. Interestingly, it’s the one going backwards that really grips and suspends the reader — the one that illuminates who the protagonist is, how she’s come to be where she is, and why present events might be happening. There’s nothing static in its revelation of the how and why; each scene is hot on the trail of the last, and there’s a dynamic, destructive force in the zipping backwards through scenes, each one torn up as it cedes to its predecessor. Everything is undone, and the undoing is fast and unsettling.

With a different pace, but with a similar compulsive momentum, is The Night Watch by Sarah Waters. This complex, beautiful novel doesn’t zip, it’s pensive and languorous as it takes its four main characters back in three episodes from 1947 to 1941, from post-war to early-war London. But like Wyld’s novel, the hunger to know who these people are, and the how and why of their lives, generates a world that is fiercely alive with their growing presence, and with the gradual piecing together of the factors and influences that have made them who we know them, thus far, to be.

To my mind, this brings an almost singular satisfaction. If some of the most confounding times of our lives arise when we lose clear sight of how a situation came to be — what caused me to become unwell, what induced my husband to leave me, etc. — then the reverse narrative reclaims some clarity. It puts emphasis on tracing back what has seemed untraceable. It has a forensic quality, a power of retrospective illumination, of hindsight supplied by the reader who now knows more than the characters to whom the events are happening.

Yet, although the backwards narrative is fiercely alive in this respect, it isn’t alive with possibility, as with most stories, but with impossibility . There is no future available; there might be hope, but nowhere for that hope to land and take seed. When we ask And then?, we look to the thing that comes next and find that what’s next has already been. The “next” is never a new thing, something that can change the course of events. It can only elucidate events. In that dead-endedness is what I experience as a kind of melancholy; the next moment or happening has no creative, generative power, only a power to retrace and reflect. The reader is part-detective, part-archaeologist, part faithful witness to a series of events that can no longer be influenced. Everything we come to understand is understood too late.

Redemption plays a role in this feeling of melancholia too. On the face of it the reverse narrative invites hope, because in going backwards it can hint at a kind of return to innocence. But it invites and denies hope in equal measure. This is starkly true of both Wyld’s and Waters’ novels. The Night Watch finds its characters in an exhausted, bombed-out and bankrupt Britain, themselves exhausted, jaded and ghostlike. It leaves them six years prior, more vigorous and purposeful, unknowing of the fact that the war would drag itself on for another four spectacularly violent years. Jake, the narrator of All the Birds, Singing , concludes her painful story at home with her family, and with the optimistic conviction that “I will always be here.” My own novel, too, narrated by a parish priest, ends at a place of open possibility and with the priest’s consoling thought that all the things he imagines might go wrong, as a result of the death of one of his parishioners, will not come to pass. But of course, they will. We know that they do. The return to innocence we’re shown by going backwards is really an accentuated expression of its loss.

This makes me think, too, of Martin Amis’s  Time’s Arrow . In most other novels that use reverse chronology the novel is told backwards while events unfold in a normal causal way. You are hungry, you eat, you are full. In Amis’s world everything is reversed — every grain of life. You are full, you eat, you are hungry. In this way, the protagonist’s life unspools from old age to birth, everyday events made strange by the reversal of cause and effect. (I know no other novel that makes such a comprehensive attempt at this reversal; Philip K. Dick’s Counter Clock World does to an extent, but more playfully and patchily.)

There is a redemption at work in Time’s Arrow— a grim, uncomfortable one. The protagonist, Odilo, is a doctor who assists in the Holocaust. The reverse narrative means that, rather than assist in murder, he heals and restores life. When he arrives at Auschwitz, the prisoners there are brought into being, not exterminated. The narrator of the novel isn’t Odilo himself but an elusive presence observing events without understanding, and there’s something very powerful in this device — why, wonders the narrator, do people feel hungry when they’ve eaten? Why do they sit in a waiting room after they’ve seen a doctor? This unfathomable behavior seems to mirror the senselessness of the Holocaust; why do people behave this way? While the novel’s chronology begs that question on every page, it also forces Odilo into humane action, it negates his monstrousness, and it eventually negates him, by rendering him unborn. And having done that, it can purify and atone.

Although ultimately not so, since at the end the narrator understands, finally, that time has been in reverse, and understands who Odilo is and what he has done — and that it cannot be undone. This collapse of redemption in the backwards narrative, so overt in Time’s Arrow , is, I think, inevitable. We know that Evie Wyld’s Jake will not “always be here,” because we’ve seen what happens to her. We know my priest’s consolation is an empty one.

The reverse narrative leverages the reader’s normal aspirations of suspense and propulsion, of hope, of redemption, of interest in the and then— it doesn’t deny any of these impulses, in fact indulges them all, only to show how flimsy our hopes can be, and yet how robustly we can’t stop hoping.

In the inverting and thwarting of my hopes and readerly impulses, there emerges in my reading experience something which is deeper and more interesting than the mere desire to know what happens next, and in the desire for what happens next to give some form of closure. As a reviewer of The Night Watch says of its characters, “It is we, not they, who feel older, wiser and sadder at the novel’s end.” This is true. The book is put down but far from finished. It lives on, and its aliveness is in all the things that are no longer possible, the lives we know and comprehend so well but which have no forwards motion, like a wheel spinning without its axle.

In the first line of The Night Watch Waters writes: “ So this , said Kay to herself, is the sort of person you’ve become : a person whose clocks and wrist-watches have stopped .” And indeed, from there her story does stop. Everything else is history — and so the novel begins.

• Share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Google+ (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Tumblr (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pinterest (Opens in new window)
• Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)

Samantha Harvey

Previous article, next article, support lit hub..

Join our community of readers.

to the Lithub Daily

Popular posts.

My Parents' Wedding Was Arranged. I Wanted Something Different.

• RSS - Posts

Literary Hub

Created by Grove Atlantic and Electric Literature

Sign Up For Our Newsletters

How to Pitch Lit Hub

Advertisers: Contact Us

Privacy Policy

Support Lit Hub - Become A Member

Become a Lit Hub Supporting Member : Because Books Matter

For the past decade, Literary Hub has brought you the best of the book world for free—no paywall. But our future relies on you. In return for a donation, you’ll get an ad-free reading experience , exclusive editors’ picks, book giveaways, and our coveted Joan Didion Lit Hub tote bag . Most importantly, you’ll keep independent book coverage alive and thriving on the internet.

Become a member for as low as $5/month

What Is Reverse Chronology in Writing? A Structural Exploration

Reverse chronology turns traditional storytelling on its head, starting at the end and working backwards.

It’s a narrative technique that can twist our perception and keep us on the edge of our seats.

By revealing the outcome first, it challenges us to piece together the how and why, creating a compelling puzzle for our minds to solve.

This approach isn’t just a gimmick; it’s a powerful tool that can reshape how we experience a story.

What Is Reverse Chronology?

Reverse chronology is a narrative device that flips the traditional storytelling format on its head.

Instead of beginning at the story’s genesis, this method starts from the end and works its way backward.

Narratives utilizing reverse chronology require audiences to reformulate their understanding of plot development and character arcs.

In the realm of filmmaking, reverse chronology presents a distinct set of challenges and opportunities.

Memento , directed by Christopher Nolan, is a prime exhibit of this technique .

The film unravels in reverse order, compelling viewers to rethink the significance of each scene as the context shifts with unfolding revelations.

Employing reverse chronology can transform a linear plot into a more intricate tapestry.

• It highlights the importance of events by revealing their outcomes first,
• It engages viewers in a unique form of suspense and discovery Scenes are crafted with meticulous attention akin to a puzzle where each piece acquires its meaning when past segments are revealed. This technique isn’t just an unconventional choice; it’s a strategic narrative decision that can deepen the impact of a story.

Viewers are invited to play detective, piecing together the causality that led to the opening outcome.

Films like Irreversible and novels such as The Night Circus deploy this technique to stunning effect, leaving audiences contemplating the narrative long after they’ve engaged with the work.

Reverse chronology isn’t merely a tool for shock and novelty – it redefines the audience’s engagement with the medium.

Through this reversal, stories gain new dimensions, unearthing the importance of each moment in the larger narrative mosaic.

Benefits Of Reverse Chronology In Writing

Reverse chronology in writing offers a unique angle that can significantly enhance storytelling.

By presenting events from end to beginning, it encourages a deeper engagement with the narrative.

Writers often find that employing this technique adds a layer of complexity and intrigue to their work.

It forces readers to pay attention as they try to understand the context of the current events with the knowledge of where it all leads.

Filmmakers have tapped into the power of reverse chronology to create some truly unforgettable cinematic experiences.

Christopher Nolan’s Memento challenged audiences to unravel a mystery in reverse, proving the effectiveness of the technique.

Let’s explore some of the core benefits that make reverse chronology so compelling in creative works:

• Ignites Curiosity – Knowing the outcome piques interest in how the characters arrived there.
• Enhances Suspense – Creates a unique tension as viewers piece together the puzzle.

In the realm of marketing, reverse chronology can capture the target audience’s attention in an oversaturated media landscape.

By flipping the narrative, we can craft campaigns that stand out and resonate with consumers.

Within the process of filmmaking, this technique requires meticulous planning and a robust understanding of the plot.

Linear storytelling allows some leeway for error, but reverse chronology demands precision from the outset.

Employing reverse chronology is more than just an artistic choice; it’s a strategic tool that heightens the emotional impact through the art of revelation.

It turns passive viewers into active participants, deciphering clues and questioning motives.

For writers and filmmakers alike, the adoption of reverse chronology is a testament to our storytelling prowess.

It showcases our ability to innovate within our crafts and keeps our audience invested from the first frame to the last.

Examples Of Reverse Chronology In Literature

Reverse chronology has been ingeniously used in literature to create complex narratives.

Books such as Martin Amis’s Time’s Arrow and Harold Pinter’s play Betrayal unfold their stories from end to start.

These works captivate readers by revealing the outcomes first and then tracing back the events that led there.

Notable novels like F.

Scott Fitzgerald’s The Curious Case of Benjamin Button challenge readers with a protagonist living his life backwards.

This reverse aging process flips the normal lifecycle narrative compelling the audience to question the nature of time.

Audrey Niffenegger’s The Time Traveler’s Wife uses a non-linear timeline to illustrate the chaotic nature of the protagonists’ lives.

Their story sharply contrasts a traditional romance, forcing an exploration of love and longing in fragmented time.

In using reverse chronology, authors offer:

• A unique vehicle for character development,
• A requiem for fate versus free will.

Julian Barnes crafts a jigsaw puzzle of memories in The Sense of an Ending, with the narrative reassembling the protagonist’s life piece by piece.

Each revelation reshuffles our understanding of the story and its characters.

The employment of reverse chronology in literature not only questions our perception of time but also our interpretation of events.

It provides us with a deeper understanding of characters by peeling back layers of the story in reverse.

How To Use Reverse Chronology Effectively

Utilizing reverse chronology in storytelling isn’t just about starting at the end and working backwards.

It’s critical to understand why and how this method can bolster the narrative.

To carry out reverse chronology effectively, one must consider the strategic placement of pivotal moments and ensure they unfold in a way that maintains engagement.

It’s essential to devise a plot structure that’s both revealing and concealing at once.

That balance keeps the audience on the edge of their seats, eagerly piecing together the storyline as it regresses.

When crafting a film or writing a novel with reverse chronology, we focus on the strength of the characters and their development.

Since the outcomes of their lives are known from the beginning, we give extra attention to the ‘why’ and ‘how’ of their journeys.

Delving deep into characters’ motivations and the consequences of their actions offers a rich tapestry of understanding and empathy.

We sculpt characters that resonate with viewers or readers on a journey through time unlike any other.

Here are a few tips on mastering the use of reverse chronology:

• Highlight key events – these become the anchors that help the audience navigate through the non-linear timeline,
• Build suspense around why events unfolded, rather than what the outcome will be,
• Choose impactful start and end points that compel audiences to rethink what they know.

Reverse chronology demands a meticulous approach to scripting or storyboarding as each scene or chapter must interlock with the next in a backwards sequence.

We adopt a granular level of planning, scrutinizing every detail to ensure that it contributes meaningfully to the overall narrative.

Carefully orchestrating the revelations not only adds depth but also orchestrates an experience that’s visually and intellectually stimulating.

Through this intricate puzzle-work, we invite our audience to play detective, actively engaging with the story as it unfolds from finish to start.

Exploring Reverse Chronology In Writing: A Guide – Wrap Up

We’ve explored the intricate dance of storytelling through reverse chronology, underscoring its unique ability to captivate audiences.

By carefully curating the sequence of events, we can craft narratives that are not only engaging but also deeply revealing of our characters’ journeys.

It’s clear that when used skillfully, this technique enriches our storytelling toolbox, offering fresh perspectives and memorable experiences.

Let’s embrace the challenge and creativity that come with reverse chronology to continue pushing the boundaries of narrative forms.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is reverse chronology in storytelling.

Reverse chronology is a narrative technique where the story is told in backward order, starting from the end and working towards the beginning.

Why Is Reverse Chronology Used In Stories?

Reverse chronology is used to create intrigue, build suspense, and offer a unique perspective on character development and pivotal plot events.

How Can Reverse Chronology Maintain Audience Engagement?

Audience engagement is maintained through strategic placement of key events and a balance of revealing and concealing information, which keeps the audience curious and invested in the narrative.

What Are The Challenges Of Using Reverse Chronology Effectively?

The main challenges include meticulous planning, ensuring clarity in the timeline, and making certain that the reversed sequence still results in a coherent and compelling story.

Can Reverse Chronology Aid In Character Development?

Yes, it can highlight characters’ motivations and consequences of their actions by exposing the outcomes first and then exploring the events leading up to those outcomes.

What Are Some Tips For Mastering Reverse Chronology?

Tips for mastering reverse chronology include focusing on significant events, building suspense, and carefully choosing the starting and ending points of the narrative.

Is Attention To Detail Important In Reverse Chronology Narratives?

Absolutely, attention to detail is crucial as the writer or filmmaker must ensure that each piece of the story fits together when the timeline is reversed.

What Is Climax in Film and Literature? The Pinnacle of Story

What Are False Protagonists in Writing? A Deep Dive

Matt Crawford

Related posts, how to unlock sensory detail in writing for vivid storytelling, write great movie dialogue effectively & efficiently, what are rhetorical questions in writing the complete guide, what are script sides definition, examples & how to write them effectively, the role of archenemy in storytelling & film: complete guide, zeugma in writing: defining the artistic speech tool, leave a reply cancel reply.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed .

Username or Email Address

Remember Me

Registration is closed.

Pin It on Pinterest

WANT GET MORE CLIENTS & GROW YOUR VIDEO COMPANY TO 7-FIGURES PER YEAR?

Enter Your Details Below!